YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 66 Sayfa Aralığı: 379 - 415 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?
Öz: Yapay zekâ, daha eski bir geçmişe sahip olsa da özellikle son on yıldaki en popüler konulardan biridir. Bu çalışma, yapay zekânın yargı uygulamasında ne kadar kullanılabileceğini keşfetmek adına yapay zekâ kavramını hukuk perspektifinden ele almaya çalışmaktadır. Bu makale yapay zekânın yargı uygulamasında, hâkime yardımcı yapay zekâ, karar taslaklarını hazırlayan yapay zekâ ve karar veren yapay zekâ olarak üç şekilde kullanılabileceğini öngörmektedir. Yargı uygulamasında kullanılacak yapay zekâ ilk olarak bir etik çerçeveye sahip olmalıdır. Zira adil olma, ayrımcılık yasağı gibi hukuk sisteminin kurucu değerlerine uygun hareket edilmesi mevcut yargı aktörleri için de bir yükümlülüktür. Aslında, henüz başlangıç aşamasında olsalar da hukuki uygulamada kullanılacak yapay zekâ için hem düzenleme hem de etik bir çerçeve oluşturmaya dair çeşitli girişimler bulunmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, yapay zekâ patlaması, her ne kadar hukuk olabildiğince geç etkilenecek sektörlerden biri olsa bile, diğer alanlarda olduğu gibi yargısal uygulamaları da etkilemeye devam edecektir.
Anahtar Kelime: Using Aİ in Judicial Proceedings – Will Aİ Be Able to Wear the Judge Robe
Öz: AI is one of the most popular topics in particular in the last decade even if it has an older history. This paper tries to address AI from the law perspective to discover to what extent AI can be used in judicial practice from an assistant to a judge. This paper anticipates that AI can be used in judicial practice by three options as AI assistant to judge, AI drafting decisions and AI deciding cases. Moreover, if AI is used in judicial practice, firstly it should have an ethical frame, as the ordinary legal actors have. Indeed, there are certain attempts for both to regulate AI, in general, and to create an ethical framework for the AI being used in legal practice even if they still remain at the initial stage. All in all, AI boom will continue to affect legal practice as it does in other professions even if the law will be one of those sectors which will be affected less and later
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Barfield Woodrow and Pagallo Ugo, Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence, Elgar, Cheltenham, 2018.
- Bramer Max and Petridis Miltos, Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII Incorporating Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XXIV, Springer, Cham, 2016.
- Corrales Marcelo, Fenwick Mark and Forgo Nikolaus, Robotics AI and the Future of Law, Springer, Singapur, 2018.
- Rich Elaine, Knight Kevin and Nair Shivashankar B., Artificial Intelligence, Tata Mcgraw-Hill, New Delhi, 2009, 3. Bası.
- Russel Stuart and Norwig Peter, Artificial Intelligence A Modern Approach, Pearson, New Jersey, 2010, 3. Bası. Makaleler
- Barfield Woodrow, Towards a Law of Artificial Intelligence, in W.
- Barfield, U. Pagallo (eds) Research Hand Book on the Law of Artificial Intelligence, 2-39, Elgar, Cheltenham, 2018.
- Becerra Sergio David, The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Field: Where We Are and Where We Are Going, Pepperdine Law School the Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and the Law, C. 11, 27-52, 2018.
- Black’s Law Dictionary, 10th ed., Thomson Reuters, 2014.
- Buocz Thomas Julius, Artificial Intelligence in Court : Legitimacy Problems of AI Assistance in the Judiciary, Copenhagen Journal Of Legal Studies, C. 2 S. 1, 41-59, 2018.
- Burrell Jenna, How the Machine ‘Thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms, Big Data & Society, C. 3 S. 1, 17-29, 2016, https://journals.sagepub. com/doi/full/10.1177/205395171562 2512
- Etzioni Amitai and Etzioni Oren, Should Artificial Intelligence be Regulated, Issues in Science and Technology, C. 33, S. 4, 32-39, 2017, https://issues.org/perspective-should-artificial-intelligence-be-regulated/
- Etzioni Oren, Should AI Technology Be Regulated? Yes, and Here's How, Communications Of The ACM, C. 61, S. 12, 32-43, 2018, https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2018/12/232893-point-should-aitechnology-be-regulated/ful ltext
- Hallevy Gabriel, The Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence Entities - from Science Fiction to Legal Social Control, Akron Intellectual Property Journal, C. 4 S. 2, 171-204, 2010.
- Heaton Paul, Waggoner Ivan&Morikawa Jamie, Victim Compensation Funds and Tort Litigation Following Incidents of Mass Violence, Buffalo Law Review C. 63, S. 5 1265-1323, 2015.
- Kingston John, Artificial Intelligence and Legal Liability, in Max Bramer and Miltos Petridis (eds) Research And Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII Incorporating Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XXIV, 269-279, Springer, Cham, 2016.
- McCarthy John, Minsky Marvin L., Rochester Nathaniel and Shannon Claude E., A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955, AI Magazine, C. 27, S.4, 12-14, 2006, https://www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aima gazine/issue/view/165
- Nunez Catherine, Artificial Intelligence and Legal Ethics: Whether AI Lawyers Can Make Ethical Decisions, Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, C. 20, 189-204, 2017.
- Pagallo Ugo, Vital, Sophia, and Co.—The Quest for the Legal Personhood of Robots, 9, Information, 9, 230-241, 2018, https://www.mdpi.com/2078- 2489/9/9/230
- Pearl Tracy Hresko, Compensation at the Crossroads: Autonomous Vehicles and Alternative Victim Compensation Schemes, William & Mary Law Review, C. 60, 1827-1875, 2018.
- Petit Nicolas, Law and Regulation of Artificial Intelligence and Robots - Conceptual Framework and Normative Implications, Social Science Research Network Electronic Journal, 1-31, 2017 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2931339
- Scherer Matthew U., Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, C. 29, S. 2, 354-400, 2016,
- Semmler Sean and Rose Zeeve, Artificial Intelligence: Application Today and Implications Tomorrow, Duke Law&Technology Review, C. 16, S. 1, 85-99, 2017.
- Simshaw Drew, Ethical Issues in Robo-Lawyering: The Need for Guidance on Developing and Using Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law, Hastings Law Journal, C. 70, S. 4, 173-225, 2018.
- Solaiman S. M., Legal Personality Of Robots, Corporations, Idols and Chimpanzees: A Quest For Legitimacy, Artificial Intelligence and Law Journal, C. 25, S. 2, 155-201, 2017.
- Solum Lawrence B., Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences, North Carolina Law Review, C. 70 S. 4, 1231-1287, 1992.
- Twaig Omri Rachum, Whose Robot Is It Anyway? Liability for Artificial Intelligence Based Robots, University of Illinois Law Review C. 2020, S. 4, 1141- 1176.
- Van den Hoven van Genderen Robert, Do We Need New Legal Personhood in the Age of Robots and AI? in Corrales M., Fenwick M., Forgó N. (eds) Robotics, AI and the Future of Law, 15-15, Springer, Singapore, 2018.
- Van den Hoven van Genderen Robert, Legal Personhood in the Age of Artificially Intelligent Robots, in W. Barfield, U. Pagallo (eds) Research Hand Book on the Law of Artificial Intelligence, 213-150, Elgar, Cheltenham, 2018.
- Volokh Eugene, Chief Justice Robots, Duke Law Journal, C. 68, S. 6, 1135- 1192, 2019.
- Wildhaber Isabelle, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, the Workplace and Workplace-related Law, in W. Barfield, U. Pagallo (eds) Research Hand Book On The Law Of Artificial Intelligence, 577-608, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2018.
