Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü

karsavuranoğlu, emre; Bahan, Onur; SARIBAY, MUSTAFA KEMAL; gozer, ahmet

doi:10.46810/tdfd.894003

Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü

Ahmet GÖZER, (Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü, Veterinerlik Doğum ve Jinekolojisi Anabilim Dalı, Hatay, Türkiye)

Onur BAHAN, (Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü, Veterinerlik Doğum ve Jinekolojisi Anabilim Dalı, Yozgat, Türkiye)

Mustafa Kemal SARIBAY, (Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü, Veterinerlik Doğum ve Jinekolojisi Anabilim Dalı, Hatay, Türkiye)

Emre KARSAVURANOĞLU (Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü, Veterinerlik Doğum ve Jinekolojisi Anabilim Dalı, Hatay, Türkiye)

Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi

5 3

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 317 - 324 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.46810/tdfd.894003 İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü

Öz:

Ağız sütü, doğumu izleyen ilk hafta içerisinde meme bezinden salgılanan buzağılar için yararlı birçok bileşene sahip ilk süttür. Ağız sütü, patojenlere karşı koruyucu özelliğe sahiptir ve buzağıların hayatta kalması ve uygun şekilde gelişimini sağlamaktadır. Ruminantların plasenta yapısı nedeniyle buzağılar gamaglobülinsiz olarak doğarlar. Bu nedenle buzağılar doğumdan sonra uygun zamanda, yeterli ve kaliteli ağız sütü almalıdır. Ağız sütünün kalitesini etkileyen birçok faktör vardır. Bunlar: ırk, süt verimi, doğum sayısı, doğum mevsimi, kuru dönem uzunluğu, prepartum dönemde memeden süt sızması, beslenme, hastalıklar, doğum ile ağız sütünün verilme zamanı arasında geçen süre ve ananın aşılanma durumudur. Bu faktörleri bilmek ağız sütünün en iyi şekilde yönetimi için önemlidir. Bu derlemede, ağız sütünün önemi, ağız sütünün kalitesini etkileyen faktörler ve kalitesinin ölçümü ve pasif transferin etkinliği hakkında güncel bilgiler ele alınacaktır.

Anahtar Kelime: yönetim buzağı ağız sütü kalite

Factors Affecting Colostrum Quality in Dairy Cows, Measurement of Colostrum Quality and Efficiency of Passive Transfer

Öz:

Colostrum is the first milk secreted by mammary gland following birth and it is secreted within the first week after calving. It has many benefical components for neonates. Colostrum has protective features against pathogens and affects viability and growth of the calves. Due to the placental structure of ruminants, calves born agammaglobulinemic. So, the calves have to intake adequate and high quality colostrum into the proper time after parturition. Numerous factors affect the quality of colostrum such as breed, milk yield, number of births, calving season, the length of the dry period, leakage of milk from the udder in the prepartum period, nutrition, diseases, the period between birth and colostrum feeding,and vaccination status of the dam. These factors should be considered to maximize the efficiency. In this review, knowledge about the on importance of colostrum, factors affecting colostrums quality, measurement of colostrums quality and the efficiency of passive transfer was reviewed.

