Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 43 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 438 - 442 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/etd.2021.24603 İndeks Tarihi: 21-01-2022

Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics

Öz:
Objective: Warfarin use is difficult due to the necessity for regular international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring and drug– drug interaction. However, it is still the most widely preferred oral anticoagulant. This study aimed to assess the efficacy andreliability of warfarin use by patients attending outpatient clinics (OC) or who received home health services (HHS). Materials and Methods: This study included 204 patients followed by OC and HHS and receiving warfarin treatment.Demographic and clinical characteristics and INR monitoring frequency were evaluated. Moreover, complications wereretrospectively questioned. The interactions between warfarin use and other medications were assessed. Hypertension,Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/alcohol (HAS-BLED)and Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) scores were calculated in the atrial fibrillation (AF) group. Results: The patients followed by HHS were older (78 vs. 68, p<0.001). Cerebrovascular disease was more frequent in theHSS group (51% vs. 29.4%, p=0.002) while AF was more common in the OC group (65.7% vs. 43.1%, p=0.001). Patientswith an INR level in the subtherapeutic range were more common in the HHS group (42.2% vs. 24.5%, p=0.025), and throm boembolic complications were also observed more frequently (14.7% versus 10.8%, p=0.013). More than half of the individu als using drugs interacted with warfarin. In AF subgroup, the HAS-BLED and ATRIA scores were higher for HHS group com pared with the OC group [HAS-BLED, 2 (1–4) vs. 2 (0–5); ATRIA, 5 (1–7) vs. 2 (0–7); p=0.032 and p<0.001, respectively]. Conclusion: The current study showed that HHS and OC staff should regularly monitor patients’ INR levels and pay atten tion to drug–drug interactions to reduce complication
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Pirmohamed M. Warfarin: the end or the end of one size fits all therapy? J Pers Med 2018; 8(3): 22.
  • 2. Kılıç S, Çelik A, Çakmak HA, Afşin A, Tekkeşin Aİ, Açıksarı G, et al. The time in therapeutic range and bleeding complications of warfarin in different geographic regions of Turkey: A subgroup analysis of WARFARIN-TR study. Balkan Med J 2017; 34(4): 349–55.
  • 3. Çayır Y. Home health services in primary care: What can we do? Dicle Med J 2013; 40(2): 340–4.
  • 4. Heneghan CJ, Garcia-Alamino JM, Spencer EA, Ward AM, Perera R, Bankhead C, et al. Self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 7(7): CD003839.
  • 5. Ozturk M, Ipekci A, Kiyak SK, Akdeniz YS, Aydin Y, Ikizceli I, et al. Bleeding complications in Warfarin-Treated patients admitted to the emergency department. J Clin Med Res 2019; 11(2): 106–13.
  • 6. Vazquez SR. Drug-drug interactions in an era of multiple anticoagulants: a focus on clinically relevant drug interactions. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2018; 2018(1): 339–47.
  • 7. Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJ, Lip GY. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest 2010; 138(5): 1093–100.
  • 8. Fang MC, Go AS, Chang Y, Borowsky LH, Pomernacki NK, Udaltsova N, et al. A new risk scheme to predict warfarin-associated hemorrhage: The ATRIA (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58(4): 395–401.
  • 9. Teruel RS, Thue G, Fylkesnes SI, Sandberg S, Kristoffersen AH. Warfarin monitoring in nursing homes assessed by case histories. Do recommendations and electronic alerts affect judgements? Scand J Prim Health Care 2017; 35(3): 299–306.
  • 10. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Atrial fibrillation and heart valve disease: self-monitoring coagulation status using pointof-care coagulometers (the CoaguChek XS system and the INRatio2 PT/INR monitor). Available from: URL: https://www.nice. org.uk/guidance/dg14/resources/atrial-fibrillation-and-heart-valve-disease-selfmonitoring-coagulation-status-using-pointofcare-coagulometers-the-coaguchek-xs-system-pdf-1053629789893. Accessed, 19 December, 2017.
  • 11. McAuliffe GN, De Silva F, Upton A, Chan G. International normalised ratio monitoring in the community populations of the Auckland and Northland regions of New Zealand: time in therapeutic range and frequency of testing. Intern Med J 2018; 48(12): 1487–91.
  • 12. Ertas F, Eren NK, Kaya H, Aribas A, Acar G, Kanadasi M, et al; AFTER Investigators. The atrial fibrillation in Turkey: Epidemiologic Registry (AFTER). Cardiol J 2013; 20(4): 447–52.
  • 13. Koca M, Yavuz BB, Tuna Doğrul R, Çalışkan H, Şengül Ayçiçek G,Özsürekçi C, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on frailty and functionality in older adults. Ir J Med Sci 2020; 189(3): 917–24.
  • 14. Çelik A, İzci S, Kobat MA, Ateş AH, Çakmak A, Çakıllı Y, et al; WARFARIN-TR Study Collaborates. The awareness, efficacy, safety, and time in therapeutic range of warfarin in the Turkish population: WARFARIN-TR. Anatol J Cardiol 2016; 16(8): 595–600.
  • 15. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J 2016; 37(38): 2893–962.
  • 16. Hellyer JA, Azarbal F, Than CT, Fan J, Schmitt SK, Yang F, et al. Impact of baseline stroke risk and bleeding risk on warfarin international normalized ratio control in atrial fibrillation (from the treat-af study). Am J Cardiol 2017; 119(2): 268–74.
  • 17. Shoeb M, Fang MC. Assessing bleeding risk in patients taking anticoagulants. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2013; 35(3): 312–9.
  • 18. Oake N, Jennings A, Forster AJ, Fergusson D, Doucette S, van Walraven C. Anticoagulation intensity and outcomes among patients prescribed oral anticoagulant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2008; 179(3): 235–44.
  • 19. Anthony CJ, Karim S, Ackroyd-Stolarz S, Fry A, Murphy NG, Christie R, et al. Intensity of anticoagulation with warfarin and risk of adverse events in patients presenting to the emergency department. Ann Pharmacother 2011; 45(7-8): 881–7.
  • 20. Melgaard L, Overvad TF, Jensen M, Lip GYH, Larsen TB, Nielsen PB. Thromboembolism and bleeding complications in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation and native aortic or mitral valvular heart disease: a descriptive nationwide cohort study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2021; 7(FI1): f101–10.
  • 21. Bertram V, Yeo K, Anoopkumar-Dukie S, Bernaitis N. Proton pump inhibitors co-prescribed with warfarin reduce warfarin control as measured by time in therapeutic range. Int J Clin Pract 2019; 73(11): e13382.
  • 22. Ray WA, Chung CP, Murray KT, Smalley WE, Daugherty JR, Dupont WD, et al. Association of proton pump inhibitors with reduced risk of warfarin-related serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 2016; 151(6): 1105–12.e10.
  • 23. Bahat G, Ilhan B, Erdogan T, Halil M, Savas S, Ulger Z, et al. Turkish inappropriate medication use in the elderly (TIME) criteria to improve prescribing in older adults: TIME-to-STOP/TIME-to-START. Eur Geriatr Med 2020; 11(3): 491–8.
  • 24. Shaik AN, Bohnert T, Williams DA, Gan LL, LeDuc BW. Mechanism of drug-drug interactions between warfarin and statins. J Pharm Sci 2016; 105(6): 1976–86.
  • 25. Merel SE, Paauw DS. Common drug side effects and drug-drug interactions in elderly adults in primary care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2017; 65(7): 1578–85.
APA ÖZDEMİR S, ÜNSAL P (2021). Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics. , 438 - 442. 10.14744/etd.2021.24603
Chicago ÖZDEMİR Sonay,ÜNSAL Pelin Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics. (2021): 438 - 442. 10.14744/etd.2021.24603
MLA ÖZDEMİR Sonay,ÜNSAL Pelin Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics. , 2021, ss.438 - 442. 10.14744/etd.2021.24603
AMA ÖZDEMİR S,ÜNSAL P Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics. . 2021; 438 - 442. 10.14744/etd.2021.24603
Vancouver ÖZDEMİR S,ÜNSAL P Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics. . 2021; 438 - 442. 10.14744/etd.2021.24603
IEEE ÖZDEMİR S,ÜNSAL P "Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics." , ss.438 - 442, 2021. 10.14744/etd.2021.24603
ISNAD ÖZDEMİR, Sonay - ÜNSAL, Pelin. "Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics". (2021), 438-442. https://doi.org/10.14744/etd.2021.24603
APA ÖZDEMİR S, ÜNSAL P (2021). Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics. Erciyes Medical Journal, 43(5), 438 - 442. 10.14744/etd.2021.24603
Chicago ÖZDEMİR Sonay,ÜNSAL Pelin Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics. Erciyes Medical Journal 43, no.5 (2021): 438 - 442. 10.14744/etd.2021.24603
MLA ÖZDEMİR Sonay,ÜNSAL Pelin Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics. Erciyes Medical Journal, vol.43, no.5, 2021, ss.438 - 442. 10.14744/etd.2021.24603
AMA ÖZDEMİR S,ÜNSAL P Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics. Erciyes Medical Journal. 2021; 43(5): 438 - 442. 10.14744/etd.2021.24603
Vancouver ÖZDEMİR S,ÜNSAL P Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics. Erciyes Medical Journal. 2021; 43(5): 438 - 442. 10.14744/etd.2021.24603
IEEE ÖZDEMİR S,ÜNSAL P "Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics." Erciyes Medical Journal, 43, ss.438 - 442, 2021. 10.14744/etd.2021.24603
ISNAD ÖZDEMİR, Sonay - ÜNSAL, Pelin. "Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services VersusOutpatient Clinics". Erciyes Medical Journal 43/5 (2021), 438-442. https://doi.org/10.14744/etd.2021.24603