Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 157 - 164 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.35208/ert.913039 İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul

Öz:
Medical waste management has always been an important topic due to its infectious status. Recently, more care has been given to it due to the COVID-19 pandemic throughout the world. Several methods are applied to handle medical wastes. Incineration and sterilization with autoclave are among the most common medical waste treatment methods. Among all methods, incineration serves the ultimate method of waste destruction since the waste is exposed to high temperatures (~800 °C) for about 2 hours. Because of the pandemic or some other reasons, administrations may want to shift their technology to incineration from autoclave. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to prepare a comparison of both technologies in terms of life cycle perspective. We used OpenLCA for calculations. Two different calculations were conducted. In the first one, the actual treatment methods and the waste amount were used. In the second one, a scenario was formed that included the treatment of the whole medical waste of Istanbul by only incineration process. The results indicated a higher mid-category life cycle impact for the combustion method. The highest contribution was for human toxicity with 3.8e4 kg 1,4-DB eq and 1.7e5 kg 1,4-DB eq for the current operation and scenario, respectively. The environmental impact of the sterilization process remained negligible relative to the combustion process.
Anahtar Kelime: incineration Medical waste life cycle assessment autoclave OpenLCA

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1]. M. Ali, W. Wang and N. Chaudhry, “Application of life cycle assessment for hospital solid waste management: A case study,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 66 (10), pp. 1012–1018, 2016.
  • [2]. M. Ali, W. Wang, N. Chaudhry and Y. Geng, “Hospital waste management in developing countries: A mini review,” Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, Vol. 35 (6), pp. 581–592, 2017.
  • [3]. M. Karaosman, “Analyzing Of Solid Waste Management With Life Cycle Assessment (LCA),” Fatih University, 2014.
  • [4]. M. Banar, Z. Cokaygil and A. Ozkan, “Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey,” Waste Management, Vol. 29 (1), pp. 54–62, 2009.
  • [5]. A. Y. Çetinkaya, L. Bilgili and S. L. Kuzu, “Life cycle assessment and greenhouse gas emission evaluation from Aksaray solid waste disposal facility,” Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health., Vol. 11 (5), pp. 549–558, 2018.
  • [6]. O. Alam and A. Mosharraf, “A preliminary life cycle assessment on healthcare waste management in Chittagong City, Bangladesh,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 17 (3), pp. 1753–1764, 2020.
  • [7]. İSTAÇ, 2021, Available: https://www.istac.istanbul/tr/temizistanbul/hizmetlerimiz/tibbi-atik-yonetimi.
  • [8]. İBB, 2021, Available: https://data.ibb.gov.tr/dataset/ilce-yil-ve-atikturu-bazinda-atik-miktari/resource/50036dfdaea5-4f06-832f-f7020fdaaa5a.
  • [9]. IBB, 2021, Available: https://atikyonetimi.ibb.istanbul/hizmetlerimiz /tibbi-atiklarin-toplanmasi-ve-bertarafi/.
  • [10]. A. Laca, M. Herrero and M. Díaz, “Life Cycle Assessment in Biotechnology,” in Comprehensive Biotechnology, Elsevier, pp. 839–851, 2011.
  • [11]. M. Z. Hauschild, R. K. Rosenbaum, and S. I. Olsen, Life Cycle Assessment. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018.
  • [12]. A. Elwan, Y. Z. Arief, Z. Adzis and N. A. Muhamad, “Life Cycle Assessment-based Environmental Impact Comparative Analysis of Composting and Electricity Generation from Solid Waste,” Energy Procedia, Vol. 68, pp. 186–194, 2015.
  • [13]. H. Taghipour and M. Mosaferi, “Characterization of medical waste from hospitals in Tabriz, Iran,” Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 407 (5), pp. 1527–1535, 2009.
  • [14]. OpenLCA, 2021, Available: https://www.openlca.org/.
  • [15]. Leiden, 2021, Available: http://cml.leiden.edu/software/datacmlia.html.
  • [16]. G. Gunes, A. Saral, Ş. Yildiz, and S. L. Kuzu, “Determination of optimum dose of adsorbent for PCDD/F removal in the flue gas of a medical waste incineration plant," Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol. 104, pp. 695–702, 2015.
  • [17]. R. Ahmad, G. Liu, R. Santagata, M. Casazza, J. Xue, K. Khan, J. Nawab, S. Ulgiati and M. Lega, “LCA of Hospital Solid Waste Treatment Alternatives in a Developing Country: The Case of District Swat, Pakistan,” Sustainability, Vol. 11 (13), pp. 3501, 2019.
  • [18]. H. Zhao, H.Q. Liu, G. Wei, H. Wang, Y. Zhu, R. Zhang and Y. Yang, “Comparative life cycle assessment of emergency disposal scenarios for medical waste during the COVID-19 pandemic in China,” Waste Management, Vol. 126, pp. 388–399, 2021.
  • [19]. J. Hong, S. Zhan, Z. Yu, J. Hong and C. Qi, “Lifecycle environmental and economic assessment of medical waste treatment,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 174, pp. 65–73, 2018.
  • [20]. L. Morselli, C. De Robertis, J. Luzi, F. Passarini, and I. Vassura, “Environmental impacts of waste incineration in a regional system (Emilia Romagna, Italy) evaluated from a life cycle perspective,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 159 (2–3), pp. 505–511, 2008.
  • [21]. H. Kumar, A. Azad, A. Gupta, J. Sharma, H. Bherwani, N. K. Labhsetwar and R. Kumar, “COVID-19 Creating another problem? Sustainable solution for PPE disposal through LCA approach,” Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10668-020- 01033-0.
APA Kilic O, KUZU S (2021). Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul. , 157 - 164. 10.35208/ert.913039
Chicago Kilic Ozge,KUZU S. Levent Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul. (2021): 157 - 164. 10.35208/ert.913039
MLA Kilic Ozge,KUZU S. Levent Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul. , 2021, ss.157 - 164. 10.35208/ert.913039
AMA Kilic O,KUZU S Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul. . 2021; 157 - 164. 10.35208/ert.913039
Vancouver Kilic O,KUZU S Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul. . 2021; 157 - 164. 10.35208/ert.913039
IEEE Kilic O,KUZU S "Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul." , ss.157 - 164, 2021. 10.35208/ert.913039
ISNAD Kilic, Ozge - KUZU, S. Levent. "Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul". (2021), 157-164. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.913039
APA Kilic O, KUZU S (2021). Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul. Environmental Research & Technology, 4(2), 157 - 164. 10.35208/ert.913039
Chicago Kilic Ozge,KUZU S. Levent Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul. Environmental Research & Technology 4, no.2 (2021): 157 - 164. 10.35208/ert.913039
MLA Kilic Ozge,KUZU S. Levent Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul. Environmental Research & Technology, vol.4, no.2, 2021, ss.157 - 164. 10.35208/ert.913039
AMA Kilic O,KUZU S Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul. Environmental Research & Technology. 2021; 4(2): 157 - 164. 10.35208/ert.913039
Vancouver Kilic O,KUZU S Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul. Environmental Research & Technology. 2021; 4(2): 157 - 164. 10.35208/ert.913039
IEEE Kilic O,KUZU S "Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul." Environmental Research & Technology, 4, ss.157 - 164, 2021. 10.35208/ert.913039
ISNAD Kilic, Ozge - KUZU, S. Levent. "Comparison of incineration and autoclave methods in the treatment of medical wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study for Istanbul". Environmental Research & Technology 4/2 (2021), 157-164. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.913039