Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 11 Sayfa Aralığı: 2090 - 2096 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260 İndeks Tarihi: 18-01-2022

The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children

Öz:
Aim: To evaluate the effects of dual-tasks on balance in school-age children aged 7-10 years. Materials and Methods: In the present study, 28 primary school children aged 7-10 years were included. Static and dynamic balances were evaluated separately without any additional task and also in the presence of additional cognitive and motor tasks. The Sharpened Romberg Test and the One-Leg Stance Test were used to evaluate the static balance. The Five-Repetition Sit-ToStand Test was used to evaluate dynamic balance. As a cognitive additional task, the children were asked to say "Yes" when they saw the red card and "No" when they saw the blue card. The motor additional task was designated as catching a ball. Results: In the static balance tests, the scores performed in the presence of an additional cognitive task were higher than those obtained without any additional task. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Test scores obtained with an additional motor task were significantly lower than those obtained without any additional task (p<0.001). In the Five-Repetition Sitto-Stand Test, the scores obtained in the presence of additional cognitive (p = 0.003) and motor (p = 0.002) tasks were significantly higher than those obtained without any additional task. Conclusion: In our study, an additional motor task performed simultaneously with static balance tests negatively affected balance performance in children aged 7-10 years. Postural control also reduced by additional motor or cognitive tasks during the dynamic balance tests. The results obtained in this study will contribute to understanding the relationship between cognition and balance system in children.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Blazquez PM, Highstein SM. Visual–vestibular interaction in vertical vestibular only neurons. Neuroreport 2007;18:1403-6.
  • 2. Mujdeci B. Investigation of the Effect of Different Cognitive Additional Tasks on Postural Stability in Healthy Individuals. Ankara: Hacettepe. 2013.
  • 3. Hyong IH. The effects on dynamic balance of dualtasking using smartphone functions. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27:527-9.
  • 4. Sapmaz M. The Effect of Fear of Falling on Balance and Dual-Duty Performance in the Elderly. Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Institute of Health Sciences; 2018 .
  • 5. Lacour M, Bernard-Demanze L, Dumitrescu M. Posture control, aging, and attention resources: models and posture-analysis methods. Neurophysiol Clin 2008;38:411-21.
  • 6. O'Shea S, Morris ME, Iansek R. Dual task interference during gait in people with Parkinson disease: effects of motor versus cognitive secondary tasks. Physical therapy 2002;82:888-97.
  • 7. Yang L, Lam FMH, Liao LR, et al. Psychometric properties of dual-task balance and walking assessments for individuals with neurological conditions: a systematic review. Gait & posture 2017;52:110-23.
  • 8. Quant S, Adkin AL, Staines WR, et al. The effect of a concurrent cognitive task on cortical potentials evoked by unpredictable balance perturbations. BMC neuroscience 2004;5:1-12.
  • 9. Teasdale N, Simoneau M. Attentional demands for postural control: the effects of aging and sensory reintegration. Gait & posture 2001;14:203-10.
  • 10. Fabri TL, Wilson KE, Holland N, et al. Using a dualtask protocol to investigate motor and cognitive performance in healthy children and youth. Gait & posture 2017;54:154-9.
  • 11. Kachouri H, Laatar R, Borji R, Rebai H, Sahli S. Using a dual-task paradigm to investigate motor and cognitive performance in children with intellectual disability. Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2020;33:172-9.
  • 12. Hagmann-von Arx P, Manicolo O, Lemola S, Grob A. Walking in school-aged children in a dual-task paradigm is related to age but not to cognition, motor behavior, injuries, or psychosocial functioning. Front Psychol 2016;7:352.
  • 13. Schaefer S, Lövdén M, Wieckhorst B, Lindenberger U. Cognitive performance is improved while walking: Differences in cognitive–sensorimotor couplings between children and young adults. European J of Developmental Psychology 2010;7:371-89.
  • 14. Andersson G, Hagman J, Talianzadeh R, et al. Effect of cognitive load on postural control. Brain Res Bull 2002;58:135-9.
  • 15. Li KZ, Bherer L, Mirelman A, et al. Cognitive involvement in balance and gait in aging: A focused review of evidence from dual-task and cognitive training research. Front Neurol 2018;9:913.
  • 16. Redfern MS, Talkowski ME, Jennings JR, Furman JM. Cognitive influences in postural control of patients with unilateral vestibular loss. Gait & posture 2004;19:105-14.
  • 17. Ramenzoni VC, Riley MA, Shockley K, Chiu C-YP. Postural responses to specific types of working memory tasks. Gait & posture 2007;25:368-73.
  • 18. de Albuquerque Sousa ACP, Dias RC, Maciel ÁCC, Guerra RO. Frailty syndrome and associated factors in community-dwelling elderly in Northeast Brazil. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2012;54:e95-e101.
  • 19. Huxhold O, Li S-C, Schmiedek F, Lindenberger U. Dual-tasking postural control: aging and the effects of cognitive demand in conjunction with focus of attention. Brain Res Bull 2006;69:294-305.
  • 20. Demirci CS, Kilinc M, Yildirim SA. The effect of dual task on clinical balance performance in ataxia patients. Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation 2016.
  • 21. Strobach T, Torsten S. Mechanisms of practice-related reductions of dual-task interference with simple tasks: data and theory. Adv Cogn Psychol 2017;13:28.
  • 22. Pardo V, Knuth D, McDermott B, et al. Validity, reliability and minimum detectable change of the maximum step length test in people with stroke. J Neurol Sci 2013;325:74-8.
  • 23. Kumban W, Amatachaya S, Emasithi A, Siritaratiwat W. Five-times-sit-to-stand test in children with cerebral palsy: reliability and concurrent validity. Neuro Rehabilitation 2013;32:9-15.
  • 24. Roncesvalles MN, Schmitz C, Zedka M, et al. From egocentric to exocentric spatial orientation: development of posture control in bimanual and trunk inclination tasks. J Mot Behav 2005;37:404-16.
  • 25. Katsumata H. ASEAN and human rights: resisting Western pressure or emulating the West? The Pacific Review 2009;22:619-37.
  • 26. Brezis RS. Memory integration in the autobiographical narratives of individuals with autism. Front Hum Neurosci 2015;9:76.
  • 27. Otte E, van Mier HI. Bimanual interference in children performing a dual motor task. Hum Mov Sci 2006;25:678-93.
  • 28. Watanabe K, Funahashi S. Neural mechanisms of dualtask interference and cognitive capacity limitation in the prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 2014;17:601-11.
  • 29. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull 1994;116:220.
  • 30. Baumgartner SE, Sumter SR. Dealing with media distractions: an observational study of computerbased multitasking among children and adults in the Netherlands. J Child Media 2017;11:295-313.
  • 31. Bonnet CT, Baudry S. Active vision task and postural control in healthy, young adults: Synergy and probably not duality. Gait & posture 2016;48:57-63.
  • 32. Bonnet CT, Szaffarczyk S, Baudry S. Functional synergy between postural and visual behaviors when performing a difficult precise visual task in upright stance. Cognitive science 2017;41:1675-93.
  • 33. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M, Kerns KA, Baldwin M. The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1997;52:232-40.
  • 34. Bayot M, Dujardin K, Tard C, et al. The interaction between cognition and motor control: A theoretical framework for dual-task interference effects on posture, gait initiation, gait and turning. Neurophysiol Clin 2018;48:361-75.
  • 35. Seker KN. Comparison of motor skills of 5-yearold children attending pre-school education in rural area and 5-year-old children receiving Montessori education: Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute; 2015.
APA Parabakan Polat A, Cengiz D, çimen h, Tezcan E, Tombuloğlu C (2021). The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children. , 2090 - 2096. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260
Chicago Parabakan Polat Anı,Cengiz Deniz,çimen hatice,Tezcan Elif İlkay,Tombuloğlu Ceren The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children. (2021): 2090 - 2096. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260
MLA Parabakan Polat Anı,Cengiz Deniz,çimen hatice,Tezcan Elif İlkay,Tombuloğlu Ceren The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children. , 2021, ss.2090 - 2096. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260
AMA Parabakan Polat A,Cengiz D,çimen h,Tezcan E,Tombuloğlu C The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children. . 2021; 2090 - 2096. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260
Vancouver Parabakan Polat A,Cengiz D,çimen h,Tezcan E,Tombuloğlu C The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children. . 2021; 2090 - 2096. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260
IEEE Parabakan Polat A,Cengiz D,çimen h,Tezcan E,Tombuloğlu C "The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children." , ss.2090 - 2096, 2021. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260
ISNAD Parabakan Polat, Anı vd. "The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children". (2021), 2090-2096. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260
APA Parabakan Polat A, Cengiz D, çimen h, Tezcan E, Tombuloğlu C (2021). The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children. Annals of Medical Research, 28(11), 2090 - 2096. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260
Chicago Parabakan Polat Anı,Cengiz Deniz,çimen hatice,Tezcan Elif İlkay,Tombuloğlu Ceren The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children. Annals of Medical Research 28, no.11 (2021): 2090 - 2096. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260
MLA Parabakan Polat Anı,Cengiz Deniz,çimen hatice,Tezcan Elif İlkay,Tombuloğlu Ceren The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children. Annals of Medical Research, vol.28, no.11, 2021, ss.2090 - 2096. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260
AMA Parabakan Polat A,Cengiz D,çimen h,Tezcan E,Tombuloğlu C The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children. Annals of Medical Research. 2021; 28(11): 2090 - 2096. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260
Vancouver Parabakan Polat A,Cengiz D,çimen h,Tezcan E,Tombuloğlu C The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children. Annals of Medical Research. 2021; 28(11): 2090 - 2096. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260
IEEE Parabakan Polat A,Cengiz D,çimen h,Tezcan E,Tombuloğlu C "The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children." Annals of Medical Research, 28, ss.2090 - 2096, 2021. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260
ISNAD Parabakan Polat, Anı vd. "The effects of additional cognitive and motor tasks on static and dynamic balance in school-age children". Annals of Medical Research 28/11 (2021), 2090-2096. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.260