Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 53 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 57 - 61 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 İndeks Tarihi: 29-06-2021
Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Öz: Objective: The most important problem for emergency physicians in patients presenting with chest pain isdeciding whether to discharge the patient or not. Therefore, many scoring systems have been developed tohelp with this decision making process. We aim to achieve a modified HEART value by combining the VASvalue with the HEART score.Materials and Methods: Data were collected on age, sex, duration of the symptoms, pain severity using a10-point visual analog scale (VAS), and the presence of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE). The HEARTscore was calculated and modified (mHEART) by adding 1 point to the total HEART score for a VAS scoreof ≥7.Results: During the study period, 4781 patients were admitted, and 293 participants were analyzed. Of thepatients, 34(11.6%) experienced MACE within a month after the encounter. The mean VAS scores were5.65±1.44. However, 77(26.3%) patients had VAS scores ≥7. Taking 3 as the threshold, 42(14.3%) patientshad HEART scores of 4 and above, where 47(16.0%) had mHEART scores ≥4. The mHEART scoring demonstrated better test indicators than the HEART score. According to the HEART score, 6(2.3%) of the 251patients predicted as negative would develop MACE, but this number decreased to 1(0.4%) in 246 using themHEART score.Conclusion: Although the HEART score performs reasonably well in discriminating patients who are MACEnegative, it is possible to further improve the score by adding the VAS item. After validation by other studies,we would suggest modifying the HEART score by including the VAS item.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Roth GA, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-pecific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet (London, England) 2018; 392: 1736-88.
- 2. Yasue H, Mizuno Y, Harada E. Coronary artery spasm-Clinical features, pathogenesis and treatment. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 2019; 95: 53-66.
- 3. Fox KF. Investigation and management of chest pain. Heart 2005; 91: 105-10.
- 4. Bax JJ, Baumgartner H, Ceconi C, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 1581-98.
- 5. Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 2345-53.
- 6. Six AJ, Backus BE, Kelder JC. Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score. Neth Heart J 2008; 16: 191-6.
- 7. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA 2000; 284: 835-42.
- 8. Poldervaart JM, Langedijk M, Backus BE, et al. Comparison of the GRACE, HEART and TIMI score to predict major adverse cardiac events in chest pain patients at the emergency department. Int J Cardiol 2017; 227: 656-61.
- 9. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 2007; 4: 1623-7.
- 10. Choi BG, Rha S-W, Yoon SG, Choi CU, Lee MW, Kim SW. Association of Major Adverse Cardiac Events up to 5 Years in Patients With Chest Pain Without Significant Coronary Artery Disease in the Korean Population. J Am Heart Assoc 2019; 8: e010541.
- 11. Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, et al. Chest pain in the emergency room: a multicenter validation of the HEART Score. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2010; 9: 164-9.
- 12. Negida A, Fahim NK, Negida Y. Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 4: How to Calculate the Sample Size for a Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study based on Sensitivity, Specificity, and the Area Under the ROC Curve. Adv J Emerg Med 2019; 3:e33.
- 13. Hess EP, Perry JJ, Calder LA, et al. Sex differences in clinical presentation, management and outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain. CJEM 2010; 12: 405-13.
- 14. Bank IEM, de Hoog VC, de Kleijn DP V, et al. Sex-Based Differences in the Performance of the HEART Score in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Chest Pain. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6: e005373.
- 15. Lowenstern A, Alexander KP, Hill CL, et al. AgeRelated Differences in the Noninvasive Evaluation for Possible Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) Trial. JAMA Cardiol 2020; 5: 193-201.
- 16. Solomon R, Nowak R, Hudson M, Moyer M, Jacobsen G, McCord J. Is Duration of Symptoms Predictive of Acute Myocardial Infarction? Curr Probl Cardiol 2021; 46: 100555.
- 17. Reaney PDW, Elliott HI, Noman A, Cooper JG. Risk stratifying chest pain patients in the emergency department using HEART, GRACE and TIMI scores, with a single contemporary troponin result, to predict major adverse cardiac events. Emerg Med J 2018; 35: 420-7.
- 18. Galinski M, Saget D, Ruscev M, et al. Chest pain in an out-of-hospital emergency setting: no relationship between pain severity and diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Pain Pract 2015; 15:343-7.
- 19. Fukuoka Y, Dracup K, Moser DK, et al. Is severity of chest pain a cue for women and men to recognize acute myocardial infarction symptoms as cardiac in origin? Prog Cardiovasc Nurs 2007; 22: 132-7.
- 20. Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA, et al. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010; 122: 1756-76.
| APA | AKGOL GUR S, Betos Koçak M, kocak a, VURAL M, Akbaş İ, Dogruyol S, Kerget B, ÇAKIR Z (2021). Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events. , 57 - 61. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
| Chicago | AKGOL GUR Sultan Tuna,Betos Koçak Meryem,kocak abdullah osman,VURAL MERT,Akbaş İlker,Dogruyol Sinem,Kerget Bugra,ÇAKIR Zeynep Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events. (2021): 57 - 61. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
| MLA | AKGOL GUR Sultan Tuna,Betos Koçak Meryem,kocak abdullah osman,VURAL MERT,Akbaş İlker,Dogruyol Sinem,Kerget Bugra,ÇAKIR Zeynep Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events. , 2021, ss.57 - 61. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
| AMA | AKGOL GUR S,Betos Koçak M,kocak a,VURAL M,Akbaş İ,Dogruyol S,Kerget B,ÇAKIR Z Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events. . 2021; 57 - 61. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
| Vancouver | AKGOL GUR S,Betos Koçak M,kocak a,VURAL M,Akbaş İ,Dogruyol S,Kerget B,ÇAKIR Z Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events. . 2021; 57 - 61. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
| IEEE | AKGOL GUR S,Betos Koçak M,kocak a,VURAL M,Akbaş İ,Dogruyol S,Kerget B,ÇAKIR Z "Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events." , ss.57 - 61, 2021. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
| ISNAD | AKGOL GUR, Sultan Tuna vd. "Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events". (2021), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
| APA | AKGOL GUR S, Betos Koçak M, kocak a, VURAL M, Akbaş İ, Dogruyol S, Kerget B, ÇAKIR Z (2021). Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 53(1), 57 - 61. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
| Chicago | AKGOL GUR Sultan Tuna,Betos Koçak Meryem,kocak abdullah osman,VURAL MERT,Akbaş İlker,Dogruyol Sinem,Kerget Bugra,ÇAKIR Zeynep Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events. Eurasian Journal of Medicine 53, no.1 (2021): 57 - 61. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
| MLA | AKGOL GUR Sultan Tuna,Betos Koçak Meryem,kocak abdullah osman,VURAL MERT,Akbaş İlker,Dogruyol Sinem,Kerget Bugra,ÇAKIR Zeynep Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, vol.53, no.1, 2021, ss.57 - 61. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
| AMA | AKGOL GUR S,Betos Koçak M,kocak a,VURAL M,Akbaş İ,Dogruyol S,Kerget B,ÇAKIR Z Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2021; 53(1): 57 - 61. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
| Vancouver | AKGOL GUR S,Betos Koçak M,kocak a,VURAL M,Akbaş İ,Dogruyol S,Kerget B,ÇAKIR Z Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2021; 53(1): 57 - 61. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
| IEEE | AKGOL GUR S,Betos Koçak M,kocak a,VURAL M,Akbaş İ,Dogruyol S,Kerget B,ÇAKIR Z "Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events." Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 53, ss.57 - 61, 2021. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
| ISNAD | AKGOL GUR, Sultan Tuna vd. "Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events". Eurasian Journal of Medicine 53/1 (2021), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20341 |
