The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 414 - 425 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.15832/ankutbd.640159 İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin
Öz: The European Landscape Convention (ELC) has directed the landscapeclassification towards landscape character analysis. Landscape characteranalysis provides a character-based classification that can combinedifferent values or variables and be applied at different scales to definethe landscapes of each country and define the forces on the landscape. Inthis study, the Kapısuyu Basin of Küre Mountains National Park, whichis one of the hot spots in the world in terms of different landscapecharacter and natural quality, was classified by landscape characteranalysis.In this study, Kapısuyu basin was analyzed on an analytical groundaccording to the landscape variables and the basin landscape types, andthe landscape character area map were obtained based on the dominantfeatures of the area and the cultural landscape pattern. Throughout thebasin, 345 landscape character types and 21 landscape character area wereidentified. Despite having similar values, the surface area of the protectedarea in the national park and the rural area had significant differences inlandscape character ratios and patchiness ratio. Patchiness was seen to behigher in rural areas. When looked at Shannon Diversity Index (SDI)values, it is seen that a high diversity of Landscape Character Types(LCT) exist in the rural areas. Within the scope of this study, the fact thatthe landscape character analysis performed at the basin scale in theprotected area can be evaluated together with different variables andinterpreted from the perspective of holistic landscape planning shows thatthe technique is a positive approach in the evaluation of protected areas.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Atik M & Ortaceşme V (2010). Analyzing Cultural Landscapes in Antalya, Side Region by Landscape Character Analysis (LCA) Method (In Turkish: Peyzaj Karakter Analizi Yöntemi ile Antalya Side Bölgesi Kültürel Peyzajlarının Karakter Analizi, Project Number: 108Y345, Antalya
- Atik M, Işikli R C, Ortaceşme V & Yildirim E (2015). Definition of landscape character areas and types in Side region, Antalya-Turkey with regard to land use planning. Land use policy 44: 90-100 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.019
- Bastian O (2008). Landscape classification between fact and fiction. In: Paper Presented at the Conference Warzaw University and Polish Association of Landscape Ecology.Warzawa: Polska Asocjacja Ekologii Krajobrazu
- Botequilha-Leitão A B, Miller J, Ahern J & MGarigal K (2006). Measuring Landscapes: A Planners Handbook, Island Press, Washington, D.C. Council of Europe
- Cole D N & Landres P B (1996). Threats to wilderness ecosystems: impacts and research needs. Ecol. Appl. 6(1): 168-184
- Council of Europe (2000). The European Landscape Convention. CETS No. 176. Retrieved from Strasbourg: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-conventions/rms/0900001680080621
- Doğan İ (2002). Selection by Cluster Analysis. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 26: 47-53 (In Turkish)
- Elkie P C, Rempel R S & Carr A P (1999). Patch Analyst User’s Manuel: A tool for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Ontorio Ministry of Natural Resources, Northwest Science and Technology, Canada. http://www.scribd.com/doc/55765258/Manual-Patch-Analyst-Users
- Erikstad L, Uttakleiv L A & Halvorsen R (2015). Characterisation and mapping of landscape types, a case study from Norway. Belgian J. Geogr. 3
- Forman R T T (1995). Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions, Cambridge University Pres
- Görmüş S (2012). Landscape character analysis for protected areas case study: Kastamonu-Bartin Küre mountains National Park. Ph.D. Thesis, Ankara University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Landscape Architecture, Ankara, Turkey https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
- Görmüş S & Oğuz D (2010). An Assessment the Process of Landscape Character Map Preparation in Turkey (In Turkish Peyzaj Karakter Haritası Hazırlama Sürecinde Türkiye İçin Bir Durum Değerlendirmesi). IV. Congress of Landscape Architecture , Union of Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects/The Chamber of Landscape Architecture Publishing , 519-528, 21-24 October, 2011, Ankara
- Görmüş S, Oğuz D & Cengiz S (2013). Ecologic Dimensions of the Landscape Character Analysis Aproaches. (In Turkish: Peyzaj Karakter Analizi Yaklaşımlarının Ekolojik Boyutu). V. Congress of Landscape Arhitecture, Union of Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architectsthe
- Chamber of Landscape Architecture, 14-17 November, Adana, Turkey
- Hair J F, Anderson R E, Tatham R L, & Black W C (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Prentice-Hall International Inc., Fourth Edition, New Jersey
- Hansen A J & Defries R (2007). Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. Ecol. Appl. 17 (4): 974-988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/05-1112
- Kim K H & Pauleit S (2007). Landscape character, biodiversity and land use planning: The case of Kwangju City Region, South Korea. Land Use Policy 24:264-274 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.12.001
- Mas J F, Gao Y & Pacheco J A N (2010). Sensitivity of Landscape Pattern Metrics to Classsification Approaches. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 1215-1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.12.016
