Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review

NAS, OMER FATİH; Korkmaz, Mehmet; Hakyemez, Bahattin; cinar, celal; Oran, Ismail

doi:10.3906/sag-2006-352

Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review

Mehmet KORKMAZ, (Kütahya Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Kütahya, Türkiye)

Celal ÇINAR, (Ege Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İzmir, Türkiye)

Ömer Fatih NAS, (Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi ,Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Bursa, Türkiye)

Bahattin HAKYEMEZ, (Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi ,Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Bursa, Türkiye)

İsmail ORAN (Ege Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İzmir, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

0 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 51 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 1049 - 1057 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/sag-2006-352 İndeks Tarihi: 17-01-2022

Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review

Öz:

Background/aim: The aim of this study is to present our experience on various endovascular treatment modalities of basilar fenestration aneurysms and reviewing our findings together with literature data. Materials and methods: A total of 26 basilar artery fenestration (BAF) aneurysms in 24 patients were endovascularly treated in two different neurointerventional radiology clinics. All patients had been evaluated with computed tomography (CT), CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography before the procedure. Results: Aneurysms of all patients were successfully occluded (technical success rate 100%). Procedure-related complications were seen in two patients. Our comprehensive literature research revealed that studies related with the topic are composed mostly of case reports. In the literature, a total of 113 BAF aneurysms of 101 patients had been treated endovascularly in 46 studies between 1993 and 2019. Success rate of the treatment was reported as 97%, clinical success rate as 91%, and complication rate as 8.8%, while these rates are 100%, 92%, and 7.6% in our study, respectively. Conclusion: Although the number of cases is low in our study, to our knowledge, it is the widest series in the literature until today. Our results demonstrate that BAF aneurysms can be treated successfully and safely with different endovascular techniques, with more stent use in recent years.Key words: Basilar artery fenestration, aneurysm, endovascular treatment

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Uchino A, Saito N, Okada Y, Kozawa E, Nishi N et al. Fenestrations of the intracranial vertebrobasilar system diagnosed by MR angiography. Neuroradiology 2012; 54 (5): 445-450. doi: 10.1007/s00234-011-0903-x
2. Gao LY, Guo X, Zhou JJ, Zhang Q, Fu J et al. Basilar artery fenestration detected with CT angiography. European Radiology 2013; 23 (10): 2861-2867. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013- 2890-2
3. Tanaka M, Kikuchi Y, Ouchi T. Neuroradiological analysis of 23 cases of basilar artery fenestration based on 2280 cases of MR angiographies. Interventional Neuroradiology 2006; 12 (1): 39-44. doi: 10.1177/15910199060120S103
4. Yoon SM, Chun YI, Kwon Y, Kwun BD. Vertebrobasilar junction aneurysms associated with fenestration: experience of five cases treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. Surgical Neurology 2004; 61 (3): 248-254. doi: 10.1016/S0090- 3019(03)00485-3
5. Tanaka S, Tokimura H, Makiuchi T, Negayama T, Takasaki K et al. Clinical presentation and treatment of aneurysms associated with basilar artery fenestration. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2012; 19 (3): 394-401. doi: 10.1016/j. jocn.2011.04.043.
6. Trivelato FP, Abud DG, Nakiri GS, de Castro Afonso LH, Ulhôa AC et al. Basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: endovascular treatment strategies based on 3D morphology. Clinical Neuroradiology 2014; 26 (1): 73-79. doi: 10.1007/s00062-014- 0336-0
7. Gupta V, Ahuja CK, Khandelwal N, Kumar A, Gupta SK. Treatment of ruptured saccular aneurysms of the fenestrated vertebrobasilar junction with balloon remodeling technique. A short case series and review of the literature. Interventional Neuroradiology 2013; 19(3): 289-298. doi: 10.1177/159101991301900305
8. Saatci I, Cekirge HS, Karcaaltincaba M, Basgun N, Berker M et al. Endovascular treatment of kissing aneurysms at the fenestrated basilar artery: case report with literature review. Surgical Neurology 2002; 58 (1): 54-58. doi: 10.1016/s0090- 3019(02)00748-6
9. Campos J, Fox AJ, Vinuela F, Lylyk P, Ferguson GG et al. Saccular aneurysms in basilar artery fenestration. American Journal of Neuroradiology 1987; 8 (2): 233-236
10. Nagashima H, Okudera H, Orz Y, Nakagawa F. Endovascular treatment of basilar trunk aneurysm associated with fenestration of the basilar artery. Neurosurgical Review 1999; 22 (4): 219-221. doi: 10.1007/s101430050020.
11. Im SH, Kwon BJ, Jung C, Seo HS, Lee DH et al. Coil embolization of “kissing aneurysms” associated with distal basilar artery fenestration. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 2007; 109 (2): 210-213. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2006.10.001
12. Juszkat R, Nowak S, Moskal J, Kociemba W, Zarzecka A. Endovascular treatment of basilar artery aneurysms associated with distal fenestration. A case report. Interventional Neuroradiology 2009; 15 (1): 109-111. doi: 10.1177/159101990901500118
13. Foroni LHL, Figueiredo EG, Teixeira MJ, Caldas JG, Leszczynski A et al. Saccular aneurysms at middle basilar trunk fenestration. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria 2010; 68 (2): 309-311. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2010000200030
14. Meckel S, McAuliffe W, Fiorella D, Taschner CA, Phatouros C et al. Endovascular treatment of complex aneurysms at the vertebrobasilar junction with flow-diverting stents: initial experience. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (3): 386-394. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000431472.71913.07
15. Zhu DY, Fang YB, Wu YN, Li Q, Duan GL et al. Treatment of fenestrated vertebrobasilar junction-related aneurysms with endovascular techniques. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2016; 28: 112-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.09.018
16. Tamrakar K, Chuan Zhi D. Embolization of ruptured aneurysm arising from basilar artery fenestration using hydrocoils. Cureus 2015; 7 (9): 326. doi: 10.7759/cureus.326
17. Gontu V, Bhogal P, Brouwer PA. Dual flow diversion stents for aneurysm treatment in a partial unfused basilar artery. Interventional Neuroradiology 2015; 21 (6): 669-673. doi: 10.1177/1591019915609135
18. Park WB, Sung JH, Huh J, Cho CB, Yang SH et al. Double stent assist coiling of ruptured large saccular aneurysm in proximal basilar artery fenestration. Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery 2015; 17 (3): 227-233. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2015.17.3.227
19. Saliou G, Power S, Krings T. Flow diverter placement for management of dissecting ruptured aneurysm in a non-fused basilar artery. Interventional Neuroradiology 2016; 22 (1): 58- 61. doi: 10.1177/1591019915617324
20. Toth G, Hui F, Bain M. Fenestra obscura: flow diverter reconstruction of a complex vertebrobasilar aneurysm through an obscured fenestration limb: technical case report. Operative Neurosurgery 2016; 12 (1): 95-100. doi: 10.1227/ NEU.0000000000000996
21. Pérez MA, Bhogal P, Moreno RM, Wendl C, Bäzner H et al. Use of the pCONus as an adjunct to coil embolization of acutely ruptured aneurysms. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery 2017; 9 (1): 39-44. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012508
22. Alqahtani SA, Felbaum DR, Tai A, Liu AH, Armonda RA. Endovascular treatment of large unruptured fusiform fenestrated vertebrobasilar junction aneurysm. Cureus 2017; 9 (5): 1219. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1219
23. Choo YS, Lee CY. Kissing aneurysms at fenestrated proximal basilar artery: double-barrel stent-assisted coiling using dual closed-cell stents. Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery 2017; 19 (2): 120-124. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2017.19.2.120
24. Morrison J, Alexander MD, Dowd CF, Cooke DL. Flanking the fenestration: circumferential limb-to-limb stent-assisted coiling of a basilar artery fenestration aneurysm. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery 2018; 10 (6): 12. doi: 10.1136/ neurintsurg-2017-013252.rep
25. Sirakov SS, Panayotova AP, Sirakov AS, Hristov H, Minkin K et al. Fenestration of the Basilar Artery Associated with Aneurysm Treated by the Support of a Temporary Bridging Device-Comaneci: A Case Report. World Neurosurgery 2018; 119: 306-310. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.047
26. Park KY, Kim BM, Kim DJ, Chung J, Lee JW. Y-configuration stenting for coiling of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms using Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Junior. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery 2019; 11 (4): 400-404. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014128

APA	Korkmaz M, cinar c, NAS O, Hakyemez B, Oran I (2021). Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review. , 1049 - 1057. 10.3906/sag-2006-352
Chicago	Korkmaz Mehmet,cinar celal,NAS OMER FATİH,Hakyemez Bahattin,Oran Ismail Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review. (2021): 1049 - 1057. 10.3906/sag-2006-352
MLA	Korkmaz Mehmet,cinar celal,NAS OMER FATİH,Hakyemez Bahattin,Oran Ismail Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review. , 2021, ss.1049 - 1057. 10.3906/sag-2006-352
AMA	Korkmaz M,cinar c,NAS O,Hakyemez B,Oran I Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review. . 2021; 1049 - 1057. 10.3906/sag-2006-352
Vancouver	Korkmaz M,cinar c,NAS O,Hakyemez B,Oran I Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review. . 2021; 1049 - 1057. 10.3906/sag-2006-352
IEEE	Korkmaz M,cinar c,NAS O,Hakyemez B,Oran I "Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review." , ss.1049 - 1057, 2021. 10.3906/sag-2006-352
ISNAD	Korkmaz, Mehmet vd. "Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review". (2021), 1049-1057. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2006-352

APA	Korkmaz M, cinar c, NAS O, Hakyemez B, Oran I (2021). Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 51(3), 1049 - 1057. 10.3906/sag-2006-352
Chicago	Korkmaz Mehmet,cinar celal,NAS OMER FATİH,Hakyemez Bahattin,Oran Ismail Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 51, no.3 (2021): 1049 - 1057. 10.3906/sag-2006-352
MLA	Korkmaz Mehmet,cinar celal,NAS OMER FATİH,Hakyemez Bahattin,Oran Ismail Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.51, no.3, 2021, ss.1049 - 1057. 10.3906/sag-2006-352
AMA	Korkmaz M,cinar c,NAS O,Hakyemez B,Oran I Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 51(3): 1049 - 1057. 10.3906/sag-2006-352
Vancouver	Korkmaz M,cinar c,NAS O,Hakyemez B,Oran I Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 51(3): 1049 - 1057. 10.3906/sag-2006-352
IEEE	Korkmaz M,cinar c,NAS O,Hakyemez B,Oran I "Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 51, ss.1049 - 1057, 2021. 10.3906/sag-2006-352
ISNAD	Korkmaz, Mehmet vd. "Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 51/3 (2021), 1049-1057. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2006-352