The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 94 - 102 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.30910/ turkjans.747031 İndeks Tarihi: 28-09-2021
The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops
Öz: This study was conducted to explore the effects of different forage types (fresh, hay and silage) on thechemical composition, forage quality and in vitro true digestibility (IVTD) of fodder turnip (Brassica rapa),fodder mustard (Brassica nigra) and canola (Brassica napus L.). Ankom Daisy incubator was used to determinethe IVTD and forages were incubated for 48 hours. According to the findings of this study, canola silage andmustard silage have the highest ether extract (EE) content, while mustard silage has the highest crude protein(CP) content (P<0.001). It was found that, among the samples, turnip silage has the highest value in terms ofneutral detergent fiber (NDF) content; mustard grass, turnip grass and canola hay have higher values in termsof lignin content while mustard silage has the lowest lignin content. As a result, it was concluded that grass,hay and silage obtained from Brassica fodder crops could be used as alternative forage souces. However, use ofBrassica silages is recommended in ruminant nutrition.
Anahtar Kelime: Bazı Brassica Grubu Yem Bitkilerinin Yem Değeri ve Sindirilebilirlikleri Üzerine Farklı Kaba Yem Tipinin Etkileri
Öz: Bu çalışma, Brassica grubu yem bitkilerinden yemlik şalgam (Brassica rapa), yemlik hardal (Brassica nigra) ve kanola (Brassica napus L.) bitkilerinde farklı kaba yem tiplerinin (taze ot, kuru ot ve silaj) besin madde içerikleri, kaba yem kaliteleri ve in vitro gerçek sindirilebilirlikleri (IVGS) üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yürütülmüştür. IVGS’nin belirlenmesinde Ankom Daisy inkübatör kullanılmış ve yemler 48 saat süre ile inkübasyona bırakılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler tek yönlü varyans analizi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma bulgularına göre; yemler arasında ham yağ (HY) içeriği bakımından en yüksek değerleri kanola silajları ve hardal silajları gösterirken, ham protein (HP) içeriği bakımından en yüksek değeri ise hardal silajları göstermiştir (P<0.001). Yemlerde NDF içeriği bakımından en yüksek değeri şalgam silajı, lignin içerikleri bakımından en düşük değeri hardal silajı, en yüksek değerleri ise hardal taze otu, şalgam taze otu ve kanola kuru otlarının gösterdiği saptanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, çalışmada kullanılan Brassica grubu yem bitkilerinin taze ot, kuru ot ve silajlarının alternatif kaba yem kaynağı olarak kullanılabileceği kanaatine varılmıştır. Ancak, bu konuda kapsamlı in vivo çalışmaların yapılması ve ruminant beslemede brassica silajlarının kullanılması önerilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- AOAC. 1998. Officinal methods of analysis. 16th Edition, AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
- AOCS. 2005. Official procedure, approved procedure Am 5-04, Rapid determination of oil/fat utilizing high temperature solvent extraction. American Oil Chemists Society, Urbana, IL.
- Ankom Technology 2005. In vitro true digestibility using th Daisy II Incubator. Available from http://www.ankom.com/media/documents /IVDMD_0805D200.pdf. Accessed:13.09.2010.
- Anonymous, 2006. Dairy industry drought response. feeding canola hay&silage. Available from http://www.dairyaustralia.com.au/files7Dro ught/canola_hay_silage_bulletin_no_8. pdf Accessed:29.11.2006
- Armstrong, R.H., Beattie, M.M., Robertson, E. 1993. Intake and digestibility of components of forage rape (Brassica napus) by sheep. Grass and Forage Science. 48 (4):410-415. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1993.tb01875.x
- Barry, T.N. 2013. The feding value of forage Brassica plants for grazing ruminant livestock. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 181,15-25.
- Buxton, D. R. 1996. Quality related characteristics of forages as influenced by plant environment and agronomic factors. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 59:37-49.
