The Evaluation of The Relationships Between Subjective Well-Being Level of Married Individuals, Humor Styles, Satisfaction of Basic Psychological Needs, and Marital Adjustment

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 58 Sayfa Aralığı: 435 - 455 Metin Dili: İngilizce

The Evaluation of The Relationships Between Subjective Well-Being Level of Married Individuals, Humor Styles, Satisfaction of Basic Psychological Needs, and Marital Adjustment

Öz:
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between subjective well-being in married individuals, humor styles, and basic psychological satisfaction with marital adjustment. The data of the research group were collected from 698 married individuals working in the public and private sector in 2018. In collecting the research data, Life Satisfaction Scale, Positive-Negative Affectivity Scale, Humor Styles Scale, Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale, Marital Adjustment Scale are used. In the findings, there is a full mediator role in both marital adjustment and psychological need satisfaction in the relationship between compatible humor sense and subjective well-being. There is also a total mediator role both in marital adjustment and psychological satisfaction in the relationship between incompatible humor style and subjective well-being. The results were evaluated and discussed in the context of theoretical knowledge.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular:
Sosyal > Sosyal > Psikoloji

Evli Bireylerin Öznel İyi Oluş Düzeyleri ile Mizah Tarzları, Temel Psikolojik İhtiyaçlarının Doyumu ve Evlilik Uyumu Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın temel amacı; evli bireylerde öznel iyi oluş ve mizah tarzları, temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların doyumu ile evlilik uyumu arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektir. Araştırma grubunun verileri, 2018 yılında Yalova ilinde yaşayan, kamu ve özel sektörde çalışan 698 evli bireyden toplanmıştır. Verilerin toplanmasında, Yaşam Doyumu Ölçeği, Olumlu-Olumsuz Duygulanım Ölçeği, Mizah Tarzları Ölçeği, Temel Psikolojik İhtiyaçlar Doyumu Ölçeği ve Evlilik Uyumu Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular; uyumlu mizah tarzları ile öznel iyi oluş arasındaki ilişkide hem evlilik uyumu hem de psikolojik ihtiyaç doyumunun tam aracı rolü olduğu, ayrıca uyumsuz mizah tarzları ile öznel iyi oluş arasındaki ilişkide de hem evlilik uyumunun hem de psikolojik ihtiyaç doyumunun tam aracı olduğu şeklindedir. Sonuçlar, kuramsal bilgiler ve yapılan araştırmalar bağlamında değerlendirilip tartışılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular:
Sosyal > Sosyal > Psikoloji
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Baumeister, R.F. & Leary, M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
  • Bayram, N. (2013). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş amos uygulamaları. Ankara: Ezgi Kitabevi.
  • Beach, S. R. H., Katz, J., Kim, S. & Brody, G. H. (2013). Prospective effects of marital satisfaction on depressive symptoms in established marriages: A dyadic model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20(1), 355-371.
  • Bentler, P.M.,& Yuan, K.H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(2), 181-197.
  • Bookwala J. (2012). Marriage and other partnered relationships in middle and late adulthood. In R. Blieszner & V. H. Bedford (Eds.), Handbook of families and aging(pp. 91-123). California, CA: Praeger.
  • Bubić, A.,& Ercegonovac, N. (2015). The relevance of cognitive styles for understanding individuals’ cognitive functioning. Suvremena psihologija, 18(2), 159-174.
  • Canbulat, N.,&Çankaya, Z. (2014). Evli bireylerin öznel iyi olma düzeylerinin yordanması. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 15(2), 556-576.
  • Cann, A.,& Collette, C. (2014). Sense of humor, stable affect, and psychological well-being. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 464-479.
  • Cann, A., Zapata, C.L.,& Davis, H.B. (2011). Humor style and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: Perceived versus self-reported humor styles as predictors of satisfaction. Humor, 24(1), 1-20.
  • Carr, D., Freedman, V. A., Cornman, J. C., & Schwarz, N. (2014). Happy marriage, happy life? Marital quality and subjective well‐ being in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(5), 930-948.
