Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation

Uçar, Arzu Yağmur; Özlek, Esin; Belli, Sema; Akkol, Elif; Neelakantan, Prasanna; GÜNDÜZ, Hüseyin

doi:10.14744/eej.2020.92905

Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation

Esin ÖZLEK, (Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Van, Türkiye)

Prasanna NEELAKANTAN, (The University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Hong Kong, China)

Elif AKKOL, (Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Van, Türkiye)

Huseyin GUNDUZ, (Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Van, Türkiye)

Yağmur Arzu UÇAR, (Selçuk Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye)

Sema BELLİ (Selçuk Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye)

European Endodontic Journal

5 1

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 264 - 270 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/eej.2020.92905 İndeks Tarihi: 25-07-2023

Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation

Öz:

Objective: To investigate the influence of sonic agitation or laser-activated irrigation techniques on the removal chlorhexidine (CHX) and modified triple antibiotic paste (mTAP) on the sealer penetration depth and dislocation resistance of Guttaflow Bioseal. Methods: Single-rooted mandibular premolars (n=96) were prepared with rotary nickel titanium instruments and randomly divided into two groups (n=48) based on the intracanal medicaments used: Group 1, mTAP; Group 2, CHX gel. After 7 days, the specimens in each group were divided into three subgroups (n=16) based on the supplementary irrigation technique used to remove the medicaments: laser activated irrigation (Er, Cr: YSGG laser, Waterlase MD, Biolase Technology Inc., San Clemente, CA, USA), sonic agitation (EndoActivator, Dentslpy Sirona Endodontics, PA, USA) and syringe-and-needle irrigation (control) techniques. Canals were filled with single matched-taper gutta-percha cone and a calcium silicate-based sealer (GuttaFlow® Bioseal, Coltène/Whaledent, Langenau, Germany). At the end of three weeks, sealer penetration was investigated using confocal microscopy (n=6), and dislocation resistance was calculated by measuring the push-out bond strength (n=10). Statistical analysis was performed using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post-hoc test (P=0.05). Results: Laser activated irrigation resulted in significantly higher depth of sealer penetration compared to sonic agitation and syringe irrigation (P<0.01). The average sealer penetration depths were recorded as 846.6 μm, 786.5 μm and 505 μm in the Er,Cr:YSGG laser, EndoActivator and control groups, respectively. The mean bond strength obtained in group 3 (syringe-and-needle irrigation) was significantly less than the other groups (P<0.05). The mean values were 9.08 in the Er,Cr:YSGG laser group, 8.44 in the EndoActivator group and 5.08 in the needle group. Conclusion: Er,Cr;YSGG laser irrigation to remove the medicaments was advantageous to other irrigation techniques in sealer penetration and dislocation resistance of the sealer.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004; 30(8):559–67. [CrossRef ]
2. Barbizam JV, Trope M, Teixeira EC, Tanomaru-Filho M, Teixeira FB. Effect of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing on the bond strength of a resinbased endodontic sealer. Braz Dent J 2008; 19(3):224–7. [CrossRef ]
3. Phillips M, McClanahan S, Bowles W. A titration model for evaluating calcium hydroxide removal techniques. J Appl Oral Sci 2015; 23(1):94–100.
4. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 2009; 35(6):791–804. [CrossRef ]
5. Gomes-Filho JE, Duarte PC, de Oliveira CB, Watanabe S, Lodi CS, Cintra LT, et al. Tissue reaction to a triantibiotic paste used for endodontic tissue self-regeneration of nonvital immature permanent teeth. J Endod 2012; 38(1):91–4. [CrossRef ]
6. Kamocki K, Nör JE, Bottino MC. Dental pulp stem cell responses to novel antibiotic-containing scaffolds for regenerative endodontics. Int Endod J 2015; 48(12):1147–56. [CrossRef ]
7. Calt S, Serper A. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers after root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide. J Endod 1999; 25(6):431–3.
8. Akcay M, Arslan H, Topcuoglu HS, Tuncay O. Effect of calcium hydroxide and double and triple antibiotic pastes on the bond strength of epoxy resin-based sealer to root canal dentin. J Endod 2014; 40(10):1663–7.
9. Zhong X, Shen Y, Ma J, Chen WX, Haapasalo M. Quality of Root Filling after Obturation with Gutta-percha and 3 Different Sealers of Minimally Instrumented Root canals of the Maxillary First Molar. J Endod 2019; 45(8):1030–5. [CrossRef ]
10. Gokturk H, Ozkocak I, Buyukgebiz F, Demir O. Effectiveness of various irrigation protocols for the removal of calcium hydroxide from artificial standardized grooves. J Appl Oral Sci 2017; 25(3):290–8. [CrossRef ]