- Asaro Peter M., The Liability Problem for Autonomous Artificial Agents (5 March, 2016) https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS16/paper/view/12699/11 949
- Delcker Janosch, Europe Divided over Robot Personhood, (4 Nov, 2018) https://www.politico.eu/article/ europe-divided-over-robot-aiartificial-intelligence-personhood/
- Dutton Tim, An Overview of National AI Strategies, 28 June,2018 https://medium.com/politics-ai/an-overview-of-national-ai-strategies2a70ec6edfd
- Ehrenfreund Max, The Machines That Could Rid Courtrooms of Racism (Aug 18, 2016), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/08/18/why-acomputer-program-that-judges-rely-on-around-the-country-was-accusedof-racism/?utm_ term=.419946f 91004
- Heikkinen Tiia-Helinä, How Does the Use of Artificial Intelligence Affect the Concept of Fair Trial? (12 June 2019) https://lup.lub.lu.se/studentpapers/search/ publication/8980709
- Kiser Matt, Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Algorithmia (Aug. 11, 2016), http://blog. algorithmia.com/introduction-naturallanguageprocessing-nip/
- Marria Vishal, The Future of Artificial Intelligence In The Workplace, ( 11 Jan 2019), https://www.forbes.com/sites/vishalmarria/2019/01/11/the-futureof-artificialintelligence-in-the-workplace/#7 851418773d4
- Thomas Valerie, Report on Artificial Intelligence: Part I-the existing regulatory landscape, (May 14, 2018) https://www.howtoregulate.org/artificial_intelligence/#sdendnote1sym
- Rouse Margaret, IBM Watson Supercomputer (16 June, 2018) https://searchenterpriseai. techtarget.com/definition/IBM-Watsonsupercomputer
- Schatsky David, Muraskin Craig and Gurumurthy Ragu, Demystifying Artificial Intelligence, A Deloitte series on cognitive technologies (Nov. 04 2014), https://dupress.deloitte.com/dup-us-en/focus/cognitive-technologies/ what-is-cognitive-technology. htrnl#endnote-sup-11
- What is an algorithm and why should you care?, Khanacademy, https://www.khanacademy.org/computing/computerscience/algorithms/intro-to-algorithms/v/what-are-algorith ms
- Zhuang Frank/Tang Tony, How Do China’s Internet Courts Work, 22 Jan 2019, https://www.chinalawandpractice.com/2019/01/22/will-chinasinternet-courts-lead-the-future-of-litigation/
- https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/pub lications/model_rules_of_ professi onal_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents/
- https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/insights/china-establishesthree-internet-courts-to-try-internet-related-cases-online.html
- https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/artificial-intelligence
- https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/high-level-expertgroup-artificial-intelligence
- https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelinestrustworthy-ai
- https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/member-statesand-commission-work-together-boost-artificial-intelligence-made-europe
- https://en.oxforddictionaries.com
- http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017- 0005_EN.html#title1
- http://fortune.com/2017/09/04/ai-artificial-intelligence-putin-ruleworld/
- https://g20tradedigital.go.jp/dl/Ministerial_Statement_on_Trade_and_Digital_Economy. pdf
- https://www.icj.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/10/IBA_International_Principles_on_Con duct_for_the_legal_prof.pdf
- https://www.judicialintegritygroup.org/
- https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/355823?rskey=86biC3&result=2#eid
- http://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/
- https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/roleoflawyers.as px
- https://rm.coe.int/conference-of-prosecutors-general-of-europe-6thsession-organised-by-t/16807204b5
- https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december2018/16808f699c
- https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december2018/16808f699c
- http://www.robotics-openletter.eu/
- http://www.rossintelligence.com/
- https://sgb.adalet.gov.tr/Resimler/SayfaDokuman/23122019162931YR S_TR.pdf
- https://sozluk.gov.tr
- https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/19/uber-selfdriving-car-kills-woman-arizona-tempe
- http://www.unicri.it/in_focus/on/UNICRI_Centre_Artificial_Robotics
- https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/corruption/judicial_group/Bangalo re_principles.pdf
- https://www.unodc.org/res/ji/import/international_standards/comme ntary_on_the_bangalore_principles_of_judicial_conduct/bangalore_princi ples_english.pdf
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/03/05/howto-punish-robots-when-they-inevita bly-turn-againstus/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.93ffb763ecc4
- https://en.wikipedia.org/
| APA | yilmaz o (2021). YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?. , 379 - 415. |
| Chicago | yilmaz oguz gokhan YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?. (2021): 379 - 415. |
| MLA | yilmaz oguz gokhan YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?. , 2021, ss.379 - 415. |
| AMA | yilmaz o YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?. . 2021; 379 - 415. |
| Vancouver | yilmaz o YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?. . 2021; 379 - 415. |
| IEEE | yilmaz o "YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?." , ss.379 - 415, 2021. |
| ISNAD | yilmaz, oguz gokhan. "YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?". (2021), 379-415. |
| APA | yilmaz o (2021). YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?. Adalet Dergisi , 0(66), 379 - 415. |
| Chicago | yilmaz oguz gokhan YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?. Adalet Dergisi 0, no.66 (2021): 379 - 415. |
| MLA | yilmaz oguz gokhan YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?. Adalet Dergisi , vol.0, no.66, 2021, ss.379 - 415. |
| AMA | yilmaz o YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?. Adalet Dergisi . 2021; 0(66): 379 - 415. |
| Vancouver | yilmaz o YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?. Adalet Dergisi . 2021; 0(66): 379 - 415. |
| IEEE | yilmaz o "YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?." Adalet Dergisi , 0, ss.379 - 415, 2021. |
| ISNAD | yilmaz, oguz gokhan. "YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?". Adalet Dergisi 66 (2021), 379-415. |
