Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 1128 - 1133 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428 İndeks Tarihi: 25-11-2021

Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques

Öz:
Aim: With the improvement of minimally invasive urology procedures, open surgical interventions are less common to treat ureteralcalculus. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) indications are large multiple and/or impacted ureteral calculus that may not be treatedwith shock-wave lithotripsy or ureterorenoscopy approaches. In this study, we aimed to compare laparoscopic retroperitoneal andtransperitoneal ureterolithotomy techniques in terms of perioperative-postoperative results. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 45 patients with large and impacted upper ureter calculus who underwent transperitonealor retroperitoneal LU between January 2012 and December 2017. The transperitoneal and retroperitoneal routes were grouped asgroup 1 and 2, respectively. Groups were crosschecked according to preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical datum. Results: We did not find statistically meaningful disparity between groups with regards to age, gender, stone size, blood loss andbody mass index. The stone free accomplishment ratio was 100% in group 1 and 2. Visual analogue scale scores were higher andstatistically meaningful in group 1 (p<0.05). The mean operative time was statistically shorter in group 2 (p:0.022). No double J stentinserted routinely intraoperatively. Conclusion: Compared to those obtained with the transperitoneal technique, the retroperitoneal technique has a significantly shorteroperating time and less postoperative pain for large and impacted proximal ureteral calculus. More randomized, controlled andprospective studies on large samples are needed.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Lopes Neto AC, Korkes F, Silva JL, et al. Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy. J Urol 2012;187:164-8.
  • 2. Fang YQ, Qiu JG, Wang DJ, et al. Comparative study on ureteroscopic lithotripsy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for treatment of unilateral upper ureteral stones. Acta Cir Bras 2012;27:266-70
  • 3. Huri E, Basok EK, Ugurlu O, et al. Experiences in laparoscopic removal of upper ureteral stones: multicenter analysis of cases, based on the Turk Uro Lap Group. J Endourol 2010; 24:1279-82.
  • 4. Tugcu V, Simsek A, Kargi T, et al. Retroperitoneal Laparoendoscopic single site ureterolithotomy versus conventional laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Urology 2013; 81:567-72.
  • 5. Gaur DD, Trivedi S, Prabhudesai MR, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and longterm follow-up. BJU Int 2002;89:339.
  • 6. Khaladkar S, Modi J, Bhansali M, et al. Which is the best option to treat large (>1.5cm) midureteric calculi? J Laparoendoscopic? Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19:501-4.
  • 7. Tefekli A, Karadag MA, Tepeler K, et al. Classifications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 2008; 53:184-90.
  • 8. Rabani SM, Moosavizadeh A. Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Comparative Clinical Trial Between Transureteral Lithotripsy (TUL) and Shock Wave lithotripsy (SWL). Nephrourol Mon 2012;4:556- 9.
  • 9. Turk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, et al. Skolarikos, K. Thomas: EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis: 3.4.11. Laparoscopy and open surgery for removal of renal stones. EAU Guideline, 2020.
  • 10. Wickham JEA (ed). The surgical treatment of renal lithiasis. In: Urinary Calculus Disease. New York: Churchill Livingstone 1979;145-98.
  • 11. Raboy A, Ferzli GS, Ioffreda R, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Urology 1992;39:223-5.
  • 12. Feyaerts A, Rietbergen J, Navarra S, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2001; 40:609-613 VE Gaur DD, Rathi SS, Ravandale AV, et al. A single centre experience of retroperitoneoscopy using the balloon technique. BJU Int 2001;87:602-6.
  • 13. Harewood LM, Webb DR, Pope AJ. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: the results of an initial series, and an evaluation of its role in the management of ureteric calculi. Br J Urol 1994;74:170-6.
  • 14. Sancaktutar AA, Bozkurt Y, Atar M, et al. Urological laparoscopic surgery: Our experience of first 100 cases in Dicle University. J Clin Exp Invest 2012 3:44- 8.
