Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 51 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 796 - 801 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/sag-1904-59 İndeks Tarihi: 24-01-2022

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire

Öz:
Background/aims: Vestibular rehabilitation has an important role in the reduction of symptoms and in the recovery of patients in peripheral vestibular pathologies. Objective and subjective vestibular assessment tools are needed to assess vestibular rehabilitation effectiveness. The aims of the study were to develop the Turkish version of the internationally used Vestibular Rehabilitation Benefit Questionnaire (VRBQ) measure and to demonstrate the reliability and validity properties of the Turkish version in patients with peripheral vestibular hypofunction (PVH). Materials and methods: 110 patients with unilateral PVH were included. For the analysis of test-retest reliability, Turkish version of VRBQ developed by translation-back translation method was applied to patients on the day of admission and the day after admission. To assess validity, patients were also evaluated with the VRBQ, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Vertigo Symptom Scale-Short Form (VSS-SF), Vertigo Dizziness Imbalance (VDI) Questionnaire. Results: The VRBQ showed moderate to excellent internal consistency in total score and subscales scores (VRBQ-total Cronbach’s α = 0.91; dizziness α = 0.81; anxiety α = 0.68; motion-provoked dizziness α = 0.89; aypmtoms α = 0.88; health-related quality of life α = 0.87). In the test-retest reliability of VRBQ-total score was excellent (ICC = 0.94). The dizziness, the anxiety, the motion-provoked dizziness, symptoms and the health-related quality of life domains’ ICC were found respectively 0.90, 0.89, 0.84, 0.90, and 0.92. The construct validity of the VRBQ was determined. The VRBQ total was correlated with all parameters (r: 0.308 to –0.699, P < 0.05). The highest positive correlation was found between VRBQ total and DHI-functional (r: 0.680). The highest negative correlation was found between VRBQ total and VDI-total (r: –0.699). Conclusion: The results suggest that the Turkish version of the VRBQ is reliable and valid for evaluating the vestibular rehabilitation results.Key words: Dizziness, peripheral vestibular disorders, vestibular rehabilitation
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Whitney SL, Alghwiri A, Alghadir A. Physical therapy for persons with vestibular disorders. Current Opinion Neurology 2015; 28 (1): 61-68. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000162
  • 2. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health 2006; 29 (5): 489-497. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147
  • 3. Jacobson GP, Newman CW. The development of the dizziness handicap inventory. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 1990; 116 (4): 424-427. doi: 10.1001/ archotol.1990.01870040046011
  • 4. Cohen HS, Kimball KT. Development of the vestibular disorders activities of daily living scale. Archives of Otolaryngology– Head and Neck Surgery 2000; 126 (7): 881-887. doi: 10.1001/ archotol.126.7.881
  • 5. Yardley L, Putman J. Quantitative analysis contributing to handicap and distress in vertigous patients: a questionnaire study. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences 1992; 17 (3): 231–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1992.tb01833.x
  • 6. Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 1995; 50 (1): M28-34. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50A.1.M28
  • 7. Alghwiri A, Alghadir A, Whitney SL. The vestibular activities and participation measure and vestibular disorders. Journal of Vestibular Research 2013; 23 (6): 305-312. doi: 10.3233/VES130474
  • 8. Ricci NA, Aratani MC, Caovilla HH, Cohen HS, Ganança FF. Evaluation of properties of the vestibular disorders activities of daily living scale (Brazilian version) in an elderly population. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 2014; 18 (2): 174–182. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000144
  • 9. Morris AE, Lutman ME, Yardley L. Measuring outcome from vestibular rehabilitation, part I: qualitative development of a new self-report measure. International Journal of Audiology 2008; 47 (4): 169-177. doi: 10.1080/14992020701843129
  • 10. Morris AE, Lutman ME, Yardley L. Measuring outcome from vestibular rehabilitation, part II: refinement and validation of a new self-report measure. International Journal of Audiology 2009; 48 (1): 24-37. doi: 10.1080/14992020802314905
  • 11. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1993; 46 (12): 1417-1432. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
  • 12. Viciana D, Lopez-Escamez JA. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials and health-related quality of life in patients with vestibular neuritis. Otology and Neurotology 2010; 31 (6): 954- 958. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181e8fb32
  • 13. Karapolat H, Eyigor S, Kirazlı Y, Celebisoy N, Bilgen C et al. Reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of Turkish dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular disease. Journal of International Advanced Otology 2009; 5 (2): 237-245.
