INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING

TARI, Ali Fuat; köşker, yakup; DEMİRCİ, Şeyma; Gönülal, Erdal; Gültekin, Rohat; Gorgisen, Ceren; ÖZBAHÇE, Aynur

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING

Aynur ÖZBAHÇE, (Selçuk Üniversitesi, Çumra Meslek Yüksekokulu, Park ve Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümü, Konya, Türkiye)

Ceren GÖRGİŞEN, (Toprak, Gübre ve Su Kaynakları Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Rohat GÜLTEKİN, (Toprak, Gübre ve Su Kaynakları Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Yakup KÖSKER, (Toprak, Gübre ve Su Kaynakları Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Şeyma DEMİRCİ, (Toprak Su Çölleşme ile Mücadele Araştırma Enstitüsü, Konya, Türkiye)

Ali Fuat TARI, (Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye)

Erdal GÖNÜLAL (Bahri Dağdaş Uluslararası Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü, Konya, Türkiye)

Bahçe

0 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 50 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 111 - 117 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING

Öz:

This study was conducted to determine the effects of different rootstocks on some growth characteristics of grafted melonseedlings under greenhouse condition in 2020. In the study, four different rootstocks were used: 1-Ungrafted, 2-Ferro, 3-Maximus and TZ148. Edalı F₁ variety (Cucumis melo var. Edalı F₁) was used as a scion. The experiment was conductedin a completely randomized block design with three replications. Melon and rootstocks seeds were sown on 28.04.2020and rootstock seeds on 03.05.2020, respectively. Grafting was done on 15.05.2020 and was performed through the splicegrafting method. Some growth characteristics studied on melon seedlings were fresh-dry seedling weights (FSW-DSW),stem diameter-height (SD-SH), leaf number-length (LN-LL), fresh-dry root weights (FRW-DRW), root height (RH) andchlorophyll content (CC-SPAD) and some macro-micro nutrient contents. According to the results of statistical analyses,positive differences were found in the grafted seedlings compared to non-grafted seedlings at these parameters (p<0.01).In many of the seedling quality values, Ferro and Maximus hybrids stood out temper to others. Also, in the experiment,correlations between FSW and SD, RH, SPAD and total N content were found significant.

Anahtar Kelime: seedling quality SPAD grafting melon rootstock

AŞILI KAVUN FİDELERİNİN BAZI KALİTE PARAMETRELERİ ÜZERİNE FARKLI ANAÇLARIN ETKİSİ

Öz:

Bu çalışma, 2020 yılında sera koşullarında aşılı kavun fidelerinin bazı büyüme özelliklerine farklı anaçların etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Denemede 1-Aşılanmamış, 2-Ferro, 3-Maximus ve TZ148 olmak üzere dört farklı anaç kullanılmıştır. Kalem olarak Edalı F₁ çeşidi (Cucumis melo var. Edalı F₁) seçilmiştir. Deneme tesadüf bloklar halinde üç tekerrürlü olarak kurulmuştur. Kavun tohumları 28.04.2020, anaç tohumları ise 03.05.2020 tarihlerinde ekilmiştir. 15.05.2020 tarihinde aşılama yapılmıştır. Aşılama kotiledon birleştirme yöntemi ile yapılmıştır. Kavun fidelerinde incelenen bazı parametreler; büyüme özellikleri, taze-kuru fide ağırlıkları (FSW-DSW), gövde çapı-yüksekliği (SD-SH), yaprak sayısı ve uzunluğu (LN-LL), taze-kuru kök ağırlıkları (FRW-DRW), kök yüksekliği (RH) ve klorofil içeriği (CCSPAD) ve bazı makro-mikro besin içerikleridir. İstatistiksel olarak bu parametrelerde aşılı fidelerde aşılanmamışlara göre pozitif farklar bulunmuştur (p<0.01). Fide kalite değerlerinin çoğunda, Ferro ve Maximus anaçları diğerlerine göre daha öne çıkmıştır. Ayrıca denemede FSW ile SD, RH, SPAD ve toplam N içeriği arasındaki korelasyonlar arasındaki farklar da önemli bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Alan, O., F. Sen and E. Duzyaman, 2018. The effectiveness of growth cycles on improving fruit quality for grafted watermelon combinations. Food Sci. Technol. 38:270-277.
2. Bantis, F., A. Koukounaras, A.S. Siomos and C. Dangitsis, 2020. Impact of scion and root stock seedling quality selection on the vigor of watermelon-interspecific squash grafted seedlings. Agriculture 10, 326; 2-10.
3. Bulgar, G., G. Villora, D.A. Moreno and L. Romeo, 2000. Improving the mineral nutrition in grafted watermelon plants: nitrogen metabolism. Biologia Plantarum 43(4):607-609.
4. Bremner, J.M., 1996. Nitrogen-total, methods of soil analysis: part III. In: Sparks D.L., Page A.L., Helmke P.A., Loeppert R.H., Soltanpour P.N., Tabatabai M.A., Johnson C.T., Sumner M.E., editors.
5. Ceylan, S., O. Alan and O.L. Elmacı, 2018. Effects of grafting on nutrient element content and yield in watermelon. Ege University Agriculture Faculty Journal, 55(1):67-74.
6. Colla, G., C.M.C. Suãrez, M. Cardarelli and Y. Rouphael, 2010. Improving nitrogen use efficiency in melon by grafting. HortScience 45(4):559-565.
7. Cushman, K., 2006. Grafting techniques for watermelon. Univ. Fla. Inst. Food Agr. Sci. HS1075:1-5.
8. Davis, A.R., P. Perkins-Veazie, Y. Sakata, S. López-Galarza, J.V. Maroto, S.G. Lee, Y.C. Huh, A. Miguel, S.R. King, R. Cohen and Y.M. Lee, 2008. Cucurbit grafting. Critical Rev. Plant Sci. 27:50-74.
9. Edelstein, M., Y. Burger, C. Horev, A. Pora, A. Meir and R. Cohen, 2004. Assessing the effect of genetic and anatomic variation of cucurbita rootstocks on vigour, survival and yield of grafted melon. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 79(3):370-374.
10.Fallik, E., S. Alkalai-Tuvi, D. Chalupowicz, S. Popovsky-Sarid and M. Zaaroor-Presman, 2019. Relationships between rootstock-scion combinations and growing regions on watermelon fruit quality. Agronomy 2019, 9, 536, 2-9.
11.Gaion, L.A., L.T. Braz and R.F. Carvalho, 2017. Grafting in vegetable crops: a great technique for agriculture. International Journal of Vegetable Science 24(1):85-102.
12.Guan, W. and X. Zhao, 2014. Techniques for melon grafting. University of Florida/Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension EDIS publication HS1257. (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf files/HS/HS125700.pdf).
13.Guan, W. and X. Zhao, 2015. Effects of grafting methods and root excision on growth characteristics of grafted muskmelon plants. American Society for Horticultural Science 25(6):706-713.
14.Hassell, R.L. and F. Memmott, 2008. Grafting methods for cucurbit production. HortScience 43:1677-1679.
15.Lee, J.M., 1994. Cultivation of grafted vegetables I. Current status grafting methods and benefits. HortScience 29(4):235-239.
16.Lee, J.M. and M. Oda, 2003. Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. Hortic. Rev. 28:61-124.
17.Lee, J.M., C. Kubota, S.J. Tsao, Z. Bie, P. Hoyos Echevarria, L. Morra and M. Oda, 2010. Current status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Sci. Hort. 127:93-105.
18.Leonardi, C. and F. Giuffrida, 2006. Variation of plant growth and macronutrient uptake in grafted tomatoes and eggplants on three different rootstocks. Eur. J. Hort. Sci. 71:97-101.
19.Lindsay, W.L. and W.A. Norvell, 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42:421-428
20.Miles, C., P. Devi, X. Zhao and W. Guan, 2017. Grafting manual: how to produce grafted vegetables plants. United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute Food and Agriculture (http://www.vegetablesgrafting.org).
21.Miles, C., L. Hesnault, S. Johnson, P. Kreider and S. Dabirian, 2016. Vegetable grafting: watermelon. Washington State University Extension Publication FS100E, 7p.
22.Rivero, R.M., J.M. Ruiz and L. Romero, 2003. Role of grafting in horticultural plants under stress conditions. Food Agric. 1(1):70-74.
23.Ruiz, J.M. and L. Romero, 1999. Nitrogen efficiency and metabolism in grafted melon plants. Sci. Hort. 81:113-123.
24.Sorgonà, A., M.R. Abenavoli, P.G. Gringeri and G. Cacco, 2006. A comparison of nitrogen use efficiency definitions in citrus rootstocks. Sci. Hort. 109, 389-393.
25.Tokgoz, H., M. Goluku, R. Toker and D.Y. Turgut, 2015. Effects of grafting and harvesting time on some physical and chemical parameters of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Food (2015) 40(5):263-270 (in Turkish).
26.Tuzel, Y. and A. Ozcelik, 2004. Recent trends and developments in protected cultivation of Turkey. International Workshop on “La Produzione in Serra dopo 1’era del bromuro dimetile” 1-3 Nisan Catania/Italy, 189-198.
27.Ulas, F. and H. Yetisir, 2016. Vaccination vegetables: history, use and development of the world in Turkey. Nevşehir Science and Technology Journal (TARGID) Special Number, pp:345-354.
28.Yetisir, H., 2001. Effect of grafted seedling on plant growth, fruit yield and quality in watermelon and investigation of grafting point histologically (Ph.D. Thesis). Cukurova University Department of Horticulture, Adana-Turkey, 178.
29.Yetisir, H., 2018. History and current status of grafted vegetables in Turkey. 30. International Horticultural Congress, 12-16 August 2018 Istanbul-Turkey, pp:13-18.
30.Yetisir, H. and N. Sarı, 2004. Effect of hypocotyl morphology on survival rate and growth of watermelon seedlings grafted on rootstocks with different emergence performance at various temperatures. Turk J. Agric. (TUBITAK) For 28(2004):231-237.
31.Yuan, H.Y., L. Zhao, Q. Kong, F. Cheng, M. Niu, J. Xi and A.N. Muhammad, 2016. Comprehensive mineral nutrition analysis of watermelon grafted on to two different rootstocks. Horticultural Plant Journal 2(2):105-113.
32.Yurtsever, N., 1984. Experimental statistics methods. Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Agriculture the former general directorate of rural service, soil-fertilizer research institute. Publication No:121, Techniques Publication No:56, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish).
33.Zhao, X., W. Guan and D.J. Huber, 2016. Melon grafting in handbook of cucurbits: growth, cultural practices and physiology. M. Pessarakli ed. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.

APA	ÖZBAHÇE A, Gorgisen C, Gültekin R, köşker y, DEMİRCİ Ş, TARI A, Gönülal E (2021). INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING. , 111 - 117.
Chicago	ÖZBAHÇE Aynur,Gorgisen Ceren,Gültekin Rohat,köşker yakup,DEMİRCİ Şeyma,TARI Ali Fuat,Gönülal Erdal INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING. (2021): 111 - 117.
MLA	ÖZBAHÇE Aynur,Gorgisen Ceren,Gültekin Rohat,köşker yakup,DEMİRCİ Şeyma,TARI Ali Fuat,Gönülal Erdal INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING. , 2021, ss.111 - 117.
AMA	ÖZBAHÇE A,Gorgisen C,Gültekin R,köşker y,DEMİRCİ Ş,TARI A,Gönülal E INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING. . 2021; 111 - 117.
Vancouver	ÖZBAHÇE A,Gorgisen C,Gültekin R,köşker y,DEMİRCİ Ş,TARI A,Gönülal E INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING. . 2021; 111 - 117.
IEEE	ÖZBAHÇE A,Gorgisen C,Gültekin R,köşker y,DEMİRCİ Ş,TARI A,Gönülal E "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING." , ss.111 - 117, 2021.
ISNAD	ÖZBAHÇE, Aynur vd. "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING". (2021), 111-117.

APA	ÖZBAHÇE A, Gorgisen C, Gültekin R, köşker y, DEMİRCİ Ş, TARI A, Gönülal E (2021). INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING. Bahçe, 50(2), 111 - 117.
Chicago	ÖZBAHÇE Aynur,Gorgisen Ceren,Gültekin Rohat,köşker yakup,DEMİRCİ Şeyma,TARI Ali Fuat,Gönülal Erdal INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING. Bahçe 50, no.2 (2021): 111 - 117.
MLA	ÖZBAHÇE Aynur,Gorgisen Ceren,Gültekin Rohat,köşker yakup,DEMİRCİ Şeyma,TARI Ali Fuat,Gönülal Erdal INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING. Bahçe, vol.50, no.2, 2021, ss.111 - 117.
AMA	ÖZBAHÇE A,Gorgisen C,Gültekin R,köşker y,DEMİRCİ Ş,TARI A,Gönülal E INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING. Bahçe. 2021; 50(2): 111 - 117.
Vancouver	ÖZBAHÇE A,Gorgisen C,Gültekin R,köşker y,DEMİRCİ Ş,TARI A,Gönülal E INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING. Bahçe. 2021; 50(2): 111 - 117.
IEEE	ÖZBAHÇE A,Gorgisen C,Gültekin R,köşker y,DEMİRCİ Ş,TARI A,Gönülal E "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING." Bahçe, 50, ss.111 - 117, 2021.
ISNAD	ÖZBAHÇE, Aynur vd. "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF GRAFTED MELON SEEDLING". Bahçe 50/2 (2021), 111-117.