Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış

Özge Gizem CABADAĞ, (Pamukkale Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Denizli, Türkiye)
Tuğba MİSİLLİ, (Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Çanakkale, Türkiye)
Nihan GÖNÜLO (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Samsun, Türkiye)
Selcuk Dental Journal
14 2
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 220 - 228 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.15311/selcukdentj.439067 İndeks Tarihi: 03-10-2021

Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış

Öz:
Günümüzde, rezin esaslı kompozitler; matriks, doldurucu ve başlatıcı teknolojilerindeki gelişmelerden dolayı posterior dişler için en popüler restoratif materyallerdir. Geçtiğimiz birkaç yılda ise kompozit rezinlerdeki güncel gelişmeler, bulk-fill kompozitleri restoratif diş hekimliğine kazandırmış olup, bu alandaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Bulk fill kompozitler arasında doldurucu miktarı, inorganik partikül boyutları ve morfolojileri, monomer tipi ve fotobaşlatıcı kimyalarına bağlı belirgin farklılıklar mevcuttur. Tüm bu farklılıklar bulk-fill kompozitlerin polimerizasyon derinliği, dönüşüm derecesi, marjinal bütünlük, biyouyumluluk, mekanik ve fiziksel özellikleri üzerinde belirgin etkilere sahiptir.Bu derlemenin amacı; klinik kullanımları gün geçtikçe artan bulk-fill kompozitler hakkındaki genel bilgiler ile literatürde yer almış olan in vivo ve in vitro çalışmaları irdeleyerek okuyucunun bilgisine sunmaktır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Current Overview of Bulk-fill Composites

Öz:
Nowadays, resin-based composites are the most popular restorative materials for posterior teeth due to improvements in matrix, filler and initiator technologies. Over the past few years, developments in the field of resin-based composites have brought bulk-fill composites to the restorative dentistry, and studies in this area are continuing. Bulk-fill composites have significant differences depending on filler amount, inorganic particle size and morphologies, monomer type and photoinitiator chemistry. All these differences have a significant effect on the depth of cure, degree of conversion, marginal integrity, biocompatibility, mechanical and physical properties of bulk-fill composites. The purpose of this study is to provide general knowledge about bulk-fill composites which are increasingly used clinically and to inform reader about in vivo and in vitro studies which are included in the literature.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Arıkan S. Posterior kompozit restorasyonlar. Cumhuriyet Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2005;8:63-70.
  • 2. Duarte S Jr, Saad JR. Marginal adaptation of class ii adhesive restorations. Quintessence Int 2008;39:413-8.
  • 3. Kwon Y, Ferracane J, Lee IB. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites. Dent Mater 2012;28:801-9.
  • 4. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D’Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 2003;31:395-405.
  • 5. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 2010;89:1063-7.
  • 6. Leprince JG, Leveque P, Nysten B, Gallez B, Devaux J, Leloup G. New insight into the “depth of cure” of dimethacrylate-based dental composites. Dent Mater 2012;28;512-20.
  • 7. Shortall AC, Palin WM, Burtscher P. Refractive index mismatch and monomer reactivity influence composite curing depth. J Dent Res 2008;87:84-8.
  • 8. Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling. Dent Mater 2008;24:1501-5.
  • 9. Abbas G, Fleming GJP, Harrington E, Shortall ACC, Burke FJT. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent 2003;31:437-44.
  • 10. El-Safty S, Silikas N, Watts DC. Creep deformation of restorative resin-composites intended for bulk-fill placement. Dent Mater 2012;28:928-35.
  • 11. Flury S, Hayoz S, Peutzfeldt A, Husler J, Lussi A. Depth of cure of resin composites: is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials? Dent Mater 2012;28:521-8.
  • 12. Ilie N, Kessler A, Durner J. Influence of various irradiation processes on the mechanical properties and polymerisation kinetics of bulk-fill resin based composites. J Dent 2013a;41:695-702.
  • 13. Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assesment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent 2013b;38:618-25.
  • 14. Ilie N, Stark K. Curing behavior of high viscosity bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014;42:977-85.
