Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 22 - 29 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 13-06-2021

Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators

Öz:
AIM: This study aimed to determine the autonomy levels and the professional attitudes of nurse educators.METHODS: This study was a descriptive, cross-sectional design. Total of 486 people, including 172 faculty members, 103 lecturers, and211 research assistants were included in this study. The individual information form, Sociotropy-Autonomy Scale autonomy subscale,and the inventory of professional attitude at occupation were used to collect the research data.RESULTS: The mean age of academics participating in the study was 35.14±8.39. In total, 94.2% of them were women. Of theacademics, 35.5% were faculty members, 21.2% were lecturers, and 43.4% were research assistants. The mean autonomy score was80.04±15.69 and the mean score of the professional attitude inventory was 146±10.59. The mean autonomy score was found to bethe highest among professors, the mean score of professional attitudes inventory was highest among associate professors, while themean value of both scale scores was the lowest in research assistants.CONCLUSION: According to the research findings, it was concluded that the autonomy levels of the nurse educators were aboveaverage, their professionalism was at a high level, and they developed more professional attitude as the professional experienceincreased.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adams, D., & Miller, B. K. (2001). Professionalism in nursing behaviors of nurse practitioners. Journal of Professional Nursing, 17, 203-210.
  • Ballou, K. S. (1998). A concept analysis of autonomy. Journal of Professional Nursing, 14, 102-110.
  • Bang, K. S., Kang, J. H., Jun, M. H., Kim, H. S., Son, H. M., Yu, S. J., Kwon, M. K., & Kim, J. S. (2011). Professional values in Korean undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 31, 72-75.
  • Baysan Arabacı, L., Taş, G., Kavaslar, İ., Dikmen, M., & Teke, C. (2017). Relationship between sociotropy autonomy personality traits, interpersonal sensitivity and facebook addiction in nursing students. Journal of Dependence, 18(3), 69-79.
  • Breda, K. L., Anderson, M. A., Hansen, L., Hayes, D., Pillion, C.,& Lyon, P. (1997). Enhanced nursing autonomy through participatory action research. Nursing Outlook, 45, 76-81.
  • Demir Dikmen, Y., Yönder, M., Yorgun, S., Yıldırım Usta, Y., Umur, S., & Aytekin, A. (2014). Investigation of nurses’ professional attitudes and factors ınfluencing these attitudes. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 17, 158-164.
  • Dikmen, Y., Kara Yılmaz, D., & Yıldırım Usta, Y. (2016). An analysıs of nurses’ autonomy levels ın terms of certaın varıables. International Refereed Journal of Nursıng Researches, 8, 72-87.
  • Dinç, L., & Basaran Acil, S. (2018). Turkish adaptation and psychometric characteristics of the nursing authority and autonomy scale. Journal of Nursing Management, 26, 735-743.
  • Duffy, R. (2013). Nurse to educator? Academic roles and the formation personal. Nurse Education Today, 33, 620-624.
  • Erbil, N., & Bakır, A. (2009). Meslekte profesyonel tutum envanterinin geliştirilmesi [Developing inventory of professional attitude at occupation]. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1) 290-302.
  • Finn, C. P. (2001). Autonomy: an important component nurses’ job satisfaction. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 38, 349-354.
  • Göriş, S., Kılıç, Z., Ceyhan, Ö., & Şentürk, A. (2014). Nurses’ professional values and affecting factors. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 5, 137-142.
  • Hisar, F., & Karadağ, A. (2010). Determining the Professional behaviour of nurse executives. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 16, 335-341.
  • Kantek, F., Kaya, A., & Gezer, N. (2017). The effect of nursing education on professional values: A longitudinal study.Nurse Education Today, 58, 43-46.
  • Karadağ. A., Hisar, F., & Özhan Elbaş, N. (2007). The level of professionalism among nurses in Turkey. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39, 371-374.
  • Karagözoğlu, Ş. (2008). Hemşirelikte bireysel ve profesyonel özerklik [Individual and professional autonomy of nursing]. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 3, 41-50.
  • Karagözoğlu, Ş. (2008). Level of autonomy of Turkish students in the final year of university baccalaureate degree in health related fields. Nursing Outlook, 56, 70-77.
  • Karagözoğlu, Ş. (2009). Nursing students’ level of autonomy: A study from Turkey, Nurse Education Today, 29, 176-187.
  • Karagözoğlu, Ş., & Kangallı, P. (2009). Autonomy levels among nurses: Professional-institutional factors that affect autonomy. Türkiye Klinikleri J. Med Sci, 29, 1085-1097.
