Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1412 - 1416 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199 İndeks Tarihi: 16-05-2022

Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible

Öz:
Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) are among the most common problems in the jaw, face, and ear zones. There are multiple factors in the etiology of TMD. It is considered that its morphology may play a role in the etiology of the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorder with condyle length, ramus length, condyle width, corpus length, gonial angle, and ramus/corpus ratio.The study was conducted on a total of 100 patients, 50 were symptomatic and 50 were asymptomatic, aged between 16 and 66 years. Symptomatic patients were selected among the patients who presented to our clinic for at least one of the complaints of crepitation, clicking, and pain in the temporomandibular zone on both sides (bilateral). The control group was selected among asymptomatic patients who did not have any complaints in the temporomandibular zone. We evaluated its relationship with TMD by measuring condyle length, condyle width, ramus length, corpus length, gonial angle, and ramus/corpus ratio on CBCT. In the total population, condyle length, ramus length, and condyle width were longer in favor of the control group. However, there was no difference between the ramus/corpus ratio and corpus length. The width of the condyle in female patients with TMD, and the length of the corpus in male patients with TMD were higher in favor of the control group. There is a relationship between TMD and mandible morphology. Knowing the effectiveness of the morphology of the mandible in TME disorders is important in terms of informing individuals with risky morphology beforehand.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Alomar X, Medrano J, Cabratosa J, et al. Anatomy of the temporomandibular joint. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 2007;28:170-183.
  • 2. S.M. Shaffer, J-M Brismée, P.S Sizer et al. Temporomandibular disorders. Part 1: anatomy and examination/diagnosis. J man manip ther., 2014;22:2- 12.
  • 3. Kuvvetli, SS. Sandallı N. Temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents: literature review. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2007;2:1-9.
  • 4. A. Ayali, and S. Ramoğlu. Assesment of prevalance and severity of temporomandibular disorders in north cyprus dentistry students. At atürkÜniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2014;24:367-72.
  • 5. Tassoker M. Kabakci A, Akin D et al. Evaluation of mandibular notch, coronoid process, and mandibular condyle configurations with cone beam computed tomography. Biomed Res. 2017:28,8327-35.
  • 6. Huumonen S, Sipilä K, Haikola B et al. Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:34-8.
  • 7. Levorová J, Machoň V, Guha A, et al. Osteoarthrosis of temporomandibular joint related to the defects of posterior dentition: a retrospective study. Prague Med Rep. 2016;117:176-84.
  • 8. Raustia AM, Salonen MAM. Gonial angles and condylar and ramus height of the mandible in complete denture wearers—a panoramic radiograph study. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:512-6.
  • 9. Carter JB, Stone JD, Clark RS, et al. Applications of cone-beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery: an overview of published indications and clinical usage in United States academic centers and oral and maxillofacial surgery practices. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:668- 79.
  • 10. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72:75.
  • 11. Liu F, Steinkeler A. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Dent Clin North Am. 2013;57:465-79.
  • 12. Önder ME, Gürses , Tüz HH, et al. Mandibulanın kondil ve ramus uzunlukları temporomandibular eklem rahatsızlıklarında (TMR) predizpozan faktörler midir? Panoramik radyografi çalışması. Turk J Clin Lab. 2018;9:297-302.
  • 13. Godoy F, Rosenblatt A, Godoy-Bezerra J. Temporomandibular disorders and associated factors in Brazilian teenagers: a cross-sectional study. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:599-604.
  • 14. Nekora‐Azak A, Evlioglu G, Ordulu M, et al. Prevalence of symptoms associated with temporomandibular disorders in a Turkish population. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:81-4.
  • 15. Warren MP, Fried JL. Temporomandibular disorders and hormones in women. Cells Tissues Organs.,2001;169:187-92.
  • 16. Greene CS. Temporomandibular disorders in the geriatric population. The J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:507-9.
  • 17. Levitt SR, McKinney MW. Validating the TMJ scale in a national sample of 10,000 patients: demographic and epidemiologic characteristics. J Orofac Pain. 1994;8:25-35.
  • 18. Pullinger A, Hollen der L. Assessment of mandibular condyle position: a comparison of transcranial radiographs and linear tomograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985;60:329-34.
