How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?

Ercan ÖPENGİN, (Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Van, Türkiye)
Hasan GÜRGÜR (Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir, Türkiye)
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
8 3
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 2021 Sayı: 27 Sayfa Aralığı: 346 - 373 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14689/enad.27.15 İndeks Tarihi: 25-12-2021

How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?

Öz:
The present research aims to determine the problems encountered during the integration of a resource room for gifted students in a primary school system and examining the measures developed for dealing with these problems. Structured as an action research, this research project was conducted in a primary school in the Eskisehir province of Turkey. Participants in this research consisted of the school headmaster, the teacher of the resource room, gifted students attending the resource room, parents of gifted students and classroom teachers whose students attended the resource room, researchers and the members of the evaluation board. Data were collected using interviews, meeting reports, documents and the researcher's diary. The research data were analyzed using the systematic analysis approach. The findings of this research showed that the resource room were generally positively perceived; however, several problems were observed as the programme was carried out during regular class hours. The findings obtained in this study suggest that in order for the gifted student resource room to be efficient, it should be implemented in coordination with classroom teachers.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aldrich, P. W., & Mills, C. J. (1989). A special program for highly able rural youth in grades five and six. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33(1), 11-14.
  • Alloway, T. P., & Elsworth, M. (2012). An investigation of cognitive skills and behavior in high ability students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 891-895. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.02.001
  • Archambault, F. X, Jr, Westberg, K. L., Brown, S., Hallmark, B. W., Emmons, C., & Zhang, W. (1993). Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Results of a national survey of classroom teachers. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
  • Bedur, S., Bilgic, N., & Taslidere, E. (2015). Ozel (ustun) yetenekli ogrencilere sunulan destek egitim hizmetlerinin degerlendirilmesi. Hasan Ali Yucel Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 12(23), 221-242.
  • Belcastro, F. (1987). Elementary pull-out programs for the intellectually gifted--boon or bane? Roeper Review, 9, 208-212.
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Borland, J. H. (2013). Problematizing gifted education. Callahan, C. M., Hertberg-Davis, H. L. (Editorler.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives icinde (s. 176- 188). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Brighton, C.M.,& Wiley, K. (2013). Analyzing pull-out programs: A framework for planning. Callahan, C. M., Hertberg-Davis, H. L. (Editorler.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives icinde (s. 188-198). New York, NY: Routledge
  • Calero, M. D., Belen, G.-M. M. and Robles, M. A. (2011). Learning potential in high IQ children: The contribution of dynamic assessment to the identification of gifted children. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 176-181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.025
  • Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., & Oh, S. (2017). Describing the status of programs for the gifted: A call for action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 20-49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216686215
  • Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Oh, S., Azano, A. P., & Hailey, E. P. (2015). What Works in gifted education: Documenting effects of an integrated curricular/instructional model. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 1–31. doi:10.3102/0002831214549448
  • Campbell, J. R., & Verna, M. A. (1998). Comparing Separate Class and Pull-out Programs for the Gifted. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association’da sunulan bildiri. San Diego, CA.
  • Clark, B. (2013). Growing up gifted: developing the potential of children at school and at home. (8th ed.). Boston, MA:Pearson.
  • Cohen, L. M. (2006). Conceptual foundations for gifted education: stock-taking. Roeper Review, 28(2), 91-110.
  • Cohen, R., Duncan, M., & Cohen, S. L. (1994). Classroom peer relations of children participating in a pull-out enrichment program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(1), 33-37.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Arastırma deseni: Nitel, nicel ve karma yontem yaklasımları (4. Baskıdan Ceviri). (Cev: S. B. Demir). Ankara: Egiten Kitap Yayınları.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quanitative and qualitative Research. Upper saddle river, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Cox, J., & Daniel, N. (1984). The pull-out model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 55-61.
  • Dade County Public Schools. (1983). An evaluative overview of the Kendale Pilot Resource Program. FL: Miami. Office of Educational Accountability.
  • Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
  • Davison, L., Coates, D., & Johnson, S. (2005). The effects of a pull-out enrichment project on academically able 9-to 10-year olds: The Pate's Curriculum Enrichment Project. Gifted Education International, 20(3), 330-342.
  • Delcourt, M. A. (1993). Creative productivity among secondary school students: Combining energy, interest and imagination. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 23-31.
