Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 273 - 281 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470
Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research
Öz: Objective: In this study, the number of bacteriae in theair at five different regions in Eskişehir (Turkey) according to thesettle plate method and some meteorological factors such as tempera ture and relative humidity were collected and analyzed statistically.The data were used to predict the amount of bacteriae using machinelearning algorithms. Material and Methods: Air samples were takenfrom specified sampling points using the settle plate method. Therandom forest method, multivariate adaptive regression splines, sup port vector machine and ordinary least squares models were em ployed to analyze a qualified data set collected through 5 differentmonitoring locations in Eskişehir city, Turkey. All analyses wereconducted using RStudio Software (version 1.2.1335). Results: Theresults revealed that all variables including weather characteristicsand particulate matters were found statistically significant on theamount of the bacteria. Among modeling methods, the random forestmodel overperformed the others in terms of root mean square. Con clusion: Results might be useful for researchers studying bacterialdensity. These findings may provide policy-makers with crucial in formation for a better climate and health policy development, whichhelps address the conflict between development and air pollution,may be applicable in Turkey and other countries as well.
Anahtar Kelime: Hava Değişkenleri ve Partikül Maddenin Bakteri Yoğunluğu ÜzerindekiEtkilerinin İstatistiksel Karşılaştırılması: Metodolojik Araştırma
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Eskişehir (Türkiye) ilinde 5 farklıbölgede petri kapları kullanılarak; bakteri miktarları, sıcaklık, nemvb. bazı meteorolojik değerler elde edilmiş ve istatistiksel olarakanaliz edilmiştir. Elde edilen verilerdeki bakteri miktarı, makineöğrenimi algoritmalarından bazıları kullanılarak tahmin edilmiştir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Petri kabı yöntemi kullanılarak belirlenenörnekleme noktalarından hava örnekleri alınmıştır. Rastgele ormanalgoritması, çoklu adaptif regresyon eğrileri, destek vektör makine si ve sıradan en küçük kareler yöntemleri, Eskişehir’deki 5 farklıbölgeden toplanan verileri analiz etmek için kullanılmıştır. Bütünanaliz ve hesaplamalarda RStudio kullanılmıştır (versiyon1.2.1335). Bulgular: Sonuçlar incelendiğinde, bütün değişkenlerin;çevre faktörlerin ve kirleticilerin, bakteri yoğunluğu üzerindekietkisi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur. Yöntemler arasında,hata kareler ortalamasının karekökü kullanılarak seçim yapıldığındarastgele orman algoritması en iyi sonucu vermiştir. Sonuç: Bu so nuçlar bakteri miktarı çalışan araştırmacılar için ileride yararlı ola bilir. Bulgular, politika yapıcılara daha iyi iklimlendirme ve sağlıkpolitikası geliştirme için önemli bilgiler sağlayabilir; kalkınma ilehava kirliliği arasındaki çatışmayı çözmeye yardımcı olabilir, ben zer koşullar görülen diğer şehir ve ülkelerde de uygulanabilir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Wu X, Lu Y, Zhou S, Chen L, Xu B. Impact of climate change on human infectious diseases: empirical evidence and human adaptation. Environment International. 2016;86:14-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 2. Kan Kılınç B. The effects o industry increase and urbanization on air pollutants in Turkey: a nonlinear air quality model. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2019;17(4):9889-903. [Crossref]
- 3. Bertolini V, Gandolfi I, Ambrosini R, Bestetti G, Innocente E, Rampazzo G, et al. Temporal variability and effect of environmental variables on airborne bacterial communities in an urban area of Northern Italy. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(14):6561-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 4. Georgakopoulos DG, Despres V, Frohlich-Nowoisky J, Psenner R, Ariya PA, Posfai M, et al. Microbiology and atmospheric processes: biological, physical and chemical characterization of aerosol particles. Biogeosciences. 2009;6(4):721-37. [Crossref]
- 5. Mandal J, Brandl H. Bioaerosols in indoor environment-a review with special reference to residential and occupational locations. Open Environ Biol Monit J. 2011;4:83-96. [Crossref]
- 6. Van Leuken JPG, Swart AN, Havelaar AH, Van Pul A, Van der Hoek W, Heederik D. Atmospheric dispersion modelling of bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock-A review to inform risk assessment studies. Microb Risk Anal. 2016;1:19-39. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- 7. Jones AM, Harrison RM. The effects of meteorological factors on atmospheric bioaerosol concentrations--a review. Sci Total Environ. 2004;326(1- 3):151-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 8. Kim KH, Kabir E, Jahan SA. Airborne bioaerosols and their impact on human health. J Environ Sci (China). 2018;67:23-35. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- 9. Brunekreef B, Holgate ST. Air pollution and health. Lancet. 2002;360(9341):1233-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 10. Burge HA, Rogers CA. Outdoor allergens. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):653-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- 11. Haas D, Galler H, Luxner J, Zarfel G, Buzina W, Friedl H, et al. The concentrations of culturable microorganisms in relation to particulate matter in urban air. Atmos Environ. 2013;65:215-22. [Crossref]
- 12. Menteşe S, Rad YA, Arısoy M, Güllü G. Ankara şehir atmosferinde biyoaerosol seviyelerinin mekansal değişimi [Spatial variation of bioaeorol levels in the urban atmosphere of Ankara]. Ekoloji. 2009;19:21-8. [Crossref]
- 13. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH. The Elements of Statistical Learning. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2008. [Crossref]
- 14. Friedman JH. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Annals of Statistics. 1991;19(1):1-67. [Crossref]
- 15. Craven P, Wahba G. Smoothing noisy data with spline functions. Numer Math. 1978;31:377-403. [Crossref]
- 16. James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R. New York: Springer, Ch.10 Boosting and Additive Trees; 2018. p.337-72.