  • 19. Krishnamoorthy B, Mamatha N, Kumar VA, TMJ imaging by CBCT: Current scenario. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013;3:80-3.
  • 20. Larheim TA, Abrahamsson AK, Kristensen M, et al. Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20140235.
  • 21. Tarazona-Álvarez P, Romero-Millán J, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, et al. Comparative study of mandibular linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography and digital calipers. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6:271-4.
  • 22. Moreira CR, Sales MAO, Lopes PML, et al. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol, Endod, 2009;108:430-6.
  • 23. Cho BH, Ahn YW, Jung YH. Comparison of mandibular morphology between patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis and asymptomatic normal subjects. Quintessence Int. 2009;40:49-54.
  • 24. Gidarakou IK, Tallents RH, Kyrkanides S, et al. Comparison of skeletal and dental morphology in asymptomatic volunteers and symptomatic patients with bilateral degenerative joint disease. Angle orthod., 2003. 73:71-8.
  • 25. Yamada K, Hiruma Y, Hanada K, et al. Condylar bony change and craniofacial morphology in orthodontic patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) symptoms: a pilot study using helical computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Clin orthod Res.1999;2:133-42.
  • 26. Ahn SJ, Baek SH, Kim TW, et al. Discrimination of internal derangement of temporomandibular joint by lateral cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006.130:331-9.
  • 27. Hwang CJ, Sung SJ, Kim SJ, Lateral cephalometric characteristics of malocclusion patients with temporomandibular joint disorder symptoms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:497-503.
  • 28. Brand JW, Nielson KJ, Tallents RH, et al. Lateral cephalometric analysis of skeletal patterns in patients with and without internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:121- 8.
  • 29. Nebbe B, Major P, Prasad N, Male adolescent facial pattern associated with TMJ disk displacement and reduction in disk length: Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999.116:301-7.
APA sancar b, ARIKAN B, BOYLU Ö, DUMAN S, dayı e (2021). Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible. , 1412 - 1416. 10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199
Chicago sancar bahadır,ARIKAN BÜŞRA,BOYLU ÖMER FARUK,DUMAN SUAYIP BURAK,dayı ertunç Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible. (2021): 1412 - 1416. 10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199
MLA sancar bahadır,ARIKAN BÜŞRA,BOYLU ÖMER FARUK,DUMAN SUAYIP BURAK,dayı ertunç Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible. , 2021, ss.1412 - 1416. 10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199
AMA sancar b,ARIKAN B,BOYLU Ö,DUMAN S,dayı e Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible. . 2021; 1412 - 1416. 10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199
Vancouver sancar b,ARIKAN B,BOYLU Ö,DUMAN S,dayı e Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible. . 2021; 1412 - 1416. 10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199
IEEE sancar b,ARIKAN B,BOYLU Ö,DUMAN S,dayı e "Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible." , ss.1412 - 1416, 2021. 10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199
ISNAD sancar, bahadır vd. "Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible". (2021), 1412-1416. https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199
APA sancar b, ARIKAN B, BOYLU Ö, DUMAN S, dayı e (2021). Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible. Medicine Science, 10(4), 1412 - 1416. 10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199
Chicago sancar bahadır,ARIKAN BÜŞRA,BOYLU ÖMER FARUK,DUMAN SUAYIP BURAK,dayı ertunç Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible. Medicine Science 10, no.4 (2021): 1412 - 1416. 10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199
MLA sancar bahadır,ARIKAN BÜŞRA,BOYLU ÖMER FARUK,DUMAN SUAYIP BURAK,dayı ertunç Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible. Medicine Science, vol.10, no.4, 2021, ss.1412 - 1416. 10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199
AMA sancar b,ARIKAN B,BOYLU Ö,DUMAN S,dayı e Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible. Medicine Science. 2021; 10(4): 1412 - 1416. 10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199
Vancouver sancar b,ARIKAN B,BOYLU Ö,DUMAN S,dayı e Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible. Medicine Science. 2021; 10(4): 1412 - 1416. 10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199
IEEE sancar b,ARIKAN B,BOYLU Ö,DUMAN S,dayı e "Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible." Medicine Science, 10, ss.1412 - 1416, 2021. 10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199
ISNAD sancar, bahadır vd. "Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible". Medicine Science 10/4 (2021), 1412-1416. https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2021.06.199