Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 283 - 297 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/electrica.2021.21016 İndeks Tarihi: 29-01-2022

A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System

Öz:
The development of a novel enhanced metaheuristic algorithm is considered in this paper. Such a structure was achieved through enhancement of the arithmetic optimization algorithm by employing the opposition-based learning mechanism together with the Nelder–Mead simplex search method. The developed algorithm (ObAOANM) adopts the opposition-based learning scheme to enhance the algorithm in terms explorative behavior, and the Nelder–Mead method in terms of exploitative behavior. The developed ObAOANM was firstly tested against well-known unimodal and multimodal benchmark functions through comparisons with the original arithmetic optimization algorithm, as it was previously shown to be superior to other efficient algorithms. The benchmark functions and related statistical results demonstrated greater capability of the ObAOANM algorithm. Then, the ObAOANM algorithm was utilized to achieve an optimum design of a proportional-integral-derivative controller adopted in an automobile cruise control system. The performance of the ObAOANM algorithm was compared with the arithmetic optimization algorithm algorithm through statistical, transient response, frequency response, and disturbance rejection analyses, which have shown better capability of the enhanced ObAOANM algorithm. Furthermore, the capability of the ObAOANM-based proportional-integral-derivative-controlled automobile cruise control system was compared with other available approaches in the literature by performing time domain analysis, which also confirmed the superior capability of the proposed approach for such a task.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. M. M. Gulzar, B. Sharif, D. Sibtain, L. Akbar and A. Akhtar, “Modelling and controller design of automotive cruise control system using hybrid model predictive controller,”, in 15th International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET), vol. 2019, 2019, pp. 1–5.
  • 2. R. Pradhan, S. K. Majhi, J. K. Pradhan and B. B. Pati, “Performance evaluation of PID controller for an automobile cruise control system using ant lion optimizer,” Engineering Journal, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 347–361, 2017.
  • 3. M. J. Blondin and J. P. Trovão, “Soft-computing techniques for cruise controller tuning for an off-road electric vehicle,” IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 196–205, 2019.
  • 4. W. Zhao, L. Wang and Z. Zhang, “Artificial ecosystem-based optimization: A novel nature-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 32, no. 13, pp. 9383–9425, 2020. .
  • 5. A. F. Nematollahi, A. Rahiminejad and B. Vahidi, “A novel metaheuristic optimization method based on golden ratio in nature,” Soft Computing, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1117–1151, 2020.
  • 6. E. H. Houssein, M. R. Saad, F. A. Hashim, H. Shaban and M. Hassaballah, “Lévy flight distribution: A new metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 94, p. 103731, 2020.
  • 7. S. Z. Mirjalili, S. Mirjalili, S. Saremi, H. Faris and I. Aljarah, “Grasshopper optimization algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 805–820, 2018.
  • 8. E. Eker, M. Kayri, S. Ekinci and D. Izci, “A new Fusion of ASO with SA algorithm and its applications to MLP training and DC motor speed control,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 3889–3911, 2021.
  • 9. D. H. Wolpert and W. G. Macready, “No free lunch theorems for optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67–82, 1997.
  • 10. L. Abualigah, A. Diabat, S. Mirjalili, M. Abd Elaziz and A. H. Gandomi, “The arithmetic optimization algorithm,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 376, p. 113609, 2021.
  • 11. A. Demirören, S. Ekinci, B. Hekimoğlu and D. Izci, “Oppositionbased artificial electric field algorithm and its application to FOPID controller design for unstable magnetic ball suspension system,” Engineering Science and Technology, An International Journal, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 469–479, 2021.
  • 12. H. R. Tizhoosh, “Opposition-based learning: A new scheme for machine intelligence,”, in International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC’06), vol. 1, 2005, pp. 695–701.
  • 13. J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, “A simplex method for function minimization,” Computer Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 308–313, 1965.
  • 14. K. Osman, M. F. Rahmat and M. A. Ahmad, “Modelling and controller design for a cruise control system,”, in 5th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications, vol. 2009, 2009, pp. 254–258.
  • 15. M. K. Rout, D. Sain, S. K. Swain and S. K. Mishra, “PID controller design for cruise control system using genetic algorithm,” In International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), Vol. 2016, 2016, pp. 4170–4174.
  • 16. R. Pradhan, S. K. Majhi, J. K. Pradhan and B. B. Pati, “Antlion optimizer tuned PID controller based on Bode ideal transfer function for automobile cruise control system,” Journal of Industrial Information Integration, vol. 9, pp. 45–52, 2018.
  • 17. H. Wang, Z. Wu and S. Rahnamayan, “Enhanced opposition-based differential evolution for solving high-dimensional continuous optimization problems,” Soft Computing, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 2127–2140, 2011.
  • 18. B. Shaw, V. Mukherjee and S. P. Ghoshal, “A novel oppositionbased gravitational search algorithm for combined economic and emission dispatch problems of power systems,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 21–33, 2012.
  • 19. Y. Zhou, R. Wang and Q. Luo, “Elite opposition-based flower pollination algorithm,” Neurocomputing, vol. 188, pp. 294–310, 2016.
  • 20. Q. Fan, H. Huang, K. Yang, S. Zhang, L. Yao and Q. Xiong, “A modified equilibrium optimizer using opposition-based learning and novel update rules,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 170, pp. 114575, 2021.
  • 21. S. M. A. Bulbul, M. Pradhan, P. K. Roy and T. Pal, “Opposition-based krill herd algorithm applied to economic load dispatch problem,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 423–440, 2018.
  • 22. S. Ekinci, B. Hekimoğlu and D. Izci, “Opposition based Henry gas solubility optimization as a novel algorithm for PID control of DC motor,” Engineering Science and Technology, An International Journal, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 331–342, 2021.
  • 23. J. C. Lagarias, J. A. Reeds, M. H. Wright and P. E. Wright, “Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 112–147, 1998.
  • 24. S. S. Fan, Y. C. Liang and E. Zahara, “Hybrid simplex search and particle swarm optimization for the global optimization of multimodal functions,” Engineering Optimization, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 401–418, 2004.
  • 25. R. M. Rizk-Allah and A. E. Hassanien, “A hybrid Harris hawksNelder-Mead optimization for practical nonlinear ordinary differential equations,” Evolutionary Intelligence, 2020.
  • 26. Y. Zhong, Y. Zhang, K. Liao and Z. Zhang, “A hybrid pigeon inspired optimization algorithm based on Nelder-Mead simplex operations,” In 39th Chinese Controlled Conference, vol. 2020, CCC, Ed., 2020, pp. 1396–1401.
  • 27. P. R. Singh, M. A. Elaziz and S. Xiong, “Modified Spider Monkey Optimization based on Nelder–Mead method for global optimization,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 110, pp. 264–289, 2018.
  • 28. M. J. Blondin, J. Sanchis, P. Sicard and J. M. Herrero, “New optimal controller tuning method for an AVR system using a simplified Ant Colony Optimization with a new constrained Nelder–Mead algorithm,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 62, pp. 216–229, 2018.
  • 29. A. Rajan and T. Malakar, “Optimal reactive power dispatch using hybrid Nelder-Mead simplex based firefly algorithm,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 66, pp. 9–24, 2015.
  • 30. E. Rashedi and H. Nezamabadi-pour, and S. Saryazdi, “GSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm,”, Informing Science (Ny), vol. 179, no. 13, pp. 2232–2248, 2009.
  • 31. P. H. Lewis and Y. Houghton, Basic Control Systems Engineering. United States: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (United States), 1997.
  • 32. D. Izci, S. Ekinci, A. Demiroren and J. Hedley, “HHO Algorithm based PID Controller Design for Aircraft Pitch Angle Control System,”, in International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA), Jun. 2020, 2020, pp. 1–6.
  • 33. R. C. Dorf, Modern Control Systems, 12th ed. Boston , London: Pearson, 2011.
APA Izci D, Ekinci S, KAYRI M, eker e (2021). A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System. , 283 - 297. 10.5152/electrica.2021.21016
Chicago Izci Davut,Ekinci Serdar,KAYRI MURAT,eker erdal A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System. (2021): 283 - 297. 10.5152/electrica.2021.21016
MLA Izci Davut,Ekinci Serdar,KAYRI MURAT,eker erdal A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System. , 2021, ss.283 - 297. 10.5152/electrica.2021.21016
AMA Izci D,Ekinci S,KAYRI M,eker e A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System. . 2021; 283 - 297. 10.5152/electrica.2021.21016
Vancouver Izci D,Ekinci S,KAYRI M,eker e A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System. . 2021; 283 - 297. 10.5152/electrica.2021.21016
IEEE Izci D,Ekinci S,KAYRI M,eker e "A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System." , ss.283 - 297, 2021. 10.5152/electrica.2021.21016
ISNAD Izci, Davut vd. "A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System". (2021), 283-297. https://doi.org/10.5152/electrica.2021.21016
APA Izci D, Ekinci S, KAYRI M, eker e (2021). A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System. Electrica, 21(3), 283 - 297. 10.5152/electrica.2021.21016
Chicago Izci Davut,Ekinci Serdar,KAYRI MURAT,eker erdal A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System. Electrica 21, no.3 (2021): 283 - 297. 10.5152/electrica.2021.21016
MLA Izci Davut,Ekinci Serdar,KAYRI MURAT,eker erdal A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System. Electrica, vol.21, no.3, 2021, ss.283 - 297. 10.5152/electrica.2021.21016
AMA Izci D,Ekinci S,KAYRI M,eker e A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System. Electrica. 2021; 21(3): 283 - 297. 10.5152/electrica.2021.21016
Vancouver Izci D,Ekinci S,KAYRI M,eker e A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System. Electrica. 2021; 21(3): 283 - 297. 10.5152/electrica.2021.21016
IEEE Izci D,Ekinci S,KAYRI M,eker e "A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System." Electrica, 21, ss.283 - 297, 2021. 10.5152/electrica.2021.21016
ISNAD Izci, Davut vd. "A Novel Enhanced Metaheuristic Algorithm for Automobile Cruise Control System". Electrica 21/3 (2021), 283-297. https://doi.org/10.5152/electrica.2021.21016