While chatter slavery is defined as a commodity belonging to another personwithout their consent, digital slavery may seem like an ambitious concept. Afterall, one aspired to digital culture and was voluntarily enticed by technology.However, during the epidemic period, people who establish their relations withthe world through the screen as before, or even more for that reason, are actu ally digital entities living in data pools in the virtual world and traveling throughdata transmission channels around the world, even if they cannot leave theirhomes. Their personal data, privacy, interactions on the platforms belong to thepeople who own those platforms. In this case, in what ways is man digitally ens laved? In this article, employees; Those who digitize their labor will be dividedinto those who do not have the opportunity to digitize and those who cannotproduce themselves materially. It will be tried to establish links between thealienation of these groups from themselves and the daily practices of their lives.The epidemic crystallized the contradiction that the lower and middle classesof the society were actually stuck somewhere between the web 2.0 and 3.0, withthe crisis of a certain group that assumed the transition to “industry 4.0” by theleaders of the business world. In this study, which is on the agenda again withthis social problem; With an emphasis on concepts such as flexibility, digitaldivide, information capitalism, privacy of personal information, abstract con cepts will be discussed through the critical dialectical inquiry method, concreteexamples, and liberal mainstream methods of obtaining epistemological know ledge will be avoided, especially with a conscious choice.