11. Devaraj S, Jagannathan N, Neelakantan P. Antibiofilm efficacy of photoactivated curcumin, triple and double antibiotic paste, 2% chlorhexidine and calcium hydroxide against Enterococcus fecalis in vitro. Sci Rep 2016; 6:24797. [CrossRef ]
12. Mohammadi Z, Jafarzadeh H, Shalavi S, Yaripour S, Sharifi F, Kinoshita JI. A Review on Triple Antibiotic Paste as a Suitable Material Used in Regenerative Endodontics. Iran Endod J 2018; 13(1):1–6.
13. Wuerch RM, Apicella MJ, Mines P, Yancich PJ, Pashley DH. Effect of 2% chlorhexidine gel as an intracanal medication on the apical seal of the root-canal system. J Endod 2004; 30(11):788–91. [CrossRef ]
14. Akman M, Akbulut MB, Aydınbelge HA, Belli S. Comparison of different irrigation activation regimens and conventional irrigation techniques for the removal of modified triple antibiotic paste from root canals. J Endod 2015; 41(5):720–4. [CrossRef ]
15. Varela P, Souza E, de Deus G, Duran-Sindreu F, Mercadé M. Effectiveness of complementary irrigation routines in debriding pulp tissue from root canals instrumented with a single reciprocating file. Int Endod J 2019; 52(4):475–83. [CrossRef ]
16. Generali L, Prati C, Pirani C, Cavani F, Gatto MR, Gandolfi MG. Double dye technique and fluid filtration test to evaluate early sealing ability of an endodontic sealer. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21(4):1267–76. [CrossRef ]
17. Cruz ATG, Grecca FS, Piasecki L, Wichnieski C, Westphalen VPD, Carneiro E, et al. Influence of the Calcium Hydroxide Intracanal Dressing on Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Two Root Canal Sealers. Eur Endod J 2017; 2(1):14–20. [CrossRef ]
18. Ozlek E, Rath PP, Kishen A, Neelakantan P. A chitosan-based irrigant improves the dislocation resistance of a mineral trioxide aggregate-resin hybrid root canal sealer. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 24(1):151–6. [CrossRef ]
19. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2006; 39(10):809–18. [CrossRef ]
20. Deniz Sungur D, Aksel H, Purali N. Effect of a Low Surface Tension Vehicle on the Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Calcium Hydroxide and Triple Antibiotic Paste. J Endod 2017; 43(3):452–5. [CrossRef ]
21. Saygili G, Saygili S, Tuglu I, Davut Capar I. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex. Iran Endod J 2017; 12(3):354–9.
22. Sen BH, Pişkin B, Baran N. The effect of tubular penetration of root canal sealers on dye microleakage. Int Endod J 1996; 29(1):23–8. [CrossRef ]
23. Silva EJ, Perez R, Valentim RM, Belladonna FG, De-Deus GA, Lima IC, et al. Dissolution, dislocation and dimensional changes of endodontic sealers after a solubility challenge: a micro-CT approach. Int Endod J 2017; 50(4):407–14. [CrossRef ]
24. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, et al. Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. Am J Dent 2000; 13(Spec No):3D–18D.
25. Uzunoglu-Özyürek E, Erdoğan Ö, Aktemur Türker S. Effect of Calcium Hydroxide Dressing on the Dentinal Tubule Penetration of 2 Different Root Canal Sealers: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopic Study. J Endod 2018; 44(6):1018–23. [CrossRef ]
26. Chaudhry S, Yadav S, Talwar S, Verma M. Effect of EndoActivator and Er,Cr:YSGG laser activation of Qmix, as final endodontic irrigant, on sealer penetration: A Confocal microscopic study. J Clin Exp Dent 2017; 9(2):e218–22. [CrossRef ]
27. Schoop U, Goharkhay K, Klimscha J, Zagler M, Wernisch J, Georgopoulos A, et al. The use of the erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser in endodontic treatment: the results of an in vitro study. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138(7):949–55. [CrossRef ]
28. Uroz-Torres D, González-Rodríguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM. Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation. J Endod 2010; 36(2):308–11. [CrossRef ]
29. Ercan E, Erdemir A, Zorba YO, Eldeniz AU, Dalli M, Ince B, et al. Effect of different cavity disinfectants on shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11(5):343–6.
30. Ok E, Altunsoy M, Nur BG, Kalkan A. Effectiveness of different irrigation solutions on triple antibiotic paste removal from simulated immature root canal. Scanning 2015; 37(6):409–13. [CrossRef ]
31. Ustun Y, Düzgün S, Aslan T, Aktı A. The efficiency of different irrigation solutions and techniques for the removal of triple antibiotic paste from simulated immature root canals. Niger J Clin Pract 2018; 21(3):287–92.
32. Aydın ZU, Özyürek T, Keskin B, Baran T. Effect of chitosan nanoparticle, QMix, and EDTA on TotalFill BC sealers' dentinal tubule penetration: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Odontology 2019; 107(1):64–71. [CrossRef ]
33. Orhan EO, Irmak Ö, Hür D, Yaman BC, Karabucak B. Does Para-chloroaniline Really Form after Mixing Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorhexidine? J Endod 2016; 42(3):455–9. [CrossRef ]
34. Bui TB, Baumgartner JC, Mitchell JC. Evaluation of the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate and its effect on root dentin. J Endod 2008; 34(2):181–5. [CrossRef ]

APA	Özlek E, Neelakantan P, Akkol E, GÜNDÜZ H, Uçar A, Belli S (2020). Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation. , 264 - 270. 10.14744/eej.2020.92905
Chicago	Özlek Esin,Neelakantan Prasanna,Akkol Elif,GÜNDÜZ Hüseyin,Uçar Arzu Yağmur,Belli Sema Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation. (2020): 264 - 270. 10.14744/eej.2020.92905
MLA	Özlek Esin,Neelakantan Prasanna,Akkol Elif,GÜNDÜZ Hüseyin,Uçar Arzu Yağmur,Belli Sema Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation. , 2020, ss.264 - 270. 10.14744/eej.2020.92905
AMA	Özlek E,Neelakantan P,Akkol E,GÜNDÜZ H,Uçar A,Belli S Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation. . 2020; 264 - 270. 10.14744/eej.2020.92905
Vancouver	Özlek E,Neelakantan P,Akkol E,GÜNDÜZ H,Uçar A,Belli S Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation. . 2020; 264 - 270. 10.14744/eej.2020.92905
IEEE	Özlek E,Neelakantan P,Akkol E,GÜNDÜZ H,Uçar A,Belli S "Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation." , ss.264 - 270, 2020. 10.14744/eej.2020.92905
ISNAD	Özlek, Esin vd. "Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation". (2020), 264-270. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2020.92905

APA	Özlek E, Neelakantan P, Akkol E, GÜNDÜZ H, Uçar A, Belli S (2020). Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation. European Endodontic Journal, 5(3), 264 - 270. 10.14744/eej.2020.92905
Chicago	Özlek Esin,Neelakantan Prasanna,Akkol Elif,GÜNDÜZ Hüseyin,Uçar Arzu Yağmur,Belli Sema Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation. European Endodontic Journal 5, no.3 (2020): 264 - 270. 10.14744/eej.2020.92905
MLA	Özlek Esin,Neelakantan Prasanna,Akkol Elif,GÜNDÜZ Hüseyin,Uçar Arzu Yağmur,Belli Sema Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation. European Endodontic Journal, vol.5, no.3, 2020, ss.264 - 270. 10.14744/eej.2020.92905
AMA	Özlek E,Neelakantan P,Akkol E,GÜNDÜZ H,Uçar A,Belli S Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation. European Endodontic Journal. 2020; 5(3): 264 - 270. 10.14744/eej.2020.92905
Vancouver	Özlek E,Neelakantan P,Akkol E,GÜNDÜZ H,Uçar A,Belli S Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation. European Endodontic Journal. 2020; 5(3): 264 - 270. 10.14744/eej.2020.92905
IEEE	Özlek E,Neelakantan P,Akkol E,GÜNDÜZ H,Uçar A,Belli S "Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation." European Endodontic Journal, 5, ss.264 - 270, 2020. 10.14744/eej.2020.92905
ISNAD	Özlek, Esin vd. "Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation". European Endodontic Journal 5/3 (2020), 264-270. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2020.92905