Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 51 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 2036 - 2042 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/sag-2004-110 İndeks Tarihi: 13-01-2022

Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position

Öz:
Background/aim: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries cause mechanoreceptor loss in the joint; therefore, proprioceptive deficits are observed after injury. In particular, proprioceptive measurements made in the functional position give more accurate results, and this is an area that requires further studies. This study aimed to evaluate proprioception in patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in functional positions used in daily life (closed kinetic chain position), according to joint angles where ACL injuries occur more frequently, in comparison with healthy controls. Materials and methods: Thirty-four participants who underwent ACLR using a hamstring tendon graft (aged 29.18 ± 8.16 years; body mass index (BMI), 26.58 ± 4.02 kg/cm2 ) and 31 healthy participants (aged 27.35 ± 5.74 years; BMI, 24.76 ± 2.98 kg/cm2) were included. Proprioception was assessed with an active angle repetition test, using an inclinometer in the closed kinetic chain position while standing. Participants were asked to perform single-leg squats until the angle at the knee joint was 30°. After the targeted angle was defined, the participants were asked to find the targeted angle. The difference between the targeted angle and the angle reached by the participants was calculated. Results: A statistically significant difference in the active joint position sense was found among the ACLR extremity, uninvolved extremity, and control extremity (p < 0.05). The proprioceptive sense between the two extremities in the ACLR group was similar, and the proprioceptive sense was worse than that of the control group. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate closed kinetic chain position in patients who underwent ACLR, and it showed that proprioceptive sense was still poor in patients with ACLR compared with the control group, even if an average of 24 months have elapsed since surgery.Key words: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, proprioception, inclinometer, closed kinetic chain position
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Gasibat Q, Jahan AM. Pre and post-operative rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young athletes. International Journal of Orthopaedics 2017; 3 (1): 819-828. doi: 10.22271/ortho.2017.v3.i1l.118
  • 2. Duthon V, Barea C, Abrassart S, Fasel J, Fritschy D et al. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2006; 14 (3): 204-213. doi: 10.1007/s00167-005-0679-9
  • 3. Palmieri-Smith RM, Thomas AC, Wojtys EM. Maximizing quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction. Clinics in Sports Medicine 2008; 27 (3): 405-424. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2008.02.001
  • 4. Butler RJ, Dai B, Garrett WE, Queen RM. Changes in landing mechanics in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction when wearing an extension constraint knee brace. Sports Health 2014; 6 (3): 203-209. doi: 10.1177/1941738114524910
  • 5. Petersen W, Fink C, Kopf S. Return to sports after ACL reconstruction: a paradigm shift from time to function. Springer 2017; 25: 1353-1355. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4559-x
  • 6. Wilk KE, Romaniello WT, Soscia SM, Arrigo CA, Andrews JR. The relationship between subjective knee scores, isokinetic testing, and functional testing in the ACL-reconstructed knee. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 1994; 20 (2): 60-73. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1994.20.2.60
  • 7. Kartus J, Magnusson L, Stener S, Brandsson S, Eriksson BI et al. Complications following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction A 2–5-year follow-up of 604 patients with special emphasis on anterior knee pain. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1999; 7 (1): 2-8. doi: 10.1007/s001670050112
  • 8. Pujji O, Keswani N, Collier N, Black M, Doos L. Evaluating the functional results and complications of autograft vs allograft use for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a systematic review. Orthopedic Reviews 2017; 9 (1): 6833. doi: 10.4081/or.2017.6833
  • 9. Palmieri-Smith RM, Lepley LK. Quadriceps strength asymmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction alters knee joint biomechanics and functional performance at time of return to activity. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2015; 43 (7): 1662-1669. doi: 10.1177/0363546515578252
  • 10. Krafft FC, Stetter BJ, Stein T, Ellermann A, Flechtenmacher J et al. How does functionality proceed in ACL reconstructed subjects? Proceeding of functional performance from pre-to six months post-ACL reconstruction. PloS one 2017; 12 (5): e0178430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178430
