Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 131 - 137 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003 İndeks Tarihi: 21-05-2022

Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures

Öz:
Depending on their unique layer structures and chemical structures, soil problems such as swelling, settlement and loss of strength can be seen especially on clay soils when exposed to water. Settlement occurring on clay soils on which the structure is built, causes various damages in the building. Additionally, in the clay soil interacting with water, strength loss occurs due to the effect of the building load. Today, when soil improvement techniques are developed and diversified, clay soils can be stabilized by using different additives. A clay soil that has been improved by adding waste marble powder within the scope of this study in certain percentages (5%, 15%, 25%), biopolymer added clay / marble powder samples were obtained by interacting with locust bean gum in certain percentages (0.5%, 1%, 1.5%). There are many studies in the literature on improving clay soils using only marble powder or only biopolymer. In this study, marble powder and biopolymer were used together and thus, the feasibility of a more effective soil improvement has been investigated. The results showed that the unconfined compressive strength of the biopolymer added clay-marble powder mixtures are higher when compared with natural clay. Similarly, shear box test results showed that the unconsolidated-undrained cohesions and internal friction angles of the doped clay samples increased. It was observed that the strength values of marble powder-added clay increased after improving with biopolymer.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akbulut S, Kurt Z, Arasan S (2012). Surfactant modified clays consistency limits and contact angles. Earth Sciences Research Journal, 16, 95-101.
  • Akbulut S, Kurt Z, Arasan S, Pekdemir Y (2013). Geotechnical properties of some organoclays. Sadhana‐Academy Proceedings in Engineering Sciences, 38, 317-329.
  • Alyamaç KE, Aydın AB (2015). Concrete properties containing fine aggregate marble powder. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(7), 2208-2216.
  • Arasan S, Bagherinia M, Akbulut RK, Zaimoglu AS (2017). Utilization of polymers to improve soft clayey soils using the deep mixing method. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, 23(1), 1-12.
  • Ashraf MS, Azahar SB, Yusof NZ (2017). Soil improvement using MICP and biopolymers: A review. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 226, 012058.
  • Ayeldeen MK, Negm AM, El Sawwaf MA (2016). Evaluating the physical characteristics of biopolymer/soil mixtures. Arabian Journal of Geoscience, 9, 371.
  • Barak S, Mudgil D (2014). Locust bean gum: Processing, properties and food applications-A review. International J of Biological Macromolecules, 66, 74-80.
  • Brooks RM (2009). Soil stabilization with fly ash and rice husk ash. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences, 1(3), 209-217.
  • Chang I, Im J, Prasidhi AK, Cho GC (2015). Effects of xanthan gum biopolymer on soil strengthening. Construction and Building Materials, 74, 65-72.
  • Chang I, Im J, Cho GC (2016a). Geotechnical engineering behaviors of gellan gum biopolymer treated sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 53(10), 1658-1670.
  • Chang I, Im, J, Cho GC (2016b). Introduction of microbial biopolymers in soil treatment for future environmentally-friendly and sustainable geotechnical engineering. Sustainability, 8, 251.
  • Chang I, Cho GC (2019). Shear strength behavior and parameters of microbial gellan gum treated soils: from sand to clay. Acta Geotechnica, 14, 361-375.
  • Chang I, Kwon YW, Im J, Cho GC (2019). Soil consistency and interparticle characteristics of xanthan gum biopolymer-containing soils with pore-fluid variation. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 56, 1206- 1213.
  • Chen R, Zhang L, Budhu M (2013). Biopolymer stabilization of mine tailings. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(10), 1802-1807.
  • Çokca E (2001). Use of class C fly ashes for the stabilization of an expansive soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1277, 568-573.
  • Dey P, Maiti S, Sa B (2012). Locust bean gum and its application in pharmacy and biotechnology: An overview. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research, 4(1), 7-11.
  • Edil T, Acosta HA, Benson CH (2006). Stabilizing soft fine grained soils with fly ash. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 18(2), 283-294.
  • Gurbuz A (2015). Marble powder to stabilise clayey soils in subbases for road construction. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 16(2), 481-492.
  • Hebhoub H, Aoun H, Belachia M, Houari H, Ghorbel E (2011). Use of waste marble aggregates in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 1167-1171.
  • Hossain KMA, Mol L (2011). Some engineering properties of stabilized clayey soils incorporating natural pozzolans and industrial wastes. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 3495-3501.
  • Im J, Chang I, Cho GC (2017). Small strain stiffness and elastic behavior of gellan treated soils with confinement. Geotechnical Frontiers, Orlando, Florida. İkizler SB, Şenol A, Etminan E, Khosrowshahi SK, Hatipoğlu M (2014).
  • Improvement of expansive soils using chemical stabilizers. AGU Fall Meeting 2014, San Francisco, USA.
  • Jain AK, Jha AK (2020). Geotechnical behaviour and micro-analyses of expansive soil amended with marble dust. Soils and Foundations, 60(4), 737-751.
  • Khatami HR, O’Kelly BC (2013). Improving mechanical properties of sand using biopolymers. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(8), 1402-1406.
  • Kurt ZN, Akbulut S (2014). The dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of clay nanocomposites. Clays and Clay Minerals, 62(4), 313- 323.
  • Kurt ZN, Akbulut S (2017). Some geotechnical properties of clay nanocomposites. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 61(3), 381- 388.
  • Kurt Albayrak ZN, Altun B (2018). Investigation of some geotechnical properties of clay/marble mixtures modified with a biopolymer. Zemin Mekaniği ve Geoteknik Mühendisliği 17. Ulusal Konferansı, Istanbul, Turkey (in Turkish).
  • Kurt Albayrak ZN, Gencer G (2021). The usability of clay/pumice mixtures modified with biopolymer as an impermeable liner. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 25(1), 28-36.
  • Latifi N, Horpibulsuk S, Meehan CL, Majid MZA, Tahir MM, Mohamad ET (2016). Improvement of problematic soils with biopolymer— An environmentally friendly soil stabilizer. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29(2), 04016204.
  • Lee S, Chang I, Chung MK, Kim Y, Kee J (2017). Geotechnical shear behavior of xanthan gum biopolymer treated sand from direct shear testing. Geomechanics and Engineering, 12(5), 831-847.
  • Lee S, Im J, Cho GC, Chang I (2019). Tri-axial shear behavior of xanthan gum biopolymer-treated sand. ASCE Geo-Congress 2019, Soil Improvement. Lopes da Silva JA, Gonçalves MP, Rao MA (1994). Influence of temperature on the dynamic and steady-shear rheology of pectin dispersions. Carbohydrate Polymers, 23(2), 77-87.
  • Maier M, Anderson M, Karl C, Magnuson K (1993). Industrial Gums Polysaccharides and Their Derivatives. In: Whistley RL, BeMiller JN, editors. Guar, Locust Bean, Tara and Fenugreek Gums. Academic Press, San Diego, California, 205-213.
  • Majedi P, Akbulut S, Kurt ZN (2019). Some geotechnical properties and damping ratio of clay nanocomposites. Journal of Engineering Research, 7(1), 1-16. Senol A, Edil TB, Bin-Shafique MS, Acosta HA, Benson CH (2006). Soft subgrades’ stabilization by using various fly ashes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 46(4), 365-376.
  • Singh, S. P., Das, R (2020). Geo-engineering properties of expansive soil treated with xanthan gum biopolymer. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 15(2), 107-122.
  • Sivrikaya O, Uysal F, Yorulmaz A, Aydin K (2020). The efficiency of waste marble powder in the stabilization of fine-grained soils in terms of volume changes. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45, 8561-8576.
  • Smitha S, Sachan A (2016). Use of agar biopolymer to improve the shear strength behavior of Sabarmati sand. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 10(4), 387-400.
  • Soldo A, Miletic M (2019). Study on shear strength of xanthan gumamended soil. Sustainability, 11(21), pp. 6142.
  • Soldo A, Miletic M, Auad ML (2020). Biopolymers as a sustainable solution for the enhancement of soil mechanical properties. Scientific Reports, 10, 267.
  • Sujatha ER, Saisree S (2019). Geotechnical behaviour of guar gumtreated soil. Soils and Foundations, 59(6), 2155-2166.
  • Tingle JS, Santoni RL (2003). Stabilization of clay soils with nontraditional additives. Transportation Research Record, 1819(1), 72-84.
  • Viswanath SM, Booth SJ, Hughes PN, Augarde CE, Perlot C, Bruno AW, Gallipoli D (2017). Mechanical properties of biopolymer-stabilised soil-based construction materials. Géotechnique Letters, 7(4), 1-18.
  • Wiszniewski M, Cabalar AF (2014). Hydraulic conductivity of a biopolymer treated sand. New Frontiers in Geotechnical Engineering, 243, 19-27.
  • Yarbaşı N, Kalkan E, Akbulut S (2007). Modification of the geotechnical properties, as influenced by freeze-thaw, of granular soils with waste additives. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 48, 44-54.
APA ALBAYRAK Z, Altun B (2021). Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures . , 131 - 137. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003
Chicago ALBAYRAK Zeynep Nese Kurt,Altun Banu Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures . (2021): 131 - 137. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003
MLA ALBAYRAK Zeynep Nese Kurt,Altun Banu Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures . , 2021, ss.131 - 137. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003
AMA ALBAYRAK Z,Altun B Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures . . 2021; 131 - 137. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003
Vancouver ALBAYRAK Z,Altun B Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures . . 2021; 131 - 137. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003
IEEE ALBAYRAK Z,Altun B "Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures ." , ss.131 - 137, 2021. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003
ISNAD ALBAYRAK, Zeynep Nese Kurt - Altun, Banu. "Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures ". (2021), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003
APA ALBAYRAK Z, Altun B (2021). Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures . Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 12(4), 131 - 137. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003
Chicago ALBAYRAK Zeynep Nese Kurt,Altun Banu Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures . Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters 12, no.4 (2021): 131 - 137. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003
MLA ALBAYRAK Zeynep Nese Kurt,Altun Banu Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures . Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, vol.12, no.4, 2021, ss.131 - 137. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003
AMA ALBAYRAK Z,Altun B Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures . Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters. 2021; 12(4): 131 - 137. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003
Vancouver ALBAYRAK Z,Altun B Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures . Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters. 2021; 12(4): 131 - 137. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003
IEEE ALBAYRAK Z,Altun B "Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures ." Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 12, ss.131 - 137, 2021. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003
ISNAD ALBAYRAK, Zeynep Nese Kurt - Altun, Banu. "Strength properties of biopolymer treated clay/marble powder mixtures ". Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters 12/4 (2021), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.20528/cjcrl.2021.04.003