Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 48 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 7 - 12 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.52037/eads.2021.0005 İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments

Öz:
Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of different resin cements after zirconia surface treatments Materials and Methods: A total of 60 zirconia discs (3x7mm) were prepared and divided into 3 main groups according to the surface treatments as control (C), sandblasting (SB), and tribochemical silica coating (TC). Main groups were divided into two subgroups according to two different resin cements were applied. No surface treatment was applied to the samples in C group. 50μm Al2O3 particles were applied to the samples in SB group for 10 s at a distance of 10 mm under 4 atm. TC group were tribochemically coated with alumina particles. Self-adhesive resin (ME) and multi-system dual-cure adhesive resin (NX3) was applied to the subgroups. After cementation, all samples were tested for SBS. SBS values were statistically analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.Results: Regardless of the cement type, SBS values of the surface treated samples were statistically different (p <0.001). Group SB was determined as the group with the highest SBS value. This group was followed by Group C and Group TC, respectively. The SBS values of the samples according to the resin cements and surface treatments were statistically significantly different (p<0.001). SBS values of the samples cemented with NX3 resin cement were found to be higher than the samples treated with ME resin cement.Conclusion: SB increased resin bond to zirconia. It is more advantageous to use multi-system dual cure adhesive cements in zirconia cementation.
Anahtar Kelime: Zirconia Tribochemical silica coating Resin cement Shear bond strength Surface Treatment

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Evaluating dental zirconia. Dent Mater. 2019;35(1):15–23. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.291.
  • 2. Rayyan MR. Marginal adaptation of monolithic high-translucency versus porcelain-veneered zirconia crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32(4):364–366. doi:10.11607/ijp.5985.
  • 3. Blatz MB, Chiche G, Holst S, Sadan A. Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strengths of luting agents to zirconia. Quintessence Int. 2007;38(9):745–753.
  • 4. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Adhesive cementation of high-strength ceramic restorations: Clinical and laboratory guidelines. Quintessence Dent Technol. 2003;26:47– 55.
  • 5. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered highpurity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(4):356–362. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.001.
  • 6. Maroulakos G, Thompson GA, Kontogiorgos ED. Effect of cement type on the clinical performance and complications of zirconia and lithium disilicate tooth-supported crowns: A systematic review. Report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the American Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(5):754– 765. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.011.
  • 7. Örtorp A, Kihl ML, Carlsson GE. A 3-year retrospective and clinical follow-up study of zirconia single crowns performed in a private practice. J Dent. 2009;37(9):731–736. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.002.
  • 8. Lawson NC, Jurado CA, Huang C, Morris GP, Burgess JO, Liu P, et al. Effect of surface treatment and cement on fracture load of traditional zirconia (3Y), translucent zirconia (5Y), and lithium disilicate crowns. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(6):659–665. doi:10.1111/jopr.13088.
  • 9. Burke F, Fleming GJ, Nathanson D, Marquis PM. Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4(1):7– 22.
  • 10. Keshvad A, Hakimaneh SMR. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to silica-based and Y-TZP ceramics using different surface treatments. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(1):67– 74.
  • 11. Chen L, Suh BI, Kim J, Tay FR. Evaluation of silica-coating techniques for zirconia bonding. Am J Dent. 2011;24(2):79– 84.
  • 12. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(3):268–274. doi:10.1067/mpr.2003.50.
  • 13. Kohal R, Klaus G, Strub JR. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(5):565–571. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01252.x.
  • 14. Özcan M. The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(5):469–472.
  • 15. Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003;19(8):725–731. doi:10.1016/s0109- 5641(03)00019-8.
  • 16. Al-Akhali M, Al-Dobaei E, Wille S, Mourshed B, Kern M. Influence of elapsed time between airborne-particle abrasion and bonding to zirconia bond strength. Dent Mater. 2021;37(3):516–522. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2020.12.010.
  • 17. Kara HB, Dilber E, Koc O, Ozturk AN, Bulbul M. Effect of different surface treatments on roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27(2):267–272. doi:10.1007/s10103-010-0860-3.
  • 18. Özcan M, Valandro LF, Amaral R, Leite F, Bottino MA. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems. Dent Mater. 2009;25(12):1477–1483.
  • 19. Nagaoka N, Yoshihara K, Tamada Y, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Ultrastructure and bonding properties of tribochemical silica-coated zirconia. Dent Mater J. 2018;38(1):2017–397. doi:10.4012/dmj.2017-397.
  • 20. Blum IR, Nikolinakos N, Lynch CD, Wilson NH, Millar BJ, Jagger DC. An in vitro comparison of four intraoral ceramic repair systems. J Dent. 2012;40(11):906–912. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.008.
  • 21. Bottino MA, Valandro LF, Scotti R, Buso L. Effect of surface treatments on the resin bond to zirconium-based ceramic. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18(1):60–65.
  • 22. Qeblawi DM, Muñoz CA, Brewer JD, Monaco Jr EA. The effect of zirconia surface treatment on flexural strength and shear bond strength to a resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103(4):210–220. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60033- 9.
  • 23. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(6):430–436. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.016.
  • 24. Blatz M, Vonderheide M, Conejo J. The effect of resin bonding on long-term success of highstrength ceramics. J Dent Res. 2018;97(2):132–139. doi:10.1177/0022034517729134.
  • 25. Moon JE, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS, Ha SR. Effects of airborne-particle abrasion protocol choice on the surface characteristics of monolithic zirconia materials and the shear bond strength of resin cement. Ceram Int. 2016;42(1):1552–1562. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.104.
  • 26. Phark JH, Duarte Jr S, Blatz M, Sadan A. An in vitro evaluation of the long-term resin bond to a new densely sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic surface. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(1):29–38. doi:10.1016/S0022- 3913(08)60286-3.
  • 27. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(3):265–273. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.027.
  • 28. Brentel AS, Özcan M, Valandro LF, Alarça LG, Amaral R, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldpathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. Dent Mater. 2007;23(11):1323–1331. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.011.
  • 29. Dérand P, Dérand T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13(2):131–135.
  • 30. Wegner SM, Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2000;2(2):139–147.
  • 31. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater. 2007;23(1):45–50. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.040.
  • 32. Hummel M, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to the alumina ceramic Procera. Dent Mater. 2004;20(5):498–508. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2003.10.014.
  • 33. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Malament KA, Thompson VP, Rekow ED. Damage accumulation and fatigue life of particleabraded ceramics. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19(5):442–448.
  • 34. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;71(2):381–386. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.30097.
  • 35. Oyagüe RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M, Osorio R. Effect of water aging on microtensile bond strength of dual-cured resin cements to pretreated sintered zirconium-oxide ceramics. Dent Mater. 2009;25(3):392–399. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.002.
  • 36. Yang B, Barloi A, Kern M. Influence of air-abrasion on zirconia ceramic bonding using an adhesive composite resin. Dent Mater. 2010;26(1):44–50. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.008.
  • 37. Kern M. Resin bonding to oxide ceramics for dental restorations. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2009;23(7-8):1097–1111.
  • 38. Matinlinna JP, Heikkinen T, Özcan M, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Evaluation of resin adhesion to zirconia ceramic using some organosilanes. Dent Mater. 2006;22(9):824–831. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.035.
  • 39. Aboushelib MN, Mirmohamadi H, Matinlinna JP, Kukk E, Ounsi HF, Salameh Z. Innovations in bonding to zirconia-based materials. Part II: Focusing on chemical interactions. Dent Mater. 2009;25(8):989–993. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.011.
  • 40. Lorente MC, Scherrer SS, Richard J, Demellayer R, AmezDroz M, Wiskott HA. Surface roughness and EDS characterization of a Y-TZP dental ceramic treated with the CoJet™ Sand. Dent Mater. 2010;26(11):1035–1042. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.06.005.
  • 41. Nishigawa G, Maruo Y, Irie M, Oka M, Yoshihara K, Minagi S, et al. Ultrasonic cleaning of silica-coated zirconia influences bond strength between zirconia and resin luting material. Dent Mater J. 2008;27(6):842–848. doi:10.4012/dmj.27.842.
  • 42. Heikkinen T, Matinlinna J, Vallittu P, Lassila L. Effect of primers and resins on the shear bond strength of resin composite to zirconia. SRX Dentistry. 2010;2010.
  • 43. Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Pilot evaluation of resin composite cement adhesion to zirconia using a novel silane system. Acta Odontol Scand. 2007;65(1):44– 51. doi:10.1080/00016350600973060.
  • 44. Lee BS, Lin YC, Chen SF, Chen SY, Chang CC. Influence of calcium hydroxide dressing and acid etching on the push-out bond strengths of three luting resins to root canal dentin. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):489–498. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-0996-1.
  • 45. Lambrechts P, Inokoishi S, van Meerbeck B, William G, Braem M, Vanherle G. Classification and Potential of Composite Luting Materials. Berlin, Germany: Quintessence; pp 61–90.; 1991.
  • 46. Papia E, Larsson C, du Toit M, von Steyern PV. Bonding between oxide ceramics and adhesive cement systems: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(2):395–413. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.33013.
APA hayran y, KUSCU S, sarıkaya ı (2021). Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments. , 7 - 12. 10.52037/eads.2021.0005
Chicago hayran yeliz,KUSCU Suha,sarıkaya ışıl Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments. (2021): 7 - 12. 10.52037/eads.2021.0005
MLA hayran yeliz,KUSCU Suha,sarıkaya ışıl Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments. , 2021, ss.7 - 12. 10.52037/eads.2021.0005
AMA hayran y,KUSCU S,sarıkaya ı Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments. . 2021; 7 - 12. 10.52037/eads.2021.0005
Vancouver hayran y,KUSCU S,sarıkaya ı Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments. . 2021; 7 - 12. 10.52037/eads.2021.0005
IEEE hayran y,KUSCU S,sarıkaya ı "Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments." , ss.7 - 12, 2021. 10.52037/eads.2021.0005
ISNAD hayran, yeliz vd. "Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments". (2021), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2021.0005
APA hayran y, KUSCU S, sarıkaya ı (2021). Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments. European annals of dental sciences (Online), 48(1), 7 - 12. 10.52037/eads.2021.0005
Chicago hayran yeliz,KUSCU Suha,sarıkaya ışıl Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments. European annals of dental sciences (Online) 48, no.1 (2021): 7 - 12. 10.52037/eads.2021.0005
MLA hayran yeliz,KUSCU Suha,sarıkaya ışıl Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments. European annals of dental sciences (Online), vol.48, no.1, 2021, ss.7 - 12. 10.52037/eads.2021.0005
AMA hayran y,KUSCU S,sarıkaya ı Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments. European annals of dental sciences (Online). 2021; 48(1): 7 - 12. 10.52037/eads.2021.0005
Vancouver hayran y,KUSCU S,sarıkaya ı Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments. European annals of dental sciences (Online). 2021; 48(1): 7 - 12. 10.52037/eads.2021.0005
IEEE hayran y,KUSCU S,sarıkaya ı "Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments." European annals of dental sciences (Online), 48, ss.7 - 12, 2021. 10.52037/eads.2021.0005
ISNAD hayran, yeliz vd. "Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements after Zirconia Surface Treatments". European annals of dental sciences (Online) 48/1 (2021), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2021.0005