  • Delcourt, M. A. B., Cornell, D. G., & Goldberg, M. D. (2007). Cognitive and affective learning Outcomes of gifted elementary school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 359–381.
  • Dimitriadis, C. (2011). Developing mathematical ability in primary school through a ‘pullout’programme: a case study. Education 3-13, 39(5), 467-482.
  • Feldhusen, J.F. (1989). Why the public schools willcontinue to neglect the gifted. Gifted Child Today. March/April, 55-59.
  • Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. N. Colangelo, & G. A. Davis (Editorler.), Handbook of gifted education icinde (s. 60-74). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Gallagher, J. (2000). Unthinkable thoughts: Education of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(1), 5-12.
  • Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasan, P. (2012). Educational research. competencises for analysis and applications. New Jersey: Pearson Ecucation Ltd.
  • Geake, J. G. (2008). High abilities at fluid analogizing: A cognitive neuroscience construct of giftedness. Roeper Review, 30(3), 187-195.
  • Glesne, C. (2014). Nitel arastırmaya giris. (4.Baskı). A. Ersoy ve P. Yalcınoglu (Cev. Ed.), Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Gubbels, J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). Cognitive, socioemotional and attitudinal effects of a triarchic enrichment program for gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37, 378–397. doi:10.1177/0162353214552565.
  • Gubbins, E. J. (2013). Cognitive and affective outcomes of pull-out programs: Knowns and unknows. C. M. Callahan, & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Editorler), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives icinde (s. 176-188). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gucyeter, S., Kanli, E., Ozyaprak, M., & Leana-Tascilar, M. Z. (2017). Serving Gifted Children in Developmental and Threshold Countries—Turkey. Cogent Education, 4/1,1–16.
  • Gurgur, H. (2017). Eylem arastırması. A. Saban, & A. Ersoy (Editorler), Egitimde nitel arastırma desenleri (2. baskı) icinde (s. 1-50). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Hoffer, T. B. (1992). Middle school ability grouping and student achievement in science and mathematics. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 14, 205–227.
  • Hong, E., Greene, M. T., & Higgins, K. (2006). Instructional practices of teachers in general education and gifted resource rooms: Development and validation of the instructional practice questionnaire. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 91-101.
  • Johnson, A. (2014). Eylem arastırması el kitabı. (Cev: Y. Uzuner, & M. Ozten Anay). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Kearney, K. (1996). Highly gifted children in full inclusion classrooms. The Hollingworth Center for Highly Gifted Children, 12(4). http://www.hollingworth.org/fullincl.html. (Erisim Tarihi: 28.12.2015)
  • Kettler, T. (2014). Critical thinking skills among elementary school students: Comparing identified gifted and general education student performance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(2), 127-136.
  • Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 73-77.
  • Kulik, J. A. (2003). Grouping and tracking. N. Colangelo, & G. A. Davis (Editorler.), Handbook of gifted education icinde (s. 268–281). Boston: Allyn and Baco.
  • Long, L. C., Barnett, K., & Rogers, K. B. (2015). Exploring the relationship between principal, policy and gifted program scope and quality. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(2), 118-140.
  • Matthews, D., & Kitchen, J. (2007). Perceptions of students and teachers in public secondary schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 5(3), 256-270.
  • McCulloch, A. C. (2010). How stakeholders perceive gifted education: A study of beliefs held by stakeholders in elementary gifted education programs. Doctoral dissertation. Capella University.
  • Ministry of National Education. (2012). Ozel Egitim Hizmetleri Yonetmeligi. Ankara: MEB Ozel Egitim ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri Genel Mudurlugu.
  • Ministry of National Education. (2013). Ustun yetenekli Bireyler Strateji ve Uygulama Planı. Ankara: MEB Ozel Ozel Egitim ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri Genel Mudurlugu.
  • Ministry of National Education. (2015a). Destek egitim odası acılması. Genelge 2015/15. Ankara: MEB Ozel Egitim ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri Genel Mudurlugu.
  • Ministry of National Education. (2015b). Destek egitim odası klavuzu. Ankara: MEB Ozel Egitim ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri Genel Mudurlugu.
