A majority vote is the usual minimum requirement for the courts to reach at a decision in most cases in constitutional justice procedure. For those instances where exists not a majority vote but an equally divided court, a.k.a. a tie vote, or simply a tie, procedural laws of constitutional justice have devised various rules and methods. This article deals with the issue of tie votes in constitutional justice, with a particular focus on the ways in which the possibility of a tie vote is addressed – the structural or procedural measures taken to preventtie votes from occurring or to break them when occurred. A number of contemporary national cases of constitutional justice are examined in comparative perspective, in order to grasp the variety of approaches to the issue, whereas the Turkish case is examined in closer detail with reference to the relevant legal framework provided by the Constitution, Internal Regulations of the Constitutional Court, Law no. 6216 on the Constitutional Court and the relevant case-law of as well as the implementation by the Constitutional Court.