Anahtar Kelime: management

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

[1] Örsan G. Neonatal buzağılar ve kolostrum. Kafkas Üniv Vet Fak. 2006;12(1):103-108.
[2] Koyuncu M, Karaca M. Buzağılarda Yaşama Gücünün Anahtarı; Kolostrum. Hay Üret. 2018;59(1):67-78.
[3] MacFarlane JA, Grove-White DH, Royal MD, Smith RF. Identification and quantification of factors affecting neonatal immunological transfer in dairy calves in the UK. Vet Rec. 2015;176(24):625-625.
[4] Thornhill JB, Krebs GL, Petzel CE. Evaluation of the Brix refractometer as an on‐farm tool for the detection of passive transfer of immunity in dairy calves. Aust Vet J. 2015;93(1-2):26-30.
[5] Hedegaard CJ, Heegaard PM. Passive immunisation, an old idea revisited: Basic principles and application to modern animal production systems. Veterinary immunol immunopathol. 2016;174:50-63.
[6] Waltner-Toews DMSWMAH, Martin SW, Meek AH. Dairy calf management, morbidity and mortality in Ontario Holstein herds. III. Association of management with morbidity. Prev Vet Med. 1986;4(2):137-158.
[7] Bolacalı M, Küçük M. Buzağı kayıplarında işletme hatalarının rolü. Buzağı Hastalıkları Sempozyumu Kitabı. Van: 2017. p. 18-21.
[8] Godden S. Colostrum management for dairy calves. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim. 2008;24(1):19-39.
[9] McGuirk SM, Collins M. Managing the production, storage and delivery of colostrum. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim. 2004;20(3):593-603.
[10] Breen J, Down P, Kerby M, Bradley A. Restoring the dairy herd: Rearing youngstock and replacing cows. In: Martin Green, Martin J. Green editors. Dairy herd health. 1st ed. London: CPI Group; 2012. p. 35-72.
[11] Besser TE, Gay CC. The importance of colostrum to the health of the neonatal calf. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim. 1994;10(1):107- 117.
[12] Foley JA, Otterby DE. Availability, storage, treatment, composition and feeding value of surplus colostrum: a review. J Dairy Sci. 1978;61(8):1033–60.
[13] Hammon HM, Zanker IA, Blum JW. Delayed colostrum feeding affects IGF-1 and insulin plasma concentrations in neonatal calves. J Dairy Sci. 2000;83(1):85–92.
[14] Jankowska M, Baliński J. Changes in active acidity and specific weight of colostrum depending on the selected factors. Rocz Nauk PTZ. 2009;5(2):75-81.
[15] Gökçe E, Erdoğan HM. Neonatal buzağılarda kolostral immünoglobulinlerin pasif transferi. Türkiye Klinikleri J Vet Sci. 2013;4(1):18-46.
[16] Korhonen H, Marnila P, Gill HS. Milk immunoglobulins and complement factors. Br J Nutr. 2000;84(S1): 75-80.
[17] Larson BL, HL Heary Jr, JE Devery. Immunoglobulin production and transport by the mammary gland. J Dairy Sci. 1980;63(4):665–671.
[18] Roy JHB. Factors affecting susceptibility of calves to disease. J Dairy Sci. 1980;63(4):650- 664.
[19] Ağaoğlu ÖK, Ağaoğlu AR. Süt sığırı yetiştiriciliğinde doğum localarının önemi. Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2012;9(1):43-50.
[20] Jaster EH. Evaluation of quality, quantity, and timing of colostrum feeding on immunoglobulin G1 absorption in Jersey calves. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88(1):296-302.
[21] Puppel K, Gołębiewski M, Grodkowski G, Slósarz J, Kunowska-Slósarz M, Solarczy P, et al. Composition and factors affecting quality of bovine colostrum: a review. Animals. 2019;9(12):1070.
[22] Odde KC. Survival of the neonatal calf. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim. 1988;4(3):501-508.
[23] Quigley Iii, JD, JJ Drewry. Nutrient and immunity transfer from cow to calf pre-and postcalving. J Dairy Sci. 1998;81(10):2779- 2790.
[24] Cortese VS. Neonatal immunology. Vet Clin N Am Food A. 2009;25(1):221-227.
[25] Lorenz I, Mee JF, Earley B, More SJ. Calf health from birth to weaning. I. General aspects of disease prevention. Ir Vet J. 2011;64(1):1-8.
[26] Topal O. Buzağılarda neonatal dönem sağlığını değerlendirmede ilk onbeş günde önemli olan klinik bulguların belirlenmesi Doktora tezi. Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2018.
[27] Arancı A. İneklerde prepartium dönemde verilen levamizolün buzağılardaki neonatal cerrahi hastalıkların önlenmesindeki etkinliğinin araştırılması Doktora tezi. Kars: Kafkas Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2006.
[28] Smith GW, Foster DM. Absorption of protein and immunoglobulin G in calves fed a colostrum replacer. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(6):2905-2908.
[29] Erdem H, Atasever S. Yeni doğan buzağılarda ağız sütünün önemi. Anadolu Tarım Bilim Derg. 2005;20(2):79-84.
[30] Bartens MC, Drillich M, Rychli K. Assessment of different methods to estimate bovine colostrum quality on farm. New Zeal Vet J. 2016;64(5):263-267.
[31] Guy MA, McFadden TB, Cockrell DC, Besser TE. Regulation of colostrum formation in beef and dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 1994;77(10):3002- 3007.
[32] Muller LD, Ellinger DK. Colostral immunoglobulin concentrations among breeds of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 1981;64(8):1727- 1730.
[33] Godden SM, Lombard JE, Woolums AR. Colostrum management for dairy calves. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim. 2019;35(3):535- 556.
[34] Conneely M, Berry DP, Sayers R, Murphy JP, Lorenz I, Doherty ML, et al. Factors associated with the concentration of immunoglobulin G in the colostrum of dairy cows. Animal. 2013;7(11):1824-1832.
[35] Shivley CB, Lombard J, Urie NJ, Haines DM, Sargent R, Kopral CA, et al. Preweaned heifer management on US dairy operations: Part II. Factors associated with colostrum quality and passive transfer status of dairy heifer calves. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(10):9185-9198.
[36] Nardone A, Lacetera N, Bernabucci U, Ronchi B. Composition of colostrum from dairy heifers exposed to high air temperatures during late pregnancy and the early postpartum period. J Dairy Sci. 1997;80(5):838-844.
[37] Gavin K, Neibergs H, Hoffman A, Kiser JN, Cornmesser MA, Haredasht SA, et al. Low colostrum yield in Jersey cattle and potential risk factors. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(7):6388- 6398.
[38] Pritchett LC, Gay CC, Besser TE, Hancock DD. Management and production factors influencing immunoglobulin G1 concentration in colostrum from Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74(7):2336-2341.
[39] Rastani RR, Grummer RR, Bertics SJ, Gümen A, Wiltbank MC, Mashek DG, et al. Reducing dry period length to simplify feeding transition cows: milk production, energy balance, and metabolic profiles. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88(3):1004-1014.
[40] Grusenmeyer DJ, Ryan CM, Galton DM, Overton TR. Shortening the dry period from 60 to 40 days does not affect colostrum quality but decreases colostrum yield by Holstein cows. Sci J Anim Sci. 2006;84:336-336.
[41] Verweij JJ, Koets AP, Eisenberg SWF. Effect of continuous milking on immunoglobulin concentrations in bovine colostrum. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2014;160(3-4):225- 229.
[42] Petrie L. Maximising the absorption of colostral immunoglobulins in the newborn dairy calf. Vet Rec. 1984;114(7):157-163.
[43] Phipps AJ, Beggs DS, Murray AJ, Mansell PD, Pyman MF. Factors associated with colostrum immunoglobulin G concentration in northern‐ Victorian dairy cows. Aust Vet J. 2017;95(7):237-243.
[44] Hough RL, McCarthy FD, Kent HD, Eversole DE, Wahlberg ML. Influence of nutritional restriction during late gestation on production measures and passive immunity in beef cattle. Sci J Anim Sci. 1990;68(9):2622-2627.
[45] Nowak W, Mikuła R, Zachwieja A, Paczyńska K, Pecka E, Drzazga K, et al. The impact of cow nutrition in the dry period on colostrum quality and immune status of calves. Pol J Vet Sci. 2012;15(1):77-82.
[46] Toghyani E, Moharrery A. Effect of various levels of dietary protein in transition period on colostrum quality and serum immunoglobulin concentration in Holstein cows and their newborn calves. Ann Anim Sci. 2015;15(2):493-504.
[47] Jolazadeh AR, Mohammadabadi T, DehghanBanadaky M, Chaji M, Garcia M. Effect of supplementing calcium salts of n-3 and n-6 fatty acid to pregnant nonlactating cows on colostrum composition, milk yield, and reproductive performance of dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci and Technol. 2019;247:127-140.
[48] Kamada H, Nonaka I, Ueda Y, Murai M. Selenium addition to colostrum increases immunoglobulin G absorption by newborn calves. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(12):5665-5670.
[49] Hall JA, Bobe G, Vorachek WR, Estill CT, Mosher WD, Pirelli GJ, et al. Effect of supranutritional maternal and colostral selenium supplementation on passive absorption of immunoglobulin G in selenium-replete dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(7):4379-4391.
[50] Maunsell FP, Morin DE, Constable PD, Hurley WL, McCoy GC, Kakoma I, et al. Effects of mastitis on the volume and composition of colostrum produced by Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 1998;81(5):1291-1299.
[51] Yıldırım K, Koçak S. Afyonkarahisar Damızlık Süt Sığırı İşletmelerinde Buzağı Bakımı ve Yaşama Gücünün Değerlendirilmesi. Kocatepe Vet Der. 2019;12(3):1-1.
[52] Moore M, Tyler JW, Chigerwe M, Dawes ME, Middleton JR. Effect of delayed colostrum collection on colostral IgG concentration in dairy cows. J Am Vet Med. 2005;226(8):1375- 1377.
[53] LE Neindre P, Menard MF, Garel JP. Suckling and drinking behaviour of newborn calves of beef or dairy cows. Ann Rech Vét. 1979;10(2- 3):211-212.
[54] Baumrucker CR, Stark A, Wellnitz O, Dechow C, Bruckmaier RM. Immunoglobulin variation in quarter-milked colostrum. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(6):3700-3706.
[55] Ferdowsi Nia E, Nikkhah A, Rahmani HR, Alikhani M, Mohammad Alipour M, Ghorbani GR. Increased colostral somatic cell counts reduce preweaning calf immunity, health and growth. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2010;94(5):628-634.
[56] Puppel K, Gołębiewski M, Grodkowski G, Solarczyk P, Kostusiak P, Klopčič M, et al. Use of somatic cell count as an indicator of colostrum quality. PloS One. 2020;15(8):e0237615.
[57] Donovan GA, Dohoo IR, Montgomery DM, Bennett FL. Associations between passive immunity and morbidity and mortality in dairy heifers in Florida, USA. Prev Vet Med. 1998;34(1):31–46,
[58] Hudgens KA, Tyler JW, Besser TE, Krytenberg DS. Optimizing performance of a qualitative zinc sulfate turbidity test for passive transfer of immunoglobulin G in calves. Am J Vet Res. 1996;57(12):1711-1713.
[59] Etzel LR, Strohbehn RE, McVicker JK. Development of an automated turbidimetric immunoassay for quantification of bovine serum immunoglobulin G. Am J Vet Res. 1997;58:1201-1205.
[60] Lee SH, Jaekal J, Bae CS, Chung BH, Yun SC, Gwak MJ, et al. Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay, single radial immunodiffusion, and indirect methods for the detection of failure of transfer of passive immunity in dairy calves. J Vet Intern Med. 2008;22(1):212-218.
[61] Pfeiffer NE, McGuire TC. A sodium sulfiteprecipitation tests for assessment of colostral immunoglobulin transfer to calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1977;170(8):809–811.
[62] Perino L, Sutherland R, Woollen N. Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase activity and protein concentration at birth and after suckling in calves with adequate and inadequate passive transfer of immunoglobulin G. Am J Vet Res. 1993;54(1):56–9.
[63] Tennant B, Baldwin BH, Braun RK, Norcross NL, Sandholm M. Use of the glutaraldehyde coagulation test for detection of hypogammaglobulinemia in neonatal calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1979;174:848–853.
[64] Calloway CD, Tyler JW, Tessman RK, Hostetler Douglas, Holle J. Comparison of refractometers and test endpoints in the measurement of serum protein concentration to assess passive transfer status in calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;221(11):1605–1608.
[65] Gelsinger SL, Jones CM, Heinrichs AJ. Effect of colostrum heat treatment and bacterial population on immunoglobulin G absorption and health of neonatal calves. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98(7):4640-4645.
[63] Hulsen J, Swormink BK. Checkbook Young Stock. 1st ed. Roodbont; 2016.
[67] Colostrometer Operating Instruction [Internet]. Available from: http://www.colostrometer.com
[68] Devery JE, Davis CL, Larson BL. Endogenous production of IgG in newborn calves. J Dairy Sci. 1979;62(11):1814–1818.
[69] Osburn BI, MacLachlan NJ, Terrell TG. Ontogeny of the immune system. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1982;18:1049–1052.
[70] Faber SN, Faber NE, McCauley TC, Ax RL. Case study: effects of colostrum ingestion on lactational performance 1. Prof Anim. 2005;21(5):420-425.
[71] Robison JD, Stott GH, DeNise SK. Effects of passive immunity on growth and survival in the dairy heifer. J Dairy Sci. 1988;71(5):1283-1287.
[72] Hernandez D, Nydam DV, Godden SM, Bristol LS, Kryzer A, Ranum J, et al. Brix refractometry in serum as a measure of failure of passive transfer compared to measured immunoglobulin G and total protein by refractometry in serum from dairy calves. Vet J. 2016;211:82-87.
[73] Smith BP. Large animal internal medicine. 5th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2014.
[74] Ott Stephen L. Dairy heifer morbidity, mortality, and health management focusing on preweaned heifers. National Dairy Heifer Evaluation Project, 1993. Iowa: No. 1498-2016- 130682

APA	gozer a, Bahan O, SARIBAY M, karsavuranoğlu e (2021). Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü. , 317 - 324. 10.46810/tdfd.894003
Chicago	gozer ahmet,Bahan Onur,SARIBAY MUSTAFA KEMAL,karsavuranoğlu emre Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü. (2021): 317 - 324. 10.46810/tdfd.894003
MLA	gozer ahmet,Bahan Onur,SARIBAY MUSTAFA KEMAL,karsavuranoğlu emre Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü. , 2021, ss.317 - 324. 10.46810/tdfd.894003
AMA	gozer a,Bahan O,SARIBAY M,karsavuranoğlu e Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü. . 2021; 317 - 324. 10.46810/tdfd.894003
Vancouver	gozer a,Bahan O,SARIBAY M,karsavuranoğlu e Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü. . 2021; 317 - 324. 10.46810/tdfd.894003
IEEE	gozer a,Bahan O,SARIBAY M,karsavuranoğlu e "Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü." , ss.317 - 324, 2021. 10.46810/tdfd.894003
ISNAD	gozer, ahmet vd. "Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü". (2021), 317-324. https://doi.org/10.46810/tdfd.894003

APA	gozer a, Bahan O, SARIBAY M, karsavuranoğlu e (2021). Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, 10(2), 317 - 324. 10.46810/tdfd.894003
Chicago	gozer ahmet,Bahan Onur,SARIBAY MUSTAFA KEMAL,karsavuranoğlu emre Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi 10, no.2 (2021): 317 - 324. 10.46810/tdfd.894003
MLA	gozer ahmet,Bahan Onur,SARIBAY MUSTAFA KEMAL,karsavuranoğlu emre Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, vol.10, no.2, 2021, ss.317 - 324. 10.46810/tdfd.894003
AMA	gozer a,Bahan O,SARIBAY M,karsavuranoğlu e Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi. 2021; 10(2): 317 - 324. 10.46810/tdfd.894003
Vancouver	gozer a,Bahan O,SARIBAY M,karsavuranoğlu e Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi. 2021; 10(2): 317 - 324. 10.46810/tdfd.894003
IEEE	gozer a,Bahan O,SARIBAY M,karsavuranoğlu e "Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü." Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, 10, ss.317 - 324, 2021. 10.46810/tdfd.894003
ISNAD	gozer, ahmet vd. "Süt İneklerinde Ağız Sütü Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler, Ağız Sütü Kalitesinin ve Pasif Transferin Etkinliğinin Ölçümü". Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi 10/2 (2021), 317-324. https://doi.org/10.46810/tdfd.894003