Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 354 - 358 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.14744/nci.2020.29895 İndeks Tarihi: 21-01-2022

Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?

Öz:
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the parameters that can be used to predict malignancy in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the files of 162 patients diagnosed with persistent cervical lymphadenopathy who underwent an excisional biopsy in our department between January 2011 and October 2019. Patient demographics and the size, side, duration, and localization of lymphadenopathy were recorded, and their relationship with histopathological results was investigated. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between clinical parameters and malignancy. RESULTS: Of the 162 patients, 91 (56.2%) were male and 71 (43.8%) were female, and the mean age was 45.40±20.41 (2–84) years. Male gender (OR=3.099; p=0.003), increasing age (OR=1.029; p=0.002), short duration of lymphadenopathy (OR=0.989; p=0.048), and neck level V (OR=2.604; p=0.031) patients had a statistically significantly higher risk of malignancy. There was no statistically significant relationship between the side and size of the lymph node and the risk of malignancy (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: In our study, male gender was determined to be the most predictive risk factor for malignancy in patients with cervical lymphadenopathy, followed by lymph node neck level, increased age, and duration of the disease.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Gaddey HL, Riegel AM. Unexplained Lymphadenopathy: Evaluation and Differential Diagnosis. Am Fam Physician 2016;94:896–903.
  • 2. Laffers W, Eggert K, Schildhaus HU, Bootz F, Gerstner AO. Histologic diagnoses in persistently swollen cervical lymph nodes. Head Neck 2012;34:371–5.
  • 3. Draper MR, Pfleiderer AG, Smith W. Assessment of a cytology grading system for head and neck masses. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2003;28:34–8.
  • 4. Roh JL, Lee YW, Kim JM. Clinical utility of fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of head and neck lymphoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008;34:817– 21.
  • 5. Celenk F, Gulsen S, Baysal E, Aytac I, Kul S, Kanlikama M. Predictive factors for malignancy in patients with persistent cervical lymphadenopathy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:251–6.
  • 6. Moore SW, Schneider JW, Schaaf HS. Diagnostic aspects of cervical lymphadenopathy in children in the developing world: a study of 1,877 surgical specimens. Pediatr Surg Int 2003;19:240–4.
  • 7. Bhattacharyya N. Predictive factors for neoplasia and malignancy in a neck mass. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:303–7.
  • 8. Hetemoğlu EK, Erbek SS. Predicting malignancy in cervical lymph node: clinical results. KBB-Forum 2019;18:28–32.
  • 9. Chau I, Kelleher MT, Cunningham D, Norman AR, Wotherspoon A, Trott P, et al. Rapid access multidisciplinary lymph node diagnostic clinic: analysis of 550 patients. Br J Cancer 2003;88:354–61.
  • 10. Al Kadah B, Popov HH, Schick B, Knöbber D. Cervical lymphadenopathy: study of 251 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:745–52.
  • 11. Matsumoto F, Itoh S, Ohba S, Yokoi H, Furukawa M, Ikeda K. Biopsy of cervical lymph node. Auris Nasus Larynx 2009;36:71–4.
  • 12. Locke R, Comfort R, Kubba H. When does an enlarged cervical lymph node in a child need excision? A systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014;78:393–401.
  • 13. Wang J, Pei G, Yan J, Zhao Q, Li Z, Cao Y, et al. Unexplained cervical lymphadenopathy in children: predictive factors for malignancy. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:784–8.
APA METİN U, Mengi E, KARA C, Bir F (2021). Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?. , 354 - 358. 10.14744/nci.2020.29895
Chicago METİN Ulaş,Mengi Erdem,KARA CÜNEYT ORHAN,Bir Ferda Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?. (2021): 354 - 358. 10.14744/nci.2020.29895
MLA METİN Ulaş,Mengi Erdem,KARA CÜNEYT ORHAN,Bir Ferda Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?. , 2021, ss.354 - 358. 10.14744/nci.2020.29895
AMA METİN U,Mengi E,KARA C,Bir F Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?. . 2021; 354 - 358. 10.14744/nci.2020.29895
Vancouver METİN U,Mengi E,KARA C,Bir F Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?. . 2021; 354 - 358. 10.14744/nci.2020.29895
IEEE METİN U,Mengi E,KARA C,Bir F "Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?." , ss.354 - 358, 2021. 10.14744/nci.2020.29895
ISNAD METİN, Ulaş vd. "Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?". (2021), 354-358. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2020.29895
APA METİN U, Mengi E, KARA C, Bir F (2021). Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, 8(4), 354 - 358. 10.14744/nci.2020.29895
Chicago METİN Ulaş,Mengi Erdem,KARA CÜNEYT ORHAN,Bir Ferda Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri 8, no.4 (2021): 354 - 358. 10.14744/nci.2020.29895
MLA METİN Ulaş,Mengi Erdem,KARA CÜNEYT ORHAN,Bir Ferda Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, vol.8, no.4, 2021, ss.354 - 358. 10.14744/nci.2020.29895
AMA METİN U,Mengi E,KARA C,Bir F Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri. 2021; 8(4): 354 - 358. 10.14744/nci.2020.29895
Vancouver METİN U,Mengi E,KARA C,Bir F Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri. 2021; 8(4): 354 - 358. 10.14744/nci.2020.29895
IEEE METİN U,Mengi E,KARA C,Bir F "Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?." İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, 8, ss.354 - 358, 2021. 10.14744/nci.2020.29895
ISNAD METİN, Ulaş vd. "Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?". İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri 8/4 (2021), 354-358. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2020.29895