- Canbolat O. 2013. Effect of maturity stage on the potential nutritive value of canola (Brassica napus L.) hays. Journal of Veterinary Faculty of Ankara Univ 60 (2). 145-150.
- Canbolat, O.,Kara, H., Filya, I. 2013. Comparison of in vitro gas production, metabolizable energy, organic matter digestibility and microbial protein production of some legume hays. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag Univ. 27(2):71-81.
- Chaudhry, A. S. 1998. Chemical and biological procedures to upgrade cereal straw for ruminants. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews. Series B. 68:319-331.
- Doane, P. H., P. Schofield and A. N. Pell. 1997. Neutral detergent fibre disappearance, gas and volatile fatty acids production during the in vitro fermentation of six forages. Journal of Animal Science. 75:3342-3352.
- Filya, I. 2001. Silage Technology. Hakan Press. Izmir-Turkey.
- Fraser, M.D., Winters, A., Fychan, R., Davies, D.R., Jones, R. 2001. The effect of harvest date and inoculation on the yield, fermentation characteristics and feeding value of kale silage. Grass and Forage Science. 56(2):151– 161. Doi:10.1046/j.1365-494.2001.00262.x
- Hall, M.H., Jung, J. 2008. Use of Brassica Crops to Extend the Grazing Season. Available from http://extension.psu.edu/plants/crops/fora ges/species/use-of-Brassica-crops-toextend-the-grazingseason/extension_publication_file [Accessed date:20.04.2016] Penn State Extension.The Pennsylvania State University.
- Kamalak, A., Canbolat, O., Gurbuz, Y., Ozkan, C. O., Kizilsimsek, M. 2005. Determination of nutritive value of wild mustard, Sinapsis arvensis harvested at different maturity stages using in situ and in vitro measurements. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science. 18(9), 1249-1254.
- Kaur, R., Garcia, S.C., Fulkerson, W.J., Barchia, I. 2009. Utilisation of forage rape (Brassica napus) and Persian clover (Trifolium resupinatum) diets by sheep: effects on whole tract digestibility and Rumen parameters. Animal Production Science 50(1)59-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EA08309
- Kaya I., Sahin T., Elmali D.A., Ünal Y. 2011. The effects of grazing and concentrate supplementation at pasture on performance and rumen parameters in lambs. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 17 (5): 693-697, 2011. DOI:10.9775/kvfd.2011.3699
- Kilic, U. 2009. Using canola forage as roughage source in ruminant nutrition. Journal of Lalahan Livestock Research Institute. 49 (2) 125-135.
- Kilic, U., Erisek, A. 2019. Effects of Additive Use on Silage Quality and in vitro Digestibility of Some Brassica silages. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2019, 6(11):163- 171. Available from http://jsaer.com/download/vol-6-iss-11- 2019/JSAER2019-6-11-163-171.pdf
- Leep, R. 2007. Forage Brassicas for supplementing pasture slumps. Available from http://www.ipm.msu.edu/pdf/drought_fora ge_Brassicas.pdf Accessed: 01.02.2009.
- Markham, R. 1942. A steam distilation apparatus suitable for micro-kjeldahl analysis. Biochemical Journal. Pp. 36:790.
- Mishra, A. S., O. H. Chaturvedi, Ananta, R. Khali, A. Prasad, A. K. Santra, S. Misra and R. C. Parthasarathy. 2000. Effect of sodium hydroxide and alkaline hydrogen peroxide treatment on physical and chemical characteristics and IVOMD of mustard straw. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 84:257-264.
- Moorby, J.M., Evans, P.R., Young, N.E. 2003. Nutritive value of barley/kale bi-crop silage for lactating dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science. 58,184-191.
- Norton B.W. 2003.The nutritive value of tree legumes. Available from http://www.fao.org/ ag/ AGP /AGPC/doc/Pub/licat/Guttshel/x5556e0j.ht m , pp. 1-10. Accessed::23.10 2003.
- Pritchard, F., Jones, D., McCaffery, D., O’Keeffe, K., Potter, T., Burton, W. 2008. A Bright future for canola & reducing risks in 2008. IREC Farmers’ Newsletter, No.178, Autumn 2008. 14-17.
- Rohweder, D. A., Barnes, R. E., Jorgensen, N. 1978. Proposed hay grading standartsbased on laboratory analysis for evaluating quality. Journal of Animal Science. 47: 747-759.
- Sahin T, Kaya O, Elmali D.A., Kaya I. 2013. Effects of dietary supplementation with distiller dried grain with solubles in growing lambs on growth, nutrient digestibility and rumen parameters. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire. 164 (4): 173-178.
- Sun, X.Z., Waghorn, G.C., Hoskin, S.O., Harrison, S.J., Muetzel,S., Pacheco, D. 2012. Methane emissions from sheep fed fresh Brassicas compared to prennial ryegrass. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 176,107-116.
- Vaithiyanathan, S., S. K. S. Raghuvanshi, A. S. Mishra, M. K. Tripathi, A. K. Misra, R. Prasad and R. C. Jakhmola. 2003. Effect of feeding chemically treated mustard (Brassica campestris) straw on rumen fibre degrading enzymes in sheep. Asian-Aust. Journal of Animal Science. 16(11):1610-1613.
- Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., Levis, B. A. 1991. Method for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74:3583-3597.
- Westwood, C. T., Mulcock, H. 2012. Nutritional evaluation of five species of forage Brassica. In Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 74:31-38.
| APA | KILIC U, ERISEK A, GARIPOĞLU A, AYAN İ, ONDER H (2021). The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops. , 94 - 102. 10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
| Chicago | KILIC Unal,ERISEK Abdulkadir,GARIPOĞLU Ali Vaiz,AYAN İlknur,ONDER Hasan The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops. (2021): 94 - 102. 10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
| MLA | KILIC Unal,ERISEK Abdulkadir,GARIPOĞLU Ali Vaiz,AYAN İlknur,ONDER Hasan The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops. , 2021, ss.94 - 102. 10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
| AMA | KILIC U,ERISEK A,GARIPOĞLU A,AYAN İ,ONDER H The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops. . 2021; 94 - 102. 10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
| Vancouver | KILIC U,ERISEK A,GARIPOĞLU A,AYAN İ,ONDER H The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops. . 2021; 94 - 102. 10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
| IEEE | KILIC U,ERISEK A,GARIPOĞLU A,AYAN İ,ONDER H "The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops." , ss.94 - 102, 2021. 10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
| ISNAD | KILIC, Unal vd. "The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops". (2021), 94-102. https://doi.org/10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
| APA | KILIC U, ERISEK A, GARIPOĞLU A, AYAN İ, ONDER H (2021). The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 94 - 102. 10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
| Chicago | KILIC Unal,ERISEK Abdulkadir,GARIPOĞLU Ali Vaiz,AYAN İlknur,ONDER Hasan The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 8, no.1 (2021): 94 - 102. 10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
| MLA | KILIC Unal,ERISEK Abdulkadir,GARIPOĞLU Ali Vaiz,AYAN İlknur,ONDER Hasan The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.8, no.1, 2021, ss.94 - 102. 10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
| AMA | KILIC U,ERISEK A,GARIPOĞLU A,AYAN İ,ONDER H The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi. 2021; 8(1): 94 - 102. 10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
| Vancouver | KILIC U,ERISEK A,GARIPOĞLU A,AYAN İ,ONDER H The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi. 2021; 8(1): 94 - 102. 10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
| IEEE | KILIC U,ERISEK A,GARIPOĞLU A,AYAN İ,ONDER H "The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops." Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 8, ss.94 - 102, 2021. 10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
| ISNAD | KILIC, Unal vd. "The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops". Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 8/1 (2021), 94-102. https://doi.org/10.30910/ turkjans.747031 |
