An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender

ÇAM, İsa; Medişoğlu, M.Sabri; Yalnız, Ahmet; sezikli, mesut; Colak, Tuncay; BALTRAK, YUSUF ATAKAN

doi:10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388

An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender

Mahmut Sabri MEDİŞOĞLU, (Kocaeli Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Anatomi Anabilim Dalı, Kocaeli, Türkiye)

Tuncay ÇOLAK, (Kocaeli Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Anatomi Anabilim Dalı, Kocaeli, Türkiye)

Ahmet YALNIZ, (Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Derince Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Kocaeli, Türkiye)

İsa ÇAM, (Kocaeli Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Kocaeli, Türkiye)

Mesut SEZİKLİ, (Hitit Üniversitesi Çorum Erol Olçok Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Anabilim Dalı, Çorum, Türkiye)

Yusuf Atakan BALTRAK (Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Derince Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Çocuk Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı, Kocaeli, Türkiye)

Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation

2 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 95 - 100 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388 İndeks Tarihi: 18-06-2021

An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender

Öz:

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the gender in which gallstone formation is seen more frequently and whether hepatic and extrahepatic biliary tract variations are associated with gallstone formation.Methods: 60 patients who underwent endoscopic intervention and MRCP between 2017-2019 were included in thestudy. Patients with gastrointestinal complaints such as gallstones, gall bladder inflammation, Ductus choledochus(DCH) stones who have been admitted to the SBU Derince Training and Research Hospital's gastroenterology clinicwere included in the study, and patients with secondary diseases such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia were excluded from the study. In this way, 33 male and 27 female patients were included in the study and MRCP was carriedout with all of them. Measurements were performed in all patients participating in the study. Variation types and thepresence of gallstones were examined in MRCP images.Results: In 60 cases examined, the presence of gallstones was observed to be statistically significantly higher in womencompared to men. There was no statistically significant relationship between biliary tract variations and gallstone formation (p=0.504).Conclusion: Gallbladder formation is found to be more common in women. The presence of biliary tract variations didnot affect the development of the gallstone presence. It may be necessary to consider this phenomenon especiallybefore surgical and radiological examinations to determine variational conditions and to conduct studies examiningthe relationship between this situation and gallstone formation.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

1. Hartleb J, Schafmayer C, Tepel J, Albert S, Freitag S, Völzke H, et.al. Predictors of gallstone composition in 1025 symptomatic gallstones from northern germany. BMC Gastroenterol 2006;6:36.
2. Çavuş B, Karaca Ç, Safra Taşı Hastalığı, İç Hastalıkları Dergisi 2013;20:151–160.
3. Huang T.L ,Cheng YF, Chen TY, Chen TL, Lee TY. Variations of the intrahepatic bile ducts: application in the potential donor of living-related hepatic transplantation. Clin transplant 1997;11:337–340.
4. Moore K, Persaud T.V.N., (Çeviri editörleri:Yıldırım M., Okar İ.,Dalçık H), İnsan Embriyolojisi Klinik yönleri ile, Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri, İstanbul, 2002.
5. Özsoy M, Karaciğer vericilerindeki vasküler ve biliyer varyasyonlar, Uzmanlık Tezi, 2009.
6. Arıncı K, Elhan A, Anatomi 1.Cilt, Güneş Kitabevi, İstanbul,2001.
7. Mortele K, Ros P.R, Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: MR cholangiographic findings and clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:389–394.
8. Hyodo T, Kumano S, Kushihata F, Okada M, Hirata M, Tsuda T, et.al. CT and MR colangiography: advantage and pitfalls in perioperative evaluation of biliary tree. Brit J Radiol 2012;85:887.
9. Sin L. Y, Kuang T. P, Sung Y. C, Mıng Y. H, Chien M. C, Chien F. H, Jeng H.T Common and Rare variants of Biliary Tree: Magnetic Resonance Cholangiographic Findings and Clinical Implications, J. Radiol Sci 2012;37:59–67.
10. Jin C.W, Tae K.K, Kyoung W.K, Pyo N.K, Hyun K.H, Moon-gyu L, Anatomic variations in intrahepatic bile ducts: an Analysis of Intraoperative Cholangiograms in 300 Copnsecusive Donors for Living donor Liver Transplantation. Korean J Radiol.AprilJune 2003;4:85–90.
11. Sun H, Tang H, Jiang S, Zeng L, En-Qiang C, Tao Z, You-Juan W. Gender and metabolic difference of gallstone disease. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:1886–1891.
12. Tierney S, Nakeeb A, Wong O, Lipsett PA, Sostre S, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD. Progesterone alters biliary flow dynamics. Ann. Surg 1999;229:205–209.
13. Youming D, Bin W, Weixing W, Binghua W, Ruoyu L, Bangchang C. The effect of h (1) calponin expression on gallstone formation in pregnancy. Saudi Med J 2006;27:1661–1666.
14. Sanal B, Korkmaz M, Zeren S, Can F, Elmalı F, Bayhan Z, Does gallbladder angle affect gallstone formation? Pan Afr Med 2016;24:165.
15. Jin S.P, Don H.L, Jun H.L, Seok J, Young S.J, Morphologic factors of biliary trees are associated with gallstone-related biliary events. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:276–82.
16. Ressurreiçao J, Batista L, Soares T, Marques I, Matos E, Andrade L, Almeida A, et all. Normal anatomy and anatomic variants af the biliary tree and pancreatic ductal system at MRCP- what clinicians want know , educational exhibit, Poster No: C-1696, ECR 2014, Vienna, 6-10 March 2014,Vienna, Austria.
17. Khayat F.M, Munaser S.A, Saleh M.A, Sibiany A, Abnormal anatomical variations of extra-hepatic biliary tract and their relation to biliary tract injuries and stone formations.Gastroenterology Res 2014;7:12–16.

