Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 694 - 702 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/dir.2021.20508 İndeks Tarihi: 30-12-2021

Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?

Öz:
We aimed to investigate the accuracy of density characteristics and washout values of lesions detected on computed tomography (CT) at the cutoff values obtained from the literature by taking the pathological results of adrenalectomy specimens as reference and to determine the cutoff values of parameters evaluated on CT for the differentiation of adenoma and nonadenoma lesions in the study group. METHODS Hospital records and standard CT imaging data (noncontrast early phase [65 s] and late phase [15 min] ) of 84 patients with 87 lesions who underwent adrenalectomy between January 2012 and December 2018 were retrospectively reevaluated by two radiologists in consensus. The patients were categorized as having adenoma and nonadenoma lesions according to the pathology results. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of CT parameters (density values and washout percentages) were evaluated. Differences in the CT parameters (size, noncontrast and early-late enhancement density and absolute and relative washout values) were investigated. The optimal cutoff values of CT parameters were determined by ROC analysis. RESULTS Noncontrast CT had a specificity of 87.75% and 95.9%, sensitivity of 60% and 48.6%, diagnostic accuracy of 77.7% and 89.47% for adenomas, at the cutoff values of ≤10 HU and ≤0 HU, respectively. For absolute washout value ≥ 60%, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 64.7%, 52.38% and 56.75%, respectively; while these rates were 76.47%, 56.52% and 62.16%, respectively, for relative washout value ≥40%. Adenomas and nonadenomas showed significant difference in terms of size (p < 0.0001), unenhanced attenuation (p < 0.0001), relative washout (p = 0.020) and delay enhancement (p < 0.001). But there were no differences in terms of absolute washout (p = 0.230) and early enhancement (p = 0.264). The cutoff values for the differentiation of adenomas and nonadenomas were as follows: size ≤44 mm, noncontrast density <20 HU, early-phase density ≥45 HU, delayed-phase density ≤44 HU, absolute washout 74.83% and relative washout 57.76%. CONCLUSION The current washout criteria used in the differentiation of adenoma and nonadenoma lesions in dynamic CT imaging can give false negative and positive results. According to the existing criteria, the most reliable parameter in adenoma–nonadenoma differentiation is ≤ 0 HU noncontrast CT density value.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Barzon L, Sonino N, Fallo F, Palu G, Boscaro M. Prevalence and natural history of adrenal incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol 2003; 149:273–285. [Crossref]
  • 2. Ctvrtlík F, Herman M, Student V, Tichá V, Minarík J. Differential diagnosis of incidentally detected adrenal masses revealed on routine abdominal CT. Eur J Radiol 2009; 69:243–252. [Crossref]
  • 3. Park SW, Kim TN, Yoon JH et al. The washout rate on the delayed CT image as a diagnostic tool for adrenal adenoma verified by pathology: a multicenter study. Int Urol Nephrol 2012; 44:1397–1402. [Crossref]
  • 4. Woo S, Suh CH, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH. Pheochromocytoma as a frequent false-positive in adrenal washout CT: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:1027–1036. [Crossref]
  • 5. Guo YK, Yang ZG, Li Y et al. Uncommon adrenal masses: CT and MRI features with histopathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol 2007; 62:359–370. [Crossref]
  • 6. Kamiyama T, Fukukura Y, Yoneyama T, Takumi K, Nakajo M. Distinguishing adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas: combined use of diagnostic parameters of unenhanced and short 5-minute dynamic enhanced CT protocol. Radiology 2009; 250:474–481. [Crossref]
  • 7. Johnson PT, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Adrenal mass imaging with multidetector CT: pathologic conditions, pearls, and pitfalls. Radiographics 2009; 29:1333–1351. [Crossref]
  • 8. Ozturk E, Sildiroglu OH, Kantarci M, et al. Computed tomography findings in diseases of the adrenal gland. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2009; 121:372–381. [Crossref]
  • 9. Boland GW, Blake MA, Hahn PF, Mayo-Smith WW. Incidental adrenal lesions: principles, techniques, and algorithms for imaging characterization. Radiology 2008; 249:756–775. [Crossref]
  • 10. Peña CS, Boland GW, Hahn PF, Lee MJ, Mueller PR. Characterization of indeterminate (lipid-poor) adrenal masses: use of washout characteristics at contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 2000; 217:798–802. [Crossref]
  • 11. Korobkin M, Brodeur FJ, Francis IR, Quint LE, Dunnick RE, Londy F. CT time-attenuation washout curves of adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:747–752. [Crossref]
  • 12. Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR et al. Adrenal masses: characterization with combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT. Radiology 2002; 222:629–633. [Crossref]