  • Ministry of National Education. (2018). Ozel Egitim Hizmetleri Yonetmeligi. Ankara: MEB Ozel Egitim ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri Genel Mudurlugu.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel arastırma desen ve uygulama icin bir rehber. S. Turan (Cev.Ed.), Ankara: Nobel Yayın.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2015). Nitel veri analizi (İkinci Baskıdan Ceviri). (Cev: S. AkbabaAltun, & A. Ersoy). Ankara: Pegem A Akademi Yayınları.
  • Milligan, J., Neal, G., & Singleton, J. (2012). Administrators of special and gifted education: Preparing them for the challenge. Education, 133(1), 171-180.
  • Moon, S. M., Swift, M., & Shallenberger, A. (2002). Perceptions of a self-contained class for fourth- and fifth-grade students with high to extreme levels of intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 64-79.
  • Moon, T.R., Tomlinson, C.A., & Callahan, C. M. (1995). Academic diversity in the middle school: Results of a national survey of middle school administrators and teachers. (NRC G/T Research Monograph No. 95124). Charlottesville, VA:University of Virginia.
  • Morelock, M. J., & Morrison, K. (1999). Differentiating ‘developmentally appropriate’: The multidimensional curriculum model for young gifted children. Roeper Review, 21(3), 195-200.
  • Morgan, A. (2007). Experiences of a gifted and talented enrichment cluster for pupils aged five to seven. British Journal of Special Education, 34(3), 144-153.
  • Murphy, P. R. (2009). Essays on gifted education's impact on student achievement. The Florida State University.
  • Naidu, S. R., & Presley, P. H. (1995). An analysis of selected descriptive and experimental studies on program model designs for gifted students for potential use in rural school districts of developing countries. Gifted Child Quarterly, 10, 76-84.
  • Nar, B., & Tortop, H. S. (2017). Turkiye’de ozel/ustun yetenekli ogrenciler icin destek egitim odası uygulaması: sorunlar ve oneriler. Aydın Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 3(1), 83-97.
  • National Association for Gifted Children. (2010). Pre-K–Grade 12 Gifted Programming Standards: A blueprint for quality gifted education programs. Washington, DC.
  • Osin, L., & Lesgold, A. (1996). A proposal for the reengineering of the educational system. Review of educational research, 66, 621–656.
  • Passow, A. H., & Frasier, M. M. (1996). Toward improving identification of talent potential among minority and disadvantaged students. Roeper Review, 18, 198-202. doi: 10.1080/02783199609553734.
  • Pemik, K. (2017). Ustun yetenekli ogrencilere destek odasında verilen egitime iliskin okul yoneticilerinin ve ogretmenlerin gorusleri. Yayınlanmamıs Yuksek Lisans tezi. İstanbul: Marmara Universitesi, Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu.
  • Persson, R. S. (2010). Experiences of intellectually gifted students in an egalitarian and inclusive educational system: A survey study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(4), 536-569.
  • Rafferty, E. F. (1996). The effect of gifted pull-out programming services on the emotional, social and intellectual well-being of middle school students. Doctoral dissertation. St. Louis: Maryville University.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1987). The positive side of pull-out programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10 (4), 245-254.
  • Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1991). The reform movement and the quiet crisis in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(1), 26-35.
  • Ritrievi, G. G. (1988). An investigation of the pull-out model utilized in elementary gifted programs. Doctoral dissertation. Lehigh University.
  • Rogers, K. B. (1991). The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learner (RBDM 9102). The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
  • Rogers, K. B. (2002). Re-forming gifted education: Matching the program to the child. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
  • Sak, U. (2014). Ustun zekalılar: ozellikleri, tanılanmaları, egitimleri. Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.
  • Schneider, J. (2006). Effects of a legislated mandate: The comprehensive school improvement process and middle-level gifted and talented programming. Roeper Review, 28, 224–231. doi:10.1080/02783190609554368
  • Stringer, E.T. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications: California. Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2012). A proposed direction forward for gifted education based on psychological science. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 176.
  • Suel, E. (2017). Ustun yetenekli Ogrenciler İcin Destek Egitim Odası. M.Z. Leana-Tascilar (ed.), Ustun yetenekli cocukların psikolojisi: Teoriden uygulamaya icinde (s.329-362). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dagıtım.
  • Swanson, J. D. (2007). Policy and practice: A case study of gifted education policy implementation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(2), 131-164.
  • Sahin, F. (2015). Ustun zekalı ogrencilerin egitimine yonelik egitsel stratejiler. F. Sahin (Ed.), Ustun Zekalı ve Ustun Yetenekli Ogrencilerin Egitimi icinde (s.3-20). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Tortop, H. S., & Dincer, S. (2016). Destek egitim odalarında ustun/ozel yetenekli ogrencilerle calısan sınıf ogretmenlerinin uygulama hakkındaki gorusleri. Ustun Yetenekliler Egitimi ve Arastırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 11-28
  • Uzuner, Y. (2005). Ozel egitimden orneklerle eylem arastırmaları. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Ozel Egitim Dergisi, 6(2), 1-12.
  • van der Meulen, R. T., van der Bruggen, C. O., Spilt, J. L., Verouden, J., Berkhout, M., & Bogels, S. M. (2014). The pullout program day a week school for gifted children: effects on social–emotional and academic functioning. Child & Youth Care Forum, 43, 287-314.
  • VanTassel-Baska, J. (1987). The ineffectiveness of the pull-out model in gifted education: A minority perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10(4), 255–64.
  • VanTassel-Baska, J. (2006). A content analysis of evaluation findings across 20 gifted programs: A clarion call for enhanced gifted program development. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(3), 199- 215,273.
  • Vaughn, V., Feldhusen, J. F., & Asher, J.W. (1991). Meta-analysis and review of research on pull-out programs in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 92–98.
  • Walker, S.Y. (2002). The survival guide for parents of gifted kids: How to understand, live with and stick up for your gifted child. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
  • Weber, C. L., Johnson, L., & Tripp, S. (2013). Implementing differentiation: A school's journey. Gifted Child Today, 36(3), 179-186.
  • Westberg, K. L., & Archambault Jr, F. X. (1997). A multi-site case study of successful classroom practices for high ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(1), 42-51.
  • Yang, Y., Gentry, M., & Choi, Y. O. (2012). Gifted students’ perceptions of the regular classes and pullout programs in South Korea. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23, 270–287. doi:10.1177/1932202X12451021.
  • Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastırma yontemleri (10.Baskı). Ankara: Seckin Yayıncılık.
  • Yin, R. (2012). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  • Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the effects of full-time vs part-time educational programs for the gifted: Affective outcomes and policy considerations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22(4), 413-427.
APA OPENGIN E, Gürgür H (2021). How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?. , 346 - 373. 10.14689/enad.27.15
Chicago OPENGIN ERCAN,Gürgür Hasan How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?. (2021): 346 - 373. 10.14689/enad.27.15
MLA OPENGIN ERCAN,Gürgür Hasan How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?. , 2021, ss.346 - 373. 10.14689/enad.27.15
AMA OPENGIN E,Gürgür H How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?. . 2021; 346 - 373. 10.14689/enad.27.15
Vancouver OPENGIN E,Gürgür H How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?. . 2021; 346 - 373. 10.14689/enad.27.15
IEEE OPENGIN E,Gürgür H "How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?." , ss.346 - 373, 2021. 10.14689/enad.27.15
ISNAD OPENGIN, ERCAN - Gürgür, Hasan. "How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?". (2021), 346-373. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.27.15
APA OPENGIN E, Gürgür H (2021). How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2021(27), 346 - 373. 10.14689/enad.27.15
Chicago OPENGIN ERCAN,Gürgür Hasan How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi 2021, no.27 (2021): 346 - 373. 10.14689/enad.27.15
MLA OPENGIN ERCAN,Gürgür Hasan How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, vol.2021, no.27, 2021, ss.346 - 373. 10.14689/enad.27.15
AMA OPENGIN E,Gürgür H How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2021; 2021(27): 346 - 373. 10.14689/enad.27.15
Vancouver OPENGIN E,Gürgür H How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2021; 2021(27): 346 - 373. 10.14689/enad.27.15
IEEE OPENGIN E,Gürgür H "How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?." Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2021, ss.346 - 373, 2021. 10.14689/enad.27.15
ISNAD OPENGIN, ERCAN - Gürgür, Hasan. "How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?". Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi 2021/27 (2021), 346-373. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.27.15
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 20:48

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları