İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye

Kazancı Altınok, Gamze; Tezer, Azime

doi:10.14744/planlama.2021.87487

İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye

Gamze Kazancı, (İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul)

Azime Tezer (İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul)

PLANLAMA

17 4

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 302 - 320 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.14744/planlama.2021.87487 İndeks Tarihi: 13-02-2022

İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye

Öz:

Bu makalenin amacı; kentlerde mekânsal planlamanın iklim değişikliğine uyumda etkinliğini artıracak “akıllı yönetişim” kapsamının irdelenmesi ve Türkiye’de akıllı yönetişimin mevcut durumunun tartışılmasıdır. Öncelikle iklim değişikliğinin etkileri tanımlanmış ve iki aşamalı literatür değerlendirmesi yapılmıştır. Birinci aşamada, iklim değişikliğine uyum ve mekansal planlama ilişkisinin anlaşılabilmesi için iklim değişikliğine uyumun mekânsal planlamanın hangi göstergeleri ile değerlendirilebileceği irdelenmiştir. Mekansal uyum politikaları, yönetişim modeli, uygulama düzeyi, aktörler ve teknolojinin rolü olmak üzere iklim değişikliğine mekansal uyum için öne çıkan konular tespit edilmiştir. İkinci aşamada, öne çıkan konular üzerinden tekrar literatür değerlendirilmesi yapılmış ve akıllı yönetişim kavramı elde edilmiştir. Ardından, mekânsal planlamayı ilişkilendirecek şekilde akıllı yönetişimin kapsamı üzerinden öne çıkan konulardan; Türkiye’de iklim değişikliğine mekansal uyumda akıllı yönetişim yaklaşımının mekansal planlama ilkeleri, katılım, yerel düzey ve teknoloji bağlamında kapsamı tartışılmıştır. Araştırma yöntemi olarak literatür üzerinden betimsel değerlendirmelere olanak sağlayan “içerik analizi” yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, yerel düzeyde mekansal planlama ilkeleri ve konuya ilişkin aktörler tanımlanmış ancak teknoloji kullanımı ile ilgili eksiklikler tespit edilmiştir. Dolayısıyla, Türkiye’de iklim değişikliğine mekânsal uyumda akıllı yönetişimin potansiyel taşıdığı ve geliştirilmeye açık olduğu saptanmış ancak yeterli kapsamlılığa henüz ulaşmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelime:

Spatial Planning in the Climate Change Adaptation and Turkey in the Framework of Smart Governance

Öz:

