Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 44 - 50 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.21653/tjpr.660186 İndeks Tarihi: 27-10-2022

TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

Öz:
Purpose: The Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ) was described as a tool with psychometricproperties that thoroughly assessed the concept of body awareness. There is no Turkish version ofthe scale with validity and reliability. The study aimed to demonstrate the validity and reliability ofthe Turkish version of the BAQ.Methods: The study sample consisted of 180 university students (age=21.87±2.36 years, 99 M,81 F). The BAQ, Self-Consciousness Scale (SCS), and Body Cathexis Scale (BCS) were applied tothe participants.Results: Result of the correlation analysis between the BAQ and the total scores obtained fromthe SCS and BCS, and the correlation coefficients were determined as 0.802 (p=0.007) and-0.753 (p=0.009), respectively. As a result of the explanatory factor analysis, a measurement toolconsisting of 18 items and four sub-groups explaining 66% of the variance was obtained. The testretest reliability coefficient was 0.830 at 3-day intervals. Cronbach's alpha was calculated as 0.917to determine internal consistency.Conclusion: Findings in the study show that the Turkish version of BAQ is valid and reliable.
Anahtar Kelime: Body Awareness Reliability Turkish Validity

VÜCUT FARKINDALIĞI ANKETİ’NİN TÜRKÇE UYARLAMASI: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Öz:
Amaç: Vücut Farkındalığı Anketi (VFA), vücut farkındalığı kavramını tam olarak değerlendiren psikometrik özelliklere sahip bir araç olarak tanımlanmıştır. Ölçeğin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik versiyonu bulunmamaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı, VFA'nın Türkçe versiyonunun geçerliğini ve güvenirliğini göstermekti. Yöntem: Araştırmanın örneklemini 180 üniversite öğrencisi (yaş=21,87±2,36 yıl, 99 E, 81 K) oluşturdu. Katılımcılara VFA, Öz-Bilinç Ölçeği (ÖBÖ) ve Vücut Algısı Ölçeği (VAÖ) uygulandı. Sonuçlar: VFA ile ÖBÖ’ve VAÖ'den elde edilen toplam puanlar arasındaki korelasyon analizi sonucunda korelasyon katsayıları sırasıyla 0,802 (p=0,007) ve -0,753 (p=0,009) olarak belirlendi. Açıklayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda toplam varyansın % 66'sını açıklayan 18 maddeden ve dört alt gruptan oluşan bir ölçüm aracı elde edildi. Test-tekrar test güvenirlik katsayısı, üç günlük aralıklarla 0,83 idi. İç tutarlılığı belirlemek için Cronbach alfa 0,917 olarak hesaplandı. Tartışma: Çalışmadaki bulgular VFA'nın Türkçe versiyonunun geçerli ve güvenilir olduğunu göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Shields SA, Mallory ME, Simon A. The Body Awareness Questionnaire: reliability and validity. J Pers Ass. 1989;53(4):802-15.
  • 2. Ginzburg K, Tsur N, Barak-Nahum A. Body awareness: differentiating between sensitivity to and monitoring of bodily signals. J Behav Med. 2014;37(1):564–75.
  • 3. Filippetti ML, Lloyd-Fox S, Longo MR, Farroni T, Johnson MH. Neural mechanisms of body awareness in infants. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25(10):3779–87.
  • 4. Gyllensten AL, Skär L, Miller M. Embodied identity: a deeper understanding of body awareness. Physio T Prac. 2010;26(7):439- 46.
  • 5. Mehling WE, Wrubel J, Daubenmier JJ, Price CJ, Kerr CE, Silow T, et al. Body awareness: a phenomenological inquiry into the common ground of mind-body therapies. Phi Eth Hum Med. 2011;6(6):1-12.
  • 6. Ferentzi E, Köteles F, Csala B, Drew R, Tihanyi B, Pulay-Kottlar G, et al. What makes sense in our body? Personality and sensory correlates of body awareness and somatosensory amplification. Pers Individ Differ. 2017;104(1):75-81.
  • 7. Craig AD. Significance of the insula for the evolution of human awareness of feelings from the body. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1225(1):72-82.
  • 8. Sze JA, Gyurak A, Yuan JW, Levenson RW. Coherence between emotional experience and physiology: does body awareness training have an impact? Emotion. 2010;10(6):803-14.
  • 9. Ahn SN. Differences in body awareness and its effects on balance function and independence in activities of daily living for stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(11):1386-89.
  • 10. Thörnborg U, Mattson M. Rating body awareness in persons suffering from eating disorders: a cross-sectional study. J Adv Phy. 2010;12(1):24-34.
  • 11. Neumark-Sztainer D, Eisenberg ME, Wall M, Loth KA. Yoga and pilates: associations with body image and disordered-eating behaviors in a population-based sample of young adults. Int J Eat Dis. 2011;44(3): 276–80.
  • 12. Erden A, Altuğ F, Cavlak U. Sağlıklı kişilerde vücut farkındalık durumu ile ağrı, emosyonel durum ve yaşam kalitesi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. J Kartal TR. 2013;24(3):145-50.
  • 13. Geuter U, Heller MC, Weaver JO. Elsa Gindler and her influence on Wilhelm Reich and body psychotherapy. B Mov Dan in Psyc. 2010;5(1):59-73.
  • 14. Hedlung L, Gyllensten AL. The physiotherapists’ experience of basic body awareness therapy in patients with schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders. J B Mov T. 2013;17(2):169- 76.
  • 15. Mehling WE, Gopisetty V, Daubenmier J, Price CJ. Body awareness: construct and self-report measures. PloS one. 2009;4(5):56-63.
  • 16. Mantovani AM, Fregonesi CEPT, Lorençoni RMR et al. Immediate effect of basic body awareness therapy on heart rate variability. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2016;22(1):8-11.
  • 17. Fougner M, Haugstad GK. Treating gynecological pain: the experiences of bachelor students in physiotherapy performing somatocognitive therapy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(5):318- 26.
  • 18. Heale R, Twycross A. Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evid Based Nurs. 2015;18(1):66-7.
  • 19. Lööf H, Johansson, UB, Henriksson EW, Lindblad S, Saboonchi F. Development and psychometric testing of the Swedish version of the Body Awareness Questionnaire. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(7):1643-51.
  • 20. Köteles F. Psychometric investigation of the Hungarian version of the Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ-H) among yoga practitioners and young adult controls. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika. 2014;15(4):373-91.
  • 21. Fenigstein A, Scheier MF, Buss AH. Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1975;43(4):522-27.
  • 22. Rugancı N. Private and public self-consciousness subscales of the Fenigstein, Scheier and Buss Self-consciousness Scale: a Turkish translation. Pers and Indiv Dif. 1995;18 (2):279-82.
  • 23. Secord PF, Jourard SM. The appraisal of body-cathexis: body-cathexis and the self. J Consult Psychol. 1953;17(5):343-7.
  • 24. Dağ İ. Türkiye’de kullanılan psikolojik ölçekler-1. 3P Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi. 1993; 1(Ek Sayı 2):S:23-69.
  • 25. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrira W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268-274.
  • 26. Erden A, Emirzeoglu M. Investigation of body awareness level and performance emotional status of athletes in different branches of sports. J Sport Rehabil. 2020;29(1):23-7.
  • 27. Gulsen M. Evaluation of pilates training on body awareness and social appearance anxiety in university students. Ejpess. 2019;5(6):56-65.
  • 28. Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. 1st ed. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing; 2002.
APA Karaca S, Bayar B (2021). TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. , 44 - 50. 10.21653/tjpr.660186
Chicago Karaca Seda,Bayar Banu TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. (2021): 44 - 50. 10.21653/tjpr.660186
MLA Karaca Seda,Bayar Banu TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. , 2021, ss.44 - 50. 10.21653/tjpr.660186
AMA Karaca S,Bayar B TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. . 2021; 44 - 50. 10.21653/tjpr.660186
Vancouver Karaca S,Bayar B TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. . 2021; 44 - 50. 10.21653/tjpr.660186
IEEE Karaca S,Bayar B "TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY." , ss.44 - 50, 2021. 10.21653/tjpr.660186
ISNAD Karaca, Seda - Bayar, Banu. "TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY". (2021), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.660186
APA Karaca S, Bayar B (2021). TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online), 32(1), 44 - 50. 10.21653/tjpr.660186
Chicago Karaca Seda,Bayar Banu TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online) 32, no.1 (2021): 44 - 50. 10.21653/tjpr.660186
MLA Karaca Seda,Bayar Banu TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online), vol.32, no.1, 2021, ss.44 - 50. 10.21653/tjpr.660186
AMA Karaca S,Bayar B TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online). 2021; 32(1): 44 - 50. 10.21653/tjpr.660186
Vancouver Karaca S,Bayar B TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online). 2021; 32(1): 44 - 50. 10.21653/tjpr.660186
IEEE Karaca S,Bayar B "TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY." Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online), 32, ss.44 - 50, 2021. 10.21653/tjpr.660186
ISNAD Karaca, Seda - Bayar, Banu. "TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY". Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online) 32/1 (2021), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.660186