  • 15. Kim RJ, Kim YJ, Choi NS, Lee IB. Polymerization shrinkage, modulus, and shrinkage stress related to tooth-restoration interfacial debonding in bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2015;43:430-9.
  • 16. Tarle Z, Attin T, Marovic D, Andermatt L, Ristic M, Tauböck TT. Influence of irradiation time on subsurface degree of conversion and microhardness of high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Clin Oral Invest 2015;19:831-40.
  • 17. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014;42:993-1000.
  • 18. Bucuta S, Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Invest. 2014; 18: 1991-2000.
  • 19. Ivoclar Vivadent Pty Ltd. Scientific documentation Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill. http://www.ivoclarvivadent.us/en-us/composites/restorative-materials/tetric-evoceram-bulk-fill Son erişim tarihi: 09.11.2015.
  • 20. Moszner N, Fischer UK, Ganster B, Liska R, Rheinberger V. Benzoyl germanium derivatives as novel visible light photoinitiators for dental materials. Dent Mater 2008;24:901-7.
  • 21. Arikawa H, Kanie T, Fujii K, Takahashi H, Ban S. Effect of filler properties in composite resins on light transmittance characteristics and color. Dent Mater J 2007;26:38-44.
  • 22. Goracci C, Cadenaro M, Fontanive L, Giangrosso G, Juloski J, Vichi A, et al. Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites. Dent Mater 2014;30:688-94.
  • 23. Omran TA, Garoushi S, Abdulmajeed AA, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Influence of increment thickness on dentin bond strength and light transmission of composite base materials. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1717-24.
  • 24. Par M, Gamulin O, Marovic D, Klaric E, Tarle Z. Raman spectroscopic assessment of degree of conversion of bulk-fill resin composites-changes at 24 hours post cure. Oper Dent 2015;40:92-101.
  • 25. Garcia D, Yaman P, Dennison J, Neiva G. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk fill flowable composite resins. Oper Dent 2014;39:441–8.
  • 26. Ibarra ET, Lien W, Casey J, Dixon SA, Vanderwalle KS. Physical properties of a new sonically placed composite resin restorative material. Gen Dent 2015;63:51-6.
  • 27. Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:227-35.
  • 28. Zorzin J, Maier E, Harre S, Fey T, Belli R, Lohbauer U, et al. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization properties and extended light curing. Dent Mater 2015;31:293-301.
  • 29. Fleming GJ, Awan M, Cooper PR, Sloan AJ. The potential of a resin-composite to be cured to a 4mm depth. Dent Mater 2008;24:522-9.
  • 30. Ilie N, Stark K. Effect of different curing protocols on the mechanical properties of low-viscosity bulk-fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:271-9.
  • 31. Ilie N, Fleming GJP. In vitro comparison of polymerisation kinetics and the micro-mechanical properties of low and high viscosity giomers and RBC materials. J Dent 2015;43:814-22.
  • 32. Dentsply Detrey GmbH. Scientific compendium SDR. http://dentsplymea.com/products/restorative/composites/sdr Son erişim tarihi: 08.11.2015.
  • 33. 3M ESPE Dental Products. Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative technical product profile. http://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/Dental/Products/Catalog/~/Filtek-Bulk-Fill-Flowable-Restorative Son erişim tarihi: 10.11.2015.
  • 34. 3M ESPE Dental Products. Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative technical product profile. http://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/Dental/Products/Catalog/~/Filtek-Bulk-Fill-Posterior-Restorative Son erişim tarihi: 10.11.2015.
  • 35. Ivoclar Vivadent. Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill: The bulk composite without compromises. Scientific Documentation 2011:1-20.
  • 36. VOCO GmbH - The Dentalists. X-tra fil light-curing posterior filling material. http://www.voco.com/en/product/x_tra_fil/index.html Son erişim tarihi: 07.12.2016.
  • 37. Dentsply Detrey GmbH. Scientific compendium on QuiXfil. http://www.dentsplymea.com/products/restorative/composites/quixfil Son erişim tarihi: 10.11.2015.
  • 38. Garoushi S, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite. Dent Mater 2013;29:835-41.