  • Karagözoğlu, Ş., Türk, G., & Özden, D. (2015). Autonomy levels of final year baccalaureate nursing students attending different curricula: Cross-sectional survey. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal, 37, 87-101.
  • Kaya, N., Aştı, T., Acaroğlu, R., & Şendir, M. (2006). Hemşire öğrencilerin sosyotropik-otonomik kişilik özellikleri ve ilişkili faktörlerin incelenmesi [Determination of sociotropic /autonomic personality characteristics and related factors among nursing students]. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 10(3), 1-11.
  • MacDonald, C. 2002. Nurse autonomy as relational. Nursing Ethics, 9, 194-201.
  • Malak, B., & Üstün, B. (2011). The relation between nurses’ sociotropy-autonomy personality features and their burnout levels. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Journal, 18(2), 1-16.
  • Mrayyan, M.T. (2004). Nurses’autonomy: influence of nurse managers’ actions. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45, 326-336.
  • Silva, A. P., & Pedro, E. N. (2010). Autonomy in nursing students’s process of knowledge construction: the educational chat as a teaching tool. Revista Latino Americana de Enfermagem, 18, 210-216.
  • Skar, R. (2009). The meaning of autonomy in nursing practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19, 2226-2234.
  • Şahin, N. H., & Ulusoy, M. (1993). Exploring the sociotropy autonomy dimensions in a sample of Turkish psychiatric inpatient. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 751-763. Tanaka, M., Taketomi, K., Yonemitsu, Y., & Kawamoto, R. (2017). The current status of nursing professionalism among nursing faculty in Japan. The Journal of Nursing Research, 25,7-12. Tanrıverdi, H. (2017). Hemşirelerin profesyonel değerleri ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranış düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi [Investigation of the relationship between professional values and organizational citizenship behaviour levels of nurses]. Ulakbilge Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(13), 1183-1204.
  • Tarhan, G., Kılıç, D., & Yıldız, E. (2016). Hemşirelerin mesleğe yönelik tutumları ile mesleki profesyonellikleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the relationship between attitudes towards the nursing profession and occupational professionalism]. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi. 58(4), 411-416.
  • Tarhan, M., & Doğan, P. (2018). The relationship between nursing students’ individual ınnovative behaviors and autonomy levels. Archives of Health Science and Research, 5, 51-58.
  • Varjus, S. L., Kilpi, H. L., & Suominen, T. (2010). Professional autonomy of nurses in hospital settings-a review of the literature. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 25, 201-207.
  • Woods, A., Cashin, A., & Stockhausen, L. (2016). Communities of practice and the construction of the Professional identities of nurse educators: A review of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 37, 164-169.
  • Wynd, C. A. (2003). Current factors contributing to professionalism in nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing, 19, 251- 261.
APA Türk G, Karagozoglu S, adana f, ÜLKÜ H (2021). Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators. , 22 - 29.
Chicago Türk Gülengün,Karagozoglu Serife,adana filiz,ÜLKÜ HILAL HATICE Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators. (2021): 22 - 29.
MLA Türk Gülengün,Karagozoglu Serife,adana filiz,ÜLKÜ HILAL HATICE Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators. , 2021, ss.22 - 29.
AMA Türk G,Karagozoglu S,adana f,ÜLKÜ H Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators. . 2021; 22 - 29.
Vancouver Türk G,Karagozoglu S,adana f,ÜLKÜ H Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators. . 2021; 22 - 29.
IEEE Türk G,Karagozoglu S,adana f,ÜLKÜ H "Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators." , ss.22 - 29, 2021.
ISNAD Türk, Gülengün vd. "Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators". (2021), 22-29.
APA Türk G, Karagozoglu S, adana f, ÜLKÜ H (2021). Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online), 29(1), 22 - 29.
Chicago Türk Gülengün,Karagozoglu Serife,adana filiz,ÜLKÜ HILAL HATICE Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online) 29, no.1 (2021): 22 - 29.
MLA Türk Gülengün,Karagozoglu Serife,adana filiz,ÜLKÜ HILAL HATICE Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online), vol.29, no.1, 2021, ss.22 - 29.
AMA Türk G,Karagozoglu S,adana f,ÜLKÜ H Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online). 2021; 29(1): 22 - 29.
Vancouver Türk G,Karagozoglu S,adana f,ÜLKÜ H Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online). 2021; 29(1): 22 - 29.
IEEE Türk G,Karagozoglu S,adana f,ÜLKÜ H "Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators." Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online), 29, ss.22 - 29, 2021.
ISNAD Türk, Gülengün vd. "Autonomy Levels and Professional Attitudes of Nurse Educators". Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online) 29/1 (2021), 22-29.