Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 446 - 451 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230 İndeks Tarihi: 06-12-2021

A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression

Öz:
In honey bee (Apis mellifera L.), aggression and aggressive behavior occur due to many reasons and the most important one is the genotype. However, regardless of genotype, a bee colony can have different levels of aggression at different times. If the bee’s aggression is not due to racial characteristics, this may indicate some problems in the colony. One of the most important reasons is the absence of queen bees in the colony, and the other is that the amount of nutrients in the hive has decreased to a critical level. Some other environmental effects are effective on bees’ aggression and aggressive behavior. In this study, the determination of the relationships between the aggression of four different honey bee genotypes (Carniolan, Caucasian, Black Sea and Muğla) in Samsun province in two different months (July, August) at different times of the day (09:00-13:00-17:00) was intended. For this purpose, a Log-linear model analysis was made. According to the findings, genotype, month and time, which are the main effects, and genotype × month interaction among the second-order interactions were found to be statistically significant, while genotype * hour and month × hour interactions were not significant. In Samsun province, it was determined that the Carniolan genotype was 7.846 times less, the Caucasian genotype 3.991 times and the Black Sea genotype 3.888 times less aggressive than the Muğla genotype. In addition, it was determined that the aggression in July was 1.185 times less than in August, and they were less aggressive in the daytime than in the evening and morning hours. It was determined that the Carniolan genotype was 2.04 times less aggressive than the Muğla genotype in July. Before and after the nectar flow seasons, studies to determine the aggression for all genotypes suitable for the regions will be a good source of information for beekeepers and researchers.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Agresti A. 2002. Cateorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Akyol Y, Yeninar Y, Kaftanoğlu P, Özkök DD. 2003. Bazı saf ve melez bal arısı genotiplerinin (Apis Mellifera L.) farklı mevsimlerdeki hırçınlık davranışlarının belirlenmesi, Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi, 3(3): 38-40.
  • Andere C, Palacio MA, Rodriguez EM, Figini E, Dominguez MT, Bedascarrasbure E. 2002. Evaluation of the defensive behavior of two honeybee ecotypes using a laboratory test. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 25(1): 57–60.
  • Anholt RRH, Mackay TFC. 2012. Genetics of aggression. Annual Review of Genetics, 46: 145–164.
  • Arechavaleta-Velasco ME, Hunt GJ, Emore C. 2003. Quantitative trait loci that influence the expression of guarding and stinging behaviors of individual honey bees. Behavior genetics, 33(3): 357–64
  • Atkinson EB, Ellis JD. 2011. Adaptive behaviour of honeybees (Apis mellifera) toward beetle invaders exhibiting various levels of colony integration. Physiological Entomology. 36(3): 282–289
  • Avalos A, Fang M, Pan H, Lluch AR, Lipka AE, Zhao SD, Giray T, Robinson GE, Zhang G, Hudson ME. 2020. Genomic regions influencing aggressive behavior in honey bees are defined by colony allele frequencies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117(29): 17135-17141, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922927117
  • Avalos A, Pan H, Li C, Acevedo-Gonzalez JP, Rendon G, Fields CJ, Brown PJ, Giray T, Robinson GE, Hudson ME, Zhang G. 2017. A soft selective sweep during rapid evolution of gentle behaviour in an Africanized honeybee. Nature Communications, 8: 1550, doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01800-0
  • Bagdatli Kalkan S. 2018. Analysis of relationships between internet usage reasons by log-linear models. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies, 5(4): 98- 109.
  • Berenbaum MR, Calla B. 2021. Honey as a Functional Food for Apis mellifera. Annual Review of Entomology, 66(1): 185- 208.
  • Breed MD, Guzmán-Novoa E, Hunt GJ. 2004. Defensive behavior of honey bees: Organization, genetics, and comparisons with other bees. Annual Review of Entomology, 49(1): 271–298.
  • Breed MD, Robinson GE, Page Jr RE. 1990. Division of labor during honey bee colony defense. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27: 395–401.
  • Burnett JD. 1983. Loglinear Analysis: A new tool for educational researchers. Canadian Journal of Education, 8(2): 139- 154.
  • Cengiz MM, Erdoğan Y. 2018. Doğu Anadolu koşullarında farklı balarısı (Apis mellifera L.) genotiplerinin davranış özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Türk Tarım-Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 6(1): 97-101.
  • Frumhoff PC, Baker J. 1988. A genetic component to division of labour within honey bee colonies. Nature, 333: 358–361.
  • Garson GD. 2012. Log-Linear analysis. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishers.
  • Guzmán-Novoa E, Hunt GJ, Uribe JL, Smith C, ArechavaletaVelasco ME. 2002. Confirmation of QTL effects and evidence of genetic dominance of honeybee defensive behavior: Results of colony and individual behavioral assays. Behavior genetics, 32: 95–102.
  • Hintze JL. 2007. Loglinear Models-Chapter 530, NCSS User’s Guide V, NCSS, Kaysville, Utah. https://www.ncss.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/09/NCSSUG5.pdf(Accessed: 25.01.2020).
  • Hunt GJ, Guzman-Novoa E, Uribe-Rubio JL, Prieto-Merlos D. 2003. Genotype-environment interactions in honeybee guarding behaviour, Animal Behaviour, 66(3): 459–467,
  • Koleoglu N, 2018. Uluslararası öğrencilerin sosyal uyum problemini belirlemede Log lineer model kullanımı. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 18(EYİ Özel Sayısı): 101-114. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18092/ ulikidince.354017
  • Moore AJ, Breed MD, Moor MJ. 1987. The guardhoneybee: ontogeny and behavioural variability of workers per-forming a specialized task. Animal Behaviour. 35: 1159–1167
  • Moritz RFA, Southwich EE. 1992. Bees as superorganisms: An evolutionary reality. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer
  • Page Jr RE. Fondrk MK, Hunt GJ, Guzmán-Novoa E, Humphries MA, Nguyen K, Greene AS. 2000. Genetic dissection of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) foraging behavior. Journal of Heredity, 91(6): 474-479.
  • Robinson GE, Page Jr RE. 1988. Genetic determination of guarding and undertaking in honey-bee colonies. Nature. 333: 356–358
  • Seeley TD. 1985. Honey bee ecology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Simsek Kandemir A, Simsek M. 2019. Geçici iş göremezlik süresi, cinsiyet, çalışılan ortam ve iş kazası türleri etkileşimlerinin istatistiksel analizi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1): 239-245.
  • Topaloglu E, Atay A, 2020. Kategorik verilerin analizinde logaritmik doğrusal modellerin kullanımı: İntihar olasılığı verileri üzerine bir uygulama. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2): 565-580.
  • Trumbo ST, Huang ZY, Robinson GE. 1997. Division of labor between undertaker specialists and other middleaged workers in honey bee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41(3): 151-163.
  • Tugrul G, Guzmán-Novoa E, Carol AW, Zelinsky B, Fahrbach SE, Robinson GE. 2000. Genetic variation in worker temporal polyethism and colony defensiveness in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Behavioral Ecology, 11(1): 44-55.
  • Uzunov A, Costa C, Panasiuk B, Meixner M, Kryger P, Hatjina F, Bouga M, Andonov S, Bienkowska M, Le Conte Y, Wilde J, Gerula D, Kiprijanovska H, Filipi J, Petrov P, Ruottinen L, Pechhacker H, Berg S, Dyrba W, Ivanova E, Büchler R. 2014. Swarming, defensive and hygienic behaviour in honey bee colonies of diferent genetic origin in a pan-European experiment. Journal of Apicultural Research, 53(2): 248–260
  • Winston ML. 1987. The biology of the honey bee. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Yucel B, Kosoglu M. 2011. Ege Bölgesi’nde Muğla ekotipi ve İtalyan melezi bal arılarının kimi performans özellikleri bakımından karşılaştırılması. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(6): 1025-1029. doi: 10.9775/kvfd. 2011.5092
APA ABACI S, Biyik S (2021). A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression. , 446 - 451. 10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230
Chicago ABACI SAMET HASAN,Biyik Selim A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression. (2021): 446 - 451. 10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230
MLA ABACI SAMET HASAN,Biyik Selim A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression. , 2021, ss.446 - 451. 10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230
AMA ABACI S,Biyik S A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression. . 2021; 446 - 451. 10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230
Vancouver ABACI S,Biyik S A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression. . 2021; 446 - 451. 10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230
IEEE ABACI S,Biyik S "A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression." , ss.446 - 451, 2021. 10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230
ISNAD ABACI, SAMET HASAN - Biyik, Selim. "A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression". (2021), 446-451. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230
APA ABACI S, Biyik S (2021). A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 9(2), 446 - 451. 10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230
Chicago ABACI SAMET HASAN,Biyik Selim A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 9, no.2 (2021): 446 - 451. 10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230
MLA ABACI SAMET HASAN,Biyik Selim A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, vol.9, no.2, 2021, ss.446 - 451. 10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230
AMA ABACI S,Biyik S A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2021; 9(2): 446 - 451. 10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230
Vancouver ABACI S,Biyik S A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2021; 9(2): 446 - 451. 10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230
IEEE ABACI S,Biyik S "A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression." Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 9, ss.446 - 451, 2021. 10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230
ISNAD ABACI, SAMET HASAN - Biyik, Selim. "A Model for Determining the Interactions Between some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes and Different Grooming Times in Terms of Aggression". Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 9/2 (2021), 446-451. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v9i2.446-451.4230