APA	Medişoğlu M, Colak T, Yalnız A, ÇAM İ, sezikli m, BALTRAK Y (2021). An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender. , 95 - 100. 10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388
Chicago	Medişoğlu M.Sabri,Colak Tuncay,Yalnız Ahmet,ÇAM İsa,sezikli mesut,BALTRAK YUSUF ATAKAN An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender. (2021): 95 - 100. 10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388
MLA	Medişoğlu M.Sabri,Colak Tuncay,Yalnız Ahmet,ÇAM İsa,sezikli mesut,BALTRAK YUSUF ATAKAN An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender. , 2021, ss.95 - 100. 10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388
AMA	Medişoğlu M,Colak T,Yalnız A,ÇAM İ,sezikli m,BALTRAK Y An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender. . 2021; 95 - 100. 10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388
Vancouver	Medişoğlu M,Colak T,Yalnız A,ÇAM İ,sezikli m,BALTRAK Y An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender. . 2021; 95 - 100. 10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388
IEEE	Medişoğlu M,Colak T,Yalnız A,ÇAM İ,sezikli m,BALTRAK Y "An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender." , ss.95 - 100, 2021. 10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388
ISNAD	Medişoğlu, M.Sabri vd. "An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender". (2021), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388

APA	Medişoğlu M, Colak T, Yalnız A, ÇAM İ, sezikli m, BALTRAK Y (2021). An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, 5(1), 95 - 100. 10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388
Chicago	Medişoğlu M.Sabri,Colak Tuncay,Yalnız Ahmet,ÇAM İsa,sezikli mesut,BALTRAK YUSUF ATAKAN An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation 5, no.1 (2021): 95 - 100. 10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388
MLA	Medişoğlu M.Sabri,Colak Tuncay,Yalnız Ahmet,ÇAM İsa,sezikli mesut,BALTRAK YUSUF ATAKAN An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, vol.5, no.1, 2021, ss.95 - 100. 10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388
AMA	Medişoğlu M,Colak T,Yalnız A,ÇAM İ,sezikli m,BALTRAK Y An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation. 2021; 5(1): 95 - 100. 10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388
Vancouver	Medişoğlu M,Colak T,Yalnız A,ÇAM İ,sezikli m,BALTRAK Y An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation. 2021; 5(1): 95 - 100. 10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388
IEEE	Medişoğlu M,Colak T,Yalnız A,ÇAM İ,sezikli m,BALTRAK Y "An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender." Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, 5, ss.95 - 100, 2021. 10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388
ISNAD	Medişoğlu, M.Sabri vd. "An Analysis of the Differences of Gallstone Presence with Respect to the Variations of Biliary Tracts and Gender". Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation 5/1 (2021), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmi.2021.60388