Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability

Barkın KÖSE, (Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences, Division of Occupational Therapy, Ankara, Turkey)
Sedef ŞAHİN, (Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences, Division of Occupational Therapy, Ankara, Turkey)
Erdem KARABULUT, (Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Ankara, Turkey)
Hülya KAYIHAN (Biruni University Faculty of Health Sciences, Division of Occupational Therapy, İstanbul, Turkey)
Bezmiâlem Science
46 11
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 198 - 204 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200 İndeks Tarihi: 14-06-2021

Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability

Öz:
Objective: Specialists often assess the motor proficiency of childrenpresented with suspected developmental delays. It is essential thatthe tools used to assess children have highly powerful measurementproperties including psychometric properties. The aim of our study,analyze the reliability and construct validity of the Turkish versionof the Bruininks Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2-Brief Form(BOT2-BF) in children with a specific learning disability (SLD).Methods: Participants, which aged between 6 and 14, were included137 children with SLD and 50 children without any diagnosis. TheTurkish version of the BOT2-BF was administered by the researcherin one session to children with SLD twice with a seven days interval.In addition, BOT2-BF was re-apply to 25 children with SLD,which were randomly selected, after 10 days.Results: The validity results of BOT2-BF were found to besignificantly better in all subtests in the control group than inthe study group, having higher performance levels (p<0.05). TheBOT2-BF demonstrated high test-retest reliability (ICC >0.8)(except Fine Motor Precision (ICC=0.57) and Manual DexteritySubtest (ICC=0.74) and good internal consistency (Cronbach’salpha =0.78) for all domains. The inter-rater reliability results werefound to be perfectly reliable (ICC >0.9).Conclusion: The Turkish version of BOT2-BF was found to bea valid and reliable assessment to evaluate motor proficiency inchildren with SLD.
Anahtar Kelime:

Bruininks-Oseretsky Motor Yeterlik Testi 2 Kısa Formunun Türkçe Uyarlaması ve Özgül Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Çocuklarda Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliği

Öz:
Amaç: Uzmanlar genellikle gelişimsel gecikmelerinden şüphelendikleri çocukların motor yeterliliklerini değerlendirirler. Çocukları değerlendirmek için kullanılan testlerin psikometrik özellikler de dahil olmak üzere kanıt değerliliği açısından güçlü ölçüm özelliklerine sahip olmaları önemlidir. Çalışmamızın amacı, özgül öğrenme güçlüğü (ÖÖG) olan çocuklarda Bruininks Oseretsky Motor Yeterlilik Testi 2-Kısa Formunun (BOT2-KF) Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliğini ve yapı geçerliliğini analiz etmektir. Yöntemler: Çalışmamıza 6-14 yaş arasındaki, 137 ÖÖG tanısı almış ve 50 herhangi bir tanı almamış (sağlıklı), çocuk dahil edildi. BOT2-KF’nin Türkçe versiyonu, ÖÖG’li çocuklara bir araştırmacı tarafından tek oturumda mola verilmeden, yedi gün arayla iki kez uygulandı. Ek olarak, BOT2-KF 10 gün sonra rastgele seçilen ÖÖG’li 25 çocuğa tekrar uygulandı. Bulgular: BOT2-KF’nin geçerlilik sonuçlarının, kontrol grubundaki tüm alt testlerde çalışma grubuna göre daha yüksek olduğu ve daha yüksek performans düzeylerine sahip olduğu bulundu (p<0,05). BOT2-KF, tüm etki alanları için yüksek testtekrar )ince motor hassasiyeti (ICC=0,57) ve el becerisi alt testi (ICC=0,74) hariç test güvenilirliği (ICC >0,8) ve iyi düzeyde iç tutarlılık (Cronbach’s alpha=0,78) göstermiştir. Değerlendiriciler arası güvenilirlik sonuçlarının mükemmel derecede güvenilir olduğu bulunmuştur (ICC >0,9). Sonuç: BOT2-KF’nin Türkçe versiyonunun SLD’li çocuklarda motor yeterliliği değerlendirmek için geçerli ve güvenilir bir değerlendirme olduğu bulunmuştur
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Demir B. Okulöncesi ve ilköğretim birinci sınıfa devam eden öğrencilerde özel öğrenme güçlüğünün belirlenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. 2005.
  • 2. Kavale KA, Forness SR. What definitions of learning disability say and don’t say: a critical analysis. J Learn Disabil 2000;33:239-56.
  • 3. Ozkardes OG. Türkiye’de Özel Öğrenme Güçlüğüne İlişkin Yapılan Araştırmaların Betimsel Analizi. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi 2013;30:123-53.
  • 4. Polat E, Adiguzel T, Akgun OE. Adaptive Web-Assisted Learning System for Students with Specific Learning Disabilities: A Needs Analysis Study. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 2012;12:3243-58.
  • 5. Tercan H, Bıçakcı MY. Children with Specific Learning Disability. Recent Advances in Health Sciences. 393.
  • 6. Son SHC, Meisels S. The relationship of young children’s motor skills to later reading and math achievement. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 2006;52:755-78.
  • 7. Viholainen H, Ahonen T, Lyytinen P, Cantell M, Tolvanen A, Lyytinen H. Early motor development and later language and reading skills in children at risk of familial dyslexia. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006;48:367-73.
  • 8. McDermott RP. The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. Understanding learning: Influences and outcomes 2001:269-305.
  • 9. Westendorp M, Hartman E, Houwen S, Smith J, Visscher C. The relationship between gross motor skills and academic achievement in children with learning disabilities. Res Dev Disabil 2011;32:2773-9.
  • 10. Fawcett AJ, Nicolson RI, Dean P. Impaired performance of children with dyslexia on a range of cerebellar tasks. Ann Dyslexia 1996;46:259-83.
  • 11. Fawcett AJ, Nicolson RI. Automatisation deficits in balance for dyslexic children. Percept Mot Skills 1992;75:507-29.
  • 12. Nicolson R, Fawcett AJ, Dean P. Dyslexia, development and the cerebellum. Trends Neurosci 2001;24:515-6.
  • 13. Bruininks RH, Bruininks BD. Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency, second edition, brief form. Bloomington: PsychCorp.; 2010.
  • 14. Anlar B, Yalaz K. Denver II Gelişimsel Tarama Testi-Türk Çocuklarına Uyarlanması ve Standardizasyonu. Hacettepe Çocuk Nörolojisi Gelişimsel Tıp Araştırmaları Grubu, Ankara. 1996.
  • 15. Bruininks RH, Bruininks BD. BOT2: Bruininks-oseretsky test of motor proficiency: AGS Publishing; 2005.
  • 16. Gallahue D, Ozmun JC, Goodway JC. Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults: Mcgraw-hill; 1998.
  • 17. King HA, Aufsesser PM. A Decision-Theoretic Examination of the Usefulness of Two Motor Performance Tests in Identifying Children for Assignment to Adapted Physical Education. 1984. p. 105.
  • 18. Donnelly FC, Mueller SS, Gallahue DL. Developmental Physical Education for Today’s Children. Human Kinetics. 2003.
  • 19. Balli OM, Gursoy F. Bruininks-Oseretsky Motor Yeterlik Testinin Beş-Altiyaş Grubu Türk Çocuklar İçin Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalişmasi. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 2012;23:104-18.
  • 20. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders Fifth Edition. American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.
  • 21. Bayaga A. MULTINOMIAL LOGISTIC REGRESSION: USAGE AND APPLICATION IN RISK ANALYSIS. Journal of applied quantitative methods. 2010;5:288-97.
  • 22. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. Using multivariate statistics: Pearson Boston, MA; 2007;1-14.
  • 23. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. SAS for windows workbook for Tabachnick and Fidell using multivariate statistics: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
  • 24. Ercan I, Kan I. Reliability and validity in the scales. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2004;30:211-6.
  • 25. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3186-91.
  • 26. Alpar R. Performance tests of validity and reliability. Spor Bilimlerinde Uygulamalı İstatistik 2nd ed İstanbul: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. 2001: s. 261.
  • 27. Alpar R. Spor, sağlık ve eğitim bilimlerinden örneklerle uygulamalı istatistik ve geçerlik-güvenirlik: Detay Yayıncılık.; 2010.
  • 28. Lilliefors HW. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1967;62:399-402.
  • 29. Finch E. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures. A guide to enhanced clinical decision making 2002;64.
  • 30. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: applications to practice: Pearson/Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.; 2009; s. 892.
  • 31. Lucas BR, Latimer J, Doney R, Ferreira ML, Adams R, Hawkes G, et al. The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Short Form is reliable in children living in remote Australian Aboriginal communities. BMC Pediatr 2013;13:135.
  • 32. Blank R. Bruininks-Oseretzky Test der motorischen Fähigkeiten: Handbuch; Grundlagen, Testauswertung und Interpretation: Pearson; 2014.
  • 33. Deitz JC, Kartin D, Kopp K. Review of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2007;27:87-102.
  • 34. Hassan MM. Validity and reliability for the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Short Form as applied in the United Arab Emirates culture. Percept Mot Skills 2001;92:157-66.
  • 35. Kambas A, Aggeloussis N. Construct validity of the BruininksOseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-short form for a sample of Greek preschool and primary school children. Percept Mot Skills 2006;102:65-72.
  • 36. Wuang YP, Su CY. Reliability and responsiveness of the BruininksOseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition in children with intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil 2009;30:847-55.
  • 37. Bruininks VL, Bruininks RH. Motor proficiency of learning disabled and nondisabled students. Percept Mot Skills 1977;44:1131-7.
APA KÖSE B, ŞAHİN S, karabulut e, Kayıhan H (2021). Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability. , 198 - 204. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
Chicago KÖSE Barkın,ŞAHİN SEDEF,karabulut erdem,Kayıhan Hülya Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability. (2021): 198 - 204. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
MLA KÖSE Barkın,ŞAHİN SEDEF,karabulut erdem,Kayıhan Hülya Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability. , 2021, ss.198 - 204. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
AMA KÖSE B,ŞAHİN S,karabulut e,Kayıhan H Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability. . 2021; 198 - 204. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
Vancouver KÖSE B,ŞAHİN S,karabulut e,Kayıhan H Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability. . 2021; 198 - 204. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
IEEE KÖSE B,ŞAHİN S,karabulut e,Kayıhan H "Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability." , ss.198 - 204, 2021. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
ISNAD KÖSE, Barkın vd. "Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability". (2021), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
APA KÖSE B, ŞAHİN S, karabulut e, Kayıhan H (2021). Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability. Bezmiâlem Science, 9(2), 198 - 204. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
Chicago KÖSE Barkın,ŞAHİN SEDEF,karabulut erdem,Kayıhan Hülya Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability. Bezmiâlem Science 9, no.2 (2021): 198 - 204. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
MLA KÖSE Barkın,ŞAHİN SEDEF,karabulut erdem,Kayıhan Hülya Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability. Bezmiâlem Science, vol.9, no.2, 2021, ss.198 - 204. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
AMA KÖSE B,ŞAHİN S,karabulut e,Kayıhan H Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability. Bezmiâlem Science. 2021; 9(2): 198 - 204. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
Vancouver KÖSE B,ŞAHİN S,karabulut e,Kayıhan H Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability. Bezmiâlem Science. 2021; 9(2): 198 - 204. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
IEEE KÖSE B,ŞAHİN S,karabulut e,Kayıhan H "Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability." Bezmiâlem Science, 9, ss.198 - 204, 2021. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
ISNAD KÖSE, Barkın vd. "Turkish Version of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 Brief Form: Its Validity and Reliability in Children with Specific Learning Disability". Bezmiâlem Science 9/2 (2021), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.4200
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 18:20

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları