The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems

Bora Korkut, (Marmara Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Tuna Unal (Yeditepe Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences
8 1
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 529 - 535 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450 İndeks Tarihi: 17-01-2022

The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems

Öz:
Objective: This study was aimed to assess the abrasiveness of 4 composite finishing and polishing systems, on 2 nano-hybrid composite materials. Methods: Fourty samples were prepared using Tetric EvoCeram BulkFill and IPS Empress Direct composites (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lichtenstein). Each group was divided into 4 subgroups (Sof-Lex Disc, 3M, MN, USA; Enhance/Pogo, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany; OptraGloss, Ivoclar Vivadent; Twist Dia, Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan). Finishing and polishing systems were performed at one side, for 30 s regarding each step. Initial (t0) and final (t1) thicknesses were measured with a micrometer (ME-DI-MIC-25-50-LD Digital External Micrometer, Machine DRO, Hoddesdon, UK). Two-way Anova test and Tukey HSD were performed for multiple comparisons, according to the t1-t0 values. Deem significance was set at p<0,05. Results: IPS Empress Direct composite presented significantly a greater level of abrasion (52.85 ± 42.26) than Tetric Evo Ceram BulkFill (p<0.001). Significantly a greater level of abrasiveness was observed for Sof-Lex Disc system (91.25 ± 47.22) among all finishing and polishing materials (p<0.001). There was no significant differences in abrasiveness, between Enhance/Pogo – Optragloss (p=0.859), Enhance/Pogo – Twist Dia (p=0.891), and Twist Dia – Optragloss (p=0.440). Conclusion: Both the type of composite and the finishing and polishing material were considered effective factors for abrasion. The greatest level of abrasiveness was observed for Sof-Lex Disc system (91 µm on average). The abrasiveness for 2-step systems was similar and ranged between 24–36 µm on average. IPS Empress Direct presented a greater level of abrasion on equal terms of finishing and polishing.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] LeSage B. Finishing and polishing criteria for minimally invasive composite restorations. General Dent 2011;59(6):422-428.
  • [2] Bashetty K, Joshi S. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites. J Conserv Dent 2010;13(1):34-38.
  • [3] Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19(5):265-275.
  • [4] Heintze SD, Reinhardt M, Müller F, Peschke A. Press-on force during polishing of resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2019;35(6):937-944.
  • [5] Jefferies SR. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: A state-of-the-art review. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51(2):379-397.
  • [6] Krejci I, Lutz F, Boretti R. Resin composite polishing—Filling the gaps. Quintessence Int 1999;30(7):490-495.
  • [7] Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa Hrikuta A, Ando S. Influence of polishing duration on surface roughness of resin composites. J Oral Sci 2005;47(1):21-25.
  • [8] Terry DA. Finishing and polishing adhesive restorations: Part II. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005;17(8):545-548.
  • [9] Daud A, Gray G, Lynch CD, Wilson NHF, Blum IR. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy. J Dent 2018;71:25-30.
  • [10] Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Rousson V. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro. Dent Mater 2006;22:146-165.
  • [11] Antonson SA, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, Antonson DE, Hardigan PC. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2011;39:9-17.
  • [12] Kemaloglu H, Karaçolak G, Türkün LŞ. Can Reduced-Step Polishers Be as Effective as Multiple Step Polishers in Enhancing Surface Smoothness? J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29(1):31-40.
  • [13] Kocaağaoğlu H, Aslan T, Gürbulak A, Albayrak H, Taşdemir Z, Gumus H. Efficacy of polishing kits on the surface roughness and color stability of different composite resins. Niger J Clin Pract 2017;20(5):557-565.
  • [14] Wilder Jr AD, Swift Jr EJ, May Jr KN, Thompson JY, McDougal RA. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. J Dent 2000;28(5):367-373.
  • [15] Takahashi R, Jin J, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Surface characterization of current composites after toothbrush abrasion. Dent Mater J 2013;32(1):75-82.
  • [16] Korkut B, Tagtekin D, Murat N, Yanikoglu F. Clinical quantitative evaluation of tooth wear: a 4-year longitudinal study. Oral Health Prev Dent 2020;18:719–730.
  • [17] Korkut B, Yanikoglu F, Tagtekin D. In vitro assessment of dimensional alterations of worn human incisors. Med Sci 2015;4:218-222.
  • [18] Nayyer M, Zahid S, Hassan SH, Mian SA, Mehmood S, Khan HA, Kaleem M, Zafar MS, Khan AS. Comparative abrasive wear resistance and surface analysis of dental resin-based materials. Eur J Dent 2018;12(1):57-66.
  • [19] Stoddard JW, Johnson GH. An evaluation of polishing agents for composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65(4):491-495.
  • [20] Carneiro PM, Ramos TM, de Azevedo CS, de Lima E, de Souza SH, Turbino ML, Cesar PF, Matos AB. Influence of finishing and polishing techniques and abrasion on transmittance and roughness of composite resins. Oper Dent 2016;41(6):634- 641.
  • [21] Dodge WW, Dale RA, Cooley RL, Duke ES. Comparison of wet and dry finishing of resin composites with aluminum oxide discs. Dent Mater 1991;1:18-20.
  • [22] Pontons-Melo JC, Garcia IM, Vargas M, Collares FM. Bioadditive and enameloplasty technique for restoring anterior esthetics: 54-month clinical follow-up. Quintessence Int 2020;51(8):622-629.
  • [23] Korkut B, Türkmen C. Longevity of direct diastema closure and recontouring restorations with resin composites in maxillary anterior teeth: A 4-year clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;33(4):590-604.
  • [24] Barutcugil Ç, Yildiz M. Intrinsic and extrinsic discoloration of dimethacrylate and silorane based composites. J Dent 2012;40(1):57-63.
  • [25] Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Ural C, Kulunk T. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96(1):33-40.
  • [26] Korkut B. Cila sistemlerinin mikrohibrit ve nanohibrit rezin kompozitlerin renklenmesi üzerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci 2020;1:1-12. Doi: 10.5336/ dentalsci.2020-77511
  • [27] Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, dos Santos Dias CT. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2002;15:193-197.
  • [28] Turkun LS, Turkun M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2004;29(2):203-211.
  • [29] Avşar A, Yüzbaşıoğlu E, Sarac D. The effect of finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness and the color of nanocomposite resin restorative materials. Adv Clin Exp Med 2015;24(5):881-890.
  • [30] Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2007;32(2):185-192.
  • [31] Marigo L, Rizzi M, LaTorre G, Rumi G. 3D surface profile analysis: Different finishing methods for resin composites. Oper Dent 2001;26(6):562-568.
  • [32] Alrahlah A, Silikas N, Watts DC. Post-cure depth of cure of bulk fill dental resin-composites. Dent Mater 2014;30(2):149-154.
  • [33] Lai G, Zhao L, Wang J, Kunzelmann KH. Surface properties and color stability of incrementally-filled and bulk-fill composites after in vitro toothbrushing. Am J Dent 2017;30(5):262-266.
APA Korkut B, Unal T (2021). The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems. , 529 - 535. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
Chicago Korkut Bora,Unal Tuna The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems. (2021): 529 - 535. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
MLA Korkut Bora,Unal Tuna The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems. , 2021, ss.529 - 535. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
AMA Korkut B,Unal T The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems. . 2021; 529 - 535. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
Vancouver Korkut B,Unal T The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems. . 2021; 529 - 535. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
IEEE Korkut B,Unal T "The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems." , ss.529 - 535, 2021. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
ISNAD Korkut, Bora - Unal, Tuna. "The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems". (2021), 529-535. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
APA Korkut B, Unal T (2021). The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 11(3), 529 - 535. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
Chicago Korkut Bora,Unal Tuna The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 11, no.3 (2021): 529 - 535. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
MLA Korkut Bora,Unal Tuna The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol.11, no.3, 2021, ss.529 - 535. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
AMA Korkut B,Unal T The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2021; 11(3): 529 - 535. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
Vancouver Korkut B,Unal T The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2021; 11(3): 529 - 535. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
IEEE Korkut B,Unal T "The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems." Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 11, ss.529 - 535, 2021. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
ISNAD Korkut, Bora - Unal, Tuna. "The Assessment of the Abrasiveness for Resin Composite Finishing and Polishing Systems". Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 11/3 (2021), 529-535. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.852450
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
30-04-2024 7:59

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları