Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 210 - 220 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.4274/jems.2021.93685 İndeks Tarihi: 20-05-2022

©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room

Öz:
Ship engine room fire is one of the major dangers that threaten the safety of the ships. An effective firefighting in the engine room is critical to prevent possible destructive consequences on-board ship. Fire detection and firefighting systems, which are designed for an effective fire prevention on-board ship, need to work flawlessly. In order to achieve this, the deficiencies of the designed systems must be determined and necessary control actions must be taken. In this study, failure probabilities of fire detection and firefighting systems on-board ship is calculated by event tree analysis and fuzzy logic environment. The possible consequences that may be encountered in case the systems fail under various scenarios are determined. Solutions have been proposed in order to minimize the risk that may arise by reducing the failure probability of each system. The outcome of this paper will be utilised by safety engineers, shipping companies and safety inspectors to prevent potential engine room fires.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] H.C. Kuo and, H.K. Chang, “A real-time shipboard fire-detection system based on grey-fuzzy algorithms,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 38, pp. 341-363, Jun 2003.
  • [2] A. Salem, “Fire engineering tools used in consequence analysis,” Ships and Offshore Structures, vol. 5, pp. 155-187, 2010.
  • [3] T. Baalisampang, R. Abbassi, V. Garaniya, F. Khan, and M. Dadashzadeh, “Review and analysis of fire and explosion accidents in maritime transportation,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 158, pp. 350-366, June 2018.
  • [4] R.M. Darbra, and J. Casal, “Historical analysis of accidents in seaports,” Safety Science, vol. 42, pp. 85-98, Feb 2004.
  • [5] Ö. Uğurlu, U. Yıldırım, and E. Yüksekyıldız, “Marine accident analysis with GIS,” Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 21-29, Feb 2013.
  • [6] L. Wang, J. Wang, M. Shi, S. Fu, and M. Zhu, “Critical risk factors in ship fire accidents,” Maritime Policy & Management, pp. 1-19, Sep 2020.
  • [7] Det Norske Veritas, Engine room fires can be avoided. Veritasveien, Norway: Det Norske Veritas, 2020.
  • [8] S. Sarıalioğlu, Ö. Uğurlu, M. Aydın, B. Vardar, and J. Wang, “A hybrid model for human-factor analysis of engine-room fires on ships: HFACS-PV&FFTA,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 217, pp. 107992, Dec 2020.
  • [9] S. Su, and L. Wang, “Three dimensional reconstruction of the fire in a ship engine room with multilayer structures,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 70, pp. 201-207, Sep 2013.
  • [10] R. Bellas, M.A. Gómez, A. González-Gil, J. Porteiro, and J. L. Míguez, “Assessment of the fire dynamics simulator for modeling fire suppression in engine rooms of ships with low-pressure water mist,” Fire Technology, vol. 56, pp. 1315-1352, Nov 2019.
  • [11] R. Puisa, S. Williams, and D. Vassalos, “Towards an explanation of why onboard fires happen: the case of an engine room fire on the cruise ship ‘Le Boreal’,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 88, pp. 223-232, Jul 2019.
  • [12] International Maritime Organization, SOLAS Consolidated Edition 2020. London: International Maritime Organization Publishing, 2020.
  • [13] International Maritime Organization, FSS Code: International code for fire safety systems. London: International Maritime Organization Publishing, 2015.
  • [14] Ö. Uğurlu, “Analysis of fire and explosion accidents occurring in tankers transporting hazardous cargoes,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonimics, vol. 55, pp. 1-11, Sep 2016.
  • [15] Y. Guan, J. Zhao, T. Shi, and P. Zhu, “Fault tree analysis of fire and explosion accidents for dual fuel (diesel/natural gas) ship engine rooms,” Journal of Marine Science and Application, vol. 15, pp. 331-335, Jul 2016.