  • 39. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on SDR technology. Dent Mater 2011;27:348-55.
  • 40. Marovic D, Tauböck TT, Attin T, Panduric V, Tarle Z. Monomer conversion and shrinkage force kinetics of low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 2014;73:474-80.
  • 41. El-Damanhoury H, Platt J. Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent 2014;39:374-82.
  • 42. Al Sunbul H, Silikas N, Watts DC. Surface and bulk properties of dental resin-composites after solvent storage. Dent Mater 2016;32:987-97.
  • 43. Benetti AR, Havndrup-Pedersen C, Honoré D, Pedersen M, Pallesen U. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. Oper Dent 2015;40:190-200.
  • 44. Jang JH, Park SH, Hwang IN. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk-fill resin composites and highly filled flowable resin. Oper Dent 2015;40:172-80.
  • 45. Shibasaki S, Takamizawa T, Nojiri K, Imai A, Tsujimoto A, Endo H, et al. Polymerization behavior and mechanical properties of high-viscosity bulk-fill and low shrinkage resin composites. Oper Dent 2017;42:177-87.
  • 46. Campos EA, Ardu S, Lefever D, Jassé FF, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Marginal adaptation of class ii cavities restored with bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014;42:575-81.
  • 47. Furness A, Tadros MY, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014;42:439–49.
  • 48. Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent 2011;39:643-7.
  • 49. Agarwal R, Hiremath H, Agarwal J, Garg A. Evaluation of cervical marginal and internal adaptation using newer bulk fill composites: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2015;18:56-61.
  • 50. Kalmowicz J, Phebus JG, Owens BM, Johnson WW, King GT. Microleakage of class i and ii composite resin restorations using a sonic-resin placement system. Oper Dent 2015;40:653-61.
  • 51. Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Dowling AH, Grufferty BF, Benetti AR, Fleming GJ. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent 2012;40:500-5.
  • 52. Webber MBF, Marin GC, Progiante PS, Lolli LF, Marson FC. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: microleakage of class ii restorations. JSCD 2014;2:15-9.
  • 53. Engelhardt F, Hahnel S, Preis V, Rosentritt M. Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:2123-30.
  • 54. Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Erickson RL, Tsujimoto A, Latta M, Miyazaki M. Localized and generalized simulated wear of resin composites. Oper Dent 2015;40:322-35.
  • 55. Kumar A, Sarthaj AS, Majumder DS. Comparative evaluation of wear resistance of cast gold with bulk-fill composites an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2018;21:302-5.
  • 56. O'neill C, Kreplak L, Rueggeberg FA, Labrie D, Shimokawa CAK, Price RB. Effect of tooth brushing on gloss retention and surface roughness of five bulk‐fill resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:59-69.
  • 57. Karadas M, Demirbuğa, S. Evaluation of color stability and surface roughness of bulk-fill resin composites and nanocomposites. Meandros Med Dent J 2017;18:199-206.
  • 58. Tanthanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B, Eiam‐O‐Pas K, Pokawattana K, Pamanee N, Thongkamkaew W, et al. Surface changes of various bulk‐fill resin‐based composites after exposure to different food‐simulating liquid and beverages. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:126-35.
  • 59. Barutcigil Ç, Barutcigil K, Özarslan MM, Dündar A, Yilmaz B. Color of bulk‐fill composite resin restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:E3-E8.
  • 60. Rigo LC, Bordin D, Fardin VP, Coelho PG, Bromage TG, Reis A, et al. Influence of polishing system on the surface roughness of flowable and regular-viscosity bulk fill composites. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018;38:79-86.
  • 61. Mansouri SA, Zidan AZ. Effect of Water Sorption and Solubility on Color Stability of Bulk-Fill Resin Composite. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19:1129-34.
  • 62. Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N. Long-term sorption and solubility of bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites in water and artificial saliva. J Dent 2015;43:1511-8.
  • 63. Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Shiflett RA, Rueggeberg F, Schuster GS. Correlation of cytotoxicity, filler loading and curing time of dental composites. Biomaterials 1991;12:737-40.