  • 11. Lee DH, Lee JH, Ahn SE, Park MJ. Effect of time after anterior cruciate ligament tears on proprioception and postural stability. PloS one 2015; 10 (9): e0139038. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0139038
  • 12. Fernandes TL, Felix ECR, Bessa F, Luna N, Sugimoto D et al. Evaluation of static and dynamic balance in athletes with anterior cruciate ligament injury–A controlled study. Clinics 2016; 71 (8): 425-429. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2016(08)03
  • 13. Tengman E, Brax Olofsson L, Nilsson KG, Tegner Y, Lundgren L et al. Anterior cruciate ligament injury after more than 20 years: I. Physical activity level and knee function. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 2014; 24 (6): 491- 500. doi: 10.1111/sms.12212
  • 14. Mourcou Q, Fleury A, Diot B, Franco C, Vuillerme N. Mobile phone-based joint angle measurement for functional assessment and rehabilitation of proprioception. Biomed Research International 2015; 15. doi: 10.1155/2015/328142
  • 15. Fouladi R, Rajabi R, Naseri N, Pourkazemi F, Geranmayeh M. Menstrual cycle and knee joint position sense in healthy female athletes. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2012; 20 (8): 1647-1652. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1811-7
  • 16. Ribeiro F, Venâncio J, Quintas P, Oliveira J. The effect of fatigue on knee position sense is not dependent upon the muscle group fatigued. Muscle and Nerve 2011; 44 (2): 217-220. doi: 10.1002/mus.22018
  • 17. Ozenci AM, Inanmaz E, Ozcanli H, Soyuncu Y, Samanci N et al. Proprioceptive comparison of allograft and autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2007; 15 (12): 1432-1437. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0404-y
  • 18. Ochi M, Iwasa J, Uchio Y, Adachi N, Sumen Y. The regeneration of sensory neurones in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 1999; 81 (5): 902-906. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.0810902
  • 19. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Ryoke K et al. Mechanoreceptors in the anterior cruciate ligament contribute to the joint position sense. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 2002; 73 (3): 330-334. doi: 10.1080/000164702320155356
  • 20. Furlanetto TS, Peyré-Tartaruga LA, Pinho ASd, Bernardes EdS, Zaro MA. Proprioception, body balance and functionality in individuals with ACL reconstruction. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira 2016; 24 (2): 67-72. doi: 10.1590/1413- 785220162402108949
  • 21. Roberts D, Ageberg E, Andersson G, Fridén T. Clinical measurements of proprioception, muscle strength and laxity in relation to function in the ACL-injured knee. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2007; 15 (1): 9-16. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0128-4
  • 22. Relph N, Herrington L. Knee joint position sense ability in elite athletes who have returned to international level play following ACL reconstruction: A cross-sectional study. The Knee 2016; 23 (6): 1029-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.09.005
  • 23. Risberg M, Beynnon B, Peura G, Uh B. Proprioception after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without bracing. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1999; 7 (5): 303-309. doi: 10.1007/s001670050168
  • 24. Stillman BC, McMeeken JM. The role of weightbearing in the clinical assessment of knee joint position sense. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2001; 47 (4): 247-253. doi: 10.1016/ S0004-9514(14)60272-5
  • 25. Nasseri N, Hadian MR, Bagheri H, Olyaei STG. Reliability and accuracy of joint position sense measurement in the laboratory and clinic; utilising a new system. Acta Medica Iranica 2007; 45 (5): 395-404
  • 26. Bernier JN, Perrin DH. Effect of coordination training on proprioception of the functionally unstable ankle. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 1998; 27 (4): 264- 275. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1998.27.4.264
  • 27. Garsden L, Bullock-Saxton J. Joint reposition sense in subjects with unilateral osteoarthritis of the knee. Clinical Rehabilitation 1999; 13 (2): 148-155. doi: 10.1191/026921599674996411
  • 28. Alentorn-Geli E, Myer GD, Silvers HJ, Samitier G, Romero D et al. Prevention of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players. Part 1: Mechanisms of injury and underlying risk factors. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2009; 17 (7): 705-729. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009- 0813-1
  • 29. Reider B, Arcand M, Diehl L, Mroczek K, Abulencia A et al. Proprioception of the knee before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 2003; 19 (1): 2-12. doi: 10.1053/jars.2003.50006
  • 30. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, Inal-Ince D, Bosnak-Guclu M et al. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2010; 111 (1): 278-284. doi: 10.2466/06.08.PMS.111.4.278-284
  • 31. Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2003; 35 (8): 1381-1395. doi: 10.1249/01. MSS.0000078924.61453.FB
  • 32. Suner-Keklik S, Cobanoglu-Seven G, Kafa N, Ugurlu M, Guzel NA. The validity and reliability of knee proprioception measurement performed with inclinometer in different positions. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 2017: 26 (6): 1-18. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0010
  • 33. Zult T, Gokeler A, van Raay JJ, Brouwer RW, Zijdewind I et al. An anterior cruciate ligament injury does not affect the neuromuscular function of the non-injured leg except for dynamic balance and voluntary quadriceps activation. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2017; 25 (1): 172- 183. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4335-3
  • 34. Action F. Physical activity and public health-a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. Journal American Medical Association 1995; 273: 402-407
  • 35. Drouin JM, Houglum PA, Perrin DH, Gansneder BM, Drouin J et al. Weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing knee-joint reposition sense and functional performance. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 2013; 12 (1): 54-66. doi: 10.1123/jsr.12.1.54
  • 36. Herrington L. Knee-joint position sense: the relationship between open and closed kinetic chain tests. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 2005; 14 (4): 356-362. doi: 10.1123/jsr.14.4.356
  • 37. Kovalak E, Atay T, Çetin C, Atay IM, Serbest MO. Is ACL reconstruction a prerequisite for the patients having recreational sporting activities? Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica 2018; 52 (1): 37-43. doi: 10.1016/j. aott.2017.11.010
  • 38. Katayama M, Higuchi H, Kimura M, Kobayashi A, Hatayama K et al. Proprioception and performance after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. International Orthopaedics 2004; 28 (5): 278-281. doi: 10.1007/s00264-004-0583-9
  • 39. Relph N, Herrington L, Tyson S. The effects of ACL injury on knee proprioception: a meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 2014; 100 (3): 187-195. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.11.002
  • 40. Arockiaraj J, Korula R, Oommen A, Devasahayam S, Wankhar S et al. Proprioceptive changes in the contralateral knee joint following anterior cruciate injury. Bone and Joint Journal 2013; 95 (2): 188-191. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30566
APA Suner-Keklik S, atalay güzel n, COBANOGLU G, Kafa N, Ataoğlu B, Öztemür Z (2021). Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position. , 2036 - 2042. 10.3906/sag-2004-110
Chicago Suner-Keklik Sinem,atalay güzel nevin,COBANOGLU GAMZE,Kafa Nihan,Ataoğlu Baybars,Öztemür Zekeriya Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position. (2021): 2036 - 2042. 10.3906/sag-2004-110
MLA Suner-Keklik Sinem,atalay güzel nevin,COBANOGLU GAMZE,Kafa Nihan,Ataoğlu Baybars,Öztemür Zekeriya Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position. , 2021, ss.2036 - 2042. 10.3906/sag-2004-110
AMA Suner-Keklik S,atalay güzel n,COBANOGLU G,Kafa N,Ataoğlu B,Öztemür Z Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position. . 2021; 2036 - 2042. 10.3906/sag-2004-110
Vancouver Suner-Keklik S,atalay güzel n,COBANOGLU G,Kafa N,Ataoğlu B,Öztemür Z Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position. . 2021; 2036 - 2042. 10.3906/sag-2004-110
IEEE Suner-Keklik S,atalay güzel n,COBANOGLU G,Kafa N,Ataoğlu B,Öztemür Z "Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position." , ss.2036 - 2042, 2021. 10.3906/sag-2004-110
ISNAD Suner-Keklik, Sinem vd. "Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position". (2021), 2036-2042. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2004-110
APA Suner-Keklik S, atalay güzel n, COBANOGLU G, Kafa N, Ataoğlu B, Öztemür Z (2021). Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 51(4), 2036 - 2042. 10.3906/sag-2004-110
Chicago Suner-Keklik Sinem,atalay güzel nevin,COBANOGLU GAMZE,Kafa Nihan,Ataoğlu Baybars,Öztemür Zekeriya Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 51, no.4 (2021): 2036 - 2042. 10.3906/sag-2004-110
MLA Suner-Keklik Sinem,atalay güzel nevin,COBANOGLU GAMZE,Kafa Nihan,Ataoğlu Baybars,Öztemür Zekeriya Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.51, no.4, 2021, ss.2036 - 2042. 10.3906/sag-2004-110
AMA Suner-Keklik S,atalay güzel n,COBANOGLU G,Kafa N,Ataoğlu B,Öztemür Z Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 51(4): 2036 - 2042. 10.3906/sag-2004-110
Vancouver Suner-Keklik S,atalay güzel n,COBANOGLU G,Kafa N,Ataoğlu B,Öztemür Z Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 51(4): 2036 - 2042. 10.3906/sag-2004-110
IEEE Suner-Keklik S,atalay güzel n,COBANOGLU G,Kafa N,Ataoğlu B,Öztemür Z "Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 51, ss.2036 - 2042, 2021. 10.3906/sag-2004-110
ISNAD Suner-Keklik, Sinem vd. "Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 51/4 (2021), 2036-2042. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2004-110