COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 125 - 131 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 İndeks Tarihi: 10-01-2022
COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma
Öz: Amaç: COVID-19 pandemisinin sezaryen anestezisi yöntem tercihini ve hastanede yatış sürecini etkileyip etkilemediğini saptamayı amaçladık. Yöntem: Mevsimsel farklılıkları ortadan kaldırmak için 2019 ve 2020 Mart-Eylül ayları arasında sezaryen ameliyatına alınan 3.320 hastanın dosyaları incelendi. Grup I (n=1941), Mart-Eylül 2019 pandemi öncesi ve Grup II (n=1379) Mart-Eylül 2020 pandemi dönemi olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Hastaların demografik bilgileri, acil/elektif cerrahi olup olmadığı, anestezi yöntemleri ve hastane- de kalış süreleri hastane veri tabanından kaydedildi. Bulgular: ASA skorları (p=0.049) ve hastanede yatış süresi (p<0.001) Grup I’de daha yüksekti. Spinal anestezi tercihi her 2 grupta da yüksekti (p<0.001). Her 2 grupta da acil ve elektif sezaryen- lerde spinal anestezi tercihi genel anesteziye oranla daha yüksekti (p<0.001). Yalnızca acil şartlar- da alınan ve spinal anestezi uygulanan 3 sezaryenin PCR sonucunun postoperatif pozitif olduğu saptandı. Her 3 vardiyada da ameliyat edilen hasta sayısı Grup I’de daha yüksekti (p<0.001). Sonuç: COVID-19 pandemisi döneminde de önceki dönemde olduğu gibi sezaryen ameliyatlarında genel anesteziye kıyasla spinal anestezi daha sık tercih edilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime: Analysis of Preferences in Cesarean Anesthesia During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period: Retrospective, Single Center Study
Öz: Objective: We aimed to see if the Covid-19 pandemic effects the cesarean anaesthesia method preference and the hospitalization process. Methods: To eliminate seasonal differences, the files of 3320 patients who underwent the cesarean section between 2019-2020 March-September were examined. The patients were divided into two groups as those who had cesarean section between March-September 2019 before the pandemic (Group I, n:1941) and those who had cesarean section after the pandemic (March-September 2020) (Group II, n:1379). The demographic information of the patients, whether there was an emergency/elective surgery, anesthesia methods and duration of hospitalization were recorded from the hospital database. Results: ASA scores (p=0.049) and duration of hospitalization (p<0.001) were higher in Group I. Spinal anaesthesia preference was higher in both groups compared to general anaesthesia (p<0.001). Spinal anaesthesia preference was higher than general anaesthesia in emergency and elective operations in both groups (p<0.001). It was found that the PCR results of three emergency cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia were postoperatively positive. The number of patients operated on in all shifts was higher in Group I (p<0.001). Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic period, spinal anaesthesia was preferred more frequently for cesareans compared to general anaesthesia as in the previous perio
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Chen R, Chen J, Meng QT. Chest computed tomography images of early coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Can J Anaesth. 2020;67:754-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01625-4
- 2. Chen R, Zhang Y, Huang L, Cheng BH, Xia ZY, Meng QT. Safety and efficacy of different anesthetic regimens for parturients with COVID-19 undergoing cesarean deli- very: a case series of 17 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67:655-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01630-7
- 3. vonUngern-Sternberg BS, Boda K, Chambers NA, et al. Risk assessment for respiratory complications in paedi- atric anaesthesia: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2010;376:773-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61193-2
- 4. Warren J, Sundaram K, Anis H, et al. Spinal anesthesia is associated with decreased complications after total knee and hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28:213-21. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00156
- 5. Uppal V, Sondekoppam RV, Landau R, El-Boghdadly K, Narouze S, Kalagara HKP. Neuraxial anaesthesia and peripheral nevre blocks during the COVID-19 pande- mic: a literature review and practice recommendati- ons. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:1350-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15105
- 6. Breslin N, Baptiste C, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 infection among asympto- matic and symptomatic pregnant women: two weeks of confirmed presentations to an affiliated pair of New York City hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020;2:100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100118
- 7. Soma-Pillay P, Nelson-Piercy C, Tolppanen H, Mebazaa A. Physiological changes in pregnancy. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016;27:89-94. https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2016-021
- 8. Afolabi BB, Lesi FE, Merah NA. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD004350. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub2
- 9. Birnbach DJ, Browne IM. Anesthesia for obstetrics. In: Miller RD (edt) Miller’s Anesthesia. 7th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone Inc; 2007. p. 2220e1.
- 10. Breivik H, Norum HM. Regional analgesia-risks and benefits. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010;130:392-7. https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.08.0220
- 11. Bauer ME, Bernstein K, Dinges E, et al. Obstetric anest- hesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anesth Analg. 2020;131:7-15. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004856
- 12. Wastnedge EAN, Reynolds RM, van Boeckel SR, et al. Pregnancyand COVID-19. Physiol Rev. 2021;101:303- 18. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00024.2020
- 13. Breslin N, Baptiste C, Miller R, et al. COVID-19 in preg- nancy: early lessons. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020;2:100111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100111
- 14. Rasmussen SA, Smulian JC, Lednicky JA, Wen TS, Jamieson DJ. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pregnancy: what obstetricians need to know. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222:415-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.017
- 15. Schwartz DA, Graham AL. Potential maternal and infant outcomes from coronavirus 2019-nCoV (SARS- CoV-2) infecting pregnant women: lessons from SARS, MERS, and other human coronavirus infections. Viruses. 2020;12:194. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12020194
- 16. Yue L, Han L, Li Q, et al. Anesthesia and infection cont- rol in cesarean section of pregnant women with COVID-19 infection: A descriptive study. J Clin Anesth. 2020;66:109908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109908
- 17. Kinsella SM, Carvalho B, Dyer RA, et al. International consensus statement on the management of hypoten- sion with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2018;73:71-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14080
- 18. Zhong Q, Liu YY, Luo Q, et al. Spinal anaesthesia for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and possible transmission rates in anaesthetists: retrospective, single-centre, observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124:670-5.
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.007 19. Jain K, Alen J, Kumar S, Mitra S. Protocolized approach to a COVID-19 parturient undergoing a cesarean secti- on- A casereport. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020;36:407-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_342_20
- 20. Türken M, Köse Ş. COVID-19 Bulaş Yolları ve Önleme. Tepecik Eğit. ve Araşt. Hast. Dergisi. 2020;30:36-42. https://doi.org/10.5222/terh.2020.02693
- 21. Yang S, Gu C, Mandeville ET, et al. Anesthesia and sur- gery impair blood-brain barier and cognitive function in mice. Front Immunol 2017;8:902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00902
- 22. Sun x, Liu Y, Mei W. Safety considerations for neuraxial anaesthesia in parturients with COVID-19. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:313-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.005
- 23. Bauer ME, Chiware R, Pancaro C. Neuraxial procedures in COVID-19 positive parturients: a review of current reports. Anesth Analg. 2020;131:22-4. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004831
- 24. Havas F, Sungur MO, Yenigün Y, Karadeniz M, Kılıç M, Seyhan TÖ.Spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean sec- tion is associated with shorter hospital stay compared to general anesthesia. Agri. 2013;25:55-63. https://doi.org/10.5505/agri.2013.42204
- 25. Fassoulaki A, Petropoulos G, Staikou C, Siafaka I, Sarantapoulos C. General versus neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean section: impact on the duration of hos- pital stay. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29:25-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610802628569
- 26. Qiao J. What are the risks of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women? Lancet. 2020;395:760-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30365-2
- 27. Guan Wj, Ni Zy, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708-20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032
- 28. Lippi G, Plebani M, Henry BM. Thrombocytopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: a meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;506:145-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.03.022
- 29. Søreide K, Hallet J, Matthews JB, et al. Immediate and long term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on deli- very of surgical services. Br J Surg. 2020;107:1250-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1167
| APA | ural s, Tor I (2021). COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma. , 125 - 131. 10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
| Chicago | ural sedef gülçin,Tor Ibrahim Hakki COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma. (2021): 125 - 131. 10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
| MLA | ural sedef gülçin,Tor Ibrahim Hakki COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma. , 2021, ss.125 - 131. 10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
| AMA | ural s,Tor I COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma. . 2021; 125 - 131. 10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
| Vancouver | ural s,Tor I COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma. . 2021; 125 - 131. 10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
| IEEE | ural s,Tor I "COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma." , ss.125 - 131, 2021. 10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
| ISNAD | ural, sedef gülçin - Tor, Ibrahim Hakki. "COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma". (2021), 125-131. https://doi.org/10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
| APA | ural s, Tor I (2021). COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma. Anestezi Dergisi, 29(2), 125 - 131. 10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
| Chicago | ural sedef gülçin,Tor Ibrahim Hakki COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma. Anestezi Dergisi 29, no.2 (2021): 125 - 131. 10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
| MLA | ural sedef gülçin,Tor Ibrahim Hakki COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma. Anestezi Dergisi, vol.29, no.2, 2021, ss.125 - 131. 10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
| AMA | ural s,Tor I COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma. Anestezi Dergisi. 2021; 29(2): 125 - 131. 10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
| Vancouver | ural s,Tor I COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma. Anestezi Dergisi. 2021; 29(2): 125 - 131. 10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
| IEEE | ural s,Tor I "COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma." Anestezi Dergisi, 29, ss.125 - 131, 2021. 10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
| ISNAD | ural, sedef gülçin - Tor, Ibrahim Hakki. "COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Sezaryen Anestezisinde Tercihlerin Analizi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkezli Çalışma". Anestezi Dergisi 29/2 (2021), 125-131. https://doi.org/10.5222/jarss.2021.86729 |
