Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 32 - 37 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372 İndeks Tarihi: 01-07-2021

EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS

Öz:
Objective: One of the causes which accelerates spinal degeneration process is lumbar disc hernia (LDH). In this study, we observed the changes in spinopelvic parameters one month after single-level lumbar microdiscectomy (LM). Materials and Methods: Standardized bilateral standing scoliosis radiography images of 19 patients, which were performed before and 1 month after LM operation, were evaluated retrospectively. Sagittal vertical axis and coronal vertical axis distances, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, sacral slope and pelvic tilt angles were measured with Surgimap software. Results: There was a positive correlation between pre-and post-LM values of all spinopelvic parameters included in the study. In comparative tests however, the difference was found to be not statistically significant. As a result, despite LM operation slightly improved spinopelvic parameters in the first month, there was not a significant change overall. Conclusion: LDH is known to worsen the degenerative process in spine. LM as a treatment option is seen to alleviate this degenerative process by slowing down the deterioration in spinopelvic parameters.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999;354:581-5.
  • 2. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, Glassman S, Hamill C, Horton W, et al. Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:86-93.
  • 3. Lagerbäck T, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Nordvall D, Lønne G, Solberg TK, et al. Effectiveness of surgery for sciatica with disc herniation is not substantially affected by differences in surgical incidences among three countries: results from the Danish, Swedish and Norwegian spine registries. Eur Spine J. 2019;28:2562-71.
  • 4. Petit A, Roquelaure Y. Low back pain, intervertebral disc and occupational diseases. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21:15-9.
  • 5. Aebi M. The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:925-48.
  • 6. Zhang G, Yang Y, Hai Y, Li J, Xie X, Feng S. Analysis of lumbar sagittal curvature in spinal decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis patients under roussouly classification. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8078641.
  • 7. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, Hales C. Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23:1750-67.
  • 8. Le Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A. Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2019;28:1889-905.
  • 9. Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, et al. Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multi center analysis. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 2013;38:803-12.
  • 10. Dalbayrak S, Öğrenci A, Akar E, Koban O, Yılmaz A, Yılmaz M. Clinical and radiological outcomes after correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis with dynamic stabilization (with the help of a rigid rod); and describing an alternative technique. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;79:123-8.
  • 11. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:682-8.
  • 12. Mehta VA, Amin A, Omeis I, Gokaslan ZL, Gottfried ON. Implications of spinopelvic alignment for the spine surgeon. Neurosurgery. 2015;76(Suppl 1):42-56.
  • 13. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl 5):609-18.
  • 14. Surgimap, Nemaris, New York, 133 USA. 2019. https://www.surgimap.com.
  • 15. Faro FD, Marks MC, Pawelek J, Newton PO. Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine(Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:2284-9.
  • 16. Lafage R, Ferrero E, Henry JK, Challier V, Diebo B, Liabaud B, et al. Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters. Spine J. 2015;15:2493-502.
  • 17. Malçok ÜA, Yaman O. Lomber dejeneratif skolyoza yaklaşım. Türk Nöroşir Derg. 2018;28:230-7.
  • 18. Surgimap user guide. Surgimap User Guide Version 3.8. 2015:62-91.
  • 19. Beck A, Killus J. Normal posture of spine determined by mathematical and statistical methods. Aerosp Med. 1973;12:1277-81.
  • 20. Scoliosis Research Society 24th Annual Meeting Amsterdam, Holland September 17-22, 1989, Spine. 1990;15:845. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Citation/1990/09000/Scoliosis_Research_Society_24th_Annual_Meeting.1.aspx
  • 21. Duval-Beaupère G, Schmidt C, Cosson P. A Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng. 1992;20:451-62.
  • 22. Otluoğlu GD, Konya D, Toktas ZO. The Influence of Mechanic Factors in Disc Degeneration Disease as a Determinant for Surgical Indication. Neurospine. 2020;17:215-20.
  • 23. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Illes T. The importance of spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbar disc lesions. Int Orthop. 2002;26:104-8.
  • 24. Endo K, Suzuki H, Tanaka H, Kang Y, Yamamoto K. Sagittal spinal alignment in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:435-8.
APA Malçok Ü, AKAR A (2021). EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS. , 32 - 37. 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372
Chicago Malçok Ümit Ali,AKAR ALI EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS. (2021): 32 - 37. 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372
MLA Malçok Ümit Ali,AKAR ALI EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS. , 2021, ss.32 - 37. 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372
AMA Malçok Ü,AKAR A EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS. . 2021; 32 - 37. 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372
Vancouver Malçok Ü,AKAR A EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS. . 2021; 32 - 37. 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372
IEEE Malçok Ü,AKAR A "EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS." , ss.32 - 37, 2021. 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372
ISNAD Malçok, Ümit Ali - AKAR, ALI. "EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS". (2021), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372
APA Malçok Ü, AKAR A (2021). EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, 32(1), 32 - 37. 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372
Chicago Malçok Ümit Ali,AKAR ALI EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery 32, no.1 (2021): 32 - 37. 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372
MLA Malçok Ümit Ali,AKAR ALI EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, vol.32, no.1, 2021, ss.32 - 37. 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372
AMA Malçok Ü,AKAR A EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery. 2021; 32(1): 32 - 37. 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372
Vancouver Malçok Ü,AKAR A EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery. 2021; 32(1): 32 - 37. 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372
IEEE Malçok Ü,AKAR A "EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS." Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, 32, ss.32 - 37, 2021. 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372
ISNAD Malçok, Ümit Ali - AKAR, ALI. "EFFECTS OF LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY ON SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS". Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery 32/1 (2021), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.4274/jtss.galenos.2021.372