Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 367 - 375 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.1515/tjb-2020-0624 İndeks Tarihi: 21-02-2022

Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals

Öz:
Objectives: It was aimed to compare Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT), Alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (AGP), Total Immuno globulin M (Total IgM), Total Immunoglobulin G (Total IgG), Galectin-3 (Gal3), and severe acute respiratory syn drome coronavirus 2 IgG (SARS-CoV-2 IgG) levels in pa tients with COVID-19 and healthy individuals. Methods: The study included a total of 86 participants, 44 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test and 42 as the control group. AAT, AGP, Total IgM, and Total IgG levels were measured using the immunoturbidimetric method. Gal3 and SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were measured using the chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay method. Results: AAT, AGP, Total IgG, Gal3, and SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were found to be significantly higher in the patient group compared to the control group (p<0.001 for all tests). In the patient group, there was a moderate correlation between AAT-AGP and SARS-CoV-2 IgG-AAT (r=0.692; r=0.561, respectively). Conclusions: High levels of AAT, AGP, Total IgG, Gal3, and SARS-CoV-2 IgG in the patient group and correlations be tween variables suggest that these parameters may be involved in the pathogenesis of the disease and provide an idea about the prognosis of the disease. However, new studies on this subject are neededin order to clearly reveal the laboratory tests related to the clinical course of the disease.
Anahtar Kelime:

-

Öz:
Amaç: COVID-19’lu hastalarda Alfa-1 antitripsin (AAT), Alfa-1 asit glikoprotein (AGP), Total IgM, Total IgG, Galektin-3 (Gal3) ve SARS-CoV-2 IgG düzeylerini çalışarak sağlıklı bireylerle karşılaştırmak amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Gerçek zamanlı ters transkripsiyon polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu (rRT-PCR) test sonucu ile COVID-19 tanısı alan 44’ü hasta, 42’si kontrol grubunu oluş turacak şekilde toplam 86 katılımcı çalışmaya dahil edildi. AAT, AGP, Total IgM ve Total IgG düzeyleri İmmüntürbidi metrik yöntem ile çalışıldı. Gal3 ve SARS-CoV-2 IgG düzeyleri ise kemilüminesan mikropartikül immünassay yöntemi ile ölçüldü. Bulgular: Hasta grubunda AAT, AGP, Total IgG, Gal3 ve SARS-CoV-2 IgG düzeyleri kontrol grubuna göre anlamlı derecede yüksek bulundu (tüm testler için p<0.001). Hasta grubunda AAT-AGP ve SARS-CoV-2 IgG-AAT arasında orta düzeyde korelasyon saptandı (sırasıyla, r=0.692; r=0.561). Sonuç: Hasta grubunda AAT, AGP, Total IgG, Gal3 ve SARS-CoV-2 IgG düzeylerinin yüksek bulunması ve değiş kenler arasındaki korelasyonlar bu parametrelerin, hastalı ğın patogenezinde yer alabileceğini ve hastalığın prognozu hakkında fikir verebileceğini düşündürmektedir. Ancak hastalığın klinik seyri ile ilişkili laboratuvar testlerinin net bir şekilde ortaya konulması için bu konu ile ilgili yeni çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Weston S, Frieman MB. COVID 19: knowns, unknowns, and questions. mSphere 2020:2:e00203–20.
  • 2. Sun P, Lu X, Xu C, Sun W, Pan B. Understanding of COVID 19 based on current evidence. J Med Virol 2020;92:548–51.
  • 3. Wang F, Nie J, Wang H, Zhao Q, Xiong Y, Deng L, et al. Characteristics of peripheral lymphocyte subset alteration in COVID 19 pneumonia. J Infect Dis 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/ infdis/jiaa150 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 4. Rodriguez-Moralesa AJ, Cardona-Ospinaa JA, Gutiérrez-Ocampoa E, Villamizar-Peñaa R, Holguin-Riveraa Y, Escalera-Antezanai JP, et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trav Med Infect Dis 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020. 101623 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 5. Lippi G, Plebani M. The critical role of laboratory medicine during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) and other viral outbreaks. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1063–9.
  • 6. Zhu Z, Cai T, Fan L, Lou K, Hua X, Huang Z, et al. Clinical value of immune-inflammatory parameters to assess the severity of coronavirus disease 2019. Int J Infect Dis 2020;95:332–9.
  • 7. Du Y, Tu L, Zhu P, Mu M, Wang R, Yang P, et al. Clinical features of 85 fatal cases of COVID-19 from Wuhan: a Retrospective Observational Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020;201:1372–9.
  • 8. Hippensteel J, Leavitt A, Maloney JP, Beckham D, Garcia C, Qing Li Q, et al. Hypothesis: alpha-1-antitrypsin is a promising treatment option for COVID-19. Med Hypotheses 2021;146:110394.
  • 9. Kim M, Cai Q, Oh Y. Therapeutic potential of alpha-1 antitrypsin in human disease. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metabol 2018;23:131–5.
  • 10. Xiao K, Su L, Yan P, Han B, Li J, Wang H, et al. α-1-Acid glycoprotein as a biomarker for the early diagnosis and monitoring the prognosis of sepsis. J Crit Care 2015;30:744–51.
  • 11. Cordero EM, Gonzalez MM, Aguilar LD, Orozco EH, Hernandez Pando R. Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein, its local production and immunopathological participation in experimental pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 2008;88:203–11.
  • 12. Caniglia JL, Guda MR, Asuthkar S, Andrew J, Tsung AJ, Velpula KK. A potential role for Galectin-3 inhibitors in the treatment of COVID-19. PeerJ 2020;8:e9392.
  • 13. Garcia-Revilla J, Deierborg T, Venero JL, Boza-Serrano A. Hyperinflammation and fibrosis in severe COVID-19 patients: galectin-3, a target molecule to consider. Front Immunol 2020;11: 2069.
  • 14. Caniglia JL, Asuthkar S, Tsung AJ, Guda MR, Velpula KK. Immunopathology of galectin-3: an increasingly promising target in COVID-19 [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Res 2020; 9:1078.
  • 15. Wu J, Zhang P, Zhang L, Meng W, Li J, Tong C, et al. Rapid and accurate identification of COVID-19 infection through machine learning based on clinical available blood test results. medRxiv 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.02.20051136 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 16. Altindis M, Toptan H. SARSCoV 2 laboratory diagnosis. J Biotechnol Strat Health Res 2020;1:76–84.
  • 17. McElvaney OJ, McEvoy NL, McElvaney OF, Carroll TP, Murphy MP, Dunlea DM, et al. Characterization of the inflammatory response to severe COVID-19 illness. AmJ Respir Crit CareMed 2020;202:812–21.
  • 18. Wettstein L, Conzelmann C, Müller JA, Weil T, Groß R, Hirschenberger M, et al. Alpha-1 antitrypsin inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection. bioRxiv 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.02. 183764 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 19. Braccialli de Loyola M, Aguiar dos Reis TT, Malcher de Oliveira GXL, Palmeira JF, Argañaraz GA, Argañaraz ER. Alpha-1-antitrypsin: a possible host protective factor against COVID-19. Rev Med Virol 2020. https://doi.org/10. 1002/rmv.2157 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 20. Chen T, Wu D, Chen H, Yan W, Yang D, Chen G, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019, retrospective study. BMJ 2020;368:m1091.
  • 21. Zhang B, Zhou X, Zhu C, Song Y, Feng F, Qiu Y, et al. Immune phenotyping based on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and IgG predicts disease severity and outcome for patients with COVID-19. Front Mol Biosci 2020;7:157.
  • 22. Xie J, Ding C, Li J, Wang Y, Guo H, LuZ, et al. Characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) confirmed using an IgM‐IgG antibody test. J Med Virol 2020;92:2004–10.
  • 23. Liu J, Lian R, Zhang G, Hou B, Wang C, Dong J, et al. Changes in serum virus-specific IgM/IgG antibody in asymptomatic and discharged patients with reoccurring positive COVID-19 nucleic acid test (RPNAT). Ann Med 2020;53:34–42.
  • 24. Long QX, Tang XJ, Qiu-Lin QL, Li Q, Deng HJ, Yuan J, et al. Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS CoV2 infections. Nat Med 2020;26:1200–4.
  • 25. Hou H, Wang T, Zhang B, Luo Y, Mao L, Wang F, et al. Detection of IgM and IgG antibodies in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Transl Immunol 2020;9:e1136.
  • 26. Zeng F, Dai C, Cai P, Wang J, Xu L, Li J, et al. A comparison study of SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG antibody between male and female COVID‐19 patients: a possible reason underlying different outcome between sex. J Med Virol 2020;92:2050–4.
  • 27. De Biasi S, Meschiari M, Gibellini L, Bellinazzi C, Borella R, Fidanza L, et al. Marked T cell activation, senescence, exhaustion and skewing towards TH17 in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Nat Commun 2020;11:3434.
  • 28. Xu Z, Li X, Huang Y, Mao P, Wu S, Yang B, et al. The predictive value of plasma galectin-3 for ARDS severity and clinical outcome. Shock 2017;47:331–6.
APA ERÇİN U, TÜRK ARIBAŞ E, TUNÇBİLEK S, Kaya C, Sepici Dincel A, Bilgihan A, TEKELİ M (2021). Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals. , 367 - 375. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0624
Chicago ERÇİN UĞUR,TÜRK ARIBAŞ Emel,TUNÇBİLEK Semra,Kaya Cantürk,Sepici Dincel Aylin,Bilgihan Ayse,TEKELİ Mehmet Emin Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals. (2021): 367 - 375. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0624
MLA ERÇİN UĞUR,TÜRK ARIBAŞ Emel,TUNÇBİLEK Semra,Kaya Cantürk,Sepici Dincel Aylin,Bilgihan Ayse,TEKELİ Mehmet Emin Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals. , 2021, ss.367 - 375. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0624
AMA ERÇİN U,TÜRK ARIBAŞ E,TUNÇBİLEK S,Kaya C,Sepici Dincel A,Bilgihan A,TEKELİ M Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals. . 2021; 367 - 375. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0624
Vancouver ERÇİN U,TÜRK ARIBAŞ E,TUNÇBİLEK S,Kaya C,Sepici Dincel A,Bilgihan A,TEKELİ M Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals. . 2021; 367 - 375. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0624
IEEE ERÇİN U,TÜRK ARIBAŞ E,TUNÇBİLEK S,Kaya C,Sepici Dincel A,Bilgihan A,TEKELİ M "Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals." , ss.367 - 375, 2021. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0624
ISNAD ERÇİN, UĞUR vd. "Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals". (2021), 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2020-0624
APA ERÇİN U, TÜRK ARIBAŞ E, TUNÇBİLEK S, Kaya C, Sepici Dincel A, Bilgihan A, TEKELİ M (2021). Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, 46(4), 367 - 375. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0624
Chicago ERÇİN UĞUR,TÜRK ARIBAŞ Emel,TUNÇBİLEK Semra,Kaya Cantürk,Sepici Dincel Aylin,Bilgihan Ayse,TEKELİ Mehmet Emin Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi 46, no.4 (2021): 367 - 375. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0624
MLA ERÇİN UĞUR,TÜRK ARIBAŞ Emel,TUNÇBİLEK Semra,Kaya Cantürk,Sepici Dincel Aylin,Bilgihan Ayse,TEKELİ Mehmet Emin Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, vol.46, no.4, 2021, ss.367 - 375. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0624
AMA ERÇİN U,TÜRK ARIBAŞ E,TUNÇBİLEK S,Kaya C,Sepici Dincel A,Bilgihan A,TEKELİ M Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi. 2021; 46(4): 367 - 375. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0624
Vancouver ERÇİN U,TÜRK ARIBAŞ E,TUNÇBİLEK S,Kaya C,Sepici Dincel A,Bilgihan A,TEKELİ M Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi. 2021; 46(4): 367 - 375. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0624
IEEE ERÇİN U,TÜRK ARIBAŞ E,TUNÇBİLEK S,Kaya C,Sepici Dincel A,Bilgihan A,TEKELİ M "Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals." Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, 46, ss.367 - 375, 2021. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0624
ISNAD ERÇİN, UĞUR vd. "Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals". Türk Biyokimya Dergisi 46/4 (2021), 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2020-0624