The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study

geneci, ferhat; Çelik, Hakan Hamdi; ocak, mert; İnce Yusufoğlu, Selen; SARIÇAM, ESMA

doi:10.26650/eor.20210009

The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study

Esma SARIÇAM, (Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi ,Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Selen İnce YUSUFOĞLU, (Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi ,Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Mert OCAK, (Ankara Üniversitesi, Sağlık Meslek Yüksekokulu, Ankara, Türkiye)

Ferhat GENECİ, (Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Anatomi Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

H. Hamdi ÇELİK (Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Anatomi Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

European oral research (Online)

6 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 55 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 74 - 79 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.26650/eor.20210009 İndeks Tarihi: 14-11-2021

The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study

Öz:

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the retreatment abilities of the ProTaper Next(PTN) and F6 SkyTaper (F6) systems by using micro-computed tomography (microct),radiographic and microscopic imaging techniques.Materials and MethodsThe root canals of twenty-six extracted mandibular premolar teeth were preparedand obturated. For the retreatment procedure, the teeth were randomly divided intotwo equal groups according to endodontic instruments: PTN (X4) and F6 (#40/.06).Pre- and post-operative filling material volumes were measured with micro-ct, andareas were measured with radiographic and microscopic imaging techniques. Thepercentages of residual material were calculated, and then statistically compared.The significance level was set at p<0.05.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference between F6 and PTN for retreatmentefficacy in the micro-ct and radiographic imaging techniques (p>0.05). PTNdemonstrated better cleaning ability when evaluated by microscopic imaging.(p<0.05). The correlation was moderate between micro-ct and radiographic,and micro-ct and microscopic imaging groups; however, it was strong betweenradiographic and microscopic imaging methods.ConclusionThe PTN and F6 files had similar effects in the removal of filling material with microctevaluation. The radiographic imaging method gave similar results with micro-ctimaging.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Bergenholtz G, Lekholm U, Milthon R, Heden G, Odesjo B, Engstrom B. Retreatment of endodontic fillings. Scand J Dent Res 1979;87:217-24. [CrossRef ]
2. Friedman S, Stabholz A. Endodontic retreatment--case selection and technique. Part 1: Criteria for case selection. J Endod 1986;12:28-33. [CrossRef ]
3. Delai D, Jardine AP, Mestieri LB, Boijink D, Fontanella VRC, Grecca FS, et al. Efficacy of a thermally treated single file compared with rotary systems in endodontic retreatment of curved canals: a micro-CT study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:1837-44. [CrossRef ]
4. Rodig T, Wagner J, Wiegand A, Rizk M. Efficacy of the ProTaper retreatment system in removing Thermafil, GuttaCore or vertically compacted gutta-percha from curved root canals assessed by micro-CT. Int Endod J 2018;51:808-15. [CrossRef ]
5. Nevares G, de Albuquerque DS, Freire LG, Romeiro K, Fogel HM, Dos Santos M, et al. Efficacy of ProTaper NEXT Compared with Reciproc in Removing Obturation Material from Severely Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study. J Endod 2016;42:803-8. [CrossRef ]
6. Bago I, Suk M, Katic M, Gabric D, Anic I. Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta-percha and an epoxy resin-based sealer from straight root canals. Int Endod J 2019;52:105-13. [CrossRef ]
7. AlShwaimi E. Comparing ProFile Vortex to ProTaper Next for the efficacy of removal of root filling material: An ex vivo microcomputed tomography study. Saudi Dent J 2018;30:63-9. [CrossRef ]
8. Ozyurek T, Demiryurek EO. Efficacy of Different Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Removing Gutta-percha during Root Canal Retreatment. J Endod 2016;42:646-9. [CrossRef ]
9. Martins MP, Duarte MA, Cavenago BC, Kato AS, da Silveira Bueno CE. Effectiveness of the ProTaper Next and Reciproc Systems in Removing Root Canal Filling Material with Sonic or Ultrasonic Irrigation: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study. J Endod 2017;43:467-71. [CrossRef ]
10. Ozyurek T, Ozsezer-Demiryurek E. Efficacy of protaper next and protaper universal retreatment systems in removing guttapercha in curved root canals during root canal retreatment. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2017;51:7-13. [CrossRef ]
11. Donnermeyer D, Bunne C, Schafer E, Dammaschke T. Retreatability of three calcium silicate-containing sealers and one epoxy resin-based root canal sealer with four different root canal instruments. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:811-7. [CrossRef ]
12. Borges MMB, Duque JA, Zancan RF, Vivan RR, Bernardes RA, Duarte MAH. Efficacy of reciprocating systems for removing root filling material plus complementary cleaning methods in flattened canals: Microtomography and scanning electron microscopy study. Microsc Res Tech 2019;82:1057-64. [CrossRef ]
13. Silva E, Belladonna FG, Zuolo AS, Rodrigues E, Ehrhardt IC, Souza EM, et al. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher and XP-endo Finisher R in removing root filling remnants: a micro-CT study. Int Endod J 2018;51:86-91. [CrossRef ]
14. Monguilhott Crozeta B, Damiao de Sousa-Neto M, Bianchi Leoni G, Francisco Mazzi-Chaves J, Terezinha Correa Silva-Sousa Y, Baratto-Filho F. A micro-computed tomography assessment of the efficacy of rotary and reciprocating techniques for filling material removal in root canal retreatment. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:2235-40. [CrossRef ]
15. Chauhan R, Tikku A, Chandra A. Detection of residual obturation material after root canal retreatment with three different techniques using a dental operating microscope and a stereomicroscope: An in vitro comparative evaluation. J Conserv Dent 2012;15:218-22. [CrossRef ]
16. Ustun Y, Topcuoglu HS, Duzgun S, Kesim B. The effect of reciprocation versus rotational movement on the incidence of root defects during retreatment procedures. Int Endod J 2015;48:952-8. [CrossRef ]
17. Joseph M, Ahlawat J, Malhotra A, Rao M, Sharma A, Talwar S. In vitro evaluation of efficacy of different rotary instrument systems for gutta percha removal during root canal retreatment. J Clin Exp Dent 2016;8:e355-e60. [CrossRef ]
18. Imura N, Kato AS, Hata GI, Uemura M, Toda T, Weine F. A comparison of the relative efficacies of four hand and rotary instrumentation techniques during endodontic retreatment. Int Endod J 2000;33:361-6. [CrossRef ]
19. de Carvalho Maciel AC, Zaccaro Scelza MF. Efficacy of automated versus hand instrumentation during root canal retreatment: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2006;39:779-84. [CrossRef ]
20. Kfir A, Tsesis I, Yakirevich E, Matalon S, Abramovitz I. The efficacy of five techniques for removing root filling material: microscopic versus radiographic evaluation. Int Endod J 2012;45:35-41. [CrossRef ]
21. Betti LV, Bramante CM, de Moraes IG, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB. Efficacy of Profile .04 taper series 29 in removing filling materials during root canal retreatment--an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e46-50. [CrossRef ]
22. Unal GC, Kaya BU, Tac AG, Kececi AD. A comparison of the efficacy of conventional and new retreatment instruments to remove gutta-percha in curved root canals: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2009;42:344-50. [CrossRef ]
23. Bramante CM, Betti LV. Efficacy of Quantec rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal. Int Endod J 2000;33:463-7. [CrossRef ]
24. Ersev H, Yilmaz B, Dincol ME, Daglaroglu R. The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 2012;45:756-62. [CrossRef ]
25. Dagna A, Gastaldo G, Beltrami R, Chiesa M, Poggio C. F360 and F6 Skytaper: SEM evaluation of cleaning efficiency. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2015;6:69-74. [CrossRef ]
26. van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F, Vorster M, de Wet FA. Root Canal Shaping Using Nickel Titanium, M-Wire, and Gold Wire: A Microcomputed Tomographic Comparative Study of One Shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold Instruments in Maxillary First Molars. J Endod 2019;45:62-7. [CrossRef ]
27. Jenkins SM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PM. A study of endodontic treatment carried out in dental practice within the UK. Int Endod J 2001;34:16-22. [CrossRef ]
28. Slaus G, Bottenberg P. A survey of endodontic practice amongst Flemish dentists. Int Endod J 2002;35:759-67. [CrossRef ]
29. Savani GM, Sabbah W, Sedgley CM, Whitten B. Current trends in endodontic treatment by general dental practitioners: report of a United States national survey. J Endod 2014;40:618-24. [CrossRef ]
30. Oltra E, Cox TC, LaCourse MR, Johnson JD, Paranjpe A. Retreatability of two endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus: a micro-computed tomographic comparison. Restor Dent Endod 2017;42:19-26. [CrossRef ]
31. Roggendorf MJ, Legner M, Ebert J, Fillery E, Frankenberger R, Friedman S. Micro-CT evaluation of residual material in canals filled with Activ GP or GuttaFlow following removal with NiTi instruments. Int Endod J 2010;43:200-9. [CrossRef ]
32. Bernardes RA, Duarte MAH, Vivan RR, Alcalde MP, Vasconcelos BC, Bramante CM. Comparison of three retreatment techniques with ultrasonic activation in flattened canals using microcomputed tomography and scanning electron microscopy. Int Endod J 2016;49:890-7. [CrossRef ]
33. Betti LV, Bramante CM, de Moraes IG, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB. Comparison of GPX with or without solvent and hand files in removing filling materials from root canals--an ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:675- 80. [CrossRef ]
34. Gergi R, Sabbagh C. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2007;40:532-7. [CrossRef ]
35. Fruchi Lde C, Ordinola-Zapata R, Cavenago BC, Hungaro Duarte MA, Bueno CE, De Martin AS. Efficacy of reciprocating instruments for removing filling material in curved canals obturated with a single-cone technique: a micro-computed tomographic analysis. J Endod 2014;40:1000-4. [CrossRef ]
36. Canali LCF, Duque JA, Vivan RR, Bramante CM, So MVR, Duarte MAH. Comparison of efficiency of the retreatment procedure between Wave One Gold and Wave One systems by Micro-CT and confocal microscopy: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:337-43. [CrossRef ]

APA	SARIÇAM E, İnce Yusufoğlu S, ocak m, geneci f, Çelik H (2021). The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study. , 74 - 79. 10.26650/eor.20210009
Chicago	SARIÇAM ESMA,İnce Yusufoğlu Selen,ocak mert,geneci ferhat,Çelik Hakan Hamdi The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study. (2021): 74 - 79. 10.26650/eor.20210009
MLA	SARIÇAM ESMA,İnce Yusufoğlu Selen,ocak mert,geneci ferhat,Çelik Hakan Hamdi The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study. , 2021, ss.74 - 79. 10.26650/eor.20210009
AMA	SARIÇAM E,İnce Yusufoğlu S,ocak m,geneci f,Çelik H The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study. . 2021; 74 - 79. 10.26650/eor.20210009
Vancouver	SARIÇAM E,İnce Yusufoğlu S,ocak m,geneci f,Çelik H The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study. . 2021; 74 - 79. 10.26650/eor.20210009
IEEE	SARIÇAM E,İnce Yusufoğlu S,ocak m,geneci f,Çelik H "The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study." , ss.74 - 79, 2021. 10.26650/eor.20210009
ISNAD	SARIÇAM, ESMA vd. "The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study". (2021), 74-79. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20210009

APA	SARIÇAM E, İnce Yusufoğlu S, ocak m, geneci f, Çelik H (2021). The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study. European oral research (Online), 55(2), 74 - 79. 10.26650/eor.20210009
Chicago	SARIÇAM ESMA,İnce Yusufoğlu Selen,ocak mert,geneci ferhat,Çelik Hakan Hamdi The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study. European oral research (Online) 55, no.2 (2021): 74 - 79. 10.26650/eor.20210009
MLA	SARIÇAM ESMA,İnce Yusufoğlu Selen,ocak mert,geneci ferhat,Çelik Hakan Hamdi The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study. European oral research (Online), vol.55, no.2, 2021, ss.74 - 79. 10.26650/eor.20210009
AMA	SARIÇAM E,İnce Yusufoğlu S,ocak m,geneci f,Çelik H The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study. European oral research (Online). 2021; 55(2): 74 - 79. 10.26650/eor.20210009
Vancouver	SARIÇAM E,İnce Yusufoğlu S,ocak m,geneci f,Çelik H The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study. European oral research (Online). 2021; 55(2): 74 - 79. 10.26650/eor.20210009
IEEE	SARIÇAM E,İnce Yusufoğlu S,ocak m,geneci f,Çelik H "The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study." European oral research (Online), 55, ss.74 - 79, 2021. 10.26650/eor.20210009
ISNAD	SARIÇAM, ESMA vd. "The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study". European oral research (Online) 55/2 (2021), 74-79. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20210009