  • 64. Toh WS, Yap AUJ, Lim SY. In vitro biocompatibility of contemporary bulk-fill composites. Oper Dent 2015;40:644-52.
  • 65. Shofu Dental Corporation. Beautifil-Bulk: one bulk-fill composite-two viscosities http://shofu.de/uploads/tx_shofuproducts/downloads/BeautifilBulk_GB_2015-09.pdf Son erişim tarihi: 09.11.2015.
  • 66. Tauböck TT, Marovic D, Zeljezic D, Steingruber AD, Attin T, Tarle Z. Genotoxic potential of dental bulk-fill resin composites. Dent Mater 2017;33:788-95.
  • 67. Manhart J, Chen H, Neuerer P, Thiele L, Jaensch B, Hickel R. Clinical performance of the posterior composite QuiXfil after 3, 6, and 18 months in class 1 and 2 cavities. Quintessence Int 2008;39:757-65.
  • 68. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R. Three-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of the posterior composite QuiXfil in class i and ii cavities. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:301-7.
  • 69. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R. Clinical evaluation of the posterior composite Quixfil in class i and ii cavities: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:237-43.
  • 70. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of “bulk-filled” posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology. Dent Mater 2014;30:245-51.
  • 71. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: a 5-year randomized controlled clinical study. J Dent 2016;51:29-35.
  • 72. Öter B, Deniz K, Çehreli SB. Preliminary data on clinical performance of bulk-fill restorations in primary molars. Niger J Clin Pract 2018;21:1484-91.
  • 73. Bayraktar Y, Ercan E, Hamidi MM, Çolak H. One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites. J Investig Clin Dent 2017;8:1-9.
  • 74. Canali GD, Ignácio SA, Rached RN, Souza EM. One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill flowable vs. regular nanofilled composite in non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2018;1-9.
  • 75. Karaman E, Keskin B, Inan U. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:709-16.
APA yenidünya ö, MİSİLLİ T, GÖNÜLOL N (2021). Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış. , 220 - 228. 10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
Chicago yenidünya özge gizem,MİSİLLİ Tuğba,GÖNÜLOL NİHAN Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış. (2021): 220 - 228. 10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
MLA yenidünya özge gizem,MİSİLLİ Tuğba,GÖNÜLOL NİHAN Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış. , 2021, ss.220 - 228. 10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
AMA yenidünya ö,MİSİLLİ T,GÖNÜLOL N Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış. . 2021; 220 - 228. 10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
Vancouver yenidünya ö,MİSİLLİ T,GÖNÜLOL N Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış. . 2021; 220 - 228. 10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
IEEE yenidünya ö,MİSİLLİ T,GÖNÜLOL N "Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış." , ss.220 - 228, 2021. 10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
ISNAD yenidünya, özge gizem vd. "Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış". (2021), 220-228. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
APA yenidünya ö, MİSİLLİ T, GÖNÜLOL N (2021). Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış. Selcuk Dental Journal, 8(1), 220 - 228. 10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
Chicago yenidünya özge gizem,MİSİLLİ Tuğba,GÖNÜLOL NİHAN Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış. Selcuk Dental Journal 8, no.1 (2021): 220 - 228. 10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
MLA yenidünya özge gizem,MİSİLLİ Tuğba,GÖNÜLOL NİHAN Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış. Selcuk Dental Journal, vol.8, no.1, 2021, ss.220 - 228. 10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
AMA yenidünya ö,MİSİLLİ T,GÖNÜLOL N Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2021; 8(1): 220 - 228. 10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
Vancouver yenidünya ö,MİSİLLİ T,GÖNÜLOL N Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2021; 8(1): 220 - 228. 10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
IEEE yenidünya ö,MİSİLLİ T,GÖNÜLOL N "Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış." Selcuk Dental Journal, 8, ss.220 - 228, 2021. 10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
ISNAD yenidünya, özge gizem vd. "Bulk-fill Kompozit Rezinlere Güncel Bakış". Selcuk Dental Journal 8/1 (2021), 220-228. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.439067
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
08-05-2024 13:21

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları