ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

Sibel Fettahoğlu, (Girilmemişş)
Özge Sayan (Girilmemişş)
Istanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
13 2
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 42 Sayfa Aralığı: 1122 - 1146 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.46928/iticusbe.793380 İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

Öz:
Purpose: The study aimed to determine why Turkish participants are voluntary or hesitant to use cryptocurrencies and to assess which factors affected cryptocurrencies usage. Method: Technology acceptance model (TAM) was used in the study to analyze Turkish individuals’ cryptocurrency usage behavior. Structural equation (regression) modeling (SEM) was used to test the research model. AMOS and SPSS programs were used for analysis. Findings: The study model showed that cryptocurrency usage was exposed to the most effect by perceived benefit. Contrary to expectations, perceived risk did not make any significant effect on usage behavior. A causality relation between perceived benefit and decentralization factor was found more than other benefit sub-factors. Perceived ease of use had no positive direct relation with usage behavior in the study. Perceived ease of use had a positive relation with perceived benefit in the study.
Anahtar Kelime: Cryptocurrency

BİREYLERİN KRİPTO PARA KULLANIMINA İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARI: TÜRKİYE'DEN BİR UYGULAMA

Öz:
Amaç: Çalışmada, Türk katılımcıların kripto paraları kullanmakta neden istekli olduklarını veya neden tereddüt ettiklerini belirlemek ve kripto paraların kullanımını etkileyen faktörleri değerlendirmek amaçlanmaktadır. Yöntem: Çalışmada Türk bireylerin kripto para kullanımına dair tutumlarını analiz etmek için teknoloji kabul modeli (TAM) kullanılmıştır. Araştırma modelini test etmek için yapısal denklem (regresyon) modellemesi (SEM) kullanılmıştır. Analiz için AMOS ve SPSS programlarından yararlanılmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışma modeli, kripto para kullanımının en fazla algılanan faydadan etkilendiğini göstermiştir. Beklentilerin aksine, algılanan risk kullanım davranışı üzerinde önemli bir etki yaratmamıştır. Algılanan fayda ile merkezi olmayan yapılanma faktörü arasında nedensellik ilişkisi diğer fayda alt faktörlerinden daha fazla bulunmuştur. Algılanan kullanım kolaylığının kullanım davranışı ile çalışmada olumlu doğrudan bir ilişkisi yoktur. Algılanan kullanım kolaylığının algılanan fayda ile çalışmada olumlu bir ilişkisi vardır. Özgünlük: Türkiye’de kripto para tutumuna yönelik bir araştırmaya rastlanılmamıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: bitcoin

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abramova, S., & Böhme, R. (2016). Perceived Benefit and Risk as Multidimensional Determinants of Bitcoin Use: A Quantitative Exploratory Study. Paper presented at the ICIS.
  • Ahamad, S., Nair, M., & Varghese, B. (2013). A survey on crypto currencies. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Advances in Computer Science, AETACS.
  • Akyildirim, E., Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Sensoy, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2020). The relationship between implied volatility and cryptocurrency returns. Finance Research Letters, 33, 101212. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612319303381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.06.010
  • Ammous, S. (2018). Can cryptocurrencies fulfil the functions of money? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 70, 38-51. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976917300777. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2018.05.010
  • Arias-Oliva, M., Pelegrín-Borondo, J., & Matías-Clavero, G. (2019). Variables influencing cryptocurrency use: A technology acceptance model in Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(475). Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00475. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00475
  • Authority, T. E. B. (2014, July 4). The European Banking Authority Opinion on 'Virtual Currencies'. [EBA]. from https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/documents/files/documents/10180/657547/81409b94- 4222-45d7-ba3b-7deb5863ab57/EBA-Op-2014- 08%20Opinion%20on%20Virtual%20Currencies.pdf?retry=1
  • Bank, E. C. (2019, June ). European Central Bank: Crypto-Assets – Trends and Implications. [ECB]. from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/intro/mip- online/2019/html/1906_crypto_assets.en.html
  • Binance. (n.d.). Cryptocurrency Exchange. Retrieved October 12, 2019, from https://www.binance.com/en
  • Bindseil, U. (2019). Central bank digital currency: Financial system implications and control. International Journal of Political Economy, 48(4), 303-335. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2019.1693160. doi:10.1080/08911916.2019.1693160
  • Bitfinex. (n.d.). Borsa ve Marjin Ticaret Platformu. Retrieved October 12, 2019, from https://www.bitfinex.com/
  • Bitlo. (n.d.). Kripto Para Borsası Nedir? Retrieved December 11, 2019, from https://www.bitlo.com/rehber/kripto-para-borsasi-nedir
  • Bitstamp. (n.d.). Buy and sell Bitcoin and Ethereum. Retrieved October 12, 2019, from https://www.bitstamp.net/
  • BittrexGlobal. (n.d.). The Next Generation Crypto-Currency Exchange. Retrieved October 15, 2019, from https://global.bittrex.com/
  • BitTurk. (n.d.). Türkiye'nin Bitcoin ve Kripto Para Platformu. Retrieved November 11, 2019, from https://bitturk.com/
  • Borsabit. (n.d.). Türkiye'nin Bitcoin ve Altcoin Borsası. Retrieved November 11, 2019, from https://borsabit.com/
  • BtcTurk. (n.d.). Bitcoin ve Kripto Para Alım Satım Platformu. Retrieved November 11, 2019, from https://www.btcturk.com/
  • Buchholz, K. (2019, 17 March). Chart: How Common is Crypto? Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/chart/18345/crypto-currency-adoption/
  • Bullmann, D., Klemm, J., & Pinna, A. (2019). In search for stability in crypto-assets: Are stablecoins the solution? . ECB Occasional Paper, 230. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3444847 doi:10.2866/969389
  • Cex.io. (n.d.). Bitcoin Exchange. Retrieved October 18, 2019, from https://cex.io/
  • Cheng, T. C. E., Lam, D. Y. C., & Yeung, A. C. L. (2006). Adoption of internet banking: An empirical study in Hong Kong. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1558-1572. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923606000066. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.01.002
  • Coinbase. (n.d.). Bitcoin, Ethereum ve daha fazlasını güvenle alıp satın. Retrieved October 18, 2019, from https://www.coinbase.com/
  • Coinmarketcap. (n.d.). Cryptocurrency Market Capitalizations. Retrieved December 30, 2019, from https://coinmarketcap.com/
  • Conti, M., Kumar, E. S., Lal, C., & Ruj, S. (2018). A survey on security and privacy issues of bitcoin. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(4), 3416-3452. doi:10.1109/COMST.2018.2842460
  • Corbet, S., Meegan, A., Larkin, C., Lucey, B., & Yarovaya, L. (2018). Exploring the dynamic relationships between cryptocurrencies and other financial assets. Economics Letters, 165, 28- 34. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176518300041. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.01.004
  • Office of Strategy and Budget Affairs at the Presidency Republic of Turkey. (2019). 2020 Presidency Annual Programme. [4 Kasım 2019 tarihli ve 30938 Mükerrer Sayılı Resmi Gazete’de yayımlanmıştır] Retrieved from https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp- content/uploads/2019/11/2020_Yili_Cumhurbaskanligi_Yillik_Programi.pdf
  • Çarkacioğlu, A. (2016). Kripto-Para Bitcoin (1130). Retrieved from Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu Araştırma Dairesi Araştırma Raporu. https://www.spk.gov.tr/SiteApps/Yayin/YayinGoster/1130
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. Retrieved from https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  • Dyhrberg, A. H., Foley, S., & Svec, J. (2018). How investible is Bitcoin? Analyzing the liquidity and transaction costs of Bitcoin markets. Economics Letters, 171, 140-143. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176518302921. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.07.032
  • Exmo. (n.d.). Cryptocurrency Exchange. Retrieved October 12, 2019, from https://exmo.com/en/
  • Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451-474. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581903001113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
  • Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440-452. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002224378201900406. doi:10.1177/002224378201900406
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002224378101800104. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Fortes, N., & Rita, P. (2016). Privacy concerns and online purchasing behaviour: Towards an integrated model. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 22(3), 167-176. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883416300134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.04.002
  • Frahat, R. T., Monowar, M. M., & Buhari, S. M. (2019, 1-3 May 2019). Secure and Scalable Trust Management Model for IoT P2P Network. Paper presented at the 2019 2nd International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS).
  • Gemini. (n.d.). The Regulated Cryptocurrency Exchange. Retrieved October 21, 2019, from https://gemini.com/
  • GoogleTrends. (2019, October). Bitcoin, ethereum, ripple, litecoin, bitcoin cash. from https://trends.google.com.tr/trends/explore?date=2009-01-03%202019-10- 03&geo=TR&q=Bitcoin,ethereum,ripple,litecoin,bitcoin%20cash
  • Gunawan, F. E., & Novendra, R. (2017). An analysis of bitcoin acceptance in Indonesia. ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 8(4), 241. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v8i4.3885. doi:10.21512/comtech.v8i4.3885
  • Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hassani, H., Huang, X., & Silva, E. (2018). Big-crypto: Big data, blockchain and cryptocurrency. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 2(4). doi:10.3390/bdcc2040034
  • He, D., Habermeier, K. F., Leckow, R. B., Haksar, V., Almeida, Y., Kashima, M., . . . Tiwari, S. (2016). Virtual currencies and beyond: Initial considerations. Staff Discussion Notes, 2016(003), A001. Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/006/2016/003/article-A001-en.xml. doi:10.5089/9781498363273.006.A001
  • Kahraman, D. (2019, Kasım). Kripto Varlık İşlem Platformu Düzenlemeleri, Türkiye Sermaye Birliği Piyasaları. Gösterge, pp. 45-60. Retrieved from https://www.tspb.org.tr/wp- content/uploads/2019/11/Gosterge_Guz_2019.pdf#page=49
  • Karagöz, Y. (2016). SPSS 23 ve AMOS 23 Uygulamalı İstatistiksel Analizler. Ankara: Nobel Akademik.
  • Karaslan, H. F. (2018, 2 February). Ripple (XRP) Nedir? SteemKR. from https://steemkr.com/cointurk/@halilfatih/ripple-xrp-nedir-cointurk-11-projesi
  • Kılınç, Ş. (2017, 28 December). Ethereum Nedir, Bitcoin ile Arasındaki Farklar Nelerdir? Webtekno. Retrieved from https://www.webtekno.com/ethereum-ile-bitcoin-arasindaki-farklar- h38580.html
  • Kim, C. Y., & Lee, K. (2018, 29-31 Jan. 2018). Risk Management to Cryptocurrency Exchange and Investors Guidelines to Prevent Potential Threats. Paper presented at the 2018 International Conference on Platform Technology and Service (PlatCon).
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
  • Koineks. (n.d.). Bitcoin Borsası. Retrieved November 9, 2019, from https://koineks.com/
  • Koinim. (n.d.). Türkiye'nin kriptopara platformu. Retrieved November 9, 2019, from https://koinim.com/
  • Kraken. (n.d.). Bitcoin & Cryptocurrency Exchange. Retrieved October 15, 2019, from https://www.kraken.com/en-us/
  • Krombholz, K., Judmayer, A., Gusenbauer, M., & Weippl, E. (2017). The other side of the coin: User experiences with bitcoin security and privacy, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Kuisma, T., Laukkanen, T., & Hiltunen, M. (2007). Mapping the reasons for resistance to Internet banking: A means-end approach. International Journal of Information Management, 27(2), 75- 85. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401206001149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.08.006
  • Litecoin. (n.d.). Litecoin. Retrieved December 10, 2019 from https://litecoin.com/en/
  • Localbitcoins. (n.d.). Fastest and easiest way to buy and sell bitcoins. Retrieved October 15, 2019, from https://localbitcoins.com/
  • Lynn, T., Mooney, J. G., Rosati, P., & Cummins, M. (2019). Disrupting finance : FinTech and strategy in the 21st century: Springer Nature.
  • Mendoza-Tello, J. C., Mora, H., Pujol-López, F. A., & Lytras, M. D. (2018). Social commerce as a driver to enhance trust and intention to use cryptocurrencies for electronic payments. IEEE Access, 6, 50737-50751. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2869359
  • Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Decentralized Business Review Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
  • Narman, H. S., Uulu, A. D., & Liu, J. (2018, 6-8 Dec. 2018). Profile Analysis for Cryptocurrency in Social Media. Paper presented at the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT).
  • OKCoin. (n.d.). Leading Global Digital Asset Exchange. Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://www.okcoin.com/
  • Oxford. (n.d.). Cryptocurrency. Available from Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary Retrieved 6 March, 2020 https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/79224404?redirectedFrom=cryptocurrency#eid Paribu. (n.d.). Türkiye'nin En Büyük Bitcoin Borsası. Retrieved November 13, 2019, from https://www.paribu.com/#/
  • Peters, G. W., Chapelle, A., & Panayi, E. (2016). Opening discussion on banking sector risk exposures and vulnerabilities from Virtual currencies: An Operational Risk perspective. Journal of Banking Regulation, 17(4), 239-272. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2015.10. doi:10.1057/jbr.2015.10
  • Rondan-Cataluña, F. J., Arenas-Gaitán, J., & Ramírez-Correa, P. E. (2015). A comparison of the different versions of popular technology acceptance models. Kybernetes, 44(5), 788-805. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2014-0184. doi:10.1108/K-09-2014-0184
  • Schueffel, P., Groeneweg, N., & Baldegger, R. (2019). The Crypto Encyclopedia: Coins, Tokens and Digital Assets from A to Z. In. Bern, Switzerland: Growth publisher.
  • Shahzad, F., Xiu, G., Wang, J., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). An empirical investigation on the adoption of cryptocurrencies among the people of mainland China. Technology in Society, 55, 33-40. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X18300204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.05.006
  • Sobhanifard, Y., & Sadatfarizani, S. (2019). Consumer-based modeling and ranking of the consumption factors of cryptocurrencies. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 528, 121263. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437119307290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.121263
  • Stergiou, D. (2019). EOS cryptocurrency initial coin offering: A case study. How the EOS cryptocurrency raised more than $4.4 billion in its 2017 ICO. (Master Thesis), Blekinge Institute of Technology,
  • Szmigiera, M. (2020, February). Number of Blockchain wallets 2019 Statista. from https://www.statista.com/statistics/647374/worldwide-blockchain-wallet-users/
  • Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5): Pearson Boston, MA.
  • Tschorsch, F., & Scheuermann, B. (2016). Bitcoin and beyond: A technical survey on decentralized digital currencies. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(3), 2084-2123. doi:10.1109/COMST.2016.2535718
  • Twentify. (2018, October). Türkiye'nin Sanal Cüzdanı. from https://www.twentify.com/tr/raporlar/turkiyenin-sanal-cuzdani-kripto-para-arastirmasi
  • Vebitcoin. (n.d.). Ripple-Algorand-Stellar Kripto Borsanız. Retrieved November 14, 2019, from https://www.vebitcoin.com/
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. Retrieved from https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540. doi:10.2307/30036540
  • Verkijika, S. F. (2020). An affective response model for understanding the acceptance of mobile payment systems. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 39, 100905. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422319300821. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100905
  • Walton, A., & Johnston, K. (2018). Exploring perceptions of bitcoin adoption: The South African virtual community perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge & Management, 13, 165-182. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=131448601&lang=tr&site =eds-live&scope=site&authtype=ip,uid. doi:10.28945/4080
  • Weber, B. (2014). Bitcoin – the promise and limits of private innovation in monetary and payment systems. Monetary Policy & The Economy(4), 53-66. Retrieved from https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:onb:oenbmp:y:2014:i:4:b:3.
  • Westland, J. C. (2015). An introduction to structural equation models. In structural equation models: From paths to networks (pp. 1-8). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • WorldBank. (2018). Europe and Central Asia Economic Update, May 2018: Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain. Retrieved from https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/978-1-4648-1299- 6 doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1299-6
  • Yermack, D. (2015). Is Bitcoin a Real Currency? An Economic Appraisal. In Handbook of Digital Currency: Bitcoin, Innovation, Financial Instruments, and Big Data (pp. 31-43). Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128021170000023?via%3Dihub doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-802117-0.00002-3
  • Yilmaz, V., Can, Y., & Aras, N. (2021). Kısmi en küçük kareler yapısal eşitlik modellemesiyle (PLS- YEM) nükleer ve yenilenebilir enerjiye ilişkin tutumların araştırılması. Alphanumeric Journal, 7(1), 87-102. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/alphanumeric/issue/47067/460563. doi:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/alphanumeric/460563
APA Fettahoglu S, SAYAN Ö (2021). ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. , 1122 - 1146. 10.46928/iticusbe.793380
Chicago Fettahoglu Sibel,SAYAN Özge ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. (2021): 1122 - 1146. 10.46928/iticusbe.793380
MLA Fettahoglu Sibel,SAYAN Özge ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. , 2021, ss.1122 - 1146. 10.46928/iticusbe.793380
AMA Fettahoglu S,SAYAN Ö ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. . 2021; 1122 - 1146. 10.46928/iticusbe.793380
Vancouver Fettahoglu S,SAYAN Ö ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. . 2021; 1122 - 1146. 10.46928/iticusbe.793380
IEEE Fettahoglu S,SAYAN Ö "ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY." , ss.1122 - 1146, 2021. 10.46928/iticusbe.793380
ISNAD Fettahoglu, Sibel - SAYAN, Özge. "ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY". (2021), 1122-1146. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.793380
APA Fettahoglu S, SAYAN Ö (2021). ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Istanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(42), 1122 - 1146. 10.46928/iticusbe.793380
Chicago Fettahoglu Sibel,SAYAN Özge ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Istanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 20, no.42 (2021): 1122 - 1146. 10.46928/iticusbe.793380
MLA Fettahoglu Sibel,SAYAN Özge ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Istanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.20, no.42, 2021, ss.1122 - 1146. 10.46928/iticusbe.793380
AMA Fettahoglu S,SAYAN Ö ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Istanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2021; 20(42): 1122 - 1146. 10.46928/iticusbe.793380
Vancouver Fettahoglu S,SAYAN Ö ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Istanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2021; 20(42): 1122 - 1146. 10.46928/iticusbe.793380
IEEE Fettahoglu S,SAYAN Ö "ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY." Istanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, ss.1122 - 1146, 2021. 10.46928/iticusbe.793380
ISNAD Fettahoglu, Sibel - SAYAN, Özge. "ATTITUDES OF INDIVIDUALS ABOUT USING CRYPTOCURRENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY". Istanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 20/42 (2021), 1122-1146. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.793380
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 21:56

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları