RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY

Gokmen, Derya; Apaydın, Umut; Elbasan, Bulent; yildiz, ramazan; Erol, Erkan; yildiz, ayse

doi:10.21653/tjpr.654151

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY

Ayse , (Gazi Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Ramazan , (Gazi Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Erkan EROL, (Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, Tokat, Türkiye)

Umut APAYDIN, (Gazi Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Derya GÖKMEN, (Ankara Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Biyoistatistik Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Bülent ELBASAN (Gazi Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online)

4 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 81 - 88 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.21653/tjpr.654151 İndeks Tarihi: 27-10-2022

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY

Öz:

Purpose: Poor bimanual performance is usually a major functional impairment for children withunilateral cerebral palsy (CP). This study was performed to examine the reliability and validity ofthe Turkish version of the Caregiver Functional Use Survey (CFUS), which assesses manual functionof children with unilateral CP.Methods: Fifty children with unilateral CP and their parents were included in the study. Thetest-retest reliability was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and internalconsistency by calculating Cronbach alpha values. Association level between other outcomesmeasures (Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test, JTT, and Manual Ability Classification System, MACS)and the Turkish version of the CFUS was analyzed to determine the criterion validity. Four onefactorial confirmatory factor analyses to validate uni-dimensionality of the CFUS were performed.Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the one-dimensional structure of the “amount of use” and“quality of movement” parts of the CFUS for unimanual and bimanual tasks.Results: The Turkish version of the CFUS showed a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbachalpha=0.92-0.94). The ICCs ranged between 0.90 and 0.93. There was a negative correlationbetween all the subscales of the CFUS and the MACS and the JTT (p<0.05).Conclusion: The Turkish version of CFUS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the upperextremity functions in children with unilateral CP.

Anahtar Kelime: Questionnaires Cerebral Palsy Caregivers

BAKIMVEREN FONKSİYONEL KULLANIM ANKETİNİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONUNUN GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİĞİ

Öz:

Amaç: Zayıf bilateral performans unilateral etkilenimi olan serebral palsili (SP) çocuklarda önemli bir fonksiyonel limitasyondur. Bu çalışma, unilateral SP tanılı çocukların el fonksiyonlarını değerlendiren Caregiver Functional Use Survey (CFUS) Türkçe versiyonunun geçerlik ve güvenirliğini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapıldı. Yöntem: Unilateral SP'li 50 çocuk ve ebeveynleri çalışmaya dahil edildi. Test-tekrar test güvenirliği, sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı (ICC) ile; iç tutarlılık ise, Cronbach alfa değeri hesaplanarak değerlendirildi. Dış yapı geçerliğini belirlemek için Jebsen Taylor El Fonksiyon Testi (JTT) ve Manuel Yetenek Sınıflandırma Sistemi (MACS) ile CFUS'un Türkçe versiyonu arasındaki ilişki incelendi. Faktör analizi ile CFUS un tek boyutlu olduğu doğrulandı. Faktör analizleri, unimanuel ve bimanuel görevler için CFUS’un “kullanım miktarı” ve “hareket kalitesi” bölümlerinin tek boyutlu yapısını incelemek için kullanıldı. Sonuçlar: CFUS'un Türkçe versiyonu yüksek derecede iç tutarlılık gösterdi (Cronbach a=0,92–0,94). ICC değerlerinin 0,90 ile 0,93 arasında değiştiği bulundu. Tüm CFUS ve MACS ve JTT alt ölçekleri arasında negatif korelasyon vardı (p<0,05). Tartışma: Unilateral SP'li çocuklarda üst ekstremite fonksiyonlarının değerlendirilmesinde CFUS'un Türkçe versiyonunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğu sonucuna varıldı.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Aisen ML, Kerkovich D, Mast J, Mulroy S,Wren TA, Kay RM, et al. Cerebral palsy: clinical care and neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(9):844-52.
2. Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Boyd RN. Efficacy of upper limb therapies for unilateral cerebral palsy: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2014;133(1):e175-e204.
3. Gordon AM. To constrain or not to constrain, and other stories of intensive upper extremity training for children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(4):56-61.
4. Bleyenheuft Y, Gordon AM. Precision grip control, sensory impairments and their interactions in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(9):3014- 28.
5. Charles JR, Wolf SL, Schneider JA, Gordon AM. Efficacy of a child-friendly form of constraint-induced movement therapy in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(8):635-42.
6. Klingels K, Demeyere I, Jaspers E, De Cock P, Molenaers G, Boyd R, et al. Upper limb impairments and their impact on activity measures in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2012;16(5):475-84.
7. Gordon AM, Schneider JA, Chinnan A, Charles JR. Efficacy of a hand–arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(11):830-8.
8. Klingels K, Jaspers E, Van de Winckel A, De Cock P, Molenaers G, Feys H. A systematic review of arm activity measures for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(10):887- 900.
9. Lemmens RJ, Timmermans AA, Janssen-Potten YJ, Smeets RJ, Seelen HA. Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: a systematic review. BMC Neurol. 2012;12(1):21.
10. Gilmore R, Sakzewski L, Boyd R. Upper limb activity measures for 5‐to 16‐year‐old children with congenital hemiplegia: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(1):14-21.
11. Spironello C, Hay J, Missiuna C, Faught B, Cairney J. Concurrent and construct validation of the short form of the Bruininks‐Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency and the Movement‐ABC when administered under field conditions: implications for screening. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36(4):499-507.
12. Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):435-41.
13. Sears ED, Chung KC. Validity and responsiveness of the Jebsen– Taylor hand function test. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(1):30-7.
14. Green D, Schertz M, Gordon AM, Moore A, Schejter Margalit T, Farquharson Y, et al. A multi‐site study of functional outcomes following a themed approach to hand–arm bimanual intensive therapy for children with hemiplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55(6):527-33.
15. Eliasson A-C, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Rösblad B, Beckung E, Arner M, Öhrvall A-M, et al. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neu-rol. 2006;48(7):549-54
16. Akpinar P, Tezel CG, Eliasson AC, Icagasioglu A. Reliability and cross-cultural validation of the Turkish version of Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(23):1910-6.
17. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175- 91.
18. Li CH. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods. 2016;48(3):936-49.
19. Geldhof GJ, Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ. Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychol Methods. 2014;19(1):72.
20. Peterson RA, Kim Y. On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. J Appl Psychol. 2013;98(1):194.
21. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63
22. Mukaka MM. A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24(3):69-71
23. Cook KF, Kallen MA, Amtmann D. Having a fit: impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT’s unidimensionality assumption. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(4):447-60.
24. Gordon AM, Charles J, Wolf, SL. Efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy on involved upper-extremity use in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy is not age-dependent. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3):363-73.
25. Thorley M, Lannin N, Cusick A, Novak I, Boyd R. Reliability of the quality of upper extremity skills test for children with cerebral palsy aged 2 to 12 years. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2012;32(1):4- 21.
26. Arnould C, Penta M, Renders A, Thonnard JL. ABILHAND-Kids: a measure of manual ability in children with cerebral palsy. Neurology. 2004;63(6):1045-52.
27. Louwers A, Meester-Delver A, Folmer K, Nollet F, Beelen A. Immediate effect of a wrist and thumb brace on bimanual activities in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(4):321-6.
28. Sköld A, Hermansson LN, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Eliasson AC. Development and evidence of validity for the children’s handuse experience questionnaire (CHEQ). Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(5):436-42.
29. Wallen M, Bundy A, Pont K, Ziviani J. Psychometric properties of the Pediatric Motor Activity Log used for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51(3):200-8.

APA	yildiz a, yildiz r, Erol E, Apaydın U, Gokmen D, Elbasan B (2021). RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY. , 81 - 88. 10.21653/tjpr.654151
Chicago	yildiz ayse,yildiz ramazan,Erol Erkan,Apaydın Umut,Gokmen Derya,Elbasan Bulent RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY. (2021): 81 - 88. 10.21653/tjpr.654151
MLA	yildiz ayse,yildiz ramazan,Erol Erkan,Apaydın Umut,Gokmen Derya,Elbasan Bulent RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY. , 2021, ss.81 - 88. 10.21653/tjpr.654151
AMA	yildiz a,yildiz r,Erol E,Apaydın U,Gokmen D,Elbasan B RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY. . 2021; 81 - 88. 10.21653/tjpr.654151
Vancouver	yildiz a,yildiz r,Erol E,Apaydın U,Gokmen D,Elbasan B RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY. . 2021; 81 - 88. 10.21653/tjpr.654151
IEEE	yildiz a,yildiz r,Erol E,Apaydın U,Gokmen D,Elbasan B "RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY." , ss.81 - 88, 2021. 10.21653/tjpr.654151
ISNAD	yildiz, ayse vd. "RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY". (2021), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.654151

APA	yildiz a, yildiz r, Erol E, Apaydın U, Gokmen D, Elbasan B (2021). RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online), 32(1), 81 - 88. 10.21653/tjpr.654151
Chicago	yildiz ayse,yildiz ramazan,Erol Erkan,Apaydın Umut,Gokmen Derya,Elbasan Bulent RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online) 32, no.1 (2021): 81 - 88. 10.21653/tjpr.654151
MLA	yildiz ayse,yildiz ramazan,Erol Erkan,Apaydın Umut,Gokmen Derya,Elbasan Bulent RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online), vol.32, no.1, 2021, ss.81 - 88. 10.21653/tjpr.654151
AMA	yildiz a,yildiz r,Erol E,Apaydın U,Gokmen D,Elbasan B RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online). 2021; 32(1): 81 - 88. 10.21653/tjpr.654151
Vancouver	yildiz a,yildiz r,Erol E,Apaydın U,Gokmen D,Elbasan B RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online). 2021; 32(1): 81 - 88. 10.21653/tjpr.654151
IEEE	yildiz a,yildiz r,Erol E,Apaydın U,Gokmen D,Elbasan B "RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY." Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online), 32, ss.81 - 88, 2021. 10.21653/tjpr.654151
ISNAD	yildiz, ayse vd. "RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY". Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online) 32/1 (2021), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.654151