Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery

Cekic, Bahanur; yeniay, dilek

doi:10.17826/cumj.978120

Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery

Dilek YENİAY, (Giresun Üniversitesi, Kadın Doğum ve Çocuk Hastalıkları Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Bölümü, Giresun, Türkiye)

Bahanur ÇEKİÇ (Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı, Trabzon, Türkiye)

Cukurova Medical Journal

0 1

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1468 - 1477 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.17826/cumj.978120 İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery

Öz:

Purpose: The aim of this study is to use ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) and endotracheal tube (ETT) in elective septorhinoplasty operation and to compare the hemodynamic differences and postoperative complications during the application. Materials and Methods: In the prospective planned study, ASA I-II and 60 patients aged 18-35 were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 30, n = 30). After the standard anesthesia technique, Group E was placed ETT, Group P PLMA. Patients’ demographic characteristics, number of attempts for correct insertion, hemodynamic changes, postoperative nausea, vomiting, sore throat, hoarseness, dysphagia and surgical satisfaction evaluated. Results: Heart rate was higher in Group E than in Group P at the 1st min after anesthesia induction, at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 10th min after airway insertion, and at the 3rd min after extubation. Difficulty in swallowing at postoperative was higher in Group E than in Group P. Insertion rates of the devices, were similar. Surgical satisfaction was higher in Group E than in Group P. Adequate tidal volume was provided in both groups during the operation. Conclusion: The use of PLMA in airway management in outpatient septorhinoplasty operations creates less hemodynamic response compared to the use of ETT, less airway complications are seen and thanks to its flexibility, it does not interfere with the surgical area. PLMA may be an alternative to ETT when the insertion of the airway devices is performed by experienced physicians.

Anahtar Kelime: rhinoplasty Endotracheal intubation laryngeal mask airway

Septorinoplasti operasyonlarında ProSeal laryngeal maske ve entübasyon tüpünün karşılaştırılması

Öz:

Amaç: Bu çalışmada amacımız elektif septorinoplasti operasyonunda ProSeal laryngeal maske havayolu (PLMA) ve endotrakeal tüp (ETT) kullanmak ve uygulama sırasında ortaya çıkan hemodinamik farklılıkları ve postoperati ve komplikasyonları karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Prospektif planlı çalışmada ASA I-II ve 18-35 yaş arası 60 hasta rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı (n=30,n=30). Standart anestezi tekniğinin ardından Grup E’ye ETT, Grup P’ye PLMA yerleştirildi. Hastaların demografik özellikleri, doğru yerleştirme girişimleri, hemodinamik değişiklikler, ameliyat sonrası bulantı, kusma, boğaz ağrısı, ses kısıklığı, yutma güçlüğü ve cerrahi memnuniyet değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Anestezi indüksiyonu sonrası 1. dk, havayolu yerleşimi sonrası 1., 2., 3., 4., 5. ve 10.dk ve ekstübasyon sonrası 3.dk kalp hızı Grup E'de Grup P'ye göre daha yüksekti. Postoperatif yutma güçlüğü Grup E'de Grup P'ye göre daha yüksekti. Cihazların yerleştirme oranları benzerdi. Grup E'de Grup P'ye göre cerrahi memnuniyet daha yüksekti. Operasyon sırasında her iki grupta da yeterli tidal volüm sağlandı. Sonuç: Günübirlik yapılan septorinoplasti operasyonlarında havayolu yönetiminde PLMA kullanımının ETT kullanımına göre daha az hemodinamik yanıt oluşturduğunu, daha az havayolu komplikasyonu görüldüğünü ve esnekliği sayesinde cerrahi alana müdahale etmediğini saptadık. Havayolu cihazlarının yerleştirilmesi deneyimli hekimler tarafından yapıldığında PLMA, ETT'ye alternatif olabilir

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anesth. 2005;52:739–60.
2. Natalini G, Lanza G, Rosano A, Dell’Agnolo P, Bernardini A. Standard laryngeal mask airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2003;15:428-32.
3. Kaplan A, Crosby GJ, Bhattacharyya N. Airway protection and the laryngeal mask airway in sinus and nasal surgery. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:652-5.
4. Wheeler M. Proseal laryngeal mask airway in 120 pediatric surgical patients: a prospective evaluation of characteristics and performance. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16:297–301.
5. Cukurova I, Cetinkaya EA, Mercan GC, Demirhan E, Gumussoy M. Retrospective analysis of 697 septoplasty surgery cases: packing versus trans-septal suturing method. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012;32:111-4.
6. Karbasforushan A, Hemmatpoor B, Makhsosi BR, Mahvar T, Golfam P, Khiabani B. The effect of pharyngeal packing during nasal surgery on the incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and sore throat. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;26:219-23.
7. Tulunay M, Tulunay FC. Assessment of pain and measurements of pain. In: Erdine S. (ed). Pain. 1. Edition. Istanbul, Nobel bookstore; 2000: 91-110.
8. Tural K, Süslü H, Arslan G, Özyurt Y. Kısa süreli ameliyatlarda laringeal maske havayolu ve cobra perilaringeal havayolunun etkinlik ve komplikasyonlarının karşılaştırılması. Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi. 2009;20(2):57-65
9. Doksrod S, Lofgren B, Nordhammer A, Svendsen MV, Gisselsson L, Raeder J. Reinforced laryngeal mask airway compared with endotracheal tube for adenotonsillectomies. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:941–6.
10. Jarineshin H, Kashani S, Vatankhah M, AbdulahzadeBaghaee A, Sattari S, Fekrat F. Better hemodynamic profile of laryngeal mask airway insertion compared to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17:e28615.
11. DurmuşKocaaslan FN, Bayramiçli M. Patient analysis and planning in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Vargel İ, (editor). Nasoplasty in Every Aspect. 1st Edition. Ankara: Turkey Clinics. 2019;7-12.
12. Aziz L. Bashir K. Comparison of armoured laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube for adenotonsillectomy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006;16:685–8.
13. Güngör G, Bozkurt PS, Yüceyar L. Comparison of classic and ProSeal laryngeal mask airways (LMA) in pediatric patients. Izmir Dr.Behçet Uz Children's Hospital Journal. 2016;6:46-52.
14. Garg R, Verma S. Cobra perilaryngeal airway for thyroid surgery in a hypertensive patient. J Anesth. 2009;23:469–70.
15. Kannan S, Harsoor SS, Sowmiya L, Nethra SS, DevikaRani D, Sathesha M. Comparison of ventilatory efficacy and airway dynamics between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in adult patients during general anesthesia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015;31:517-21.
16. Hohlrieder M, Brimacombe J, von Goedecke A, Keller C. Postoperative nausea, vomiting, airway morbidity, and analgesic requirements are lower for the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway than the tracheal tube in females undergoing breast and gynaecological surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:576-80.
17. Lloyd Jones FR, Hegab A. Case report. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy after laryngeal mask airway insertion. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:171-2.
18. Ghai B, Ram J, Makkar JK, Wig J. Fiber-optic assessment of LMA position in children: a randomized crossover comparison of two techniques. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21:1142-7.
19. Sanders JC, Olomu PN, Furman JR. Detection, frequency and prediction of problems in the use of the proseal laryngeal mask airway in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:1183-9.
20. Ovat E, Örkei TK, Güzelmeriç F, Gürcü E, Koçak T. Effects of endotracheal intubation or proseal laryngeal mask application on hemodynamics, ventilation and gastric distension in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anestezi Dergisi. 2012;20:99–102.
21. Leena G, Sambhram S, Shivam G. A prospective, randomized comparative study for use of proseal laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to endotracheal intubation for airway management in children under general anesthesia. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2016;3:80– 4.
22. Tekin M, Kati I, Tomak Y, Yuca K. Comparison of the effects of room air and N2O+O2 used for ProSeal LMA cuff inflation on cuff pressure and oropharyngeal structure. J Anesth. 2008;22:467–70.
23. Hohlrieder M, Brimacombe J, Eschertzhuber S, Ulmer H, Keller C. A study of airway management using the ProSeal LMA laryngeal mask airway compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:913–8.
24. McHardy FE, Chung F. Postoperative sore throat: cause, prevention and treatment. Anaesthesia. 1999;54:444–53.

APA	yeniay d, Cekic B (2021). Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery. , 1468 - 1477. 10.17826/cumj.978120
Chicago	yeniay dilek,Cekic Bahanur Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery. (2021): 1468 - 1477. 10.17826/cumj.978120
MLA	yeniay dilek,Cekic Bahanur Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery. , 2021, ss.1468 - 1477. 10.17826/cumj.978120
AMA	yeniay d,Cekic B Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery. . 2021; 1468 - 1477. 10.17826/cumj.978120
Vancouver	yeniay d,Cekic B Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery. . 2021; 1468 - 1477. 10.17826/cumj.978120
IEEE	yeniay d,Cekic B "Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery." , ss.1468 - 1477, 2021. 10.17826/cumj.978120
ISNAD	yeniay, dilek - Cekic, Bahanur. "Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery". (2021), 1468-1477. https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.978120

APA	yeniay d, Cekic B (2021). Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery. Cukurova Medical Journal, 46(4), 1468 - 1477. 10.17826/cumj.978120
Chicago	yeniay dilek,Cekic Bahanur Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery. Cukurova Medical Journal 46, no.4 (2021): 1468 - 1477. 10.17826/cumj.978120
MLA	yeniay dilek,Cekic Bahanur Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery. Cukurova Medical Journal, vol.46, no.4, 2021, ss.1468 - 1477. 10.17826/cumj.978120
AMA	yeniay d,Cekic B Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery. Cukurova Medical Journal. 2021; 46(4): 1468 - 1477. 10.17826/cumj.978120
Vancouver	yeniay d,Cekic B Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery. Cukurova Medical Journal. 2021; 46(4): 1468 - 1477. 10.17826/cumj.978120
IEEE	yeniay d,Cekic B "Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery." Cukurova Medical Journal, 46, ss.1468 - 1477, 2021. 10.17826/cumj.978120
ISNAD	yeniay, dilek - Cekic, Bahanur. "Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in septorhinoplasty surgery". Cukurova Medical Journal 46/4 (2021), 1468-1477. https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.978120