Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 25 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.30798/makuiibf.691529 İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ

Öz:
Araştırmanın temel amacı, ekonomik yarar, sürdürülebilirlik, güven, elektronik ağızdanağıza iletişim ve fiyat hassasiyetinin, ikinci el e-moda sitelerini kullanma niyetiüzerindeki etkisinde ortak tüketime ilişkin tutumların aracılık etkisini incelemektir.Türkiye’de daha önce ortak tüketim kapsamında yapılmış çalışmalar araba ve evpaylaşımı üzerine odaklanmışlardır. Bu çalışmada ise ortak tüketim kapsamında ikinciel e-moda sitelerinin ele alınması çalışmayı literatürdeki benzerlerinden ayırmaktadır.Araştırmanın verileri 316 katılımcıdan anket toplanarak elde edilmiş ve yedi değişkenlibir yapısal eşitlik modeli kurulmuştur. Çalışmada güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik analizi,korelasyon analizi, keşfedici faktör analizi, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve yol analizleriyapılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda, ekonomik yarar, sürdürülebilirlik, güven,elektronik ağızdan ağıza iletişim ve fiyat hassasiyetinin ortak tüketim anlayışına ilişkintutumları ve kullanma niyetini pozitif yönde etkilediği görülmüştür. Ayrıca ortaktüketim anlayışına ilişkin tutumların bağımsız değişkenler ve bağımlı değişken olankullanma niyeti arasında aracılık etkisine sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime: İkinci El Alışveriş Ortak Tüketim Paylaşım Ekonomisi

THE EFFECT OF ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE CONCEPT OF COLLABORATIVE CONSUMPTION ON INTENTION TO USE SECOND HAND E-FASHION WEBSITES

Öz:
The main aim of the study is to examine the mediating effect of attitudes towards collaborative consumption on the effect of economic benefit, sustainability, trust, eWOM and price sensitivity on the intention of using second-hand e-fashion sites. Previous studies in Turkey that related collaborative consumption have focused on the car and home-sharing. In this study, second-hand fashion sites were examined within the scope of collaborative consumption. Therefore this study distinguishes from its peers in the literature. The data of the study was obtained by collecting questionnaires from 316 participants and a structural equation model with seven variables was established. Reliability and validity analysis, correlation analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and path analysis were performed in the study. As a result of the study, it was seen that economic benefit, sustainability, trust, eWOM and price sensitivity positively affect attitudes and intention to use on collaborative consumption. In addition, it was found that the attitudes towards the concept of collaborative consumption had a mediating effect between the independent variables and intention to use as a dependent variable
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aigrain, P. (2012). Sharing: Culture and the Economy in the Internet Age. Amsterdam: University Press.
  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Kuhl ve J. Beckmann (Eds.). In Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. (11–39). Berlin, Germany: Springer‐Verlag.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  • Ajzen, I. ve Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.
  • Albarq, A. N. (2014). Measuring the impacts of Online word-of-mouth on tourists' attitude and intentions to visit jordan: an empirical study. International Business Research, 7(1), 14.
  • Bardhi, F. ve Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881-898.
  • Barnes, S. J. ve Mattsson, J. (2017). Understanding collaborative consumption: test of a theoretical model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 281-292.
  • Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  • Belk, R. (2007). Why not share rather than own?. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 126-140.
  • Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715-734.
  • Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595-1600.
  • Bhattacherjee, A. (2002). Individual trust in online firms: scale development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 211-241.
  • Billows, G. ve Mcneill, L. (2018). Consumer attitude and behavioral ıntention toward collaborative consumption of shared services. Sustainability, 10(12), 4468.
  • Binninger, A. S., Ourahmoune, N. ve Robert, I. (2015). Collaborative consumption and sustainability: a discursive analysis of consumer representations and collaborative website narratives. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 31(3), 969-986.
  • Botsman, R. ve Rogers, R. (2010). What’s Mine is Yours. The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. New York: Harper Business.
  • Bray, J., Johns, N. ve Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors ımpeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.
  • Buda, G. (2017). Attitudes and Motivations of Consumers in Sharing Economy. Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking in the 21st Century, 22.
  • Çakmur, H. (2012). Araştırmalarda ölçme-güvenilirlik-geçerlilik. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 11(3).
  • Cheung, M. F. ve To, W. M. (2017). The influence of the propensity to trust on mobile users' attitudes toward in-app advertisements: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 102-111.
  • Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(4), 265–279.