The aim of this article is to examine the smart governance in order to increase the effectiveness of spatial planning in cities, which are one of the domains of climate change, and to discuss the current situation of smart governance in Turkey within the framework of climate change adaptation. For the purpose; firstly, the effects of climate change were defined and a two-stage literature review was conducted. In the first stage, in order to understand the relationship between climate change adaptation and spatial planning the indicators by which spatial planning of adaptation to climate change can be evaluated were examined. The prominent issues for spatial adaptation to climate change have been identified as including spatial adaptation policies, governance model, implementation level, participation and the role of technology. In the second stage, literature was reviewed again on the prominent issues and the smart governance was obtained in it. Then, the scope of the smart governance approach in spatial adaptation to climate change in Turkey was discussed through spatial planning principles, participation, local level and technology. The "content analysis" method, which allows descriptive evaluations over the literature, was used as a research method. As a result, spatial planning principles and relevant actors were identified at the local level, but some deficiencies in the use of technology were determined. Therefore, it has been asserted that smart governance in spatial adaptation to climate change in Turkey has the potential and is open to development, but it has not yet reached sufficient scope.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Ahammad, R. (2011). Constraints of pro-poor climate change adaptation in Chittagong city. Environment and Urbanization, 23(2), 503-515.
Aijaz, R. (2020). The Smart Cities Mission in Delhi, 2015–2019: An Evaluation (Vol. 98).
Anguelovski, I., Carmin, J. (2011). Something barrowed everythinh new: Innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 169-175.
Arafah, Y., Winarso, H. (2017). Redefining smart city concept with resilience approach. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 70, No. 1), IOP Publishing.
Aşıcı, A. A., Şahin, Ü. (Ed.) (2017). Yeşil ekonomi. Tohum Yayıncılık Turizm Reklam ve Sağlık Hizmetleri.
Balaban, O., Balaban, M. Ş. (2015). Adaptation to climate change: Barriers in the Turkish local context. TEMA Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 7-22.
Birkmann, J., Garschagen, M., Kraas, F., Quang, N. (2010). Adaptive urban governance: New challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change. Sustainability Science, 5(2), 185-206.
Bolívar, M. P. (2015). Transforming city governments for successful smart cities. Balogun, A. L., Marks, D., Sharma, R., Shekhar, H., Balmes, C., Maheng, D.,
Salehi, P. (2020). Assessing the potentials of digitalization as a tool for climate change adaptation and sustainable development in urban centres. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53.
Bulkeley, H. (2010). Cities and the governing of climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 229–253.
Bütün Bayındır, G. D. (2020). How do transnational municipal networks affect climate policymaking? A qualitative study in Turkey. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1-19.
Calthorpe, P. (2010). Urbanism in the age of climate change. Island Press. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82.
Cardullo, P., Kitchin, R. (2019). Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’smart cities in Europe. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(5), 813-830.
Carter, J. G., Cavan, G., Connelly, A., Guy, S., Handley, J., Kazmierczak, A. (2015). Climate change and the city: Building capacity for urban adaptation. Progress in planning, 95, 1- 66.
Castán Broto, V., Westman, L. K. (2020). Ten years after Copenhagen: Reimagining climate change governance in urban areas. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 11(4), 1-22.
Chan, F. K. S., Griffiths, J. A., Higgitt, D., Xu, S., Zhu, F., Tang, Y. T. & Thorne, C. R. (2018). “Sponge City” in China—A breakthrough of planning and flood risk management in the urban context. Land use policy, 76, 772-778.
Clift, S. (2003). E-Democracy, E-Governance and Public Net-Work. Corfee-Morlot, J., Kamal-Chaoui, L., Donovan, M. G., Cochran, I., Robert,
A., Teasdale, P. J. (2009). Cities, climate change and multilevel governance.
Dąbrowski, M., Stead, D., He, J., Yu, F. (2021). Adaptive capacity of the Pearl River Delta cities in the face of the growing flood risk: Institutions, ideas and interests. Urban Studies, https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020951471.
Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı (ÇŞB). (2011). Türkiye İklim Değişikliği Eylem Planı, https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/iklim/editordosya/file/eylem%20 planlari/Iklim%20Degisikligi%20Eylem%20Plani_TR.pdf
Daniere, A. G., Garschagen, M. (Ed.) (2019). Urban climate resilience in Southeast Asia.
Davoudi, S., Crawford, J., Mehmood, A. (Ed.) (2009). Planning for climate change: Strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. Earthscan.
De Falco, S., Angelidou, M., Addie, J. P. D. (2019). From the “smart city” to the “smart metropolis”? Building resilience in the urban periphery. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(2), 205-223.
Dyson, L. (2013). Beyond transparency: Open data and the future of civic innovation.
Eger, J. M. (2009). Smart growth, smart cities, and the crisis at the pump a worldwide phenomenon. The Journal of E-Government Policy and Regulation, 32(1), 47-53.
Leal Filho., W.Balogun, A. L., Olayide, O. E., Azeiteiro, U. M., Ayal, D. Y., Muñoz, P. D. C. & Li, C. (2019). Assessing the impacts of climate change in cities and their adaptive capacity: Towards transformative approaches to climate change adaptation and poverty reduction in urban areas in a set of developing countries. Science of the Total Environment, 692, 1175-1190.
Florida, R. (2010). Who's your city?: How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. Vintage Kanada.
Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L. & Paterson, J. (2011). A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations. Climatic change, 106(2), 327-336.
Fratini, C. F., Geldof, G. D., Kluck, J., Mikkelsen, P. S. (2012). Three Points Approach (3PA) for urban flood risk management: A tool to support climate change adaptation through transdisciplinarity and multifunctionality. Urban Water Journal, 9(5), 317-331.
Fröhlich, J., Knieling, J. (2013). Conceptualising climate change governance. Climate change governance, 9-26.
Gagnon-Lebrun, F., Agrawala, S. (2007). Implementing adaptation in developed countries: An analysis of progress and trends. Climate Policy, 7(5), 392-408.
Gedikli, B., Balaban, O. (2018). An evaluation of local policies and actions that address climate change in Turkish metropolitan cities. European Planning Studies, 26(3), 458-479.
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities. Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna UT: Centre of Regional Science.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., Nam, T. (2015). What makes a city smart? Identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization. Information Polity, 20(1), 61–87.
Gossop, C. (2011). Low carbon cities: An introduction to the special issue. Cities, 28(6), 495– 497.