  • 15. Gaur DD: Retroperitoneal endoscopic ureterolithotomy: our experience in 12 patients. J Endourol 1993;7:501.
  • 16. Bove P, Micali S, Miano R, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: a comparison between the transperitoneal and the retroperitoneal approach during the learning curve. J Endourol 2009;23:953-7.
  • 17. Singh V, Sinha RJ, Gupta DK, et al. Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparison Study. J Urol 2013;189:940-5.
  • 18. McAllister M, Bhayani SB, Ong A, et al. Vena cava transection during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: report of the complication and review of the literature. J Urol 2004;172:183-5.
  • 19. Rofeim O, Yohannes P, Badlani G. Does laparoscopic ureterolithotomy replace shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for ureteral stones? Curr Opin Urol 2001; 11:287-91.
  • 20. Garg M, Singh V, Sinha RJ, et al. Prospective Randomized Comparison of Open versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: Experience of a Single Center Prospective Randomized Comparison of Open versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: Experience of a Single Center from Northern India. Curr Urol 2013;7:83-9.
  • 21. Flasko T, Holman E, Kovacs G, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: the method of choice in selected cases. JLaparoendoscAdvSurgTechA 2005;15:149- 52.
  • 22. Kaygisiz O, Coskun B, Kilicarslan H, et al. Comparison of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy with Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for Large Proximal and Mid-Ureter Stones Urol Int 2015;94:205-9.
  • 23. Karami H, Javanmard B, Hasanzadeh-Hadah A, et al. Is it necessary to place a Double J catheter after laparoscopic ureterolithotomy? A four-year experience. J Endourol 2012; 26:1183-6.
  • 24. Bellman GC, Smith AD. Specialconsiderationsinthetechnique of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. J Urol 1994;151:146-9.
  • 25. Hammady A, Gamal WM, Zaki M, et al. Evaluation of ureteral stent placement after retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteral stone: randomized controlled study. J Endourol 2011; 25:825.
  • 26. Kijvikai K and Patcharatrakul S: Laparascopic ureterolithotomy: its role and some controversial technical considerations: İnt J Urol 2006;13:206.
  • 27. Nouira Y, Kallel Y, Binous MY, et al. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy: initial experience and review of literature. J Endourol 2004;18:557-61.
APA aydin c, Akkoç A (2021). Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques. , 1128 - 1133. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428
Chicago aydin cemil,Akkoç Ali Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques. (2021): 1128 - 1133. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428
MLA aydin cemil,Akkoç Ali Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques. , 2021, ss.1128 - 1133. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428
AMA aydin c,Akkoç A Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques. . 2021; 1128 - 1133. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428
Vancouver aydin c,Akkoç A Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques. . 2021; 1128 - 1133. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428
IEEE aydin c,Akkoç A "Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques." , ss.1128 - 1133, 2021. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428
ISNAD aydin, cemil - Akkoç, Ali. "Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques". (2021), 1128-1133. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428
APA aydin c, Akkoç A (2021). Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques. Annals of Medical Research, 28(6), 1128 - 1133. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428
Chicago aydin cemil,Akkoç Ali Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques. Annals of Medical Research 28, no.6 (2021): 1128 - 1133. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428
MLA aydin cemil,Akkoç Ali Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques. Annals of Medical Research, vol.28, no.6, 2021, ss.1128 - 1133. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428
AMA aydin c,Akkoç A Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques. Annals of Medical Research. 2021; 28(6): 1128 - 1133. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428
Vancouver aydin c,Akkoç A Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques. Annals of Medical Research. 2021; 28(6): 1128 - 1133. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428
IEEE aydin c,Akkoç A "Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques." Annals of Medical Research, 28, ss.1128 - 1133, 2021. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428
ISNAD aydin, cemil - Akkoç, Ali. "Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques". Annals of Medical Research 28/6 (2021), 1128-1133. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.428