Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 25 - 40 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040 İndeks Tarihi: 08-10-2021

Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge

Öz:
This study aims to investigate the dynamic behavior of a one-span historical masonry arch bridge. For thisreason, the masonry bridge with 15.5m in length and 4.75m in width was chosen and the modal parameterswere obtained by performing numerical analyses and experimental measurements. Operational ModalAnalysis technique is utilized for experimental study to determine modal parameters of the historicalmasonry bridge. Sensitive three-axial accelerometers were located on critical points on the bridge span andsignals originated by accelerometers were collected to quantify the vibratory response of the historical bridge.The Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition and Stochastic Subspace Identification method areemployed to identify the natural frequencies, mode shapes, and damping ratios experimentally. The 3D finiteelement modeling of the historical masonry bridge was created and the natural frequencies and mode shapesof the bridge were determined numerically. Experimental results were compared with those of the finiteelement analysis of the bridge. It can be noticed significant differences when comparing the results of theexperimental and numerical with the initial conditions. Therefore, the finite element model is calibrated byusing the response surface method according to the experimental results to minimize the uncertain finiteelement modeling parameters of the historical masonry arc bridge such as material properties and boundaryconditions. At the end of the calibration process, the maximum differences between natural frequenciesobtained experimental measurements and numerical analysis decreases from 4%-50% to 0.5%-2.5%. Thefinal calibrated finite element model for the masonry bridge is able to produce natural frequencies in closeagreement with the measured ones.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Sevim B, Altunışık AC, Bayraktar A (2012) Earthquake behavior of berke arch dam using ambient vibration test results. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 26: 780-792.
  • [2] Rathi AK, Chakraborty A. Adaptive response surface-based FE model updating for operational modal analysis of RC road bridge. 4th Optimization and Stochastic Days, 18-19 September 2014, Bangolore, India.
  • [3] Deshan S, Qiao L, Inamullah K, Xiaohang Z (2015) A novel finite element model updating method based on substructure and response surface model. Engineering Structures 103: 147-156.
  • [4] Zong Z, Lin X, Niu J (2015) Finite element model validation of bridge based on structural health monitoring-Part I: Response surface-based finite element model updating. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) 2: 258-278.
  • [5] Başaran H, Demir A, Ercan E, Nohutçu H, Hökelekli E, Kozanoğlu C (2016) Investigation of seismic safety of a masonry minaret using its dynamic characteristics. Earthquakes and Structures 10: 523-538.
  • [6] Günaydın M, Adanur S, Altunışık AC, Sevim B, Bayraktar A (2017) Finite modeling updating effects on the dynamic response of building models. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 45: 1630-1649.
  • [7] Alpaslan E. Damage detection of historical masonry bridges with analytical model and experimental techniques. PhD Thesis. Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Tukey, 2019.
  • [8] Ministry of Transport and Infrastructures, Department of Structures, Division of Historical Bridges. Report and Restoration Project of the Historical Sarpdere Bridge, Samsun, Turkey. Yıl, sayı vs bilgiler eksik
  • [9] Onat O, Yön B (2018) Adopted material properties of historical masonry structures for finite element models: Mosques and bridges, Turkish Journal of Science and Technology 13: 69-75.
  • [10] Brincker R, Zhang L. Frequency domain decomposition revisited. 3rd International Operational Modal Analysis Conference, 4-6 May 2009, Portonovo, Italy.
  • [11] Bendat JS, Piersol AG. Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2010.
  • [12] Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P. Modal identification from ambient response using frequency domain decomposition. Procededing of IMAC-XVIII: A conference and exposition on structural dynamics, 7 February 2000, Texas, USA.
  • [13] Van Overschee P, De Moor BL. Subspace Identification for Linear System: TheoryImplementation-Applications. Springer, USA, 1996.
  • [14] Hermans L, Der Aueveraer V (1999) Modal testing and analysis of structures under operational conditions: Industrial applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 13: 193-216.
  • [15] Reynders E, De Roeck G (2008) Reference-based combined deterministic-stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis. Mechanical System and Signal Processing 22: 617-637.
  • [16] Pastor M, Binda M, Harčarik T (2012) Modal assurance criterion. Procedia Engineering 4: 543– 548.
  • [17] Umar SB. Response surface methodology for damage detectıon using frequency and mode shapes. MSc Thesis. University of Technology, Malaysia, 2015.
  • [18] Cheng J, Zhang J, Cai CS, Xiao RC (2007) A new approach for solving inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions. Engineering Structures 29: 71-79.
  • [19] Landman D, Simpson J, Vicroy D, Parker P (2007) Response surface methods for efficient complex aircraft configuration aerodynamic characterization. Journal of Aircraft 44: 1189-1195.
  • [20] ANSYS Workbench (2013) Ansys Incorporation, Pennsylvania.
  • [21] Box GEB, Draper NR. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1987.
  • [22] Fand SE, Perera R (2009) A response surface methodology based damage identification technique. Smart Material and Structures 18: 065009.
  • [23] ARTeMIS Modal 1.5 (2012) Structural Vibration Solution, Denmark.
  • [24] Onat O (2019) Fundamental vibration frequency prediction of historical masonry bridges. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 69: 155-162.
  • [25] Deere DV, Miller RL. Engineering classification and index properties of Intact Rock. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, Technical Report, No: AFWL-TR-65-116, 1966, pp. 327.
APA Alpaslan E, KARACA Z (2020). Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge. , 25 - 40. 10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040
Chicago Alpaslan Emre,KARACA Zeki Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge. (2020): 25 - 40. 10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040
MLA Alpaslan Emre,KARACA Zeki Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge. , 2020, ss.25 - 40. 10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040
AMA Alpaslan E,KARACA Z Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge. . 2020; 25 - 40. 10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040
Vancouver Alpaslan E,KARACA Z Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge. . 2020; 25 - 40. 10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040
IEEE Alpaslan E,KARACA Z "Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge." , ss.25 - 40, 2020. 10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040
ISNAD Alpaslan, Emre - KARACA, Zeki. "Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge". (2020), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040
APA Alpaslan E, KARACA Z (2020). Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online), 3(1), 25 - 40. 10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040
Chicago Alpaslan Emre,KARACA Zeki Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online) 3, no.1 (2020): 25 - 40. 10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040
MLA Alpaslan Emre,KARACA Zeki Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online), vol.3, no.1, 2020, ss.25 - 40. 10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040
AMA Alpaslan E,KARACA Z Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online). 2020; 3(1): 25 - 40. 10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040
Vancouver Alpaslan E,KARACA Z Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online). 2020; 3(1): 25 - 40. 10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040
IEEE Alpaslan E,KARACA Z "Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge." Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online), 3, ss.25 - 40, 2020. 10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040
ISNAD Alpaslan, Emre - KARACA, Zeki. "Response surface-based finite element model calibration of a one-span historical masonry bridge". Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online) 3/1 (2020), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.31462/jseam.2020.01025040