  • 14. Yanik B, Kulcu DG, Kurtais Y, Boynukalin S, Kurtarah H et al. The reliability and validity of the vertigo symptom scale and the vertigo dizziness imbalance questionnaires in a Turkish patient population with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Journal of Vestibular Research 2008; 18 (2): 159-170.
  • 15. Wilhelmsen K, Strand LI, Nordahl SHG, Eide GE, Ljunggren AE. Psychometric properties of the vertigo symptom scale–short form. BMC Ear Nose and Throat Disorders 2008; 8 (1): 1-9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6815-8-2
  • 16. Gamiz MJ, Lopez-Escamez JA. Health-related quality of life in patients over sixty years old with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Gerontology 2004; 50 (2): 82-86. doi: 10.1159/000075558
  • 17. Whitney SL, Wrisley DM, Brown KE, Furman JM. Is perception of handicap related to functional performance in persons with vestibular dysfunction? Otology and Neurotology 2004; 25 (2): 139-143. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200403000-00010
APA Gunduz B, APAYDIN Y, GUCLU-GUNDUZ A, Kabis B (2021). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire. , 796 - 801. 10.3906/sag-1904-59
Chicago Gunduz Bulent,APAYDIN Yasemin,GUCLU-GUNDUZ ARZU,Kabis Burak Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire. (2021): 796 - 801. 10.3906/sag-1904-59
MLA Gunduz Bulent,APAYDIN Yasemin,GUCLU-GUNDUZ ARZU,Kabis Burak Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire. , 2021, ss.796 - 801. 10.3906/sag-1904-59
AMA Gunduz B,APAYDIN Y,GUCLU-GUNDUZ A,Kabis B Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire. . 2021; 796 - 801. 10.3906/sag-1904-59
Vancouver Gunduz B,APAYDIN Y,GUCLU-GUNDUZ A,Kabis B Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire. . 2021; 796 - 801. 10.3906/sag-1904-59
IEEE Gunduz B,APAYDIN Y,GUCLU-GUNDUZ A,Kabis B "Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire." , ss.796 - 801, 2021. 10.3906/sag-1904-59
ISNAD Gunduz, Bulent vd. "Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire". (2021), 796-801. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1904-59
APA Gunduz B, APAYDIN Y, GUCLU-GUNDUZ A, Kabis B (2021). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 51(2), 796 - 801. 10.3906/sag-1904-59
Chicago Gunduz Bulent,APAYDIN Yasemin,GUCLU-GUNDUZ ARZU,Kabis Burak Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 51, no.2 (2021): 796 - 801. 10.3906/sag-1904-59
MLA Gunduz Bulent,APAYDIN Yasemin,GUCLU-GUNDUZ ARZU,Kabis Burak Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.51, no.2, 2021, ss.796 - 801. 10.3906/sag-1904-59
AMA Gunduz B,APAYDIN Y,GUCLU-GUNDUZ A,Kabis B Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 51(2): 796 - 801. 10.3906/sag-1904-59
Vancouver Gunduz B,APAYDIN Y,GUCLU-GUNDUZ A,Kabis B Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 51(2): 796 - 801. 10.3906/sag-1904-59
IEEE Gunduz B,APAYDIN Y,GUCLU-GUNDUZ A,Kabis B "Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 51, ss.796 - 801, 2021. 10.3906/sag-1904-59
ISNAD Gunduz, Bulent vd. "Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 51/2 (2021), 796-801. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1904-59