  • Ek Styvén, M. ve Mariani, M. M. (2020). Understanding the intention to buy secondhand clothing on sharing economy platforms: the ınfluence of sustainability, distance from the consumption system, and economic motivations. Psychology ve Marketing, 37(5), 724-739.
  • Feldman, J. M. ve Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421.
  • Felson, M. ve Spaeth, J. L. (1978). Community structure and collaborative consumption: a routine activity approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 21(4), 614-624.
  • Fishbein, M. ve Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 10(2), 130-132.
  • Fraiberger, S. P. ve Sundararajan, A. (2015). Peer-To-Peer Rental Markets in The Sharing Economy. NYU Stern School of Business Research Paper, 6, 1-44.
  • Gansky, L. (2010). The Mesh: Why the Future of Business is Sharing. Penguin.
  • Goldsmith, R. E. ve Newell, S. J. (1997). Innovativeness and Price Sensitivity: Managerial, Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Journal of Product ve Brand Management, 6(3), 163-174.
  • Goldsmith, R. E., Flynn, L. R. ve Kim, D. (2010). Status consumption and price sensitivity. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(4), 323-338.
  • Gretzel, U., Zhong, L., Koo, C., Doosti, S., Jalilvand, M. R., Asadi, A., ... & Adl, P. M. (2016). Analyzing the influence of electronic word of mouth on visit intention: the mediating role of tourists’ attitude and city image. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 2(2), 137-148.
  • Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T. ve Czaplewski, A. J. (2006). Ewom: the ımpact of customer-tocustomer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 449-456.
  • Hair, F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. ve Tatham, R, L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis, 6, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M. ve Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9): 2047–2059.
  • Hauser, M., Nussbeck, F. W. ve Jonas, K. (2013). The impact of food‐related values on food purchase behavior and the mediating role of attitudes: a swiss study. Psychology and Marketing, 30(9), 765-778.
  • Hawapi, M. W., Sulaiman, Z., Kohar, U. H. A. ve Talib, N. A. (2017). Effects of Perceived Risks, Reputation and Electronic Word of Mouth (E-WOM) on Collaborative Consumption of Uber Car Sharing Service. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 215(1), 012019, IOP Publishing.
  • Hofmann, E., Hartl, B. ve Penz, E. (2017). Power versus trust–what matters more in collaborative consumption?. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(6), 589–603.
  • Hwang, J. ve Griffiths, M. A. (2017). Share more, drive less: millennials value perception and behavioral intent in using collaborative consumption Services. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(2), 132-146.
  • Jalilvand, M. R., Samiei, N., Dini, B. ve Manzari, P. Y. (2012). Examining the structural relationships of electronic word of mouth, destination image, tourist attitude toward destination and travel intention: an integrated approach. Journal of Destination Marketing ve Management, 1(1-2), 134-143.
  • Kacar, A. İ. (2018). Toplulukların Gücü Paylaşımcı Markalar. Ay, C., Yakın, V. ve Kacar, A. İ. (Ed.). Paylaşım Ekonomisi içinde. (35-59). Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi.
  • Kaplan, A. M. ve Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
  • Kim, E. Y. ve Kim, Y. K. (2004). Predicting online purchase intentions for clothing products. European Journal of Marketing, 38(7), 883–897.
  • Köse, Ş. G. (2020). Is organic food a sustainable choice? evaluating organic food production in the framework of environmental sustainability. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(4), 685-700.
  • Lamberton, C. P. ve Rose, R. L. (2012). When is ours better than mine? a framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 109-125.
  • Larzelere, R.E. ve Huston, T.L., (1980). The dyadic trust scale: toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family August, 595–604.
  • Li, H. ve Wen, H. (2019). How is Motivation generated in collaborative consumption: mediation effect in extrinsic and ıntrinsic motivation. Sustainability, 11(3), 640.
  • Liang, L. J., Choi, H. C. ve Joppe, M. (2018). Understanding repurchase ıntention of airbnb consumers: perceived authenticity, electronic word-of-mouth, and price sensitivity. Journal of Travel ve Tourism Marketing, 35(1), 73-89.
  • Lindblom, A., Lindblom, T. ve Wechtler, H. (2018). Collaborative consumption as c2c trading: analyzing the effects of materialism and price consciousness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 244-252.
  • Lorcu, F. (2015). Örneklerle Veri Analizi Spss Uygulamalı. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  • May, A., Ross, T., Grebert, J. ve Segarra, G. (2008). User reaction to car share and lift share within a transport ‘marketplace’. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2(1), 47-60.
  • Melnik, M. I. ve Alm, J. (2002). Does a seller’s ecommerce reputation matter? evidence from ebay auctions. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(3), 337-349.
  • Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(3), 193-207.
  • Moon, J., Chadee, D. ve Tikoo, S. (2008). Culture, product type, and price ınfluences on consumer purchase ıntention to buy personalized products online. Journal of Business Research, 61(1), 31–39.
  • Owyang, J., Tran, C. ve Silva, C. (2013). The Collaborative Economy. United States: Altimeter.
  • Perren, R. ve Grauerholz, L. (2015). Collaborative consumption. International Encyclopedia of the Social ve Behavioral Sciences, 4, 139-144.
  • Phipps, M., Ozanne, L. K., Luchs, M. G., Subrahmanyan, S., Kapitan, S., Catlin, J. R., ... ve Weaver, T. (2013). Understanding the ınherent complexity of sustainable consumption: a social cognitive framework. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1227-1234.
  • Polanco-Diges, L. ve Debasa, F. (2020). The use of digital marketing strategies in the sharing economy: a literature review. Journal of Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, 8(3), 217-229.
  • Retamal, M. (2019). Collaborative consumption practices in southeast asian cities: prospects for growth and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 143-152.
  • Santoso, A. S. ve Erdaka, A. (2015). Customer loyalty in collaborative consumption model: empirical study of crm for product-service system-based e-commerce in ındonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 543-551.
  • Schor, J. B. ve Fitzmaurice, C. J. (2015). Collaborating and Connecting: The Emergence of the Sharing Economy. In Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Sordi, J. D., Perin, M. G., Petrini, M. D. C. ve Sampaio, C. H. (2018). Construal level and collaborative consumption: an exploratory approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(2), 264-273.
  • Tussyadiah, I. P. (2015). An Exploratory Study on Drivers and Deterrents of Collaborative Consumption in Travel. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015, 817-830. Cham: Springer.
  • Wang, S. M., ve Lin, J. C. C. (2011). The Effect of Social Influence on Bloggers' Usage Intention. Online Information Review.
  • Yakın, V. (2018). Paylaşım Ekonomisi: Tanımı ve Sınıflandırmaları. Ay, C., Yakın, V. ve Kacar, A. İ. (Ed.). Paylaşım Ekonomisi içinde. (19-30). Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi
  • Yang, S. B., Lee, H., Lee, K. ve Koo, C. (2018). The application of aristotle’s rhetorical theory to the sharing economy: an empirical study of airbnb. Journal of Travel ve Tourism Marketing, 35(7), 938-957.
  • Yoon, S. J. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of trust in online-purchase decisions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 47–63.
APA Özer Çizer E, MUCAN B (2021). ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ. , 1 - 25. 10.30798/makuiibf.691529
Chicago Özer Çizer Ece,MUCAN BURCU ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ. (2021): 1 - 25. 10.30798/makuiibf.691529
MLA Özer Çizer Ece,MUCAN BURCU ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ. , 2021, ss.1 - 25. 10.30798/makuiibf.691529
AMA Özer Çizer E,MUCAN B ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ. . 2021; 1 - 25. 10.30798/makuiibf.691529
Vancouver Özer Çizer E,MUCAN B ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ. . 2021; 1 - 25. 10.30798/makuiibf.691529
IEEE Özer Çizer E,MUCAN B "ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ." , ss.1 - 25, 2021. 10.30798/makuiibf.691529
ISNAD Özer Çizer, Ece - MUCAN, BURCU. "ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ". (2021), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.691529
APA Özer Çizer E, MUCAN B (2021). ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 1 - 25. 10.30798/makuiibf.691529
Chicago Özer Çizer Ece,MUCAN BURCU ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 8, no.1 (2021): 1 - 25. 10.30798/makuiibf.691529
MLA Özer Çizer Ece,MUCAN BURCU ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.8, no.1, 2021, ss.1 - 25. 10.30798/makuiibf.691529
AMA Özer Çizer E,MUCAN B ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021; 8(1): 1 - 25. 10.30798/makuiibf.691529
Vancouver Özer Çizer E,MUCAN B ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021; 8(1): 1 - 25. 10.30798/makuiibf.691529
IEEE Özer Çizer E,MUCAN B "ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ." Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8, ss.1 - 25, 2021. 10.30798/makuiibf.691529
ISNAD Özer Çizer, Ece - MUCAN, BURCU. "ORTAK TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARIN, İKİNCİ EL E-MODA SİTELERİNİ KULLANMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ". Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 8/1 (2021), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.691529