  • [16] H. Karahalios, “Effect of human behaviour in shipboard firefighting decisions: the case of fire in engine rooms,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, vol. 25, pp. 256-268, Jan 2017.
  • [17] J.R. Harrald, et al. “Using system simulation to model the impact of human error in a maritime system,” Safety Science, vol. 30, pp. 235-247, Dec 1998.
  • [18] A. Toffoli, J.M. Lefevre, E. Bitner-Gregersen, and J. Monbaliu, “Towards the identification of warning criteria: analysis of a ship accident database,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 27, pp. 281-291, Dec 2005.
  • [19] P. Antao and C.G. Soares, “Fault-tree models of accident scenarios of RoPax vessels,” International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 2, pp. 107-116, 2006.
  • [20] O. Arslan, and I.D. Er, “A SWOT analysis for successful bridge team organization and safer marine operations.,” Process Safety Progress, vol. 27, pp. 21-28, Jul 2007.
  • [21] J.U. Schröder-Hinrichs, M. Baldauf, K.T. Ghirxi, “Accident investigation reporting deficiencies related to organizational factors in machinery space fires and explosions,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 43, pp. 1187-1196, May 2011.
  • [22] O. Soner, U. Asan, and M. Celik, “Use of HFACS-FCM in fire prevention modelling on board ships,” Safety Science, vol. 77, pp. 25-41, Aug 2015.
  • [23] P.A. Sarvari, E. Çevikcan, M. Çelik, and A. Üstündağ, “A simulation aided methodology suggestion for managing emergency evacuation operation under engine room sourced fire conditions,” Journal of ETA Maritime Science, vol. 5, pp. 362-385, Oct 2017.
  • [24] B.O. Tac, E. Akyuz, and M. Celik, “Analysis of performance influence factors on shipboard drills to improve ship emergency preparedness at sea,” International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, vol. 12, pp. 92-116, 2020.
  • [25] R. Tao, H.X. Ren, and X.Q. Peng, “Ship fire-fighting training system based on virtual reality technique,” in Proceedings of 17th Asia Simulation Conference, part 2, M.S.M. Ali, H. Wahid, N.A.M. Subha, S. Sahlan, M.A.M. Yunus, A.R. Wahap, Eds. Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 249-260.
  • [26] J. McNay, R. Puisa, and D. Vassalos, “Analysis of effectiveness of fire safety in machinery spaces. Fire Safety Journal, vol. 108, pp. 102859, Sep 2019.
  • [27] Y. Jin, and B.S. Jang, “Probabilistic fire risk analysis and structural safety assessment of FPSO topside module,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 104, pp. 725-737, Aug 2015.
  • [28] R. Yang, F. Khan, M. Yang, D. Kong, and C. Xu, “A numerical fire simulation approach for effectiveness analysis of fire safety measures in floating liquefied natural gas facilities,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 157, pp. 219-233, Jun 2018.
  • [29] L.A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, pp. 338- 353, Jun 1965.
  • [30] F. Castiglia, and M. Giardina, “Analysis of operator human errors in hydrogen refuelling stations: comparison between human rate assessment techniques,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, pp. 1166-1176, Jan 2013.
  • [31] A. Barua, L.S. Mudunuri, and O. Kosheleva, “Why trapezoidal and triangular membership functions work so well: towards a theoretical explanation,” Journal of Uncertain Systems, vol. 8, Oct 2013.
  • [32] J. Wang, et al. “Use of advances in technology for maritime risk assessment,” Risk Analysis, vol. 24, pp. 1041-1063, Sep 2004.
  • [33] P. Badida, Y. Balasubramaniam, and J. Jayaprakash, “Risk evaluation of oil and natural gas pipelines due to natural hazards using fuzzy fault tree analysis,” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 66, pp. 284-292, Jun 2019.
  • [34] J.X. Wang, and M.L. Roush, What every engineer should know about risk engineering and management. New York: CRC Press, 2000.
  • [35] N. Ramzali, M.R.M. Lavasani, and J. Ghodousi, “Safety barriers analysis of offshore drilling system by employing fuzzy event tree analysis,” Safety Science, vol. 78, pp. 49-59, Oct 2015.
  • [36] R. Ferdous, F. Khan, R. Sadiq, P. Amyotte, and B. Veitch, “Handling data uncertainties in event tree analysis,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 87, pp. 283-292, Sep 2009.
  • [37] T. Aven, Reliability and risk analysis. London and New York: Elsevier Applied Science, 1992.
  • [38] S. Mannan. Lees’ Loss prevention in the process industries: Hazard identification, assessment and control. 4th ed. Vol. 1, Oxford: Elsevier, 2012.
  • [39] S. Fu, X. Yan, D. Zhang, C. Li, and E. Zio, “Framework for the quantitative assessment of the risk of leakage from LNG-fueled vessels by an event tree-CFD,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 43, pp. 42-52, Sep 2016.
  • [40] A. Raiyan, S. Das, and M. R. Islam, “Event tree analysis of marine accidents in Bangladesh,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 194, pp. 276-283, 2017.
  • [41] N. J. Duijm, “Safety-barrier diagrams as a safety management tool,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 94, pp. 332- 341, Feb 2009.
  • [42] S. Sklet, “Safety barriers: definition, classification, and performance,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 19, pp. 494-506, Sep 2006
  • [43] M. Rausand, Risk assessment: theory, methods and applications. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  • [44] A.D. Livingston, G. Jackson, and K. Priestley, “Root causes analysis: Literature review,” HSE Contract Research Report 325/2001, WS Atkins Consultants Ltd for the Health and Safety Executive, Norwich, United Kingdom, 2001.
  • [45] S.M. Lavasani, N. Ramzali, F. Sabzalipour, and E. Akyuz, “Utilisation of Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA) for quantified risk analysis of leakage in abandoned oil and natural-gas wells,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 108, pp. 729-737, Nov 2015.
  • [46] D. Yuhua, and Y. Datao, “Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 18, pp. 83-88, Mar 2005.
  • [47] E. Akyuz, O. Arslan, and O. Turan, “Application of fuzzy logic to fault tree and event tree analysis of the risk for cargo liquefaction on board ship,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 101, pp. 102238, Aug 2020.
  • [48] H.M. Hsu, and C.T. Chen, “Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 79, pp. 279- 285, May 1996.
  • [49] H.T. Nguyen and N.R. Prasad, Eds., Fuzzy modeling and control: Selected works of M. Sugeno. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1999.
  • [50] T. Onisawa, “An approach to human reliability in man-machine systems using error pos
  • [51] A.D. Swain, and H.E. Guttmann, “Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications,” Final Report (NUREG/CR-1278), United States, 1983.
  • [52] S. Mineo, G. Pappalardo, A. D’Urso, and D. Calcaterra, “Event tree analysis for rockfall risk assessment along a strategic mountainous transportation route,” Environmental Earth Science, vol. 76, pp. 620, Sep 2017.
  • [53] S. Zhang, “Fire protection onboard: enhance fire safety by design,” Master dissertion, (MSc Thesis). World Maritime University, Malmö, Sweden, 2000.
  • [54] A.C. Kuzu, E. Akyuz, and O. Arslan, “Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis (FFTA) to maritime industry: a risk analysing of ship mooring operation,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 179, pp. 128-134, May 2019.
  • [55] B. Sahin, “Consistency control and expert consistency prioritization for FFTA by using extent analysis method of trapezoidal FAHP,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 56, pp. 46-54, Jul 2017.
  • [56] S.J. Chen, and C. L. Hwang, (1992). “Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods,” in Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1992, pp. 289-486.
  • [57] Y.E. Senol, Y.V. Aydogdu, B. Sahin, and I. Kilic, “Fault tree analysis of chemical cargo contamination by using fuzzy approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, pp. 5232-5244, Jul 2015.