  • Chmielewska, M. (2012). Marital quality in the context of interpersonal dependency. Economics & Socialogy, 5(2), 58- 74. Cihangir Çankaya, Z. (2009).Özerklik desteği, temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların doyumu ve öznel iyi olma: Öz-belirleme kuramı.Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(31), 23-31.
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
  • Deci, E., Ryan, R., Gagne, M, Lronr, D., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation and well-being in the work organizasions of a former esatern bloc country: a cross-cultural study of self determination. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin, 27 (8), 930-942.
  • DiDomenico, S.R. (2012). Laughing matters: The impact of family humor on associations between family communication environments and family satisfaction. USA: ProQuest LLC.
  • Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., & Smith, H.L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.
  • Dush, C.M., Taylor, M.G., & Kroeger, R.A. (2008). Marital happiness and psychological well-being across the life course. Family Relations, 57(2), 211-226.
  • Esmaili, S.S., Mohammadi A.Z., & Hakami M. (2016). Predicting marital satisfaction on the basis of early maladaptive schema in married women. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences, 5(6), 262- 270.
  • Fenwick, T.,& Bierema, L. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Issues for human resouerce development professionals. International Journal of Training and Development, 12(1), 24-35.
  • Fidanoğlu, O. (2006). Evlilik uyumu, mizah tarzı ve kaygı düzeyi arasındaki ilişki (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Fincham, F.D., Hall, J.H., & Beach, S.R.H. (2006). Forgiveness in marriage: Current status and future directions. Family Relations, 55(4), 415-427.
  • Gottman, J.M.,& Krokoff, L.J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 47-52.
  • Gottman, J.M.,& Notarius, C.I. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 737-745.
  • Gove, W.M.,& Shin, H. (1989). The psychological well-being of divorced and widowed men and women an empirical analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 10(1), 122-144.
  • Güngör, H.C.,& İlhan, T. (2008). Evlilik uyumu ve mizah tarzları arasındaki ilişkiler. Aile ve Toplum Dergisi, 4(13), 97-106. Hampes, W. P. (2005). Correlations between humor styles and loneliness. Psychological Reports, 96(3), 747-750.
  • Jöreskog, K.G.,& Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User’s guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science, 30(312), 1908–1910.
  • Kasapoğlu, F. Kutlu, M.,& Durmuş, E. (2017). Evli bireylerde kişilerarası ilişki tarzı ile evlilik doyumu arasındaki ilişki: Evlilikte özyeterlik algısının aracı rolü. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 5(11), 469-487.
  • Kim, K.H.,& McKenry, P.C. (2002). The relationship between marriage and psychological well-being: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 23(3), 885-911.
  • Koerner, N., Tallon, K., & Kusec, A. (2015). Maladaptive core beliefs and their relation to generalized anxiety disorder. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 44(6), 441-455.
  • Leech, N.L., Barrett, K.C., & Morgan, G.A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics; Use and interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Lyubomirsky, S., King, L.A., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803-855.
  • Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review (2000), 50(4), 370-396.
  • McBrien, R.J. (1993). Laughing together: Humor as encouragement in couples counseling. Individual Psychology: Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research & Practice, 49(4), 419-427.
  • Miller, R.B., Hollist, C.S., Olsen, J., & Law, D. (2013). Marital quality and health over 20 years: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(3), 667-680.
  • Raykov, T.,& Marcoulides, G.A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Ruch, W.,& Heintz, S. (2012). Humour styles, personality and psychological well-being: What’s humour got to do with it? European Journal of Humour Research, 1(4), 1-24.
  • Ryan, M.,& Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of instrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
  • Sancaktar, N. (2016). Yeni evlenen ve uzun süredir evli olan çiftlerin evlilikte problem çözme becerisi düzeylerinin öznel iyi oluş ve evlilik doyumu düzeyleri ile ilişkisinin incelenmesi (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Beykent Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Shackelford, T.K. (2001). Self-esteem in marriage. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(3), 371-390.