  • 13. Szolar DH, Korobkin M, Reittner P et al. Adrenocortical carcinomas and adrenal pheochromocytomas: mass and enhancement loss evaluation at delayed contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 2005; 234:479–485. [Crossref]
  • 14. Park BK, Kim B, Ko K, Jeong SY, Kwon GY. Adrenal masses falsely diagnosed as adenomas on unenhanced and delayed contrast-enhanced computed tomography: pathological correlation. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:642–647. [Crossref]
  • 15. Park BK, Kim CK, Kwon GY, Kim JH. Re-evaluation of pheochromocytomas on delayed contrast-enhanced CT: washout enhancement and other imaging features. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:2804–2809. [Crossref]
  • 16. Patel J, Davenport MS, Cohan RH, Caoili EM. Can established CT attenuation and washout criteria for adrenal adenoma accurately exclude pheochromocytoma? Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201:122–127. [Crossref]
  • 17. Sangwaiya MJ, Boland GW, Cronin CG, Blake MA, Halpern EF, Hahn PF. Incidental adrenal lesions: accuracy of characterization with contrast-enhanced washout multidetector CT-10-minute delayed imaging protocol revisited in a large patient cohort. Radiology 2010; 256:504–510. [Crossref]
  • 18. Park JJ, Park BK, Kim CK. Adrenal imaging for adenoma characterization: imaging features, diagnostic accuracies and differential diagnoses. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20151018. [Crossref]
  • 19. Kebapci M, Kaya T, Gurbuz E, Adapınar B, Kebapci N, Demirustu C. Differentiation of adrenal adenomas (lipid rich and lipid poor) from nonadenomas by use of washout characteristics on delayed enhanced CT. Abdom Imaging 2003; 28:709–715. [Crossref]
  • 20. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, McNicholas MM, Mueller PR. Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: an analysis of the CT literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:201–204. [Crossref]
  • 21. Foti G, Faccioli N, Mantovani W, Malleo G, Manfredi R, Mucelli RP. Incidental adrenal lesions: Accuracy of quadriphasic contrast enhanced computed tomography in distinguishing adenomas from nonadenomas. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81:1742–1750. [Crossref]
  • 22. Foti G, Malleo G, Faccioli N, Guerriero A, Furlani L, Carbognin G. Characterization of adrenal lesions using MDCT washout parameters: diagnostic accuracy of several combinations of intermediate and delayed phases. Radiol Med 2018; 123:833–840. [Crossref]
  • 23. Northcutt BG, Raman SP, Long C et al. MDCT of adrenal masses: Can dual-phase enhancement patterns be used to differentiate adenoma and pheochromocytoma? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201:834–839. [Crossref]
  • 24. Choi YA, Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B. Evaluation of adrenal metastases from renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: use of delayed contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 2013; 266:514–520. [Crossref]
APA Gündoğdu e, OĞUZMAN M, Emekli E, KEBAPÇI M (2021). Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?. , 694 - 702. 10.5152/dir.2021.20508
Chicago Gündoğdu elif,OĞUZMAN MEHMET,Emekli Emre,KEBAPÇI MAHMUT Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?. (2021): 694 - 702. 10.5152/dir.2021.20508
MLA Gündoğdu elif,OĞUZMAN MEHMET,Emekli Emre,KEBAPÇI MAHMUT Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?. , 2021, ss.694 - 702. 10.5152/dir.2021.20508
AMA Gündoğdu e,OĞUZMAN M,Emekli E,KEBAPÇI M Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?. . 2021; 694 - 702. 10.5152/dir.2021.20508
Vancouver Gündoğdu e,OĞUZMAN M,Emekli E,KEBAPÇI M Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?. . 2021; 694 - 702. 10.5152/dir.2021.20508
IEEE Gündoğdu e,OĞUZMAN M,Emekli E,KEBAPÇI M "Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?." , ss.694 - 702, 2021. 10.5152/dir.2021.20508
ISNAD Gündoğdu, elif vd. "Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?". (2021), 694-702. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2021.20508
APA Gündoğdu e, OĞUZMAN M, Emekli E, KEBAPÇI M (2021). Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 27(6), 694 - 702. 10.5152/dir.2021.20508
Chicago Gündoğdu elif,OĞUZMAN MEHMET,Emekli Emre,KEBAPÇI MAHMUT Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology 27, no.6 (2021): 694 - 702. 10.5152/dir.2021.20508
MLA Gündoğdu elif,OĞUZMAN MEHMET,Emekli Emre,KEBAPÇI MAHMUT Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, vol.27, no.6, 2021, ss.694 - 702. 10.5152/dir.2021.20508
AMA Gündoğdu e,OĞUZMAN M,Emekli E,KEBAPÇI M Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2021; 27(6): 694 - 702. 10.5152/dir.2021.20508
Vancouver Gündoğdu e,OĞUZMAN M,Emekli E,KEBAPÇI M Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2021; 27(6): 694 - 702. 10.5152/dir.2021.20508
IEEE Gündoğdu e,OĞUZMAN M,Emekli E,KEBAPÇI M "Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?." Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 27, ss.694 - 702, 2021. 10.5152/dir.2021.20508
ISNAD Gündoğdu, elif vd. "Are the washout values currently accepted for lesion characterization in dedicated adrenal CT adequate for diagnosis?". Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology 27/6 (2021), 694-702. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2021.20508