Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 58 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 428 - 434 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378 İndeks Tarihi: 27-06-2021

Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients

Öz:
Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate whether renal veinvariations had an effect on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)values in diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Methods: Images of 958 patients who underwent MRI betweenJanuary 2017 and October 2018 were retrospectively evaluatedfor renal vein variations based on the records obtained from theimage archive. Forty-six patients with renal vein variations andthirty patients of similar age and gender as the control groupenrolled in the study. The ADC values of both kidneys weremeasured at low-high b values.Results: The ADC values in the left kidney were lower than inthe right kidney in both groups (2.04x10-3± 0.22x10-3 mm2/sec,1.96x10-3±0.17x10-3 mm2/sec, for the renal vein variation group;p=0.008 and 2.08x10-3±0.13x10-3 mm2/sec, 1.94x10-3±0.11x10-3mm2/sec, for the control group; p=0.0001). However, no significantdifference was found between the renal vein variation and controlgroups in terms of the ADC values in both kidneys.Conclusion: Renal vein variations had no effect on renal ADCvalues in asymptomatic patients. Further studies can provideadditional information for symptomatic patient groups.
Anahtar Kelime:

Asemptomatik Hastalarda Renal Ven Varyasyonlarının Böbrek Görünür Difüzyon Katsayısı Değerlerine Etkisi

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, renal ven varyasyonlarının difüzyon ağırlıklı manyetik rezonans görüntülemede (MRG) görünür difüzyon katsayısına (GDK) etkisinin olup olmadığını araştırmaktadır. Yöntemler: Ocak 2017 ile Ekim 2018 tarihleri arasında abdominal MRG çekilmiş 958 hastanın tetkikleri renal ven varyasyonları açısından hastane görüntü arşivinden retrospektif olarak incelendi. Renal ven varyasyonu olan 46 hasta ve 30 hastadan oluşan kontrol grubunda yüksek ve düşük b değerlerinde her iki böbreğin GDK değerleri ölçüldü. Bulgular: Renal ven varyasyonu olan grupta ve kontrol grubunda sağ ve sol böbrek GDK değerleri arasında fark saptandı [2,04x10-3±0,22x10-3 mm2/sec, 1,96x10-3±0,17x10-3 mm2/sec; p=0.008 (varyasyonu olan grupta sağ ve sol böbrek, sırasıyla), 2,08x10-3±0,13x10-3 mm2/sec, 1,94x10-3±0,11x10-3 mm2/sec; p=0,0001, kontrol grubunda sağ ve sol böbrek, sırasıyla]. Sol böbrek GDK değerleri her iki grupta da sağ böbrekten daha düşüktü. Her iki böbrek GDK değerleri renal ven varyasyonu olan grupta ve kontrol grubunda benzerdi. Sonuç: Renal ven varyasyonu asemptomatik hastalarda böbrek GDK değerleri üzerinde herhangi etki göstermemektedir. Gelecekte semptomatik hasta gruplarıyla yapılacak çalışmalar ek bilgi verebilir
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Dilli A, Ayaz UY, Kaplanoğlu H, et al. Evaluation of the left renal vein variations and and inferior vena cava variations by means of helical computed tomography. Clin Imaging 2013;37:530-5.
  • 2. Zhu J, Zhang L, Yang Z, et al. Classification of the renal vein variations: a study with multidetector computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat 2015;37:667-75.
  • 3. Pandya VK, Patel AS, Sutariya HC, et al. Evaluation of renal vascular anatomy in live renal donors: Role of multi detector computed tomography. Urol Ann 2016;8:270-6.
  • 4. Karaman B, Koplay M, Ozturk E, et al. Retroaortic left renal vein: multidetector computed tomography angiography findings and its clinical importance. Acta Radiol 2007;48:355-60.
  • 5. Hangge PT, Gupta N, Khurana A, et al. Degree of left renal vein compression predicts nutcracker syndrome. J Clin Med 2018;8;7.
  • 6. Cuéllar i Calàbria H, Quiroga Gómez S, Sebastià Cerqueda C, et al. Nutcracker or left renal vein compression phenomenon: multidetector computed tomography findings and clinical significance. Eur Radiol 2005;15:1745-51.
  • 7. Cox EF, Buchanan CE, Bradley CR, et al. Multiparametric Renal Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation, Interventions, and Alterations in Chronic Kidney Disease. Front Physiol 2017;8:696.
  • 8. Caroli A, Schneider M, Friedli I, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to assess diffuse renal pathology: a systematic review and statement paper. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018;33:ii29-40.
  • 9. Lanzman RS, Ljimani A, Müller-Lutz A, et al. Assessment of time-resolved renal diffusion parameters over the entire cardiac cycle. Magn Reson Imaging 2018;10;55:1-6.
  • 10. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of native and transplanted kidneys. Radiology 2011;259:25-38.
  • 11. Leung G, Kirpalani A, Szeto SG, et al. Could MRI be used to image kidney fibrosis? A review of recent advances and remaining barriers. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;12:1019-28.
  • 12. Li Q, Li J, Zhang L, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in assessing renal pathology of chronic kidney disease: a preliminary clinical study. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:756-62.
  • 13. Morrell GR, Zhang JL, Lee VS. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fibrotic kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;28:2564-70.
  • 14. Zhao J, Wang ZJ, Liu M, et al. Assessment of renal fibrosis in chronic kidney disease using diffusion weighted MRI. Clin Radiol 2014;69:1117-22.
  • 15. Yalçin-Şafak K, Ayyildiz M, Ünel SY, et al. The relationship of ADC values of renal parenchyma with CKD stage and serum creatinine levels. Eur J Radiol Open 2016;3:8-11.
  • 16. Thiravit S, Suwanchatree P, Skulratanasak P, et al. Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient values of the renal parenchyma and estimated glomerular filtration rates on 3-T diffusion-weighted echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2019;43:780-5.
  • 17. Bedoya MA, Berman JI, Delgado J, et al. Relationship of renal apparent diffusion coefficient and functional MR urography in children with pelvicalyceal dilation. Pediatr Radiol 2019;49:1032-41.
  • 18. Kim BR, Song JS, Choi EJ, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of upper abdominal organs acquired with multiple B-value combinations: value of normalization using spleen as the reference organ. Korean J Radiol 2018;19:389-96.
  • 19. Kiliçkesmez O, Yirik G, Bayramoğlu S, et al. Non-breath-hold high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI with parallel imaging technique: apparent diffusion coefficient determination in normal abdominal organs. Diagn Interv Radiol 2008;14:83-7.
  • 20. Lavdas I, Rockall AG, Castelli F, et al. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient of Normal Abdominal Organs and Bone Marrow from Whole-Body DWI at 1.5 T: The Effect of Sex and Age. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:242-50.
  • 21. Pawluś A, Szymańska K, Łasecki M, et al. Which organ should be considered a reference in diffusion weighted imaging of the abdomen?. The reproducibility of ADC measurements of the spleen and the renal cortex on a 1.5T MR. Adv Clin Exp Med 2017;26:811-16.
  • 22. Yoshikawa T, Kawamitsu H, Mitchell DG, et al. ADC measurement of abdominal organs and lesions using parallel imaging technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:1521-30.
  • 23. Song JS, Hwang SB, Chung GH, et al. Intra-individual, intervendor comparison of diffusion-weighted MR imaging of upper abdominal organs at 3.0 Tesla with an emphasis on the value of normalization with the spleen. Korean J Radiol 2016;17:209-17.
  • 24. Hagmann P, Jonasson L, Maeder P, Thiran JP, Wedeen VJ, Meuli R. Understanding diffusion MR imaging techniques: from scalar diffusion-weighted imaging to diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Radiographics 2006;26:205-23.
  • 25. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986;161:401-7.
  • 26. Sigmund EE, Vivier PH, Sui D, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion-tensor imaging in renal tissue under hydration and furosemide flow challenges. Radiology 2012;263:758-69, Epub 2012 Apr 20.
  • 27. Wittsack HJ, Lanzman RS, Mathys C, et al. Statistical evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging of the human kidney. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:616-22.
  • 28. Li XM, Yang L, Reng J, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of renal structure and function of healthy individuals with multiparametric MRI: Effects of sex and age. Sci Rep 2019;9:10661.
APA Gündoğdu e, Emekli E, OĞUZMAN M, KEBAPÇI M (2020). Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients. , 428 - 434. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378
Chicago Gündoğdu elif,Emekli Emre,OĞUZMAN MEHMET,KEBAPÇI MAHMUT Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients. (2020): 428 - 434. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378
MLA Gündoğdu elif,Emekli Emre,OĞUZMAN MEHMET,KEBAPÇI MAHMUT Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients. , 2020, ss.428 - 434. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378
AMA Gündoğdu e,Emekli E,OĞUZMAN M,KEBAPÇI M Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients. . 2020; 428 - 434. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378
Vancouver Gündoğdu e,Emekli E,OĞUZMAN M,KEBAPÇI M Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients. . 2020; 428 - 434. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378
IEEE Gündoğdu e,Emekli E,OĞUZMAN M,KEBAPÇI M "Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients." , ss.428 - 434, 2020. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378
ISNAD Gündoğdu, elif vd. "Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients". (2020), 428-434. https://doi.org/10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378
APA Gündoğdu e, Emekli E, OĞUZMAN M, KEBAPÇI M (2020). Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, 58(5), 428 - 434. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378
Chicago Gündoğdu elif,Emekli Emre,OĞUZMAN MEHMET,KEBAPÇI MAHMUT Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients. Haseki Tıp Bülteni 58, no.5 (2020): 428 - 434. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378
MLA Gündoğdu elif,Emekli Emre,OĞUZMAN MEHMET,KEBAPÇI MAHMUT Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, vol.58, no.5, 2020, ss.428 - 434. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378
AMA Gündoğdu e,Emekli E,OĞUZMAN M,KEBAPÇI M Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients. Haseki Tıp Bülteni. 2020; 58(5): 428 - 434. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378
Vancouver Gündoğdu e,Emekli E,OĞUZMAN M,KEBAPÇI M Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients. Haseki Tıp Bülteni. 2020; 58(5): 428 - 434. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378
IEEE Gündoğdu e,Emekli E,OĞUZMAN M,KEBAPÇI M "Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients." Haseki Tıp Bülteni, 58, ss.428 - 434, 2020. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378
ISNAD Gündoğdu, elif vd. "Effect of Renal Vein Variations on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Asymptomatic Patients". Haseki Tıp Bülteni 58/5 (2020), 428-434. https://doi.org/10.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.6378