Greiving, S., Fleischhauer, M. (2012). National climate change adaptation strategies of European states from a spatial planning and development perspective. European Planning Studies, 20(1), 27-48.
Gustafsson, S., Mignon, I. (2020). Municipalities as intermediaries for the design and local implementation of climate visions. European Planning Studies, 28(6), 1161-1182.
Hope, K.R. (2009). Climate change and urban development in Africa. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 66(5), 643–658.
Hughes, S., Tozer, L., Giest, S., Van Der Heijden, J., Bulkeley, H., Certoma, C. (2019). The Politics of Data-Driven Urban Climate Change Mitigation. Urban Climate Politics: Agency and Empowerment, https://doi. org/10.1017/9781108632157.007, 116-134.
Hurlimann, A. C., March, A. P. (2012). The role of spatial planning in adapting to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(5), 477-488.
Israilidis, J., Odusanya, K., Mazhar, M. U. (2019). Exploring knowledge management perspectives in smart city research: A review and future research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 56, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.015.
Janis, I. (1965). The problem of validating content analysis. The content analysis reader, 358-375.
Jeong, J. S. (2018). Design of spatial PGIS-MCDA-based land assessment planning for identifying sustainable land-use adaptation priorities for climate change impacts. Agricultural Systems, 167, 61-71.
Johnson, P. A., Robinson, P. J., Philpot, S. (2020). Type, tweet, tap, and pass:How smart city technology is creating a transactional citizen. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1).
Karvonen, A. (2020). Urban techno-politics: Knowing, governing, and imagining the city. Science as Culture, 29(3), 417-424.
Kern, K., Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, Europeanization and multilevel governance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 309–332.
Kıvılcım, İ. (2013). 2020’ye Doğru Kyoto-Tipi İklim Değişikliği Müzakeleri, AB’nin Yeterliliği ve Türkiye’nin Konumu. İktisadi Kalkınma Vakfı Yayını, İstanbul.
Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., Arribas, D. (2012). Smart cities in perspective – A comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps. Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 229–246.
Köse, İ. (2018). İklim Değişikliği Müzakereleri: Türkiye’nin Paris Anlaşması’nı İmza Süreci. Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi 9 (1), 55-81. Kpienbaareh, D., Bezner Kerr, R., Luginaah, I., Wang, J., Lupafya, E., Dakishoni,
L., Shumba, L. (2020). Spatial and Ecological Farmer Knowledge and Decision-Making about Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity. Land, 9(10), 356.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
Kumar, C. B. (2013). Climate change and Asian cities: So near yet so far. Urban Studies, 50(7), 1456–1468.
Kumar, T. V. (2015). E-governance for smart cities. E-governance for smart cities, 1-43.
Kumar, H., Singh, M. K., Gupta, M. P. (2019). A policy framework for city eligibility analysis: TISM and fuzzy MICMAC-weighted approach to select a city for smart city transformation in India. Land use policy, 82.
Kundzewicz, Z. W., Su, B., Wang, Y., Xia, J., Huang, J., Jiang, T. (2019). Flood risk and its reduction in China. Advances in Water Resources, 130, 37-45.
Lammers, I., Hoppe, T. (2018). Analysing the institutional setting of local renewable energy planning and implementation in the EU: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 10(9), 3212.
Lin, Y., Zhang, X., Geertman, S. (2015). Toward smart governance and social sustainability for Chinese migrant communities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 389–399.
Lopes, N. V. (2017). Smart governance: A key factor for smart cities implementation. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid and Smart Cities (ICSGSC), 277-282.
Lorenz, S., Dessai, S., Forster, P. M., Paavola, J. (2017). Adaptation planning and the use of climate change projections in local government in England and Germany. Regional Environmental Change, 17(2), 425-435.
Macintosh, A., Foerster, A., McDonald, J. (2015). Policy design, spatial planning and climate change adaptation: A case study from Australia. Journal of environmental planning and management, 58(8), 1432-1453.
MacLeod, G. (2011). Urban politics reconsidered: Growth machine to postdemocratic city?. Urban Studies, 48(12), 2629–2660.
Matthews, T., Lo, A. Y., Byrne, J. A. (2015). Reconceptualizing green infrastructure for climate change adaptation: Barriers to adoption and drivers for uptake by spatial planners. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 155-163.
Mees, H. L., Dijk, J., van Soest, D., Driessen, P. P., van Rijswick, M. H., Runhaar, H. (2014). A method for the deliberate and deliberative selection of policy instrument mixes for climate change adaptation. Ecology and Society, 19(2).
Meijer, A., Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International review of administrative sciences, 82(2), 392-408.
Muñoz-Erickson, T. A., Campbell, L. K., Childers, D. L., Grove, J. M., Iwaniec, D. M., Pickett, S. T. & Svendsen, E. S. (2016). Demystifying governance and its role for transitions in urban social–ecological systems. Ecosphere, 7(11).
Nguyen, T. B. N., Do, T. L. (2020). Some solutions of “Smart city” in response to urban climate change. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 869, No. 2).
NIUA (National Institute of Urban Affairs). (2020). Climate Smart Cities Assessment Framework. https://csc.urbanindustrial.in/downloads/public_ downloads/index_eng.html.
Odendaal, N. (2003). Information and communication technology and local governance: Understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27(6), 585–607.
Okada, N. (2018). Adaptive process for SMART community governance under persistent disruptive risks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 9(4), 454-463.
Parks, D. (2019). Energy efficiency left behind? Policy assemblages in Sweden’s most climate-smart city. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 318-335.
Peker, E., Aydın, C.İ. (2019). Değişen İklim de Kentler: Yerel Yönetimler İçin Azaltım Ve Uyum Politikaları. İstanbul Politikalar Merkezi Bilgi Notu.
Praharaj, S., Han, J. H., Hawken, S. (2017). Urban innovation through policy integration: Critical perspectives from 100 smart cities mission in India. City, Culture and Society.
Pieterse, A., du Toit, J., Van Niekerk, W. (2020). Climate change adaptation mainstreaming in the planning instruments of two South African local municipalities. Development Southern Africa, 1-16.
Pereira, G. V., Parycek, P., Falco, E., Kleinhans, R. (2018). Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review. Information Polity, 23(2), 143-162.
Shelton, T., Zook, M., Wiig, A. (2015). The “actually existing smart city”. Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 13–25.
Smith, P. F. (2009). Building for a changing climate: The challenge for construction, planning and energy. Earthscan.
Soomro, K., Khan, Z., Ludlow, D. (2017). Participatory governance in smart cities: The urbanAPI case study. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 23(5-6), 419-444.
Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S. (1966). The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis.
Şahin, Ü. (2014). Türkiye’nin İklim Politikalarında Aktör Haritası. İstanbul Politikalar Merkezi. İstanbul.
Tanner, T., Mitchell, T., Polack, E., Guenther, B. (2009). Urban governance for adaptation: Assessing climate change resilience in ten Asian cities. IDS Working Papers, 2009(315), 1-47.