  • Shapiro, A., Keyes, M., & Lee, C. (2008). Marital status and social well-being: Are the married always better off? Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 239-346.
  • Soulsby, L.K.,& Bennett, K.M. (2015). Marriage and psychological wellbeing: The role of social support. Psychology, 6, 1349-1359.
  • Stevens, J.P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York: Routledge.
  • Şimşek, Ö.F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınları.
  • Tabachnick, B.G.,& Fidell, L.S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Tarhan, N. (2014). Son sığınak aile (21.Baskı). İstanbul: Nesil Yayın Grubu.
  • TÜİK, (2012). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Haber Bülteni, 2013. Retrieved July 18, 2017 from http://www. tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=13662.
  • TÜİK,(2015). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Haber Bülteni, 2016. Retrieved July 23, 2017 from www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=2157.
  • Veldrole-Brogan, A., Bradford, K., & Vail, A. (2010). The missing link: Marital virtues and their relationship to individual functioning, communication, and relationship adjustment. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 281- 293.
  • Voss, K., Markiewicz, D., & Doyle, A.B. (1999). Friendship, marriage and self-esteem. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(1), 103-122.
  • Whisman, M.A, Uebelacker, L.A.,& Weinstock, L.M. (2004). Psychopathology and marital satisfaction: The importance of evaluating both partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(5), 830-838.
  • Wilkins, J.,& Eisenbraun, A.J. (2009). Humor theories and the physiological benefits of laughter. Holistis Nursing Practice, 23(6), 349-354.
  • Williams, M.A. (1977). The quantity and quality of marital interaction related to marital satisfaction: A behavioral analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, USA.
  • Woo, H.,& Kelly Raley, R. (2009). The effects of marriage on psychological well-being focusing on parental status prior to marriage.Retrieved July 27, 2017 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/
  • Young, J.E.,& Klosko, J.S. (2016). Hayatı yeniden keşfedin (9. Bs.). İstanbul: Psikonet Yayınları.
  • Zararsız, Y. (2016). Evli ve boşanmış kişilerin depresyon, öznel iyi oluş ve geleceğe umutla bakış açısından karşılaştırılması (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Ziv, A.,& Gaddish, O. (1989). Humor and marital satisfaction. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129(6), 759-768.
APA DEMİRCİ M, ODACI H (2020). The Evaluation of The Relationships Between Subjective Well-Being Level of Married Individuals, Humor Styles, Satisfaction of Basic Psychological Needs, and Marital Adjustment. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 10(58), 435 - 455.
Chicago DEMİRCİ Meryem Kulaber,ODACI Hatice The Evaluation of The Relationships Between Subjective Well-Being Level of Married Individuals, Humor Styles, Satisfaction of Basic Psychological Needs, and Marital Adjustment. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi 10, no.58 (2020): 435 - 455.
MLA DEMİRCİ Meryem Kulaber,ODACI Hatice The Evaluation of The Relationships Between Subjective Well-Being Level of Married Individuals, Humor Styles, Satisfaction of Basic Psychological Needs, and Marital Adjustment. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, vol.10, no.58, 2020, ss.435 - 455.
AMA DEMİRCİ M,ODACI H The Evaluation of The Relationships Between Subjective Well-Being Level of Married Individuals, Humor Styles, Satisfaction of Basic Psychological Needs, and Marital Adjustment. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi. 2020; 10(58): 435 - 455.
Vancouver DEMİRCİ M,ODACI H The Evaluation of The Relationships Between Subjective Well-Being Level of Married Individuals, Humor Styles, Satisfaction of Basic Psychological Needs, and Marital Adjustment. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi. 2020; 10(58): 435 - 455.
IEEE DEMİRCİ M,ODACI H "The Evaluation of The Relationships Between Subjective Well-Being Level of Married Individuals, Humor Styles, Satisfaction of Basic Psychological Needs, and Marital Adjustment." Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 10, ss.435 - 455, 2020.