- 17. Epstein PR. Climate and health. Science. 1999;285(5426):347-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 18. Rodó X, Pascual M, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Gershunov A, Stone DA, Giorgi F, et al. Climate change and infectious diseases: can we meet the needs for better prediction? Clim Chang. 2013;118:625-40. [Crossref]
- 19. Ostfeld RS, Brunner JL. Climate change and Ixodes tick-borne diseases of humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370(1665):20140051. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- 20. Schwab F, Gastmeier P, Meyer E. The warmer the weather, the more gram-negative bacteria - impact of temperature on clinical isolates in intensive care units. PLoS One. 20145;9(3):e91105. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- 21. Manisalidis I, Stavropoulou E, Stavropoulos A, Bezirtzoglou E. Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: a review. Front Public Health. 2020;8:14. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- 22. Alghamdi MA, Shamy M, Redal MA, Khoder M, Awad AH, Elserougy S. Microorganisms associated particulate matter: a preliminary study. Sci Total Environ. 2014;479-80:109-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 23. Wu DM, Zhang Y, Qin WW, Tian Y, Li AG, Hou LA, et al. Assessment of seasonal variations in concentration, particle-size distribution, and taxonomic composition of airborne fungi in a courtyard space. Atmospheric Pollution Research. 2021;12(2):113-21. [Crossref]
| APA | KILINÇ B, ERGİN B, CANKILIÇ M (2021). Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research. , 273 - 281. 10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
| Chicago | KILINÇ Betül KAN,ERGİN Büşra,CANKILIÇ Meral YILMAZ Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research. (2021): 273 - 281. 10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
| MLA | KILINÇ Betül KAN,ERGİN Büşra,CANKILIÇ Meral YILMAZ Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research. , 2021, ss.273 - 281. 10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
| AMA | KILINÇ B,ERGİN B,CANKILIÇ M Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research. . 2021; 273 - 281. 10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
| Vancouver | KILINÇ B,ERGİN B,CANKILIÇ M Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research. . 2021; 273 - 281. 10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
| IEEE | KILINÇ B,ERGİN B,CANKILIÇ M "Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research." , ss.273 - 281, 2021. 10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
| ISNAD | KILINÇ, Betül KAN vd. "Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research". (2021), 273-281. https://doi.org/10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
| APA | KILINÇ B, ERGİN B, CANKILIÇ M (2021). Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research. Türkiye Klinikleri Biyoistatistik Dergisi, 13(3), 273 - 281. 10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
| Chicago | KILINÇ Betül KAN,ERGİN Büşra,CANKILIÇ Meral YILMAZ Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research. Türkiye Klinikleri Biyoistatistik Dergisi 13, no.3 (2021): 273 - 281. 10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
| MLA | KILINÇ Betül KAN,ERGİN Büşra,CANKILIÇ Meral YILMAZ Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research. Türkiye Klinikleri Biyoistatistik Dergisi, vol.13, no.3, 2021, ss.273 - 281. 10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
| AMA | KILINÇ B,ERGİN B,CANKILIÇ M Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research. Türkiye Klinikleri Biyoistatistik Dergisi. 2021; 13(3): 273 - 281. 10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
| Vancouver | KILINÇ B,ERGİN B,CANKILIÇ M Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research. Türkiye Klinikleri Biyoistatistik Dergisi. 2021; 13(3): 273 - 281. 10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
| IEEE | KILINÇ B,ERGİN B,CANKILIÇ M "Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research." Türkiye Klinikleri Biyoistatistik Dergisi, 13, ss.273 - 281, 2021. 10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
| ISNAD | KILINÇ, Betül KAN vd. "Statistical Comparison of the Impacts of Weather Variablesand Particulate Matter on Bacterial Density:Methodological Research". Türkiye Klinikleri Biyoistatistik Dergisi 13/3 (2021), 273-281. https://doi.org/10.5336/biostatic.2021-85470 |
