Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge

SUNGUR, Semra; TEKKAYA, Ceren; Kilic, Kerem; ÇAKIROĞLU, Jale

Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge

Kerem KILIÇ, (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Semra SUNGUR, (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Jale ÇAKIROĞLU, (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Ceren TEKKAYA (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

0 0

Yıl: 2005 Cilt: 2005 Sayı: 28 Sayfa Aralığı: 127 - 133 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge

Öz:

Bu çalısmanın amacı lise 1 ögrencilerinin bilimsel bilginin dogasını nasıl algıladıklarını ve bu bilginin cinsiyete ve okul türüne baglı olarak degisip degismedigini saptamaktır. Arastırmaya dört farklı okul türünden (devlet lisesi, anadolu lisesi, meslek lisesi ve süper lise) 575 ögrenci katılmıstır. Veriler “Bilimsel Bilginin Dogası Ölçegi” kullanılarak toplanmıs ve çoklu varyans analizi kullanılarak analiz edilmistir. Sonuçlar lise 1 ögrencilerinin bilimsel bilginin dogasını algılamasının cinsiyete ve okul türüne baglı olarak degistigini göstermistir. Ayrıca katılımcıların büyük bir kısmının bilimsel bilginin dogası hakkında yeterli bilgiye sahip olmadıgı saptanmıstır.

Anahtar Kelime: primary education scientific knowledge understanding level

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (7), 665-701.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Science Education, 88, 785-810.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 673-699.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
Ainkenhead, G. & Ryan, A.G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: Views on Science-Technology-Society(VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477-491.
Akerson, V., A.B.D.-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000) Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295-317.
Clough, M. P. (1997). Strategies and activities for initiating and maintaining pressure on students’ naive views concerning the nature of science, Interchange, 28, 191-204.
Haidar, A. H. & Balfakih, N. M. (1999) United Arab Emirates science students’ views about the epistemology of science.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national association for research in science teaching, Boston, MA.
Kang, S., Scharmann, L.C. & Noh, T. (2005) Examining students’ views on the nature of science: results from Korean 6th,8th, and 10th graders. Science Education, 89, 314-334.
Khishfe, R. & A.B.D.-El-Khalick, F. (2002) Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on 6th-graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551-578.
Lederman N.G., A.B.D.-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L. & Schwarts R.S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521.
Lederman, N.G (1992). Students and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
McComas, W. (1996). Ten myths of science: Reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 91, 10-16.
Morrison, J.A &Lederman, N.G. (2003). Science teachers’ diagnosis and understanding of students’ preconceptions. Science Education, 87, 849-867.
Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Robb, J. (2001) Examining student misconceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 771-790.
Rubba, P.A., & Andersen, H. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62(4), 449-458.
Rubba, P.A., Horner, J. & Smith, J.M. (1981). A study of two misconceptions about the nature of science among junior high school students. School Science and Mathematics, 81, 221-226.
Schwarts R.S., Lederman N.G., & Crowford, B.A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: an explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610-645.
Tao, P. (2003). Eliciting and developing junior secondary students’ understanding of the nature of science through a peer collaboration instruction in science stories. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 147-171.

APA	Kilic K, SUNGUR S, ÇAKIROĞLU J, TEKKAYA C (2005). Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. , 127 - 133.
Chicago	Kilic Kerem,SUNGUR Semra,ÇAKIROĞLU Jale,TEKKAYA Ceren Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. (2005): 127 - 133.
MLA	Kilic Kerem,SUNGUR Semra,ÇAKIROĞLU Jale,TEKKAYA Ceren Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. , 2005, ss.127 - 133.
AMA	Kilic K,SUNGUR S,ÇAKIROĞLU J,TEKKAYA C Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. . 2005; 127 - 133.
Vancouver	Kilic K,SUNGUR S,ÇAKIROĞLU J,TEKKAYA C Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. . 2005; 127 - 133.
IEEE	Kilic K,SUNGUR S,ÇAKIROĞLU J,TEKKAYA C "Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge." , ss.127 - 133, 2005.
ISNAD	Kilic, Kerem vd. "Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge". (2005), 127-133.

APA	Kilic K, SUNGUR S, ÇAKIROĞLU J, TEKKAYA C (2005). Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2005(28), 127 - 133.
Chicago	Kilic Kerem,SUNGUR Semra,ÇAKIROĞLU Jale,TEKKAYA Ceren Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2005, no.28 (2005): 127 - 133.
MLA	Kilic Kerem,SUNGUR Semra,ÇAKIROĞLU Jale,TEKKAYA Ceren Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.2005, no.28, 2005, ss.127 - 133.
AMA	Kilic K,SUNGUR S,ÇAKIROĞLU J,TEKKAYA C Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2005; 2005(28): 127 - 133.
Vancouver	Kilic K,SUNGUR S,ÇAKIROĞLU J,TEKKAYA C Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2005; 2005(28): 127 - 133.
IEEE	Kilic K,SUNGUR S,ÇAKIROĞLU J,TEKKAYA C "Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge." Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2005, ss.127 - 133, 2005.
ISNAD	Kilic, Kerem vd. "Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge". Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2005/28 (2005), 127-133.