Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks

İbrahim YAĞL (Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümü, Nevşehir, Türkiye)
Alanya Akademik Bakış
1 0
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 861 - 873 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 10-01-2022

Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks

Öz:
The current study aims to compare the performance of state participation banks with the performance of private participation banks. This comparison is quite significant since both state participation banks have a very short history and Turkey is a model for the world in interest-free banking. The integrated approach is adopted in the study. In the first stage, performance indicators are determined with the help of the CAMELS rating system. In the second stage, Turkish participation banks are ranked according to their relative performance by using the TOPSIS method. The results show that state participation banks outperform private participation banks. These results are valid even when different weights are used for CAMELS dimensions.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • AKKOC, S. & VATANSEVER, K. (2013). “Fuzzy Performance Evaluation with AHP and TOPSIS Methods: Evidence from Turkish Banking Sector after the Global Financial Crisis”, Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 6(11): 53-74.
  • ARAS, O. N. & OZTURK, M. (2011). “Analysis of Allocated Funds of Participation Banks In Terms Of Contribution to Real Economy”, Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2): 167- 169.
  • ARIFF, M. (1989). “Islamic Banking In Malaysia: Framework, Performance, and Lessons”, International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 2(2): 67-78.
  • BATIR, T. E., VOLKMAN, D. A. & GUNGOR, B. (2017). “Determinants Of Bank Efficiency In Turkey: Participation Banks Versus Conventional Banks”, Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(2): 86-96.
  • DAR, H. A. & PRESLEY, J. R. (2000). “Lack Of Profit Loss Sharing In Islamic Banking: Management And Control Imbalances”, International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, 2(2): 3-18.
  • DASH, M. & DAS, A. (2013). “Performance Appraisal of Indian Banks Using CAMELS Rating”, IUP Journal of Bank Management, 12(2): 31-42.
  • DEMIRELI, E. (2010). “TOPSIS Multicriteria Decision Making Method: An Examination On State Owned Commercial Banks In Turkey”, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development, 5(1): 101-112.
  • DINÇER, H. & YUKSEL, S. (2019). “An Integrated Stochastic Fuzzy MCDM Approach to the Balanced Scorecard-Based Service Evaluation”, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 166: 93-112.
  • DINCER, H., GENCER, G., ORHAN, N. & ŞAHINBAŞ, K. (2011). “A Performance Evaluation of the Turkish Banking Sector after the Global Crisis via CAMELS Ratios”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24: 1530-1545.
  • DINCER, H., HACIOGLU, U. & YUKSEL S. (2016). “Performance Assessment of Deposit Banks with CAMELS Analysis Using FUZZY ANP-MOORA Approaches and An Application on Turkish Banking Sector”, Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 6(2): 32-56.
  • DOGAN, M. (2013). “Measuring Bank Performance with Gray Relational Analysis: The Case of Turkey”, Ege Academic Review, 13(2): 215-226.
  • EGE, İ., TOPALOĞLU, E., & KARAKOZAK, Ö. 2015, ‘CAMELS Performans Değerleme Modeli: Türkiye’deki Mevduat Bankalari Üzerine Ampirik Bir Uygulama”, Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(4): 109-126.
  • EROL, C., F. BAKLACI, H., AYDOGAN, B. & TUNÇ, G. (2014). “Performance Comparison of Islamic (Participation) Banks and Commercial Banks in Turkish Banking Sector”, EuroMed Journal of Business, 9(2): 114-128.
  • GOKALP, F. (2015). “Comparing the Financial Performance of Banks in Turkey by Using PROMETHEE Method”, Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(1): 63-82.
  • HWANG, C. L. & YOON, K. (1981). “Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making”, In Multiple Attribute Decision Making (58-191). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • IKA, S. R. & ABDULLAH, N. (2011). “A Comparative Study of Financial Performance of Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks in Indonesia”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(15): 199-207.
  • IQBAL, M. (2001). “Islamic and Conventional Banking in the Nineties: A Comparative Study”, Islamic Economic Studies, 8(2): 1-28.
  • ISMAIL, F., MAJID, M. S. A. & RAHIM, R. A. (2013). “Efficiency of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Malaysia”, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 11(1): 92-107.
  • KAKAKHEL, S. J., RAHEEM, F. & TARIQ, M. (2013). “A Study of Performance Comparison between Conventional and Islamic Banking in Pakistan”, Abasyn University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2): 91-105.
  • KAMARUDDIN, B. H. & MOHD, R. (2013). “CAMEL Analysis of Islamic Banking and Conventional Banking in Malaysia”, Business and Management Quarterly Review, 4(3): 81-89.
  • KAMARUDDIN, B. H., SAFAB, M. S. & MOHD, R. (2008). “Assessing Production Efficiency of Islamic Banks and Conventional Bank Islamic Windows in Malaysia”, International Journal of Business and Management Science, 1(1): 31-48.
  • KARAPINAR, A. & DOGAN, I. C. (2015). “An Analysis on the Performance of the Participation Banks in Turkey”, Accounting and Finance Research, 4(2): 24-33.
