Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery

Gulsen, Mert Rusen; Huri, Gazi; Karmış, Ece Belen; Karagüven, Doğaç

doi:10.3906/sag-2011-71

Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery

Gazi HURİ, (Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı Ankara, Türkiye)

Mert Ruşen GÜLŞEN, (Edremit Devlet Hastanesi, Balıkesir, Türkiye)

Ece Belen KARMIŞ, (İstanbul Tuzla Devlet Hastanesi, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Doğaç KARAGÜVEN (Ufuk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

5 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 51 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 1179 - 1190 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/sag-2011-71 İndeks Tarihi: 18-01-2022

Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery

Öz:

Introduction: There are few studies that compare the cadaver dissections with the medical simulators in means of talent improvement. Therefore, the aim of this study is to find out if using cadaver dissections is still the golden standard for surgical training or using the medical simulators in surgery could replace cadaver dissections. Materials and methods: The study is conducted during the European Orthopaedics & Traumatology Education Platform accredited Shoulder Club International Cadaver Course including a number of 34 orthopedics trainees. The participants were randomly divided into two groups to be trained with the simulator (Group 1) and on cadavers (Group 2), followed by a test performed on shoulder arthroscopy simulator (Virtamed ArthroS, Switzerland). There was no conflict of interest before, during, or after the study. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Results: Group 2 had statistically significant higher simulation overview procedure time values than Group 1 (p < 0.05), the meaning of which is participants trained with the simulator completed the given tasks in a shorter period of time. Group 2 had statistically significant higher scratching of humerus cartilage values than Group 1 (p < 0.05), which means that participants trained with simulation have less scratching done on the humerus cartilage than the participants trained on a cadaver. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one to compare virtual reality (VR) simulators with cadavers for surgical education in an objective manner, while using qualitative and quantitative data. According to this study, it is possible to state that VR simulators are just as effective as cadavers in means of training subjects. As medical education will face a total change all around the world after the COVID-19 pandemic, this study has the potential to be an important guide during and after this period. Key words: Arthroscopy, simulator, education, shoulder, coronavirus

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Decaro N, Lorusso A. Novel human coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2): A lesson from animal coronaviruses. Veterinary Microbiology 2020; 244: 108693. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108693
2. Van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020; 382 (16): 1564-1567. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2004973
3. Li H, Liu L, Zhang D, Xu J, Dai H et al. SARS-CoV-2 and viral sepsis: observations and hypotheses. Lancet 2020; 395 (10235): 1517-1520. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30920-X
4. Karaliotas, C. When simulation in surgical training meets virtual reality. Hellenic Journal of Surgery 2011; 83: 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-011-0055-9
5. Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Tielsch JM, Powe NR, Gordon TA et al. The importance of surgeon experience for clinical and economic outcomes from thyroidectomy. Annals of Surgery. 1998;228(3):320-330. doi:10.1097/00000658-199809000-00005
6. Wiese M, Krämer J, Bernsmann K, Ernst Willburger R. The related outcome and complication rate in primary lumbar microscopic disc surgery depending on the surgeon’s experience: comparative studies. The Spine Journal. 2004;4(5):550-556. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.02.007
7. Mabrey JD, Reinig KD, Cannon WD. Virtual reality in orthopaedics: is it a reality?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2010;468(10):2586-2591. doi:10.1007/s11999-010- 1426-1
8. Blaschko SD, Brooks HM, Dhuy SM, Charest-Shell C, Clayman RV et al. Coordinated multiple cadaver use for minimally invasive surgical training. Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. 2007;11(4):403-407
9. Jeff S. Simpson. “An Economical Approach to Teaching Cadaver Anatomy: A 10-Year Retrospective.” The American Biology Teacher 76, no. 1 (2014): 42-46. Accessed January 10, 2021. doi:10.1525/abt.2014.76.1.9
10. Demiryürek D, Bayramoğlu A, Ustaçelebi S. Infective agents in fixed human cadavers: a brief review and suggested guidelines. The Anatomical Record. 2002;269(4):194-197. doi:10.1002/ ar.10143
11. Nader Francis AF, Roberto Bergamaschi, Roger Motson (2015) Cadaveric Training: Fresh Frozen and Thiel Embalmed. In: Training in Minimal Access Surgery. Springer. p. 6.
12. Rahm S, Wieser K, Bauer DE, Waibel FW, Meyer DC et al.. Efficacy of standardized training on a virtual reality simulator to advance knee and shoulder arthroscopic motor skills. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018;19(1):150. Published 2018 May 16. doi:10.1186/s12891-018-2072-0
13. Scott CF Jr. Length of operation and morbidity: is there a relationships? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1982 Jun;69(6):1017-1021. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198206000- 00024
14. Kissler SM, Tedijanto C, Goldstein E, Grad YH, Lipsitch M. Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period. Science. 2020;368(6493):860-868. doi:10.1126/science.abb5793
15. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP et al. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Annals of Surgery. 2005;241(2):364-372. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000151982.85062.80
16. Yari SS, Jandhyala CK, Sharareh B, Athiviraham A, Shybut TB. Efficacy of a Virtual Arthroscopic Simulator for Orthopaedic Surgery Residents by Year in Training. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018;6(11):2325967118810176. Published 2018 Nov 21. doi:10.1177/2325967118810176
17. Pulijala Y, Ma M, Pears M, Peebles D, Ayoub A. Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality in Surgical Training-A Randomized Control Trial. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: 2018;76(5):1065-1072. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2017.10.002
18. Stunt JJ, Kerkhoffs GM, van Dijk CN, Tuijthof GJ. Validation of the ArthroS virtual reality simulator for arthroscopic skills. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2015;23(11):3436-3442. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3101-7
19. Slade Shantz JA, Leiter JR, Gottschalk T, MacDonald PB. The internal validity of arthroscopic simulators and their effectiveness in arthroscopic education. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2014;22(1):33-40. doi:10.1007/ s00167-012-2228-7
20. Gallagher K, Bahadori S, Antonis J, Immins T, Wainwright TW et al. Validation of the Hip Arthroscopy Module of the VirtaMed Virtual Reality Arthroscopy Trainer. Surgical Technology International. 2019;34:430-436
21. Bartlett JD, Lawrence JE, Stewart ME, Nakano N, Khanduja V. Does virtual reality simulation have a role in training trauma and orthopaedic surgeons?. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2018;100-B(5):559-565. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.100B5.BJJ2017-1439

APA	Huri G, Gulsen M, Karmış E, Karagüven D (2021). Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery. , 1179 - 1190. 10.3906/sag-2011-71
Chicago	Huri Gazi,Gulsen Mert Rusen,Karmış Ece Belen,Karagüven Doğaç Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery. (2021): 1179 - 1190. 10.3906/sag-2011-71
MLA	Huri Gazi,Gulsen Mert Rusen,Karmış Ece Belen,Karagüven Doğaç Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery. , 2021, ss.1179 - 1190. 10.3906/sag-2011-71
AMA	Huri G,Gulsen M,Karmış E,Karagüven D Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery. . 2021; 1179 - 1190. 10.3906/sag-2011-71
Vancouver	Huri G,Gulsen M,Karmış E,Karagüven D Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery. . 2021; 1179 - 1190. 10.3906/sag-2011-71
IEEE	Huri G,Gulsen M,Karmış E,Karagüven D "Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery." , ss.1179 - 1190, 2021. 10.3906/sag-2011-71
ISNAD	Huri, Gazi vd. "Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery". (2021), 1179-1190. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2011-71

APA	Huri G, Gulsen M, Karmış E, Karagüven D (2021). Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 51(3), 1179 - 1190. 10.3906/sag-2011-71
Chicago	Huri Gazi,Gulsen Mert Rusen,Karmış Ece Belen,Karagüven Doğaç Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 51, no.3 (2021): 1179 - 1190. 10.3906/sag-2011-71
MLA	Huri Gazi,Gulsen Mert Rusen,Karmış Ece Belen,Karagüven Doğaç Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.51, no.3, 2021, ss.1179 - 1190. 10.3906/sag-2011-71
AMA	Huri G,Gulsen M,Karmış E,Karagüven D Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 51(3): 1179 - 1190. 10.3906/sag-2011-71
Vancouver	Huri G,Gulsen M,Karmış E,Karagüven D Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 51(3): 1179 - 1190. 10.3906/sag-2011-71
IEEE	Huri G,Gulsen M,Karmış E,Karagüven D "Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 51, ss.1179 - 1190, 2021. 10.3906/sag-2011-71
ISNAD	Huri, Gazi vd. "Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 51/3 (2021), 1179-1190. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2011-71