APA	Kazancı Altınok G, Tezer A (2021). İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye. , 302 - 320. 10.14744/planlama.2021.87487
Chicago	Kazancı Altınok Gamze,Tezer Azime İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye. (2021): 302 - 320. 10.14744/planlama.2021.87487
MLA	Kazancı Altınok Gamze,Tezer Azime İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye. , 2021, ss.302 - 320. 10.14744/planlama.2021.87487
AMA	Kazancı Altınok G,Tezer A İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye. . 2021; 302 - 320. 10.14744/planlama.2021.87487
Vancouver	Kazancı Altınok G,Tezer A İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye. . 2021; 302 - 320. 10.14744/planlama.2021.87487
IEEE	Kazancı Altınok G,Tezer A "İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye." , ss.302 - 320, 2021. 10.14744/planlama.2021.87487
ISNAD	Kazancı Altınok, Gamze - Tezer, Azime. "İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye". (2021), 302-320. https://doi.org/10.14744/planlama.2021.87487

APA	Kazancı Altınok G, Tezer A (2021). İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye. PLANLAMA, 31(2), 302 - 320. 10.14744/planlama.2021.87487
Chicago	Kazancı Altınok Gamze,Tezer Azime İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye. PLANLAMA 31, no.2 (2021): 302 - 320. 10.14744/planlama.2021.87487
MLA	Kazancı Altınok Gamze,Tezer Azime İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye. PLANLAMA, vol.31, no.2, 2021, ss.302 - 320. 10.14744/planlama.2021.87487
AMA	Kazancı Altınok G,Tezer A İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye. PLANLAMA. 2021; 31(2): 302 - 320. 10.14744/planlama.2021.87487
Vancouver	Kazancı Altınok G,Tezer A İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye. PLANLAMA. 2021; 31(2): 302 - 320. 10.14744/planlama.2021.87487
IEEE	Kazancı Altınok G,Tezer A "İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye." PLANLAMA, 31, ss.302 - 320, 2021. 10.14744/planlama.2021.87487
ISNAD	Kazancı Altınok, Gamze - Tezer, Azime. "İklim Değişikliğine Uyumda Mekânsal Planlama ve Akıllı Yönetişim Çerçevesinde Türkiye". PLANLAMA 31/2 (2021), 302-320. https://doi.org/10.14744/planlama.2021.87487