Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults

Volkan Yazıcı, Melek; ozkul, cagla; Bayraktar, Deniz; Yazici, Gokhan; Varol, Fatmagül

doi:10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults

Gökhan YAZICI, (Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ankara, TURKEY)

Melek VOLKAN YAZIC, (Yüksek İhtisas University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ankara, TURKEY)

Çağla ÖZKUL, (Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ankara, TURKEY)

Fatmagül VAROL, (Hamidiye University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, İstanbul TURKEY)

Deniz BAYRAKTAR (İzmir Kâtip Çelebi University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, İzmir, TURKEY)

Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi

9 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 476 - 482 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783 İndeks Tarihi: 17-02-2022

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults

Öz:

Objective: Physical activity plays an important role in maintaining health, preventing causes of disability and even death. To be able to manage physical inactivity and the associated millions of deaths per year, we need to understand the basic principles that govern physical activity. Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire (BHPAQ) has widely been employed in clinical settings and research however, the reliability and validity of this questionnaire have not been investigated amongst the Turkish population. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Turkish Version of BHPAQ in Healthy Adults. Material and Methods: A total of 194 healthy subjects (93 female, 101 male) were included in the study. BHPAQ was translated using a back-translation technique to Turkish. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used for construct validity (Spearman’s rho). Intra class coefficients (ICCs) were used for reliability, and Cronbach’s alpha was used for internal consistency. Results: The statistical analysis showed that all BHPAQ subscores had almost perfect test–retest reliability. According to the analysis, ICC varied from 0.98 to 0.99 in all of the BHPAQ sub-scores. BHPAQ total score was found moderately related to IPAQ total score (rho: 0.47 p<0.001). Conclusion: The findings revealed that the Turkish version of BHPAQ and its sub-scores show excellent reproducibility and moderate construct validity.

Anahtar Kelime:

Sağlıklı Yetişkinlerde Baecke Habitual Fiziksel Aktivite Anketinin Türkçe Güvenilirliğinin ve Geçerliğinin İncelenmesi

Öz:

Amaç: Fiziksel aktivite, özürlülüğü ve hatta ölüme neden olabilecek faktörleri önlemek için önemlidir. Fiziksel inaktiviteye bağlı olarak her yıl meydana gelen milyonlarca ölümü önleyebilmek için fiziksel aktivitenin detaylıca ölçülmesi gerekmektedir. Baecke Habitual Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi (BHPAQ) klinik ortamda ve araştırmalarda yaygın olarak kullanılan bir anket olmasına rağmen bu anketin Türk olgulardaki güvenilirliği ve geçerliği araştırılmamıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, BHPAQ’nun sağlıklı yetişkinlerde Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliğini ve geçerliğini incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 194 (93 kadın, 101 erkek) sağlıklı olgu dâhil edildi. BHPAQ, çevirigeri çeviri tekniği kullanılarak Türkçeye çevrildi. Yapı geçerliğinin araştırılması için Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi [International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)] kullanılmıştır (Spearman’s Rho). Güvenilirlik için sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı [intra class coefficients (ICC)], iç tutarlılık için Cronbach’s alfa kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: İstatistiksel analiz sonuçları, tüm BHPAQ alt skorlarının neredeyse mükemmel test-tekrar test güvenilirliğine sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Analize göre, tüm BHPAQ alt skorlarında ICC; 0,98 ile 0,99 arasında değişmiştir. BHPAQ toplam puanı IPAQ toplam puanı ile orta derecede ilişkili bulunmuştur (rho=0,47, p<0,001). Sonuç: Bulgular, Türkçe BHPAQ ve alt puanlarının mükemmel tekrarlanabilirliği ve orta düzeyde yapı geçerliliği gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. WHO, Constitution of the World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health; 2010. Date of access: 3.3.2020. [Link]
2. Warburton DER, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017;32(5):541-56. [Crossref] [Pubmed]
3. WHO, Constitution of the World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018-2030: more active people for a healthier world; 2019. Date of access: 3.3.2020. [Link]
4. Dowd KP, Szeklicki R, Minetto MA, Murphy MH, Polito A, Ghigo E, et al. A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15(1):15. [Crossref] [Pubmed] [PMC]
5. Shephard RJ, Tudor-Lucke C. A history of physical activity measurement in epidemiology. The Objective Monitoring of Physical Activity: Contributions of Accelerometry to Epidemiology, Exercise Science and Rehabilitation. Aktiengesellschaft: CH Springer International Publishing; 2016. p.39-83. [Crossref]
6. Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:56. [Crossref] [Pubmed] [PMC]
7. Welk GJ. Methods for Assessing Phsical Activity and Challenges for Research. 1st ed. Physical activity assessments for health-related research. Champaign, IL, uSA: Human Kinetics; 2002. p.19-35.
8. Kelly P, fitzsimons C, Baker G. Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behaviour measurement? validity and reliability reconsidered. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13:32. [Crossref] [Pubmed] [PMC]
9. Thomas JR, Nelson JK, Silverman SJ. Research Methods in Physical Activity. 7th ed. Stanningley, LS, uK: Human Kinetics; 2015. p.133-242.
10. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin f, ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of crosscultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-91. [Crossref] [Pubmed]
11. Baecke JA, Burema J, frijters JE. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;36(5):936-42. [Crossref] [Pubmed]
12. Ho SC, Yu R, Chan S. Comparison of the modified Chinese Baecke Questionnaire with a 3-day activity diary in a Hong Kong Chinese population. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015;27(2):NP2358-71. [Crossref] [Pubmed]
13. Silva fG, Oliveira CB, Hisamatsu TM, Negrão filho Rf, Rodrigues CRD, franco MR, et al. Critical evaluation of physical activity questionnaires translated to Brazilian-Portuguese: a systematic review on cross-cultural adaptation and measurements properties. Braz J Phys Ther. 2020;24(3):187-218. [Crossref] [Pubmed] [PMC]
14. Sadeghisani M, Dehghan Manshadi f, Azimi H, Montazeri A. validity and reliability of the persian version of baecke habitual physical activity questionnaire in healthy subjects. Asian J Sports Med. 2016;7(3):e31778. [Crossref] [Pubmed] [PMC]
15. Carvalho fA, Morelhão PK, franco MR, Maher CG, Smeets RJEM, Oliveira CB, et al. Reliability and validity of two multidimensional self-reported physical activity questionnaires in people with chronic low back pain. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;27:65-70. [Crossref] [Pubmed]
16. Ono R, Hirata S, Yamada M, Nishiyama T, Kurosaka M, Tamura Y. Reliability and validity of the Baecke physical activity questionnaire in adult women with hip disorders. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:61. [Crossref] [Pubmed] [PMC]
17. florindo AA, Hallal PC, Moura EC, Malta DC. Practice of physical activities and associated factors in adults, Brazil, 2006. Rev Saude Publica. 2009;43 Suppl 2:65-73. [Crossref] [Pubmed]
18. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381-95. [Crossref] [Pubmed]
19. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, Inal-Ince D, Bosnak-Guclu M, Karabulut E, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;111(1):278-84. [Crossref] [Pubmed]
20. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al; American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334-59. [Crossref] [Pubmed]
21. Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials. 3rd ed. Hamilton: ON, CA; BC Decker Inc; 2008. p.70-320.
22. Philippaerts RM, Lefevre J. Reliability and validity of three physical activity questionnaires in flemish males. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 147(10):982-90. [Crossref] [Pubmed]
23. Pols MA, Peeters PH, Bueno-De-Mesquita HB, Ocké MC, Wentink CA, Kemper HC, Collette HJ. validity and repeatability of a modified Baecke questionnaire on physical activity. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24(2):381-8. [Crossref] [Pubmed]
24. Oyeyemi AL, Moss SJ, Monyeki MA, Kruger HS. Measurement of physical activity in urban and rural South African adults: a comparison of two self-report methods. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1004. [Crossref] [Pubmed] [PMC]
25. Hertogh EM, Monninkhof EM, Schouten EG, Peeters PH, Schuit AJ. validity of the modified Baecke questionnaire: comparison with energy expenditure according to the doubly labeled water method. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:30. [Crossref] [Pubmed] [PMC]

APA	Yazici G, Volkan Yazıcı M, ozkul c, Varol F, Bayraktar D (2021). Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults. , 476 - 482. 10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783
Chicago	Yazici Gokhan,Volkan Yazıcı Melek,ozkul cagla,Varol Fatmagül,Bayraktar Deniz Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults. (2021): 476 - 482. 10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783
MLA	Yazici Gokhan,Volkan Yazıcı Melek,ozkul cagla,Varol Fatmagül,Bayraktar Deniz Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults. , 2021, ss.476 - 482. 10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783
AMA	Yazici G,Volkan Yazıcı M,ozkul c,Varol F,Bayraktar D Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults. . 2021; 476 - 482. 10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783
Vancouver	Yazici G,Volkan Yazıcı M,ozkul c,Varol F,Bayraktar D Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults. . 2021; 476 - 482. 10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783
IEEE	Yazici G,Volkan Yazıcı M,ozkul c,Varol F,Bayraktar D "Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults." , ss.476 - 482, 2021. 10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783
ISNAD	Yazici, Gokhan vd. "Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults". (2021), 476-482. https://doi.org/10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783

APA	Yazici G, Volkan Yazıcı M, ozkul c, Varol F, Bayraktar D (2021). Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults. Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(3), 476 - 482. 10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783
Chicago	Yazici Gokhan,Volkan Yazıcı Melek,ozkul cagla,Varol Fatmagül,Bayraktar Deniz Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults. Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 6, no.3 (2021): 476 - 482. 10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783
MLA	Yazici Gokhan,Volkan Yazıcı Melek,ozkul cagla,Varol Fatmagül,Bayraktar Deniz Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults. Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.6, no.3, 2021, ss.476 - 482. 10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783
AMA	Yazici G,Volkan Yazıcı M,ozkul c,Varol F,Bayraktar D Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults. Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2021; 6(3): 476 - 482. 10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783
Vancouver	Yazici G,Volkan Yazıcı M,ozkul c,Varol F,Bayraktar D Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults. Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2021; 6(3): 476 - 482. 10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783
IEEE	Yazici G,Volkan Yazıcı M,ozkul c,Varol F,Bayraktar D "Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults." Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 6, ss.476 - 482, 2021. 10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783
ISNAD	Yazici, Gokhan vd. "Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Adults". Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 6/3 (2021), 476-482. https://doi.org/10.5336/healthsci.2020-76783