Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 51 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1883 - 1888 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/sag-2011-126 İndeks Tarihi: 12-01-2022

A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery

Öz:
Background/aim: This study compared ultrasound guided costoclavicular (CC) and lateral sagittal infraclavicular (LS) brachial plexus block in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery. Materials and methods: A total of 80 patients undergoing upper extremity surgery were randomly classified into two groups: Group CC (costoclavicular (n = 40)) and Group LS (lateral sagittal infraclavicular (n = 40)). Both groups received a 25 mL containing a mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine. A blinded observer recorded the block onset time and decided which patients who were admitted to the operation room needed general anesthesia or rescue block or without any iv. narcotics for the surgical procedure. Results: The sensorimotor onset time was found to be faster in the CC group [(15.95 2.97) min] compared to the LS group [(17.72 4.15) min]. There was a statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of sensorimotor onset time (p = 0.031). There was no difference between two groups in terms of the block performance times and post-block motor block dissolution times. Conclusion: The CC approach provides faster onset of sensorimotor blockade than LS approach when the 4 major terminal nerves of the brachial plexus were evaluated.Key words: Costoclavicular approach, brachial plexus, infraclavicular block, sensorimotor blockade, upper extremity surgery
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Tran DQ, Dugani S, Dyachenko A, Correa JA, Finlayson RJ. Minimum effective volume of lidocaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2011; 36 (2): 190-194. doi:10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d4266
  • 2. Sandhu NS, Capan LM. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2002; 89 (2): 254-259. doi: 10.1093/bja/aef186
  • 3. Karmakar MK, Sala-Blanch X, Songthamwat B, Tsui BC. Benefits of the costoclavicular space for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: description of a costoclavicular approach. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2015; 40 (3): 287-288. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000232
  • 4. Bigeleisen P, Wilson M. A comparison of two techniques for ultrasound guided infraclavicular block. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006; 96 (4): 502-507. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael024
  • 5. Sauter AR, Smith HJ, Stubhaug A, Dodgson MS, Klaastad O. Use of magnetic resonance imaging to define the anatomical location closest to all three cords of the infraclavicular brachial plexus. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2006; 103 (6): 1574-1576. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000242529.96675.fd
  • 6. Di Filippo A, Orando S, Luna A, Gianesello L, Boccaccini A et al. Ultrasound identification of nerve cords in the infraclavicular fossa: a clinical study. Minerva Anestesiologica 2012; 78 (4): 450-455. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
  • 7. Nieuwveld D, Mojica V, Herrera AE, Pomés J, Prats A et al. Medial approach of ultrasound-guided costoclavicular plexus block and its effects on regional perfussion. Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación 2017; 64 (4): 198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2016.09.010
  • 8. Leurcharusmee P, Elgueta MF, Tiyaprasertkul W, Sotthisopha T, Samerchua A et al. A randomized comparison between costoclavicular and paracoracoid ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block for upper limb surgery. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2017; 64 (6): 617-625. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017- 0842-z
  • 9. Songthamwat B, Karmakar MK, Li JW, Samy W, Mok LYH. Ultrasound-guided ınfraclavicular brachial plexus block: prospective randomized comparison of the lateral sagittal and costoclavicular approach. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2018; 43 (8): 825-831. doi: 10.1097/ AAP.0000000000000822
  • 10. Sotthisopha T, Elgueta MF, Samerchua A, Leurcharusmee P, Tiyaprasertkul W et al. Minimum effective volume of lidocaine for ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2017; 42 (5): 571-574. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000629
  • 11. Li JW, Songthamwat B, Samy W, Sala-Blanch X, Karmakar MK. Ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block: sonoanatomy, technique, and block dynamics. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2017; 42 (2): 233-240. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000566
  • 12. Wong MH, Karmakar MK, Mok LYH, Songthamwat B, Samy W. Minimum effective volume of 0.5% ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block: A dose finding study. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2020; 37 (9): 780-786. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001287
  • 13. Kewlani A, Bhatia N, Makkar JK, Kumar V. Median effective volume of 0.5% ropivacaine for ultrasoundguided costoclavicular block. Anesthesiology 2021; 134 (4): 617-625. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003731
  • 14. Tran DQ, Bertini P, Zaouter C, Muñoz L, Finlayson RJ. A prospective, randomized comparison between single- and double-injection ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2010; 35 (1): 16-21. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181c7717c
  • 15. Marhofer P, Schrögendorfer K, Koinig H, Kapral S, Weinstabl C et al. Ultrasonographic guidance improves sensory block and onset time of three-in-one blocks. Anesthesia & Analgesia 1997; 85 (4): 854-857. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199710000- 00026
  • 16. Layera S, Aliste J, Bravo D, Fernández D, García A et al. Singleversus double-injection costoclavicular block: a randomized comparison. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2020; 45 (3): 209-213. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101167
  • 17. Silva GR, Borges DG, Lopes IF, Ruzi RA, Costa PRRM et al. Ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block as an alternative for upper limb anesthesia in obese patients. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia 2019; 69 (5): 510-513. doi: 10.1016/j. bjan.2019.01.004
APA cesur s, Yayik A, Daş A, Ahiskalioglu A (2021). A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery. , 1883 - 1888. 10.3906/sag-2011-126
Chicago cesur sevim,Yayik Ahmet Murat,Daş Ayşe nur,Ahiskalioglu Ali A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery. (2021): 1883 - 1888. 10.3906/sag-2011-126
MLA cesur sevim,Yayik Ahmet Murat,Daş Ayşe nur,Ahiskalioglu Ali A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery. , 2021, ss.1883 - 1888. 10.3906/sag-2011-126
AMA cesur s,Yayik A,Daş A,Ahiskalioglu A A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery. . 2021; 1883 - 1888. 10.3906/sag-2011-126
Vancouver cesur s,Yayik A,Daş A,Ahiskalioglu A A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery. . 2021; 1883 - 1888. 10.3906/sag-2011-126
IEEE cesur s,Yayik A,Daş A,Ahiskalioglu A "A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery." , ss.1883 - 1888, 2021. 10.3906/sag-2011-126
ISNAD cesur, sevim vd. "A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery". (2021), 1883-1888. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2011-126
APA cesur s, Yayik A, Daş A, Ahiskalioglu A (2021). A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 51(4), 1883 - 1888. 10.3906/sag-2011-126
Chicago cesur sevim,Yayik Ahmet Murat,Daş Ayşe nur,Ahiskalioglu Ali A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 51, no.4 (2021): 1883 - 1888. 10.3906/sag-2011-126
MLA cesur sevim,Yayik Ahmet Murat,Daş Ayşe nur,Ahiskalioglu Ali A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.51, no.4, 2021, ss.1883 - 1888. 10.3906/sag-2011-126
AMA cesur s,Yayik A,Daş A,Ahiskalioglu A A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 51(4): 1883 - 1888. 10.3906/sag-2011-126
Vancouver cesur s,Yayik A,Daş A,Ahiskalioglu A A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 51(4): 1883 - 1888. 10.3906/sag-2011-126
IEEE cesur s,Yayik A,Daş A,Ahiskalioglu A "A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 51, ss.1883 - 1888, 2021. 10.3906/sag-2011-126
ISNAD cesur, sevim vd. "A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 51/4 (2021), 1883-1888. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2011-126