- McDonald R I, Kareiva P& Forman R T (2008). The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 141 (6): 1695-1703 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.025
- McGarigal K & Cushman S A (2002). Hierarchical, Multi-scale Decomposition of Species-Environment Relationships. Landscape Ecology 17, Kluwer Academic Publishers https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021571603605
- McGarigal K (2002). Landscape Pattern Metrics. Encyclopedia of Environmentrics. A. El-Shaarawi and W. W. Piegrorsch, eds. Sussex, England, John Wiley and Sons. 2, pp. 1135-1142
- MEP (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2003. Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC
- Parks S A & Harcourt A H (2002). Reserve size, local human density, and mammalian extinctions in US protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 16(3): 800-808 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00288.x
- Pedroli B, Van Doorn A, De Blust G, Paracchini ML, Wascher D & Bunce F (2007). Europe’s living landscapes. Essays on exploring our identity in the countryside. Landscape Europe/KNNV, The Netherlands
- Sarlöv Herlin I (2016). Exploring the national contexts and cultural ideas that preceded the landscape character assessment method in England. Landsc. Res. 41(2): 175-185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2015.1135317
- Şahin Ş, Perçin H, Kurum E & Uzun O (2011). PEYZAJ-44: İl Ölçeğinde Peyzaj Karakter Analizi ve Turizm/Rekreasyon Açısından Değerlendirilmesi (In English: Tourism/Recreation Based Landscape Character Analysis at Provincial Scale)109G074 Nolu TÜBİTAK 1007 Programı KAMAG Projesi
- Tatlidil H (1996). Applied Multivariate Analysis, Akademi Matbaası, Ankara (In Turkish)
- Turner M G (1989). Landscape Ecology: The Effect of Pattern on Process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20
- USGAO (US General Accounting Office) (1994). National Park Service: Activities Outside Park Borders have Caused Damage to Resources and Will Likely Cause More. (No. GAO/RCED-94-59), Washington, DC
- Uzun O, Dilek E F, Çetinkaya G, Erduran F & Açiksöz S (2010). Konya İli, Bozkır-Seydişehir-Ahırlı-Yalıhüyük İlçeleri ve Suğla Gölü Mevkii Peyzaj Yönetimi, Koruma ve Planlama Projesi (In english: Landscape Management, Conservation and Planning Project of Konya Province, BozkırSeydişehir-Ahırlı-Yalıhüyük Districts and Suğla Lake Area) Sonuç Raporu. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı
- Wiens J A, Van Horne B & Noon B R (2002). Integrating landscape structure and scale into natural resource management. In: Liu, J.G., Taylor, W.W. (Eds.), Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p. 485
| APA | Gormus s, Oğuz D, TUNÇAY H, cengiz s (2021). The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin. , 414 - 425. 10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
| Chicago | Gormus sevgi,Oğuz Dicle,TUNÇAY Hayriye EŞBAH,cengiz serhat The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin. (2021): 414 - 425. 10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
| MLA | Gormus sevgi,Oğuz Dicle,TUNÇAY Hayriye EŞBAH,cengiz serhat The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin. , 2021, ss.414 - 425. 10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
| AMA | Gormus s,Oğuz D,TUNÇAY H,cengiz s The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin. . 2021; 414 - 425. 10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
| Vancouver | Gormus s,Oğuz D,TUNÇAY H,cengiz s The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin. . 2021; 414 - 425. 10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
| IEEE | Gormus s,Oğuz D,TUNÇAY H,cengiz s "The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin." , ss.414 - 425, 2021. 10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
| ISNAD | Gormus, sevgi vd. "The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin". (2021), 414-425. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
| APA | Gormus s, Oğuz D, TUNÇAY H, cengiz s (2021). The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 27(4), 414 - 425. 10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
| Chicago | Gormus sevgi,Oğuz Dicle,TUNÇAY Hayriye EŞBAH,cengiz serhat The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 27, no.4 (2021): 414 - 425. 10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
| MLA | Gormus sevgi,Oğuz Dicle,TUNÇAY Hayriye EŞBAH,cengiz serhat The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.27, no.4, 2021, ss.414 - 425. 10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
| AMA | Gormus s,Oğuz D,TUNÇAY H,cengiz s The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. 2021; 27(4): 414 - 425. 10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
| Vancouver | Gormus s,Oğuz D,TUNÇAY H,cengiz s The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. 2021; 27(4): 414 - 425. 10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
| IEEE | Gormus s,Oğuz D,TUNÇAY H,cengiz s "The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin." Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 27, ss.414 - 425, 2021. 10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
| ISNAD | Gormus, sevgi vd. "The Use of Landscape Character Analysis to Reveal Differences Between Protected and Nonprotected Landscapes in Kapısuyu Basin". Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 27/4 (2021), 414-425. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.640159 |
