Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation

DURMUS, BASAK; Eren Giray, Figen; kalyoncu, ışıl özgül; Tanboğa, İlknur; garip berker, yıldız

doi:10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726

Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation

Işıl KALYONCU, (Marmara Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Çocuk Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Figen Eren Giray, (Marmara Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Çocuk Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Basak Durmus, (Marmara Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Çocuk Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Yildiz Garip Berker, (Kent Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

İlknur TANBOĞA (Marmara Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Çocuk Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences

5 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 9 - 13 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726 İndeks Tarihi: 11-01-2022

Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation

Öz:

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of MTAD (a mixture of a tetracycline isomer, an acid, and a detergent), Er:YAG laser, 17% EDTA, and 5.25% NaOCl in removing the smear layer from the surface of instrumented root canals. Methods: Various organic acids, instruments and lasers have been used to remove the smear layer from the surface of instrumented root canals. Twenty-eight extracted maxillary and mandibular permanent incisors were prepared with rotary files. The teeth were randomly allocated to four treatment groups for final irrigation as follows: (1) 17% EDTA (followed by NaOCl), (2) 5.25% NaOCl, (3) Er:YAG laser, and (4) MTAD. All teeth were processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the removal of the smear layer was examined in the apical, middle and coronal thirds. Results: At coronal location, NaOCl(2.2±0.4) group had significantly higher scores than MTAD(0.0±0.0), EDTA(0.6±0.4) and Er:YAG laser(0.6±0.4) groups (p<0.001, p=0.039, and p=0.039, respectively). At the middle third, NaOCl(2.6±0.5) scores were significantly higher than MTAD(0.0±0.0) and EDTA(0.8±0.4) groups (p<0.001 and p=0.036 respectively). At apical MTAD (0.4±0.3) group had significantly better scores (p<0.001). Conclusion: The results of this suggest that MTAD is an effective final irrigator agent, particularly in the apical segment of the root canal, which presents challenges during cleaning.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

[1] Gupta PK, Mahajan UP, Gupta K, Sheela NV. Comparative evaluation of a new endodontic irrigant – mixture of a tetracycline isomer, an acid, and a detergent to remove the intracanal smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Int Oral Health 2015;7:1-6.
[2] Susila A, Minu J. Activated Irrigation vs. Conventional nonactivated irrigation in endodontics – A systematic review. Eur Endod J 2019;4:96-110.
[3] Charlie KM, Kuttappa MA, George L, Manoj KV, Joseph B, John NK. A Scanning electron microscope evaluation of smear layer removal and antimicrobial action of mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent, sodium hypochlorite, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and chlorhexidine gluconate: An in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2018;8:62-9.
[4] Kumar P, Prasad N, Darawade A, Bhagat SK, Narayana N, Darawade P. The Effect of four commonly used root canal irrigants on the removal of smear layer: An in-vitro scanning electron microscope study. J Int Oral Health 2015;7:88-93.
[5] Guidotti R, Merigo E, Fornaini C, Rocca JP, Medioni E, Vescovi P. Er:YAG 2,940-nm laser fiber in endodontic treatment: a help in removing smear layer. Lasers Med Sci 2014;29:69-75.
[6] Karunakaran JV, Kumar SS, Kumar M, Chandrasekhar S, Namitha D. The effects of various irrigating solutions on intraradicular dentinal surface: An SEM analysis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012;4:S125-30.
[7] Teixeira CS, Felippe MC, Felippe WT. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Int Endod J 2005;38:285-90.
[8] Dotto L, Sarkis Onofre R, Bacchi A, Rocha Pereira GK. Effect of root canal irrigants on the mechanical properties of endodontically treated teeth: A scoping review. J Endod 2020;46:596-604.e3.
[9] Kalyoncuoglu E, Demiryurek EO. A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal from teeth with different irrigation solutions and lasers. Microsc Microanal 2013;19:1465-9.
[10] Torabinejad M, Khademi AA, Babagoli J, Cho Y, Johnson WB, Bozhilov K. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. J Endod 2003;29:170-5.
[11] Zhou H, Li Q, Wei L, Huang S, Zhao S. A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal with chitosan and MTAD. Niger J Clin Pract 2018;21:76-80.
[12] Yadav HK, Yadav RK, Chandra A, Tikku AP. A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effectiveness of etidronic acid, SmearClear and MTAD in removing the intracanal smear layer. J Dent (Shiraz) 2017;18:118-26.
[13] Paul ML, Mazumdar D, Niyogi A, Baranwal AK. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of different irrigants including MTAD under SEM. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:336-41.
[14] Srikumar GP, Sekhar KS, Nischith KG. Mixture tetracycline citric acid and detergent – A root canal irrigant. A review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2013;3:31-5.
[15] Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Yaripour S, Kinoshita JI, Manabe A, Kobayashi M. Smear layer removing ability of root canal irrigation solutions: A review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20:395-402.
[16] Deari S, Mohn D, Zehnder M. Dentine decalcification and smear layer removal by different ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 1-hydroxyethane-1,1-diphosphonic acid species. Int Endod J 2019;52:237-243.
[17] Zehnder M, Kosicki D, Luder H, Sener B, Waltimo T. Tissuedissolving capacity and antibacterial effect of buffered and unbuffered hypochlorite solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;94:756-762.
[18] Andrabi SM, Kumar A, Kumar Tewari R, Kumar Mishra S, Iftekhar H. An in vitro SEM study on the effectiveness of smear layer removal of four different irrigations. Iran Endod J 2012;7:171-176.
[19] Yamada RS, Armas A, Goldman M, Lin PS. A scanning electron microscopic comparison of a high volume final flush with several irrigating solutions: Part 3. J Endod 1983;9:137-142.
[20] Ashraf H, Asnaashari M, Darmiani S, Birang R. Smear Layer Removal in the Apical third of root canals by two chelating agents and laser: A comparative in vitro study. Iran Endod J 2014;9:210-214.

APA	kalyoncu ı, Eren Giray F, DURMUS B, garip berker y, Tanboğa İ (2021). Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation. , 9 - 13. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
Chicago	kalyoncu ışıl özgül,Eren Giray Figen,DURMUS BASAK,garip berker yıldız,Tanboğa İlknur Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation. (2021): 9 - 13. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
MLA	kalyoncu ışıl özgül,Eren Giray Figen,DURMUS BASAK,garip berker yıldız,Tanboğa İlknur Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation. , 2021, ss.9 - 13. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
AMA	kalyoncu ı,Eren Giray F,DURMUS B,garip berker y,Tanboğa İ Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation. . 2021; 9 - 13. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
Vancouver	kalyoncu ı,Eren Giray F,DURMUS B,garip berker y,Tanboğa İ Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation. . 2021; 9 - 13. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
IEEE	kalyoncu ı,Eren Giray F,DURMUS B,garip berker y,Tanboğa İ "Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation." , ss.9 - 13, 2021. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
ISNAD	kalyoncu, ışıl özgül vd. "Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation". (2021), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726

APA	kalyoncu ı, Eren Giray F, DURMUS B, garip berker y, Tanboğa İ (2021). Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 11(1), 9 - 13. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
Chicago	kalyoncu ışıl özgül,Eren Giray Figen,DURMUS BASAK,garip berker yıldız,Tanboğa İlknur Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 11, no.1 (2021): 9 - 13. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
MLA	kalyoncu ışıl özgül,Eren Giray Figen,DURMUS BASAK,garip berker yıldız,Tanboğa İlknur Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol.11, no.1, 2021, ss.9 - 13. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
AMA	kalyoncu ı,Eren Giray F,DURMUS B,garip berker y,Tanboğa İ Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2021; 11(1): 9 - 13. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
Vancouver	kalyoncu ı,Eren Giray F,DURMUS B,garip berker y,Tanboğa İ Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2021; 11(1): 9 - 13. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
IEEE	kalyoncu ı,Eren Giray F,DURMUS B,garip berker y,Tanboğa İ "Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation." Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 11, ss.9 - 13, 2021. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
ISNAD	kalyoncu, ışıl özgül vd. "Efficacy of MTAD Solution and Er:YAG Laser in Smear Layer Removal from Extracted Root Canals: A SEM Evaluation". Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 11/1 (2021), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726