  • [58] S.J. Wang, D.L. Jeng, and M.T. Tsai, “Early fire detection method in video for vessels,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 82, pp. 656-667, Apr 2009.
  • [59] H. Sim, W.J. Ha, and Y.S. Park, “A basic study on standardization of fire-fighting drill scenarios on board,” Journal of International Maritime Safety Environmental Affairs and Shipping, vol. 3, pp. 28-35, Dec 2019.
  • [60] International Maritime Organization, Revised guidelines for the maintenance and inspection of fire protection systems and appliances (MSC.1/Circ.1432). London: International Maritime Organization, 2012.
  • [61] International Maritime Organization, Amendments to the revised guidelines for the maintenance and inspection of fire protection systems and appliances (MSC.1/Circ.1516). London: International Maritime Organization, 2015.
  • [62] E. Akyuz, E. Celik, and M. Celik, “A practical application of human reliability assessment for operating procedures of the emergency fire pump at ship,” Ships and Offshore Structures, vol. 13, pp. 208-216, 2018.
  • [63] E. Akyuz, and E. Celik, “The role of human factor in maritime environment risk assessment: a practical application on Ballast Water Treatment (BWT) system in ship,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, vol. 24, pp. 653-666, 2018.
  • [64] M. Aydin, E. Akyuz, O. Turan, and O. Arslan, “Validation of risk analysis for ship collision in narrow waters by using fuzzy Bayesian networks approach,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 231, pp. 108973, Jul 2021.
APA Tunçel A, Akyuz E, arslan o (2021). ©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room. , 210 - 220. 10.4274/jems.2021.93685
Chicago Tunçel Ahmet Lutfi,Akyuz Emre,arslan ozcan ©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room. (2021): 210 - 220. 10.4274/jems.2021.93685
MLA Tunçel Ahmet Lutfi,Akyuz Emre,arslan ozcan ©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room. , 2021, ss.210 - 220. 10.4274/jems.2021.93685
AMA Tunçel A,Akyuz E,arslan o ©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room. . 2021; 210 - 220. 10.4274/jems.2021.93685
Vancouver Tunçel A,Akyuz E,arslan o ©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room. . 2021; 210 - 220. 10.4274/jems.2021.93685
IEEE Tunçel A,Akyuz E,arslan o "©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room." , ss.210 - 220, 2021. 10.4274/jems.2021.93685
ISNAD Tunçel, Ahmet Lutfi vd. "©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room". (2021), 210-220. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2021.93685
APA Tunçel A, Akyuz E, arslan o (2021). ©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 9(3), 210 - 220. 10.4274/jems.2021.93685
Chicago Tunçel Ahmet Lutfi,Akyuz Emre,arslan ozcan ©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room. Journal of Eta Maritime Science 9, no.3 (2021): 210 - 220. 10.4274/jems.2021.93685
MLA Tunçel Ahmet Lutfi,Akyuz Emre,arslan ozcan ©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, vol.9, no.3, 2021, ss.210 - 220. 10.4274/jems.2021.93685
AMA Tunçel A,Akyuz E,arslan o ©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2021; 9(3): 210 - 220. 10.4274/jems.2021.93685
Vancouver Tunçel A,Akyuz E,arslan o ©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2021; 9(3): 210 - 220. 10.4274/jems.2021.93685
IEEE Tunçel A,Akyuz E,arslan o "©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room." Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 9, ss.210 - 220, 2021. 10.4274/jems.2021.93685
ISNAD Tunçel, Ahmet Lutfi vd. "©Copyright 2021 by the Journal of ETA Maritime Science published by UCTEA Chamber of Marine Engineers 210 An Extended Event Tree Risk Analysis Under Fuzzy Logic Environment: The Case of Fire in Ship Engine Room". Journal of Eta Maritime Science 9/3 (2021), 210-220. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2021.93685