  • KARTAL, F. (2012). “Interest-free Banking in the World and a Financial Analysis of the Turkey Experience’, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 93: 183-201.
  • KAYA, T. & CINAR, Y. (2016). “Analyzing Internal Efficiency Dynamics of Turkish Banks: Activity Based Multi-Objective Dynamic DEA Model and Its Application”, Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 32(3): 729-746.
  • KOUSER, R. & SABA, I. (2012). “Gauging the Financial Performance of Banking Sector Using CAMEL Model: Comparison of Conventional, Mixed and Pure Islamic Banks in Pakistan”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 82(1): 67-88.
  • ONDER, E., TAS, N. & HEPSEN, A. (2013). “Performance Evaluation of Turkish Banks Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS Methods”, Journal of International Scientific Publication: Economy and Business, 7(1): 470-503.
  • PEKKAYA, M. & DEMIR, F. E. (2018). “Determining the Priorities of CAMELS Dimensions Based on Bank Performance”, In Global Approaches in Financial Economics, Banking, and Finance (pp. 445-463). Springer, Cham.
  • PRESLEY, J. R. (2012). “Directory of Islamic Financial Institutions (RLE: Banking and Finance)”. Routledge.
  • ROSTAMI, M. (2015). “Determination of CAMELS Model on Bank’s Performance”, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(10): 652-664.
  • ROZZANI, N. & RAHMAN, R. A. (2013). “CAMELS and Performance Evaluation of Banks In Malaysia: Conventional versus Islamic”, Journal of Islamic Finance and Business Research, 2(1): 36-45.
  • SAMAD, A. (2004). “Performance of Interest-Free Islamic Banks Vis-À-Vis Interest-Based Conventional Banks of Bahrain”, International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 12(2): 1-15.
  • SAMAD, A. & HASSAN, M. K. (2006). “The Performance of Malaysian Islamic Bank During 1984–1997: An Exploratory Study”, International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, 1(3).
  • SANGMI, M. & NAZIR, T. (2010). “Analyzing Financial Performance of Commercial Banks in India: Application of CAMEL Model”, Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 4(1): 40-55.
  • SEÇME, N. Y., BAYRAKDAROĞLU, A. & KAHRAMAN, C. (2009). “Fuzzy Performance Evaluation in Turkish Banking Sector Using Analytic Hierarchy Process and
  • TOPSIS”, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9): 11699-11709.
  • STAUB, R. B., E SOUZA, G. D. S. & TABAK, B. M. (2010). “Evolution of Bank Efficiency in Brazil: A DEA Approach”, European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1): 204- 213.
  • TKKB, Participation Banks Association of Turkey, “Participation Banks 2018 Sector Report” , file:///C:/Users/Admin/Desktop/bank%20competition/Participation-Banks-2018- Sector-Report.pdf, 06.03.2020
  • WANKE, P., KALAM AZAD, M. A., BARROS, C. P. & HADI‐VENCHEH, A. (2016). “Predicting Performance in ASEAN Banks: An Integrated Fuzzy MCDM–Neural Network Approach”, Expert Systems, 33(3): 213-229.
  • YAHYA, M. H., MUHAMMAD, J., & HADI, A. R. A. (2012). “A Comparative Study on the Level of Efficiency between Islamic and Conventional Banking Systems in Malaysia”, International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 5(1): 48-62.
  • YUDISTIRA, D. (2004). “Efficiency in Islamic Banking: An Empirical Analysis of Eighteen Banks”, Islamic Economic Studies, 12(1): 1-19.
  • YUKSEL, S., DINCER, H. & HACIOGLU, U. (2015). “CAMELS-Based Determinants for the Credit Rating of Turkish Deposit Banks”, International Journal of Finance and Banking Studies (2147-4486), 4(4): 1-17.
  • YUKSEL, S., MUKHTAROV, S. & MAMMADOV, E. (2016), “Comparing the Efficiency of Turkish and Azerbaijani Banks: An Application with Data Envelopment Analysis”, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3): 1059-1067.
APA YAGLI I (2020). Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks. , 861 - 873.
Chicago YAGLI IBRAHIM Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks. (2020): 861 - 873.
MLA YAGLI IBRAHIM Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks. , 2020, ss.861 - 873.
AMA YAGLI I Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks. . 2020; 861 - 873.
Vancouver YAGLI I Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks. . 2020; 861 - 873.
IEEE YAGLI I "Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks." , ss.861 - 873, 2020.
ISNAD YAGLI, IBRAHIM. "Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks". (2020), 861-873.
APA YAGLI I (2020). Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 4(3), 861 - 873.
Chicago YAGLI IBRAHIM Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks. Alanya Akademik Bakış 4, no.3 (2020): 861 - 873.
MLA YAGLI IBRAHIM Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks. Alanya Akademik Bakış, vol.4, no.3, 2020, ss.861 - 873.
AMA YAGLI I Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks. Alanya Akademik Bakış. 2020; 4(3): 861 - 873.
Vancouver YAGLI I Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks. Alanya Akademik Bakış. 2020; 4(3): 861 - 873.
IEEE YAGLI I "Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks." Alanya Akademik Bakış, 4, ss.861 - 873, 2020.
ISNAD YAGLI, IBRAHIM. "Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks". Alanya Akademik Bakış 4/3 (2020), 861-873.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 20:58

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları